Let's Get Honest! Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History

Identify the Entities, Find the Funding, Talk Sense!

Archive for September 2012

Independence entails Independent Investigations; this means YOU!

with 5 comments

[post word-count ca.  10,000]

[Note:    Blog focus has  broadened; Tags less relevant.  Use “search” instead]

Confession:

I am a little negative the past month, or should I say, disturbed about what I’ve been learning and what it means as to planning a future life that includes staying alive (not as a slave, either). I’m not using that word figuratively, in my case:  I tangled with seeking help from the courts a very, very long time ago — and the net loss so far –well, the tab keeps running up, with or without an attorney on board.

I am only one person here, and not fully networked with people who are putting this together — where it’s heading. But I see their work, and could possibly boil it down to maybe FIVE total individuals’ work I consider critical reading.  We have to admit (this is why I blogged FEDMINE a few times) that our government far outclasses the individual workers in access to liquid cash (i.e., they can contract), and in timely and more accurate database as to what they are doing.

There needs to be more people working TOGETHER on this project (in every county of every single state in the united states) and we also need to keep track of how many various component units of government, and authorities (i.e., s
pecial districts, etc.) are being created nationwide.  We do not realize how entrenched we are in committing economic suicide on a massive scale — and how passive and disarmed (emotionally, intellectually, and –which is the primary weapon, backed by force where necessary — economically).

The language of economics and accounting is no longer optional for average Americans.  We are taught to think wages, unemployment benefit, retirement, paycheck and JOBS.  This is not how profits are made, and until we leverage INFORMATION (at least organized locally) — it’s a mismatch.

But I’d say the same thing (in maybe a different tone) either way.  Wake the Hell Up!

For months and months I poured over these financial statements for the various types of government municipal corporations, attempting to comprehend the almost foreign creative accounting language and legalese that was presented within – which was sure to drive off even the most ardent of researchers. {{LGH Note — I just started this process, although I’d been looking at financial statements and tax returns, etc., earlier.  But this is a new language for me also.  If we can do it, you can do it!}} But for some reason, as frustrating as that learning curve was, I persisted. And finally, after so many years of being blinded by that unseen hand, I can at last see my nemesis…

No wonder the average Joe can’t get ahead!

I have been asked several times to explain how banks, weapons manufacturers, insurance companies, investment holdings companies, health and pharmaceutical corporations, and essentially the entire corporate business structure of the world is funded – why do private corporations have so much extra money to expand, to buy other corporations, and to just in general play around with? How do banks come up with the capital to mortgage the entirety of the salable lands of the world? And where does that money come from in the first place?

As it turns out, the people of the United States are paying for this through their own sheer ignorance of where their own taxpayer money is being taken and invested. And this of all ironies is the most destructive reality for the very people who lack the knowledge of their own governments’ grand conspiracy through its investment fund scheme.

And today, I’m here to wake you the hell up!

I saw this the long hard way, tracking backwards from nonprofits servicing the courts (ca. 2009) and running their policy — and downwards from TAGGS.hhs.gov — which is where it got really interesting.  But all I could see, really (and I did blog it) was that the tax system itself (i.e., centralized wealth) was the problem.

We tend to think “nonprofit” means somehow, “not profitable” (see Phoebe factoids — or start reading tax returns to figure that one out) and this is OK with all of us because they are helping handle social services problems which otherwise WE would have to personally handle. Better to let the government handle it, right?  (I’m going to have to say — wrong.)

I finally came to accept that nonprofits are not (at all) accountable to their clients — only their articles of incorporation and funders.  Some may have nice altruistic ideas and really help people, and others are crooks.  And you can’t tell by looking at their tax status — you have to actually look at the organization. . . . .


Please understand that the speed of transactions and wealth transfer has accelerated and there is an economic war on and most of you were not in on the strategic planning of it.   

Preserving social status needs to be a lower priority.  Find some spare time and start looking these things up, if you are helping fund the same government that’s jeopardizing the lives and safety of — literally many times — your neighbors!   And for most, social status isn’t preservable anyhow, except to the extent they cooperate with starving out the rest of us (those on the economic fringes).  If you’re comfortable with witnessing and enabling this, then stop reading here and plan a future that’s based on how things were a decade or a generation ago.

Welfare change of 1996 speeded up centralized collective government — if you consider where the US government (federal) actually gets $4 billion to spend on only support — it’s a little frightening. And understanding economic matters (and particularly changes in the past 15-20 years or so) is no longer optional.  This is a matter of not just sounding the alarm, but putting a countering policy into place, in order to avoid genocide, in the not too distant future.  

Here’s another, one-piece summary of the past 100 years asserting that we are heading into World War III, and saying why. Coherently…… I hate to mention this, but there are SEVERAL prophesies in the Bible which sound a lot like what’s described here.

The post shows some animosity towards Israel as a state.  I feel uncomfortable with it, but do not have a problem with the ECONOMIC analysis put forth here about the series of wars we’re in.  You don’t get this fast a summary (in one post) too often, that makes any sense!

Look at ca. Revelation 19 — it’s talking about the destruction of Babylon and it speaks almost exclusively in terms of an economic empire — merchants, etc. etc.  I only put that out as a possibility.

Here’s the summary — and it’s in economic terms.  (When the Bible says, “the love of money is the root of all evil” I’d like to agree that genocide is a form of evil, for sure, whether by starvation, war, or etc.).

A short summary like this (read the whole post, please!) is a rarety.  Being from a blogger, it’s an opinion. Its the sequence of events that should be read (he goes “war by war” with turning points in currency & banks, and presidents).

