Posts Tagged ‘HHS-TAGGS grants database’
The ACES study — Bridging apparent Skipped Synapses in Family Court thinking….
Happy Labor Day post. I give you one study I refer to often on this blog, that dates back to 1998, and one (more) inane/insane custody discussion from Australia, case dating 1999-2003, and topic, joint legal custody and visitation with a young girl and the father who crushed her baby brother’s skull with his bare hands, baby being 3 weeks old and in his father’s arms at the time. The court is less concerned with that behavior than the mother’s “phobia” (odd label, eh?) about that behavior. Nothing much new for Family Law Arena — this is its speciality, in fact, stigmatizing parents that actually seek to protect their kids from trauma, abuse, and possible (in that case) death.
ACES (below): Bridging the Gap between Childhood Trauma and . . . . .Negative consequences later in life.
Or should I call this bridging the gap between theory and reality? Which results in the ever-widening “Chasm,” the Court public Credibility Gap.
So, how does one talk with mad engineer at the helm of a runaway train with one’s kids on it? How get one’s kids safely OFF the train? because in this venue, it doesn’t seem possible. If they spend the duration of their childhood on this train, perhaps this will become their new “normal” and then another generation of trainsters and railway-hoppers will grow up, have kids, and provide new cargo for this Trip to Nowhere (except the trips to the bank for the railroad and its employees). Like the formerly renowned rail system in the U.S., it took a lot of subsidy to keep the thing operational.
There are basically two types of conversations going through the courts:
1. IN open court — in open, and
2. Behind closed doors — in private.
The heart of the matter is in the 2nd arena. Best interests of the child is static, sound-fluff and media-bytes. It’s not reality, and I don’t any longer believe that any one who makes a living in this arena seriously, seriously believes in this paradigm — or if they do, their eyes are simply closed, because the cat is out of the bag.
I believe the language the speak, as any good employee or business person truly does, is that of who is paying their bills. One reason I know this is that I actually experienced leaving an abusive marriage, and how vital a part finances was in getting free. I also watched systematic economic abuse (mismangement, comandeering of access to basic funds/cash flow/steady jobs that would make this possible, and so forth), which restricted and delayed the exit.
Which would you be more accountable to as a secretary whose family’s food and rent (lifestyle) depends on your pleasing that employer? Up to your own personal level of moral/social tolerance (and ability to choose), a disgruntled customer in the waiting room or on the phone? Or your employer? . . . . Well, what about judges and other professionals, some of whose salary (US$) is well over $100,000 and lifestyles and associates to match? Along with judgeships go political influence and possibly later activity — it’s a career path. It took a lot of convincing in California (and publicity) for these judges to give up (statewide) their almost $20 million in SUPPLEMENTAL pay, but not until one of their own, an attorney in Los Angeles, was firmly intimidated and jailed for reporting financial corruption (Richard Fine case), which was his actual job to do in this city, as I understood it. He was put in punitive solitary conffinement, moreover, and I heard, disbarred, for actually bucking this system.
However, these articles ARE about “best interests of the child” and whose head is where in being unable to figure that out in a given case involving infanticide! Or other horrors to any growing child, or the parent of any such child.
I am going to start grading the Family Law systems in my country, and in any country that imitates policies that I give an “F” in my country:
1998 THIS study is also old, and underestimated. Probably because of its common sense, like the 1989 and 1992 ones I quoted earlier, from NOMAS, talking about why the HECK have we got to continue exposing each new generation of children to more and more parents who batter, and then posing STUPID questions like, why is the next generation ending up in jail, or beating THEIR women, or taking the assaults, either.
WHY is business as usual, THAT’s why. A case came to light today where an Australian court (dealing with similar issues down under) is ordering psychiatric evaluation for the mother of a two-year old because the two-year-old’s father, quickly knocking up another woman, had just crushed to death the newborn (3 weeks old) infant with his bare hands, in response to the baby’s crying. The man is in jail, and the court is trying to tell the mother that she needs to have her head examined for wanting to make sure this doesn’t happen to the one that came out of HER womb. No, I am not kidding!
FAMILY LAW – Children – parenting orders – contact in prison – father incarcerated for killing child of another relationship – specific phobic anxiety of the primary carer and compromised capacity to care for the child – no significant contact ordered.
At what point do we get to have the COURT’s “head” – and values — examined? ???
O & C [2005] FMCAfam 200 (29 April 2005)
Last Updated: 6 June 2005
FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
REASONS FOR JUDGMENTIntroduction – the proceedings
1. This matter comes before me as the final hearing of the competing applications of the various parties concerning B M C born 9 March 1999. Final parenting orders were made in relation to B on 20 February 2002 whereby B lived with the mother and the father had regular contact. However, on 11 March 2003, the father killed his newborn child of another relationship, Z, and the father is now incarcerated until approximately February 2006.
Yes you read that right. Infanticide: 3 years. 3 hots and a cot. Wonder if he’ll get out on parole early, like Garrido did, in time for a repeat performance. Sounds like it didn’t affect his entitlement much, being incarcerated for baby-killing; he still wants to assert his shared parenting responsibilities and rights. Where’s KING SOLOMON (of the Bible) when you need him? Where’s the anti-abortion pro-lifers when you need them? This mother, of child “B” is a pro-lifer. She doesn’t want HER kid to suffer the same fate. For expressing and acting on this protective, motherly sentiment, she may be sentenced to a lifetime — or at least for the duration of B’s childhood — of having her “head examined” over this “phobia.”
“Phobia” being, I guess, being afraid of something the Court isn’t afraid of, probably because it’s not the Court’s offspring involved or at risk.
2. The proceedings were initiated by the mother filing an application on 1 July 2003 in which she sought that previous parenting orders made by this court on 20 February 2002 be suspended and that she have sole responsibility for making decisions about the long term and day to day care, welfare and development of B. Effectively, she sought that there be no contact between B and the father.
3. On 21 November 2003 a Form 3 response was filed and served on behalf of the father {{BEING AS HE WAS INCARCERATED??}}. Relevantly, the father sought joint responsibility for long term decisions affecting B and contact in prison
RELEVANT: What the jailed Dad wants.
IRRELEVANT: what the killed 3-week old baby wanted before his Daddy crushed his skull together: probably either some cuddling, a diaper change, some milk, or to be held differently. Or his Mama.
IRRELEVANT: What the mother wants, safety for HER kid, and her concerns taken seriously.
YES, this WAS 2006, “DOWN UNDER,” and a term well-earned from what I can see of this decision, at least.
As to his paternal grandparents: Well, their son was an adult at the time, but still, they raised this guy. PERHAPS this should be considered “relevant” in allowing unsupervised contact of child “B” with them. (Not mentioned are her parents. . . . or mother of the deceased newborn. )
===============================
I give you one more reason (not including Phillip Garrido, Jaycee Dugard, and any woman who opts to marry a convicted kidnapper and raper) to take domestic violence seriously: The children:
What is the ACE Study?
The ACE Study is an ongoing collaboration between the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention and Kaiser Permanente. Led by Co-principal Investigators Robert F. Anda, MD,
MS, and Vincent J. Felitti, MD, the ACE Study is perhaps the largest scientific research study
of its kind, analyzing the relationship between multiple categories of childhood trauma
(ACEs), and health and behavioral outcomes later in life.What’s an ACE?
Growing up experiencing any of the following conditions in the household prior to age 18:
- Recurrent physical abuse
- Recurrent emotional abuse
- Contact sexual abuse
- An alcohol and/or drug abuser in the
household
- An incarcerated household member
- Someone who is chronically depressed,
mentally ill, institutionalized, or suicidal
- Mother is treated violently
- One or no parents
- Emotional or physical neglect
Origins and Essence of the Study (2003)
ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES AND STRESS: PAYING THE PIPER (2004?)
The findings of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study, an ongoing collaboration between Co-Principal
Investigators Vincent J. Felitti, MD, of Kaiser Permanente, and Robert F. Anda, MD, MS, of the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
Because the two links above are in multi-column format, I can’t copy and paste. I exhort you to take a look at some of this.
Please note that “one or no parents” was NOT on the top of the list, as it is on current “fatherhood.gov” policy, or HHS/ACF grants prioritization in the Designer Family mode it appears to be stuck in.
Women, including women like me, whose children have been exposed to from 1 to all of the factors above, are after removing their children FROM such factors, having the courts force them back in through shared parenting considerations. IN this case the theoretical ideal is held over the head, and clubbing protective parents, of the practical reality that Batterers do NOT make Good parents until they thoroughly address the battering behavior, and what drives it. Moreover, men have graduated with flying colors from programs allegedly adjusting their attitudes, and gone right out to murder that bitch who forced them to sit through it (McAlpin is one case that comes to mind, Bay Area, 2005. Within just a few days, her body was discovered in a trunk).
Again, the issue becomes who gets to rig the test and give the grades? I give any policy that lacks common sense — protect the kids! — and ignores the golden rule and “F.”
Golden Rule in Family Law: Do unto OTHERS as you would have them do unto YOU (i.e., if it were YOUR kid, whose father just killed a newborn, would you as a judge order the woman who was alarmed at said murder to have her head examined, and the child ordered into contact with the parents of the killer, OR would you yourself be alarmed, and rule accordingly?)
If it’s not good enough for YOUR kid, it’s not good enough for HER kid. That’s the golden rule in the courtroom, I say.
This of course presumes that a judge cares about his or her own kids, which may be a presumption indeed; some judges have been convicted of collecting child pornography and making some of it (Thompson, NJ), another of sexual harassment of female employees (Fed. District judge in Texas).
SHARE THIS POST on...
Mixed Sentiments — from a different battlefield — on the Passing of Senator Ted Kennedy, who valiantly fought: Brain Cancer, for Not Leaving Children Behind, and for Caring for the nation’s Health.
AUGUST 26, 2009
I rarely sleep, and as the TV flashed with news of this lion of a personality, and carrier of the family name, it coincided unfortunately with the third year since I lost my daughters to felony child-stealing, in retaliation for reporting, in seeking asylum from domestic violence.
I struggle with respecting this event, with discomfort about our nations hyper-respect of public figures. Senator Ted apparently was a womanizer as well as struggled with alcohol, and eventually married a woman 22 years his junior; do his many public accomplishments compensate, is this just the way of “famous men” that change society?
He lost two brothers to assassination, assassinations that affected our country.
I am currently reviewing the work of a young woman, local, that lost a sister and a brother to murder, for being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and probably also wrong color. She too is near the end of her dynasty — both parents gone. Her mother took the loss of two children hard, and also was fighting cancer. Her older sister was seen talking to some people in a van. She was found later, hog-tied, stabbed many times, raped many times, and thrown out like trash in a dumpster. Her SISTER. Her brother was stabbed in the heart for confronting someone trailing other women. Why do I run across people like this? I don’t know, except I don’t live in a castle or gated community, and I find people’s stories interesting. I have been cut out of my own daughters’ stories by a top-heavy, supposedly well-intentioned system that knew that two bright girls were not going to escape its radar or grasp, and that mother must therefore disappear.
Unlike me, she figured out FAST that a system was not going to protect her own two sons, and found a trusted friend to become guardian, so at least she can see them. Like others, for a fee. Like me, she wants some version of the truth to survive for her children.
We are allowed to give birth, but too often, not to also speak.
How famous is Senator Ted, then, and how much more important his story, and his contributions? Should I mourn him more than others? And yet it’s clear he worked hard, campaigned hard, pushed initiatives through, and changed our society. How can I handle this today, when I shouldn’t be blogging but doing something more self-preserving. Do I share the national regret and awe?
Quite honestly, no, but I mean no harm in saying so.
How long can I afford to pause and commemorate?
Probably shouldn’t have today, but i did.
it is easy and common to pick heroes and praise them, and transfer parts of our identity to heroes who gave their lives in service, and forget the non-heroes, some of whom I commemorate below.
I am not sure where Senator Ted falls in this mix. I think the metaphor of this book has come to the rescue. It seems both to symbolize the federalism and the poverty, and the reporting of it that go together in the topic “FAMOUS.”
“Let us Now Praise Famous Men“
The book Let Us Now Praise Famous Men grew out of an assignment the two men accepted in 1936 to produce a magazine article on the conditions among white sharecropper families in the U.S. South. It was the time of U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt‘s “New Deal“ programs designed to help the poorest segments of the society. Agee and Evans spent eight weeks that summer researching their assignment, mainly among three white sharecropping families mired in desperate poverty. They returned with Evans’ portfolio of stark images—of families with gaunt faces, adults and children huddled in bare shacks before dusty yards in the Depression-era nowhere of the deep south—and Agee’s detailed notes.
As he remarks in the book’s preface, the original assignment was to produce a “photographic and verbal record of the daily living and environment of an average white family of tenant farmers.” However, as the Literary Encyclopedia points out, “Agee ultimately conceived of the project as a work of several volumes to be entitled Three Tenant Families,though only the first volume, Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, was ever written.” Agee considered that the larger work, though based in journalism, would be “an independent inquiry into certain normal predicaments of human divinity.“
The resulting single book is a critically praised opus that leapt over the traditional forms and limitations of journalism of the time. By combining factual reportage with passages of literary complexity and poetic beauty, Agee presented a complete picture, an accurate, minutely detailed report of what he had seen coupled with insight into his feelings about the experience and the difficulties of capturing it for a broad audience. In doing so, he created an enduring portrait of a nearly invisible segment of the American population.
My father had a love, and some ear, for poetry, and always claimed he could hear the rhythm of the Lord’s Prayer (or possibly it was the 23rd psalm) in Agee’s “Knoxville, Summer of 1915.” Ever the critic (and unable to carry a tune himself) he tried to talk me out of both music, and Christianity (unsuccessful in both cases), and we had something of a truce. I do not have, emotionally or socially, a family at this point; I have made my own in life, and as to the one with whom I share DNA, it’s the two daughters only (now gone) and the deceased Dad, and my memories of him will have to do. . . .
So perhaps the Agee reference, the federalism, and my wish to point out, that deep poverty and distress still exist, sometimes still caused by either the basic human lusts, or the governmental god-like posturing, will make up for my mixed sense of duty in perhaps failure to “note” with enough awe, the passing of another member of the Kennedy dynasty, regardless of on how wide a screen and with how broad a stroke for how long, he painted his visions of what the United States should be. For one, as a woman, a mother, and a Christian, I do not share his multiple visions on how to help the poor and educate America. I do not think this is the original American vision, a totalitarian welfare state, an inverted pyramid building the 21st century equivalent of pyramids of social structure. I think this “nation/religion” is the way of Egypt, milennia ago. No, I do not. But still, Let us Now Praise Famous Men.
One of the follies of humanity is poor choice of who to praise and with whom to associate — famous preempts worthy.
Throughout the book, Agee and Evans use pseudonyms to obscure the identity of the three tenant farmer families. This convention is retained in the follow-up book And Their Children After Them.
lthough Agee’s and Evans’ work was never published as the intended magazine article, their work has endured in the form in which it finally emerged, a lengthy, highly original book. Agee’s text is part ethnography, part cultural anthropological study, and part novelistic, poetic narrative set in the shacks and fields of Alabama. Evans’ black-and-white photographs, starkly real but also matching the grand poetry of the text, are included as a portfolio, without comment, in the book.
Although at its heart a story of the three families, the Gudgers, Woods, and Ricketts (pseudonyms for the Burroughs, Tengles and Fields) the book is also a meditation on reporting and intrusion, on observing and interfering with subjects, sufficient to occupy any student of anthropology, journalism, or, for that matter, revolution.
THE ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF SENATOR EDWARD M. KENNEDY 1962-2009
August 26, 2009
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Senator Kennedy has authored more than 2,500 bills throughout his career in the United States Senate. Of those bills, several hundred have become Public Law. Attached is a sample of some of those laws, which have made a significant difference in the quality of life for the American people. Download the PDF document of his accomplishments here.
Reflections:
Who old enough does not remember? the assassinations, the plane crash, and now we have newsbroadcasts, and a nation commemorating the legacy of this Senator from Massachusetts. It is healing to commemorate, with respect, men who have changed the face of the nation. Last night, I watched on TV, Charlie Rose seeking to know this man through former friends and writers, and also speaking with the Senator also. As I saw the shock of white hair, the broad, broad charismatic smile, and listened to Senator Kennedy promote Education and Health Care, his two major federal programs and passions, I had a hard time. I heard the Senator talk about how America cannot be left behind in globalization and MUST give EVERY child the capacity to succeed in a global economy.
I thought, where are the memorials for the people who were not born into Kennedy family, but still died?
By thee have I run through a troop and leapt over a wall
1 I will love thee, O LORD, my strength.
2 The LORD is my rock, and my fortress, and my deliverer; my God, my strength, in whom I will trust; my buckler, and the horn of my salvation, and my high tower.
3 I will call upon the LORD, who is worthy to be praised: so shall I be saved from mine enemies.
4 The sorrows of death compassed me, and the floods of ungodly men made me afraid.
5 The sorrows of hell compassed me about: the snares of death prevented me.
6 In my distress I called upon the LORD, and cried unto my God: he heard my voice out of his temple, and my cry came before him, even into his ears.
. . . .
With the merciful thou wilt shew thyself merciful; with an upright man thou wilt shew thyself upright;
26 With the pure thou wilt shew thyself pure; and with the froward thou wilt shew thyself froward.
27 For thou wilt save the afflicted people; but wilt bring down high looks.
28 For thou wilt light my candle: the LORD my God will enlighten my darkness.
29 For by thee I have run through a troop; and by my God have I leaped over a wall.
30 As for God, his way is perfect: the word of the LORD is tried: he is a buckler to all those that trust in him.
31 For who is God save the LORD? or who is a rock save our God?
32 It is God that girdeth me with strength, and maketh my way perfect.
33 He maketh my feet like hinds’ feet, and setteth me upon my high places.
34 He teacheth my hands to war, so that a bow of steel is broken by mine arms.
35 Thou hast also given me the shield of thy salvation: and thy right hand hath holden me up, and thy gentleness hath made me great.
36 Thou hast enlarged my steps under me, that my feet did not slip
WHO MOURNS THESE?
Deborah Ross (51) and Ersie Charles Everette (58)
2009 Tried to break up, Shot to death at work, in a Tollbooth, and her male friend in a parking lot, ambushed
Cross said the shootings appeared to stem from a domestic dispute as Burris and Deborah Ross, 51, a California Department of Transportation toll booth collector, had recently broken up.
“He clearly had no regard for human life, so we wanted to apprehend him as soon as possible,” Cross said. “We had authorities all throughout Northern California trying to find this guy.”
Burris apparently opened fire with a shotgun shortly before 6 p.m. Tuesday, killing Ross and Ersie Charles Everette, 58, of San Leandro, Calif., who was sitting in his truck in the toll plaza parking lot.