The Federal Reserve From Creation in 1913 To Destruction in 2013

Posted on April 1, 2012

The Federal Reserve was created in 1913 to do four things which the FED is still engaged in today.  The Panic of 1907 was caused by speculators who used borrowed money to buy stock and by bucket shops which defrauded investors.  The Monetary Reform Commission run by Senator Nelson Aldrich wanted an elastic currency so  the financial blunders of the 0.1% could be covered up by passing the costs onto the 99.9% through inflation. An elastic currency also allowed the costs of wars to be disguised  by inflation.

The Federal Reserve also set up a fractional reserve banking system which permitted ten dollars to be loaned out for every one in deposit.

This intentionally created an exaggerated credit cycle so bankers could profit from the wild swings in the prices of stocks and mortgages.

And finally the Federal Reserve Note is an interest bearing currency which requires us to give the banks 500 billion dollars a year in interest payments for debts which are fictions created by a law passed in 1913.The Federal Reserve was designed to transfer our wealth to the bankers.

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Let's Get Honest|She Looks It Up

September 10, 2012 at 6:45 AM

Show Me The Money — and Let’s Eliminate the Child Support System. [Publ. Sept. 9, 2012. HHS Access-Visitation Funds Table at Bottom].

leave a comment »

Sometimes I stray into the movie theater to break the monotony of dealing every single day with how to break off abusive relationships without losing either my life, or literally everything, after already having lost the centrality of my work life and purpose in life when it comes to parenting or raising my kids — or demonstrating by example that “There is no excuse for abuse” when in truth, there is every excuse under the book for it, politically and in the courts and in federal policy.
The bottom line in this country is that it’s all under pressure and as such, the bottom of the social heap are under attack, as well as those attempting to get out of that bottom sector by doing something politically incorrect.
I have yet to find someone able AND willing to stick up for THEIR rights to know the truth about the past, and for my ability to finish getting the people who committed crimes (un-prosecuted) against my kids, me, and their grandma away from me or vice versa.

POST TITLE (Title Date Published and ending phrase added during my Review of Sept. 2012 posts, i.e., almost a decade later.//LGH Aug. 5, 2022):

This is an unusually (for me) short post, even counting the TAGGS.HHS.Gov table at the bottom!

I WANT TO REMIND (EVERYONE) OF WHAT THE RICHARD FINE CASES TAUGHT (OR SHOULD HAVE) ABOUT COUNTIES HAVING SPECIAL FUNDS AND REFUSING TO DISTRIBUTE, OR TALK ABOUT, THE PROFITS FROM THOSE FUNDS. THE “CAFR” MATERIAL ALSO ADDRESSES THIS:

D.A. Fails to Get Suit on Child Support Dismissed

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA / A news summary | The Local Review
/ DEVELOPMENTS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY

September 30, 1999

LOS ANGELES — A Municipal Court judge on Wednesday allowed a taxpayer lawsuit against the Los Angeles County district attorney’s child support unit to proceed.

Judge S. Patricia Spear did not grant the demurrer sought by county attorneys, which would have ended the lawsuit that seeks to compel the office to release child support money it has collected but says it cannot distribute.

The office has held as much as $25 million in an interest-bearing account, sometimes in violation of state law. But county officials say the amount has been reduced to about $10 million and that they are trying to distribute the funds. The lawsuit, by taxpayer attorney Richard Fine, alleges that the office has no right to hold the money and should return it.

County lawyers were successful in getting an earlier version of the suit dismissed on technical grounds, but Fine amended it to meet the county’s objections and refiled.

He was definitely one persistent attorney, right up unto being disbarred and tossed in solitary coercive confinement, and after that too.  This is a message to taxpayers of what our government entitities think of them, and why the cities need to make sure to keep great counsel on board to help dismiss the inevitable host of lawsuits against them.
It’s also a note to us that about the first step in any lawsuit where one is the defendant is to make the plaintiff work harder, by getting the thing dismissed if at all possible. IT’s where the County apparently started…
It’s election year, and while I’m still barely hanging on through years in this piece of crap Family Court System (so-called) — at which point normal life ceases because reality sets in about this country — and someone just commented on an older post, using the words “bullet” and “headline” in the context of a solution, on my post showing the OCSE grants spent on enforcement.  This person appears to know about the level of fraud (i.e., billing the feds for fake or closed cases) and filed AND won a lawsuit over the matter.
I just found some of the casework he’s talking about — and this appears to date to a divorce or child support case settled back in 1985!   It’s not very often you can read the words “Fucked Up” in a court pleading, but as the pleading is 2007 and the matter dated back to pre-welfare times, I can hardly fault someone for using it.   Except it has more capitals (the main writes all sentences in all capitals), a segment reads like this:
“This case and the related suits generated from it are a case text book history of a federal court’s (?) going off the rails and how the US Congress (fucked up) in abdicating its over cite (oversight) duties, in making judges the police of other judges, directly leading to misconduct councils being in outcome only judicial criminal cover-up councils, and citizens have no venue to relief and justice from the Criminal government’s and the crimes of federal court judges.
Other cases. I can’t understand it all, but some of the issues he’s bringing up are keeping cases alive which aren’t legally alive, going after a father in Alaska for a child that never lived in Alaska and which eh claims isn’t his, forged signatures (on some of the earlier parts of the case), and in general dealing out hell on wheels.  He has run smack up against the fact that the house always wins:

Written by Let's Get Honest|She Looks It Up

September 9, 2012 at 4:39 PM