Ross and Burris had shared a house in Richmond, and neighbors said the two had been having financial problems. Richmond Police were called to the house on Saturday, police spokeswoman Sgt. Bisa French said Wednesday. It is unknown what the nature of the call was as no report was taken, French said.
Although their relationship had just ended, Burris was aware of Everette, who drove Ross to work Tuesday, Cross said.
“Somehow, he knew the guy was there at her job, there’s a connection between the two victims, but what that relationship is, we don’t know at this time,” Cross said.
Everette, known as “Chuck” by those who knew him, was a longtime, well-respected bus driver for Golden Gate Transit who had received numerous accolades, spokeswoman Mary Currie said Wednesday.
“He was a likable guy, a good guy,” Currie said. “Passengers liked him. His co-workers liked him.”
Tuesday’s shootings occurred at the bridge over the northern portion of San Francisco Bay that connects well-to-do Marin County with Richmond and other East Bay suburbs. Witnesses said a man used the butt of a shotgun to shatter the window of the No. 3 toll booth, then fired at least three times inside, stunning rush-hour commuters in the westbound lanes before fleeing in the van owned by Western Eagle Shuttle of San Rafael, Calif.
Officers found Ross’ body inside the booth, while Everette was discovered slumped over in a white pickup truck in a nearby parking lot.
> > >
2009/2008 Torres, Catalina (44) & Eustacio (41), Sgt. Paul Starzyk
Brother, Sister, both domestic violence workers, both murdered by an “ex”
According to the San Francisco chronicle, on the evening of July 19th, Eustacio Torres was shot by his ex-girlfriend at a converted garage that Torres was renovating. Torres and his girlfriend, Bernadette Agustin, met about five years ago when Torres was renovating her house. They became partners in that business for a few years. The market started to tumble downhill, and their buildings went into foreclosure causing them to lose money. This caused tension between the couple. After some time, their relationship started to become difficult for both of them. Torres realized that Agustin was dangerous; however he never got a restraining order against her. On the evening on July 19th Agustin went to meet Torres at the garage. Prior to this incident she bought a pistol. She brought shot him with it.
About a year ago Eustacio Torres’ sister, Catalina Torres, a volunteer for a battered women’s group, was shot and killed inside of her Martinez apartment while trying to protect one of her customers in a beauty salon.
Her customer’s husband, Felix Sandoval, entered the beauty salon raged at his wife who had a restraining order against him. Catalina and her customer jetted out of the beauty salon. Sandoval couldn’t find his wife so he followed Torres to her apartment and shot her in the head, simply because she was affiliated with the incident. He then shot at the door and hit Sgt. Paul Starzyk. He still busted in and shot and killed Sandoval.
Since these two murders are a year apart and both victims come from the same family, the Torres family is suffering deeply from these two tragedies.
It is sad, yet ironic how both tragedies happened in the way that they did. They were related and both incidents happened a year apart. Considering the fact that Eustacio, Catalina’s brother had to help bury her, it is sad that he got killed also. They both worked together in a domestic violence group together. Now the Torres family has lost two of their family members to similar incidents.
MARTINEZ — Last September, Catalina Torres’ family struggled to find answers about why she died at the hands of an estranged in-law who also killed a Martinez police sergeant.
> > >
Less than a year later, they find themselves again trying to find clarity after the slaying late last month of her brother, Eustacio Torres, by an estranged girlfriend in San Diego.
According to San Diego police, the bodies of Eustacio Torres, 41, and Bernadette Agustin, 52, were discovered by his nephew — Catalina Torres’ son — in the early-morning hours of July 20 at his home on in the Paradise Hills area. Investigators believe that Agustin shot Eustacio Torres and herself.
Eustacio Torres’ death follows the slaying of his sister Sept. 6, 2008, by Felix Sandoval. Sandoval burst into a Martinez beauty salon looking for his wife. She was not there, and he confronted her cousin, Catalina Torres, at a nearby apartment. While she shielded one of the home’s residents, Sandoval shot and killed her.
Sandoval then shot at police approaching the apartment, mortally wounding Sgt. Paul Starzyk. But Starzyk’s final act was to kill Sandoval, saving the others in the apartment.
Sandoval was in the midst of a divorce from his wife, who had filed a restraining order against him, and Catalina Torres had been supporting her separation from him. In San Diego, Eustacio Torres was severing ties with Agustin. Although the Torres family has experienced two devastating losses, Noe Torres, youngest of the six siblings, said they do not feel like victims.
A memorial fund has been established in Eustacio Torres’ name. Donations can be made at any Wells Fargo Bank branch to the account number 2629533015.
Since these two murders are a year apart and both victims come from the same family, the Torres family is suffering deeply from these two tragedies.
It is sad, yet ironic how both tragedies happened in the way that they did. They were related and both incidents happened a year apart. Considering the fact that Eustacio, Catalina’s brother had to help bury her, it is sad that he got killed also. They both worked together in a domestic violence group together. Now the Torres family has lost two of their family members to similar incidents.
2008 account “Details emerge in Martinez triple shooting:
Catalina Torres survived domestic abuse and became a strong advocate for a nonprofit group that helps victims of domestic violence.
“She was a battered woman who became an advocate,” said Maria Preciado, Torres’ close friend. “She took negative experiences and turned them into positive things.”
In a tragic turn of events, the 44-year-old STAND Against Domestic Violence volunteer lost her life Saturday, an innocent bystander in a deadly domestic disturbance involving her cousin’s estranged husband.
Officers were called to the salon about 11:35 a.m. Saturday on reports of a domestic disturbance. Sandoval broke the salon’s front window with his hand and entered holding a gun, police said. According to witnesses, he was looking for his estranged wife, salon owner Margarita Sandoval.
Martinez police Chief Tom Simonetti said Felix Sandoval, who was waving the gun around, never fired a shot in the salon, but confronted his teenage daughter in the parking lot behind the salon and told her he was going to kill his wife and his other children. Sandoval ran to an upstairs apartment on the opposite side of the parking lot where Torres, an unidentified woman and three of Sandoval’s children were, the chief said.
Elnora Caldwell, 46
She asked for protection
SEPTEMBER 2008, This beautiful woman Tried to Leave, Died, Stabbed, on side of the road
Contra Costa sheriff building death penalty argument in wife stabbing
Investigators said Monday that they are trying to build a death penalty case against an Oakland man who allegedly stabbed his estranged wife near the Caldecott Tunnel and pushed her out of his pickup in front of stunned motorists. Robert Woods, a 47-year-old former maintenance worker for the city of Oakland, was arrested on suspicion of murdering Elnora Caldwell, 46. Caldwellobtained a restraining order against Woods earlier this year, saying she was afraid of him. She was stabbed to death Saturday night and pushed from the pickup on a stretch of Fish Ranch Road that passes over the east end of the Caldecott Tunnel. ..Caldwell’s family members believe she was kidnapped Saturday from her Oakland home, perhaps by someone other than Woods.
Police and witnesses said Woods went to Caldwell’s Oakland apartment and washed up, then turned himself in to an Oakland police officer in the area. More than a dozen motorists stopped to help Caldwell. Some gave her chest compressions and others jotted down the license plate number of the GMC pickup. Alameda County Superior Court records show that Caldwell applied for a domestic violence restraining order against Woods on April 29, and that the order was to be active until 2013.
Caldwell wrote in her application for the restraining order that Woods had shoved her after showing up unannounced at the Nordstrom department store in San Francisco where she worked and accusing her of infidelity. In 2007, she wrote, Woods pulled her hair during an argument in his truck, forcing her to flee and take a taxi home.
In a third incident, Caldwell said, her husband broke a glass sliding door at her apartment.
“It has to stop,” Caldwell wrote of alleged verbal and physical abuse.
Court records show that Woods was fired from his job as a maintenance worker for the city of Oakland last year for allegedly doing drugs and threatening to kill co-workers.
? ? ?
Domestic Violence Murder/Suicides – Here’s a summary:
In the U.S., estimates from the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) are that more than three women a day are killed by their intimate partners. Women are killed by intimate partners more often than by another acquaintance of stranger.Most of these murders involved were preceded by physical and psychological abuse.
Outside the domestic realm, males are killed much more often than females; they are killed most often in fights with other men.
According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports, 1,055 women and 287 men were murdered by their intimate partners in 2005. These figures are striking, because in the past, in the 1970s and earlier, the numbers of men and women so victimized were about even. In other words, there has been a significant decline in the numbers of men killed by their partners but not for women.
The number of men who were murdered by intimates dropped by 75% between 1976 and 2005 (BJS). The number of black females murdered in this time has declined but the number of white females murdered has dropped only by 6%. Statistics Canada (1998, 2005), similarly, reveals a sharp decline in the numbers of male domestic homicide victims but not of female victims of homicide.
The reason that women are resorting less to murder of their partners is most likely because many of these women were battered women who felt trapped in a dangerous situation. Today, the presence of violence prevention programming and the availability of shelters are paving the way to other options. The fact that domestic violence services apparently are saving the lives of more men than women is a positive, though unintended consequence of the women’s shelter movement (see van Wormer and Bartollas, 2007).
Nina Reiser (31), mother of 2. No asylum in America
Hans Reiser Admits to Murdering Nina Reiser, Pleads to Reduced …
In 1998, while working in Saint Petersburg, Russia, Hans Reiser reportedly selected from a mail-order bride catalogue,[9] and subsequently married, Nina Sharanova (Нина Шаранова), a Russian-born and trained obstetrician and gynecologist[10] who was studying to become an American licensed OB/GYN. Reiser himself stated that he met Nina when he went to a date set up by a Russian dating service; Nina had come along to translate for his date. . . .
In May, Nina Reiser alleged in court filings that her husband had failed to pay 50 percent medical expenses and childcare expenses as ordered by a judge and was in arrears for more than $12,000. [13]
Recovery of Nina’s body and sentencing
According to officials, prosecutors agreed to a deal whereby Reiser would reveal the location of his wife’s body in exchange for pleading guilty to second-degree murder. The deal was made with the agreement of Nina’s family, but was subject to final approval by Judge Goodman.[45][46] On Monday, July 7, 2008, Reiser led police to Nina’s body buried in the Oakland hills. Reiser’s attorney, William DuBois, who was handcuffed to Reiser and accompanied by a heavy police guard to the site, said that the remains were found buried on the side of a hill between Redwood Regional Park and the Huckleberry Botanic Regional Preserve, less than half a mile (< 800 m) from the home on Exeter Drive where Reiser lived with his mother, and where Nina Reiser was last seen alive on 3 September 20
Anastasia Melnitchenko, 22, unmarried, No asylum in America
2005 Tried to break up, stalked; a clearly preventable homicide — her body found in car trunk
Body-in-trunk suspect got lots of counseling
‘Doing satisfactorily’ after 6 months of weekly sessions
He was fulfilling that obligation Oct. 19, two days before Melnitchenko disappeared, when he attended a weekly session of a program in Richmond run by Priority Male Center for Positive Peaceful Living
Jaxon Van Derbeken, Chronicle Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 26, 2005
The El Sobrante man charged with murdering a woman he had repeatedly terrorized attended a two-hour counseling session for domestic violence offenders just days before the slaying, authorities said Tuesday.
McAlpin was on probation stemming from eight felony convictions in two separate cases for stalking, threatening and attacking Melnitchenko on several occasions from 2001 to 2004. Part of his sentence in the most recent case was that he attend a yearlong domestic violence prevention program.
THE BEST WAY TO “PREVENT” VIOLENCE IS TO SEND A CLEAR MESSAGE TO GIVE NO QUARTER TO PERPERTRATORS. MCALPIN WAS A COCKY OVERENTITLED YOUNG MAN WITH NO RESPECT FOR THE WOMAN, OR THE LAW — AND FROM THE STORY, IT’S CLEAR WHY HE HAD NO REASON TO RESPECT THE LAW, TOO. I DNR BUT I SUSPECT HE WAS WHITE. I DON’T THINK THIS POOR WOMAN EVER EVEN LIVED WITH HIM. THEY DATED BRIEFLY. SHE DIED. THE STORY OF HER DEATH INTERSECTS WITH THE STORY OF A JUDGE WITH A MISSION; I MAY TELL IT ANOTHER TIME. THIS EVENT INTERSECTS WITH MY ATTEMPTS TO GET HELP IN 2005, THE SAME YEAR. I REMEMBER TRYING TO TELL MY FAMILY THAT THIS STALKING, THESE INDICATORS, SPELLED TROUBLE! MY PROBLEM WAS WHO I TOLD, WHO I SOUGHT HELP FROM, AS WAS ANASTASIA’S.
Taking matters into their own hand; two brothers kill widow & her relatives:
Winta Mehari, 28; her brother Yonas Mehari, 17;
and their mother, 50-year-old Regbe Bahrengasi
Widow and HER relatives killed in revenge, seeking money, by deceased husband’s relatives. 2 year old involved.
2006 – No Asylum for Eritrean Family from revenge, greed,
extortion? in the Golden State
Planned to exterminate family during Thanksgiving Dinner?
ALAMEDA — A dispute over money was the cause of the shooting deaths of three members of an Eritrean family in Oakland on Thanksgiving Day, a relative of the victims alleged Tuesday after the suspects in the case were arraigned on charges that could bring them the death penalty.
Asmeron Gebreselassie, 43, the suspected gunman, and 39-year-old Tewodros Gebreselassie were each charged Tuesday with three counts of murder; one count of attempted murder for the non-fatal shooting of Yehtram Mehari, the brother of Winta and Yonas; one count of kidnapping for allegedly taking Winta Mehari’s 2-year-old son from the scene; and two counts of false imprisonment involving two other family members, Angersom Mehari and Merhawi Mehari.
They also were charged with two special circumstances murder allegations that could earn them the death penalty: multiple murder and murder during the course of a kidnapping.
The victims and the defendants were all members of Oakland’s sizable Eritrean community. About 50 members of that community, many dressed in traditional Eritrean clothing, packed Tuesday’s court hearing.
Oakland police say they think the motive for the shooting at the Keller Plaza apartment complex at 5301 Telegraph Ave. in Oakland about 3 p.m. on Thanksgiving was that the Gebreselassie brothers wanted revenge for the death of their brother, Abraham Tewolde, 42, on March 1.
Police said Abraham Tewolde’s cause of death was undetermined and his brothers were suspicious of Winta Mehari, his widow.
Keflezighi said Tewolde died of natural causes but Tewolde’s family members asked Mehari’s family members to give them money.
I REMEMBER THIS ONE. I WAS DRIVING TO EAT DINNER, TAKEN CHARITABLY IN, NOT WITH MY DAUGHTERS, BECAUSE THEY’D ALREADY BEEN TAKEN, COMPLICIT WITH MY OWN FAMILY AND AROUND MONEY ISSUES ALSO. I RAN INTO POLICE CARS & TV CAMERAS BLOCKING THE WAY.
Was this misogyny? Was this something like an honor killing? What WAS this? A young man, apparently a good one, was killed, victim to two men seeking revenge on his mother. His crime? Being a brother, apparently!
Meanwhile, students and teachers at Berkeley High School were mourning the death of Yonas Mehari. The boys varsity soccer team, which he played on, wore black armbands in his honor and dedicated its season to him Monday night.
All the victims and suspects were immigrants from Eritrea, and the killings have shocked the East Bay’s tightly-knit community from that small East African nation. Many people packed the courtroom today, and others without seats waited in the hallway.
Hundreds of mourners have been visiting the apartment complex, home to a large number of Eritreans and Ethiopians, to pay their respects. Many have also brought food for the family and donated money for transporting the three bodies to Eritrea for burial, for medical bills for others injured in the attack and for care of Winta’s Mehari’s son.
Police said the brothers, who also live in the apartment complex, were angry at Winta Mehari over the unexplained death of their brother, Abraham Tewolde, 42, who was her husband. A mechanic who ran a small auto shop on Broadway, Tewolde collapsed and died March 1. An autopsy was unable to determine the cause of his death, coroner’s officials said.
Police said the Gebreselassie brothers suspected Winta Mehari had some role in her husband’s death. Tewodros Gebreselassie, an engineer, attended the party at the Mehari’s third-floor apartment on Thanksgiving, and police said he admitted to helping his brother plan the attack.
Witnesses told police that Tewodros Gebreselassie was talking on his cell phone and said, “Yeah, they’re all here,” according to court records. Minutes later he opened the apartment door for Asmeron Gebreselassie, who then opened fire on the Mehari family. When the shooting started, Tewodros Gebreselassie grabbed his 2-year-old nephew, Winta Mehari’s son, and carried him back to the second-floor apartment where the Gebreselassie lived, witnesses said.
Asmeron Gebreselassie also shot his brother-in-law Yehtram Mehari in the foot, witnesses told police. Another brother, Angersom Mehari, jumped out a window and suffered a broken back. A third brother, Merhawi Mehari, hid in the closet and avoided injury.
Police found the boy unharmed after the two brothers surrendered to a SWAT team following a brief standoff at their apartment. The guns he allegedly used were later found, police said.
At Berkeley High School, students, teachers and counselors spent Monday and today remembering the 17-year-old Yonas Mehari, who played soccer, ran cross country and helped tutor other students.
“I’ve known him for four years, and I really saw him as a leader, an independent thinker and just a really sweet kid to be around,” said Kristin Glenchur, athletic director at Berkeley High. “He was always around volunteering for something” such as working the scoreboards during football games or the concession stands, she said.
His slain mother was active in the Eritrean Orthodox Church in Oakland and was popular among her immigrant community, estimated by the Eritrean consulate in Oakland at to be about 3,000 people.
Donations to the Mehari Family Fund can be deposited at any Bank of America branch under account number 0560942210.
SUMMARY:
Sometimes there is no refuge from family violence — members take the law into their own hands; oftentimes greed is a factor, as in many cases above. McAlpin appears to have just been a man with a mission intersecting with a system with a different mission. She got cross in the cross-fire of attempts to reform a man after: kidnapping, stalking, assault, and threats to kill.
How IMPORTANT is it that the United States set the standard that misogyny is “anathema” it’s unacceptable?
I fear that Senator Ted, Presidents Bush, Clinton, and now Obama, have failed to do this. Moreover, women’s groups also, subject to the same human emotions, claw and fight each other sometimes to the top, seeking scarce prestige, or abundant federal funds. This is also a spinoff of misogyny. We who watch such things don’t see such huge, huge divides among the men’s groups. We have now an older Republican white President, a young and charming (and philandering) white President, and an even younger and MORE charming African-American President, all united in fixing the crises of fatherlessness, and making sure that mothers don’t actually get to (safely) fulfil their motherhood unless a man is present, and it’s CLEAR we do not have have equal protection or rights under law, despite the claims to the contrary. If so, where are all the dead men on the side of the road simply for leaving? Where are the women blowing away a few family generations to take the law into their own hands? They just aren’t there!
I should be more respectful, and I will take another day to be so, of the passing of a major political figure this week, Senator Ted Kennedy.
I wish I did not have a troubling memory of his womanizing, of the two programs he promoted the mOST (education/health) which have negatively affected my family the MOST. I wish that the date of his passing did not coincide with the date my kids were stolen, yet remain within (at last sighting) driving distance, but inaccessible to me, because I simply took a stand against misogyny and violence.
I took a stand for telling the truth in court, and not mincing words. Perhaps I am very disrespectful.
I wish I were not thinking of how he endorsed our current President, for whom I too voted, not being fully aware of his stance on the ubiquitous and impoverishing, endangering to women “fatherhood” movement. It is never enough, never enough — always another initiative, another grant, through churches, through family members when they are themselves swept up and confronted by their failure to confront, and through family law system, and through an unbelievably condescending virtual caste system by the elite making it near impossible for less fortunate to escape the economic abuse that would enable them to escape threats of injury, death, having children abducted, either by the ex or through the courts or (case in point) both, and through violence to our civil rights within this nation.
They said Sen. Kennedy worked like a dog, and i believe it. Some of us do, too, on a single issue that doesn’t often go away. I never tried to raise his offspring, and I do not appreciate his or any other administration , or their programs, just because they have the platform, prating on about how to raise mine, married or single, through a burdensome system that doesn’t even impart decent values, let alone decent academics. And in 20 years of THIS battle, I’ve never had a hand laid on any of mine, anything that was mine, or on ME, from someone who openly said he or she hated me or wanted to hurt me.
It was always from the “helpers” and those “concerned.” Sure. . . .
But in re:
Kennedy’s Battle With Cancer Lost
U.S. has lost a great statesman, obviously. But before this, long before this, we have lost something else. We have lost self-respect as individuals, and transferred it to our leaders, HOPING in them. This is misplaced hope too often, and it’s unwise.
Jeremiah was a prophet who watched and spoke out against the deterioration of his nation: For this, he got left in a pit without water, and would’ve starved there, were he not later rescued. Later, Jesus Christ, also preaching “repent” got crucified.
Jeremiah 17
.
5 Thus saith the LORD: Cursed is the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.
6 For he shall be like the heath in the desert, and shall not see when good cometh; but shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, a salt land and not inhabited.
7 Blessed is the man that trusteth in the LORD, and whose hope the LORD is.
8 For he shall be as a tree planted by the waters, and that spreadeth out his roots by the river, and shall not fear when heat cometh, but his leaf shall be green; and shall not be careful in the year of drought, neither shall cease from yielding fruit.
9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and it is desperately sick: who can know it?
10 I the LORD search the heart, I try the reins, even to give every man according to his ways, according to the fruit of his doings.
11 As the partridge that gathereth young which she hath not brought forth, so is he that getteth riches, and not by right; in the midst of his days they shall leave him, and at his end he shall be a fool.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
For the past 20 years, I have sought refuge in my home, from my home, from my family’s close resonance to the tune my ex-husband played. I have a logical mind, and mind seeks logic to piece a life together, even if the logic is to accept chaos. But I HAVE found a logic to the, what I will call, narcissistic, self-referential habit of federal domination of the markets — well MOST markets. Education, family design, health care, welfare, child-bearing practically, and reform.
The U.S. is succeeding at incarceration — we are the world’s LARGEST jailor — and failing at education. The reason we are failing at education is because we have trusted our leaders to design a system. Instead, they designed an ECONOMY to support themselves, and placed our children at its mercy. This was a transformational system of values sold as good, but not in practice good. It is possible to succeed very well in this educational system and be an utter failure as a person. It is also possible to fail in this system and be a business success. Or to fail all round.
I am 50-plus. At this age, I had to pick WHAT to dedicate what’s left of my life to; and it was a hard choice between Family Law system and Educational System. Both systems hurt my kids and my family, and are creating the tiered society, while claiming to provide the opposite. I have a relative with her own children run through a private school system that took offence that i too — in a different way — opted out of the local public schools. In truth, I believe that if our daughters succeeded without wealth at what she’d sacrificed to become wealthy and with wealth BUY, it would somehow show up her life plan. Our respective nieces might be competing for similar college slots – – I don’t know.
But I have watched close up, and then system-wide, forced failure and social exclusion for simply doing something about it. So have many fellow-blogger mothers (see right column).
Look at this graphic:
(it’s an old one) from “America, What Went Wrong“? An book that documents the destruction of the middle class.
An INDEPENDENT middle class, with time to think, and understanding basic business principles, will hold its government accountable. A DEPENDENT (upon professional jobs, many of them government-sanctioned or supplied), which my generation came from (but not my parents) will indeed do the dirty work and bidding of the top group, keeping the heirarchy in place.
From 1990 to 2009, I have been overexposed to impoverishment, and how it’s manufactured. I watched my husband do this, in order to keep himself on top, he was willing that the ship should go down. Nothing more mattered, and all discussions were moot (or off) that didn’t first establish this dominance. Neither I nor our children were actually to show up as people, or with needs, but as performers.
Now, according to the myths taught in public school (and elsewhere) about HOW government works (which dealing with in-home abuse didn’t really leave time for an official study of), it should be possible to leave the situation. No one should care HOW I leave it, so long as it’s done legally and without harm to our children. However once we showed up as a household, without a resident male, in waltzed the “experts,” ignoring the facts, the danger, the track record, and proudly proclaiming situations that didn’t exist as though they did.
Having some exposure to the Bible and its language, this was easy to detect as playing “god.” And naturally, I protested.
And so, the divide and conquer of the middle class, overeducated fools (lots of academia, insufficient truly hard times), scrabbling to assert their intellectual dominance and right to explain away that violence happened in their family, and they, too, failed to report.
In the long run, I chalk it up to basic human emotions of (1) pride (2) fear (3) greed (4) prejudice (THIs kind, “misogyny.”) Where logic fails, dominance by gender — or age (it keeps flipping around, the varieties of messages I get), only a few years — or marital status, or SOMETHING to preserve the us/them, Object/subject relationship which is not a human relationship. Because surely they didn’t misdiagnose a situation, the judges were wrong, I was wrong, the statistics were wrong, everyone else was wrong, and this intact family unit (sort of) was “right.” Or else. . . . . Social shunning was tried, and I didn’t repent, to the antes were upped, and my kids were stolen, and all contact cut off.
Perhaps it is because of working so hard on these issues, I have been watching politics from afar.
Perhaps it is because of these issues, I have a different “take” on the passing of a Senator that was compared last night to Daniel Webster and Henry Clay. The words “dynasty” may apply, but these are NOT words coherent with the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Here’s a woman talking sense:
In THE SHOCK DOCTRINE, Naomi Klein explodes the myth that the global free market triumphed democratically. Exposing the thinking, the money trail and the puppet strings behind the world-changing crises and wars of the last four decades, The Shock Doctrine is the gripping story of how America’s “free market” policies have come to dominate the world– through the exploitation of disaster-shocked people and countries.
At the most chaotic juncture in Iraq’s civil war, a new law is unveiled that would allow Shell and BP to claim the country’s vast oil reserves…. Immediately following September 11, the Bush Administration quietly out-sources the running of the “War on Terror” to Halliburton and Blackwater…. After a tsunami wipes out the coasts of Southeast Asia, the pristine beaches are auctioned off to tourist resorts…. New Orleans’s residents, scattered from Hurricane Katrina, discover that their public housing, hospitals and schools will never be reopened…. These events are examples of “the shock doctrine”: using the public’s disorientation following massive collective shocks – wars, terrorist attacks, or natural disasters — to achieve control by imposing economic shock therapy. Sometimes, when the first two shocks don’t succeed in wiping out resistance, a third shock is employed: the electrode in the prison cell or the Taser gun on the streets.
This is the theme of the National Fatherhood Initiative, there is a “crisis in fatherlessness.” I have watched these manufactured crises on a personal level and also a national level and have begun to get an understanding of some of the causes and sources, ONE of which is most definitely the educational system. Divide and conquer, and assume control of assets and assessments. That’s elementary. One very empowering activity, to young people, is the arts, and self-sufficiency. No problem. Delete the arts, if possible, and free time, and uninterrupted quantities of time for reflection, and also do not study (honestly) either history or the economic system, in particular not the history of any system one is currently in. Again, I saw this in my marriage, how the most basic amenities were threatening to my “intimate partner.” THE most threatening one apparently was access to a steady cash flow. If I got this by working, the reserves must be eliminated by his working less, or making the process of getting to/from work more burdensome and timesconsuming. Rooms got trashed or re-arranged while I was out, at class or working or with the kids. There was no stability. Once you get the pattern, it’s only a matter of breaking it. My writing (I was also journaling the abuse) threatened this person. I exported the journals. He exported his behind and friendship to the people into whose care I’d put them. I went and got them back. . . . . But it was too late. They had to be turned, I guess (?).
Here’s another one which speaks to it about “lockdown” of the fortress continents. Care must be taken to incorporate cheap labor:
Fortress continents
The US and Europe are both creating multi-tiered regional strongholds
There is so much in life to be considered, but in considering memorials, again, I keep coming back to scripture:
“Pray for kings and all that are in authority, that we may live a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.” (I Tim. 2:1).
“It is not good to have respect of persons.” (James).
You know what, with all due respect, it’s not. LIFE is about what you respect, and who you honor: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, soul, mind and strength, and thy neighbor as thyself.”
There is not to be a tiered respect of people according to how MUCH of this world they’ve changed. We, ALL of us in the U.S., are to respect ourselves, and the founding principles of this country, which then allow us to respect at LEAST our neighbors.
“Love worketh no ill towards his neighbor.”
Sometimes it’s simply in what one does NOT do, that love.
So, below are my unforgiveable (??) thoughts, in respect that a Senator has died, on seeing the extensive television recognition of this man, and hearing about what he had been doing while I was across the country, trying to stay afloat and keep the pilot light lit in my own life, spiritually and physically.
And I have to go about what’s left of this day, seeking funds sufficient for today and build something to tomorrow.
I saw a charming, Robert-Redford smile, and I thought about Chappaquiddick,
about this man’s marriage to a woman 22 years his junior, a 38 year old divorced attorney single mother, and wondered things that were less respectful than appropriate. I thought about the CFDA pie chart I know, where his two most passionate areas: Education and Health — were THE largest and most impoverishing segments of the budget; and the effect of this incredible top-heavy Federal language transformation into a welfare state directing lives of the lowly.
It did not help when I learned that this person was a prime author of the “No Child Left Behind” act and a real pusher of Head Start. Trust the elite to prescribe for the poor every time. It is also quite unfortunate that his death this week commemorates about 3 years fo the “death” of my relationship with my own daughters, and primarily because I REFUSED to accept that poverty resulting from violence should result in becoming a surrogate womb for childless narcissistic relatives convinced that, having not experienced what my daughters and I did, or accepted court rulings already made, that they, TOO, “knew what was best” for three females leaving family violence. When I refused, I was punished by these people, and part of the punishment was declaring what I provided for our daughters, either was irrelevant and did not exist, and what they wished instead, was somehow superior.
The punishment included the gradual deletion of the arts, the dumbing down of my children, the deletion of jobs in my profession (in the arts) because of the need to fight family!, and eventually the criminal removal of children (minors) from my household in order to, ostensibly, “rescue” them somehow, by totally removing all contact with a law abiding, working, intelligent, informed and independent mother. I have had cause and many years to reflect on the benefits and fallbacks of my own, and my ex-spouses public educations amid dysfuncitonal families, mine in a different way from his, and the values that differ.
This gives a totally different perspective on “No Child Left Behind,” when one realizes that the children of those promoting this policies (if such exist) do not always attend public schools, and if they did, they are not in lower-income neighborhoods. To me, the mark of acceptability is, if it’s good enough for YOUR child, then I’ll listen.
I’ll finish with this well-written summary:
MichaelMoore.com Commemoration
August 26th, 2009 2:25 am
Ted Kennedy Dies of Brain Cancer at Age 77
‘Liberal Lion’ of the Senate Led Storied Political Family After Deaths of President John F. Kennedy, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy
Aug. 26, 2009 — Sen. Ted Kennedy died shortly before midnight Tuesday at his home in Hyannis Port, Mass., at age 77.
The man known as the “liberal lion of the Senate” had fought a more than year-long battle with brain cancer, and according to his son had lived longer with the disease than his doctors expected him to.
“We’ve lost the irreplaceable center of our family and joyous light in our lives, but the inspiration of his faith, optimism, and perseverance will live on in our hearts forever,” the Kennedy family said in a statement. “He loved this country and devoted his life to serving it.”
Sen. Edward Moore Kennedy, the youngest Kennedy brother who was left to head the family’s political dynasty after his brothers President John F. Kennedy and Sen. Robert F. Kennedy were assassinated.
Kennedy championed health care reform, working wages and equal rights in his storied career. In August, he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom — the nation’s highest civilian honor — by President Obama. His daughter, Kara Kennedy, accepted the award on his behalf.
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, known as Ted or Teddy, was diagnosed with a malignant brain tumor in May 2008 and underwent a successful brain surgery soon after that. But his health continued to deteriorate, and Kennedy suffered a seizure while attending the luncheon following President Barack Obama’s inauguration.
For Kennedy, the ascension of Obama was an important step toward realizing his goal of health care reform.
At the Democratic National Convention in August 2008, the Massachusetts Democrat promised, “I pledge to you that I will be there next January on the floor of the United States Senate when we begin the great test.”
Sen. Kennedy made good on that pledge, but ultimately lost his battle with cancer.
Kennedy was first elected to the Senate in 1962, at the age of 30, and his tenure there would span four decades.
A hardworking, well-liked politician who became the standard-bearer of his brothers’ liberal causes, his career was clouded by allegations of personal immorality and accusations that his family’s clout helped him avoid the consequences of an accident that left a young woman dead.
But for the younger members of the Kennedy clan, from his own three children to those of his brothers JFK and RFK, Ted Kennedy — once seen as the youngest and least talented in a family of glamorous overachievers — was both a surrogate father and the center of the family.
And certainly it was Ted Kennedy who bore many of the tragedies of the family — the violent deaths of four of his siblings, his son’s battle with cancer, and the death of his nephew John F. Kennedy Jr. in a plane crash.
Kennedy, Youngest Kennedy Brother, Led Political Dynasty in Wake of Tragedy
Edward Moore Kennedy was born in Brookline, Mass., on Feb. 22, 1932, the ninth and youngest child of Joseph P. Kennedy and Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy.
His father, a third-generation Irish-American who became a multimillionaire businessman and served for a time as a U.S. ambassador to Britain, had risen high and was determined that his sons would rise higher still.
Overshadowed by his elder siblings, Teddy, as he was known to family and friends, grew up mostly in the New York City suburb of Bronxville, N.Y., and attended private boarding schools. He was expelled from Harvard during his freshman year after he asked a friend to take an exam for him.
After a two-year stint in the Army, Kennedy returned to earn degrees at Harvard and then the University of Virginia law school. He married Virginia Joan Bennett, known by her middle name, in 1958. The couple would have three children, Kara, Teddy Jr. and Patrick.
By the time he reached adulthood, tragedy had already claimed some of his siblings: eldest brother Joe Jr. was killed in World War II, sister Kathleen died in a plane crash, and another sister, Rosemary, who was mildly retarded, had to be institutionalized following a botched lobotomy.
But then the family hit its pinnacle in 1960, when John F. Kennedy became president.
His brother’s ascension created a political opportunity, and Joe Kennedy decided he should take over JFK’s Senate seat. Ted Kennedy was only 28 at the time — two years short of the required age — so a family friend was found to hold the temporary appointment.
In 1962, Ted Kennedy — backed by his family money and the enthusiasm his name generated among Massachusetts’ Catholics, was elected to the Senate.
The Only One Left
In 1963, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas. His brother Robert became the focus of the family’s — and much of the country’s — dreams.
Following the tragedy in Dallas, Robert and Ted Kennedy became closer than they had ever been as children.
“When I was working for Robert Kennedy, there was hardly a day in which the two of them didn’t physically get together, I would say at least three or four times,” said Frank Mankiewicz, who served as an aide to Robert Kennedy. “I mean, if, if Sen. Robert Kennedy wasn’t in his office, and nobody knew where he was, chances are he was seeing Ted about something.”
Five years later, while pursuing the Democratic presidential nomination in 1968 against Lyndon Johnson, Sen. Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed. That left Ted as the only surviving Kennedy son.
“He seriously contemplated getting out of politics after Robert’s death,” said Kennedy biographer Adam Clymer. “He thought, you know, it might just be too much. He might be too obviously the next target and all of that. But he decided to stick it out and as he said on more than one occasion, pick up a fallen standard.”
Kennedy was seen by many as his brothers’ heir, and perhaps he could have won the White House had he stepped into the presidential race then. But he didn’t. And the very next year there occurred a tragedy that would forever block Ted Kennedy’s presidential ambitions.
In July 1969, following a party on Martha’s Vineyard, Kennedy drove off a bridge on the tiny Massachusetts island of Chappaquiddick. The car plunged into the water. Kennedy escaped, but his passenger did not.
Kennedy later said he dived into the water repeatedly in a vain attempt to save Mary Jo Kopechne, one of the “boiler room girls” who had worked on Bobby Kennedy’s campaign. But Kopechne, 28, drowned, still trapped in the car.
Questions arose about how Kennedy had known Kopechne — he denied any “private relationship,” and Kopechne’s parents also insisted there was no relationship — and why he failed to report the accident for about nine hours.
Kennedy pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of leaving the scene of an accident. He received a two-month suspended sentence and lost his driver’s license for a year, but the political price was higher.
Kennedy was re-elected to the Senate in 1970, but the accident at Chappaquiddick effectively squashed his presidential hopes.
He ran unsuccessfully for the Democratic nomination in 1979 against incumbent President Jimmy Carter.
Once when his daughter Kara, then 19, was passing out campaign leaflets, a man took one and said to her, “You know your father killed a young woman about your age, don’t you?”
Kennedy Curse: Political Power, Personal Tragedy
Sen. Ted Kennedy was not done confronting personal tragedy.
In 1973, 12-year-old Teddy Jr. was diagnosed with bone cancer, and he had to have a leg amputated. Kennedy’s marriage to Joan deteriorated. Some blamed her drinking, others cited his alleged womanizing. The couple divorced in 1981.
In contrast, Kennedy’s career in the Senate continued to flourish.
He supported teachers’ unions, women’s and abortion rights, and health care reform. He sponsored the Family and Medical Leave Act. And he was seen as a stalwart of the Democratic Party, delivering several rousing speeches at conventions.
Former Boston Glober reporter Tom Oliphant, who covered Kennedy’s career in Washington, observed, “It’s not all back slapping and, and personal relationships. I think one of the things that sets Kennedy’s politics apart is his, what I call his dirty little secret. He works like a dog.”
Political analyst Mark Shields said Kennedy’s “concerns were national concerns, but his forum for achieving his ends and changing policy, became the Senate. And he mastered it like nobody else I’ve ever seen.”
But another family incident exposed Kennedy’s vulnerabilities and held him up to public censure.
A nephew, William Kennedy Smith, was accused of raping a woman at the family’s estate in Palm Beach, Fla. The case generated lurid headlines around the world. Kennedy was at the estate at the time of the alleged attack and had been at the bar where Smith met his accuser.
Eyebrows were raised even further when a young woman who had been with Kennedy’s son Patrick that night revealed that she had seen the senator roaming around the house at night, wearing an oxford shirt but no trousers.
Smith was acquitted following a highly sensational trial, but the incident definitely left a dent in Kennedy’s armor. His alleged heavy drinking and womanizing were widely lampooned, and in October 1991 he thought it prudent to be low-key in his opposition to Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, who had been accused of sexually harassing a former subordinate.
Kennedy’s life, both professional and personal, took a turn for the better in 1992.
He married Victoria Reggie, a divorced attorney with two children from a previous marriage, Curran and Caroline. That year Kennedy also supported Bill Clinton, an open admirer of the Kennedy clan.
“Well, sometime during our courtship, I realized that I didn’t want to live the rest of my life without Vicky,” Kennedy said about his wife of nearly 30 years. “And since we have been together, it’s made my life a lot more fulfilling. I think more serene, kind of emotional stability.”
Elected in 1992, President Bill Clinton appointed Kennedy’s sister, Jean Kennedy Smith, ambassador to Ireland. And in 1994, Kennedy had the satisfaction of seeing his son Patrick elected to the House of Representatives from Rhode Island.
But tragedy returned that year.
In May 1994, Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis died of cancer. Kennedy had remained close to his sister-in-law, who once quit her job at a publisher’s after it came out with an unflattering biography of Ted.
Kennedy’s Battle With Cancer Lost
Kennedy had served as a surrogate father for many of his nephews and nieces, but he may have been closest to Jackie’s children, Caroline and John F. Kennedy Jr.
He was horrified when in July 1999, five years after Jackie’s death, John Jr. and his bride of two years, Carolyn Bessette Kennedy, along with her sister Lauren Bessette, were killed when the small plane John was piloting crashed off the Massachusetts island of Martha’s Vineyard.
Sen. Kennedy led the family during the harrowing wait for information as Coast Guard crews searched for the missing plane.
When the bodies were retrieved from the ocean, Kennedy and his two sons went to identify the remains. The senator’s eulogy for his nephew who “had every gift but length of years” and “the wife who became his perfect soul mate” touched grief-stricken Americans.
It was an all-too-familiar sight for those who remember Ted Kennedy mourning the deaths of his brothers John and Robert, and helping the family bear up after the deaths of Robert’s sons David and Michael.
For decades, it was Ted Kennedy who carried the burden and led the way as the patriarch of a family seen as America’s answer to royalty.
With all due respect, we do not need any more royalty in this country. We need to set our sites on something invisible, something written, but something of principle, that unites us. Our leaders need to stick to that, and out of respect to OURSELVES ,we should demand that.
SHARE THIS POST on...
Only $118,310,126 (last year), in hopes of Healthy Marriages and Responsible Fathers
Set this Press Release to the “SPIN” Cycle:
California Healthy Marriages Coalition Says GM Bankruptcy Could Create More Than Financial Devastation for Families SAN DIEGO, June 11 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The GM Bankruptcy is causing six dealerships around California to be closed. These closures will create more bad news for California's economy by increasing the already high unemployment rate of 11 percent, and adding financial stress to the families involved in these cutbacks. Statistics show that financial strain is one of the leading causes of divorce and that divorce itself places additional strains on the economy and on business. This is a distressing cycle for which California's leading marriage-support organization offers some new reassurance. {{Just "trust" our press release, statistics show. Which, or should we say "whose", is not mentioned..}}{{And HOW did this premiere marriage-support organization (at least according to itself) race to the forefront of all California's marriage support organizations?? Clearly it must be on its own merits. . . . blood, sweat, tears, ingenuity (that's true), and entrepreneurship, standing on the shoulders of giants. Seriously, the Dept. of Health and Human Services IS indeed a giant, funding this group from the top down, and some of the other coalitions under its w - i - d - e umbrella from the bottom up.)
Target Population: Married and Unmarried persons in California, ages 15 and older, of all racial, cultural and economic backgrounds Federal Award Amount: $2,342,080/year Program Name: California Healthy Marriages Coalition Project Period: 9/30/2006 - 9/29/2011 . . .SOURCE California Healthy Marriages Coalition
Yes, alas, ’tis true. . ..
recently, as well as, well, not so recently, it seems clear from the various newspaper headlines that many marriages are not very healthy. Also, the same could be said of divorces. But, for those readers who, as either (U.S.) employees or employERS, actually pay taxes, I would like to reassure you that the U.S. Government is on it, it has a PLAN. You may or may not be in on the plan, but I assure you it has many plan to fix the overall unhealthiness of both marriages, and the lack of safety attendant to divorce from, well, a spouse that doesn’t believe in divorce. It would also like to assure you to trust the experts (its hired ones and delegated ones) To analyze and fix the situation. This IS, after all, what governments exist for right? I seem to foggily remember something about the purpose of governments in the Declaration of Independence, and about the word “consent.” It seems to me that somewhere along the line “We the People” got turned into a version of “You People,” and the posse of experts got called in to fix families. What they actually ended up doing is breaking the legal system, by turning it into a behavioral health marketplace, clearly infringing on the niche of the faith institutions, for example, I heard that recently the Knights of Columbus, on behalf of Catholics everywhere, have launched a(nother) fatherhood initiative, lest we somehow forget who’s the boss, called: http://FathersForGood.org.
Notice anything missing from the logo there?
And now again, this time with
a little more style…
Now for all those little pieces of education that add up to $118, 310, 126 – – for 2008 — enjoy the panorama of organizations that are addressing this problem of, well, unhealthy marriages and irresponsible fathers. (I have omitted “Abstinence Education,” because it would overload this post’s, well, capacity).
This wordpress page can only carry one year’s worth of links at a time. Moreover these are alphabetical by Grant Recipient, nationwide, and not by state (although zip codes are listed). The fun part is, they are “click-able,” meaning, you can click on an institution’s name and see what else it’s been up to, for how long and for how much. Perhaps I might show a few more ways to search, but someone of basic intelligence (and motivated) can learn a lot simply by looking. Another trick you might try is searching its name on “usaspending.gov” and see what kind of cute bar charts and stats show up.
Thus one can get an overview of almost any CFDA number BUT this one, 93.086, on a certain database.
Is this inintentional? If part of required Civic Literacy was understanding the federal grants system, if rather than whine, moan, or complain — or complain to elected representatives –MORE AVERAGE JOES & JANE DOES (the alive ones) started monitoring our home states, state by state and agency by agency, we might stop asking why states are running out of money for domestic violence shelters and general assistance, because the answer would be obvious. Instead, we would ask intelligent, and pointed questions from the point of view, these are public funds, and (if government) you are public servants, and (if nonprofit) you’re tax exempt for a reason — how does this fulfil the reason, and who is evaluating, and by what standard?
And then question the standards if they are unreasonable, inconsistent, or do not exist.
Alternately, we could chug along and say, “isn’t so and so handling this? Because I’m busy, and have my own life to handle.”
Sure they are. That’s why inbetween talking about this, I can’t keep up with the healines, or follow up with the last ones before there are new ones. That’s why protective orders protect, law enforcement enforces (consistently), child support is collected (consistently and without gender bias), and welfare helps people be better. AND, (case in point) marriages are clearly getting healed — either that, or they can’t keep up with the new babies (despite Abstinence Education, which I omitted from this list, but is still going strong).
(OK, that’ll have to be another post — WOW, I just pulled 653 records under one code, 93.010 (community-based A.E.)
(not a searchable code in “usaspending.gov,” at least not readily…)
However, top 5 programs with the keyword “abstinence” in the PROJECT title:
| 93.010: Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | $128,610,003 |
| 98.001: USAID Foreign Assistance for Programs Overseas | $11,058,644 |
| 93.279: Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs | $9,561,182 |
| 93.995: Adolescent Family Life_Demonstration Projects | $8,064,374 |
| 93.273: Alcohol Research Programs | $6,222,97 |
AND as far as WHO is really interested in why people don’t abstain and trying to get them to:
Top 10 Recipients
| FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL (FHI) | $3,593,286 |
| SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $2,551,682 |
| PROGRAM FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY IN HEALTH | $2,233,162 |
| HERITAGE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $2,000,000 |
| BROWN UNIVERSITY | $1,672,760 |
| POPULATION COUNCIL INC | $1,613,000 |
| PATH | $1,500,000 |
| NEUROBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH INC | $1,466,239 |
| NEW HOPE CENTER INC | $1,399,907 |
| CENTER FOR SELF-SUFFICIENCY, INC. | $1,399,300 |
Results 1 to 500 of 653 matches. restricted to “NEW” only, I got 240 new grants:
(AFTER ALL THIS, WILL YOU BE ABLE TO “ABSTAIN” FROM LOOKING FURTHER INTO THESE?)
Here’s a quick partial look:
| Fiscal Year | Grantee Name | State | Award Title | Budget Year | CFDA Program Name | Award Class | Principal Investigator | ($$)Sum of Actions |
| 2009 | Columbus Hospital | NJ | COMMUNITY BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 2 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | BERNADETTE VISSANI | $- 739,820 |
| 2009 | METRO ATLANTA YOUTH FOR CHRIST, INC | GA | COMMUNITY-BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 3 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | CINDY MILLER | $ 300,186 |
| 2009 | Saint Michael`s Medical Center, Inc | NJ | COMMUNITY BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 1 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | BERNADETTE VISSANI | $ 677,551 |
| 2008 | A WOMAN`S PLACE MINISTRIES, INC. | FL | ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 1 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | MICHAEL LAYTON | $ 600,000 |
| 2008 | A WOMENS CONCERN, INC. | MA | HEALTHY FUTURES ABSTINENCE EDUCATION INITIATIVE | 3 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | ELIZABETH SNYDER | $ 600,000 |
| 2008 | ABSTINENCE & MARRIAGE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP | IL | COMMUNITY BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 1 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | SCOTT PHELPS | $ 512,500 |
| 2008 | ABSTINENCE EDUCATION CONSULTANTS,INC. | KS | COMMUNITY-BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 1 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | LOIS THEIS | $ 600,000 |
| 2008 | ABSTINENCE TIL MARRIAGE EDUCATION | OH | COMMUNITY BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 3 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | CATHERINE E WOOD | $ 600,000 |
| 2008 | AIDS RESOURCE CENTER OF WISCONSIN, INC | WI | COMMUNITY BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 1 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | SCOTT STOKES | $ 600,000 |
| 2008 | ALPHA CENTER | SD | COMMUNITY BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 1 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | KIMBERLY MARTINEZ | $ 600,000 |
| 2008 | ALTERNATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | TX | COMMUNITY BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 1 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | SHARI L CARROLL | $ 454,922 |
| 2008 | ARIZONA MEXICO BORDER HEALTH FOUNDATION | AZ | COMMUNITY BASED ABSTINENCE EDUCATION | 1 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | ALBERT MORENO | $ 550,000 |
| 2008 | AWARE, INC. | WA | WASHINGTON STATE: COMMUNITY-BASED ABSTINENCE UNTIL MARRIAGE PROJECT | 1 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | JAMES N GRENFELL | $ 499,849 |
| 2008 | About Our Kids, Inc. | MO | STRATEGIES FOR ABSTINENCE AND VIRTUE EDUCATION (SAVE) | 2 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | ALICIA HUMES | $ 600,000 |
| 2008 | Abstinence the Better Choice, Inc. | OH | ABSTINENCE THE BETTER CHOICE | 3 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | CHERYL BIDDLE | $ 600,000 |
| 2008 | Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Inc. | AZ | POWER FITNESS ABSTINENCE PROGRAM- TEACHING YOUTH AGES 12 THROUGH 18 THE SOCIAL, PSYCHOLOGI | 3 | Community-Based Abstinence Education (CBAE) | DISCRETIONARY | EVA GODDARD | $ 600,000 |
and $427 mil (see above link “still going strong”) for another code 93.235, plain old “A.E.” Then I searched the word “abstinence” as a keyword in the project title, and got
In these venues, (once under the facuet of grants and publications – alittle easier to do while not being stalked, or in a court case onesself) talking (and publishing) about problems pays more than solving them, in fact, a LOT more. This also provides an incentive to try to keep actual problem-solvers (like those who have observed and been hurt by the system, and been taking names and notes, too) OUT of the talkfests, or decision making process, if they are heard. And, more and more, out of being informed that the decisionmaking process is not where it should be — as to legal matters, in the courts, not the psychologists’ offices.
Solving problems cuts off cash flow. There’s a clear disincentive. Ask someone who’s life, or whose child’s life is at stake (and who has not got a history of perjury in the case file already) and SHE will tell you, safety first, shared parenting second. Child’s right not to suffer abuse or be threatened (let alone the mother’s) or kidnapped supersedes person with history of threatening or abuse’s right to see the child. In re: “healthy marriages,” her /their (if children) right not to be hurt or killed, or traumatized in fear of this happening, or expose her children to being abused, and deal with frequent exchanges with a former batterer (even if the children were not directly battered) supersedes 53 professionals’ need to reconsider this. At what point are professionals to be forced to read these headlines that we read, and sometimes analyze, kind of like sitting through traffic court and watch graphic accident footage after one was caught speeding.
I have been through this. I have been IN a court case, same month, and domestic violence murder going on, same city, and one could not tell from the demeanor on the outside. My case had a history of violence, injury, repeated disregard of laws, and treats to abduct (which in fact had just happened). No matter, we are in la-la-land again. . . . I had a PTSD incident in the courtroom. No matter. . . .
SO, my hope is that the general public will become generally acquainted with how this works, so that if one of THEIR friends is involved (and, of course this presumes that my readers are interested in justice, not perverting it) (which may or may not be wise) – – they can at least see where things went. $$ wise. This year.
Experts are being churned out at an alarming rate. Grants go to this, too. Grants sometimes drive the field of expertise, and very much so in this field of fatherhood and families. I have looked, and can say this. Have you? Could you rebut that assertion with data from the top universities around the country, and colleges? (Not unless several programs disappear fast….)
Do yourself and others a favor — become a LITTLE more expert in this today than you were yesterday.
And show someone else. OK?
One philosophical question I have from time to time is how much of our adult lives (let alone growing up) are spent OUTside any government institutions to start with. I mean, what part of our lives are NOT regulated, measured, examined and evaluated (at our own expense) to drive policiesi (without our informed consent, really) that will further tinker with the dynamics of eat, sleep, breed, marry, divorce, educate (let’s not omit that) and re-educate, regulate, and direct. I have an unfortunate independent streak, and I tend to think there are often better ways to do things. As a woman, I don’t think needlessly repetitive tasks are the natural inheritance of my gender biologically, and although sometimes there’s a comfort in them, there should be other ways to do one thing or another.
Like better, or less wasteful. The benefit is, getting more done. Take for example, deleting religion from public school systems (supposedly) and then trying to re-inject it after criminal behavior, or during the divorce/separation scenarios. Take for example, a system that itself stresses and dismantles families, and then another (equally chaotic and burdensome to the general public) system to put them back together again. Take for example, the talk about “separation of church and state” and then nationally calling upon “faith-based organizations” to, though they are largely tax-exempt, at public expense put them back together again. To WHOM are any of the organizations below accountable, and what demonstration of effectiveness are they showing, or are the “exempt” from that as well as (those that are) from taxes, too?
Anyhow, I give you a single “CFDA” (Category of Federal Domestic Assistance) called “Healthy Marriages Promoting Responsible Fatherhood.” I guess it is assumed that mothers will be healthy without extra coaching and bribing. Or, that if you get a responsible father (i.e., buy one, and this is explained through another grants systems as well, this IS indeed the premise in practice here – – one has to look at the child support system’s role in divorce). . . . or perhaps this acknowledges that for whatever reasons (let’s not mention any OTHER programs this same Of/By/For the people government might have had its hands in), there is a social crisis not just of “fatherlessness” but of “irresponsible fatherhood.”
I can vouch for the one I know — father of my children. He’d rather fight than work any day, which process eventually put me out of work. No matter, the government stepped in, through family court matters, enter mediation, exit civil rights, eventually exit my contact with my offspring (they did spring out of me, physically. I pushed, they sprang. . .. whatever… I was awake for the process and can verify: I had two children a very long time ago). And then out they go, to work their own way through life, lest Dad be humiliated by paying much of his child support arrears, which was partly what the battle was about to start with. I felt that one of us should work, and offered the alternatives of (1) stop messing with me, so I could (since it doesn’t appear you want to) or (2) pay up. Version (1) entailed requesting a restraining order renewal, or 2nd one, or . . . . or . . . . and version (2) required — and I pursued this through the assigned agency – – court-ordered child support should actually be collected before our daughters became adults. However the MAIN conversation was not about what’s good for the children, but who gets to give orders — forever, basically. I categorically disagreed with this philosophy as being anti-Constitutional and anti-civil rights and anti-reasonable. My right to disagree was disagreed with, which makes the situation a GREAT pickings for the family law venue, it LOVES “high-conflict” situations — this draws federal moneys and justifies many professions.
Anyhow, here they are: the helpers, last year (2008):
While not all of these were birthed, or even nurtured, by California Healthy Marriages Coalition (“the coalition of coalitions model.” Sounds kind of like the “war to end all wars,” I don’t know….), they were perhaps started as a gleam in SOMEONE”s eye, having been informed of what’s available from Big Brother, who, on behalf of us all, will make all those ouchies better, soon, soon . . When we “consent” to taxes, it’s good to know what we have consented for them to be distributed to, well, do. For example, ///
CFDA Number = 93086 Fiscal Year = 2008 Recipient: ACTIVE RELATIONSHIPS CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 75205
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0037 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: AS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Recipient ZIP Code: 96799
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0054 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $450,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $450,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: AUBURN UNIVERSITY Recipient ZIP Code: 36849
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0001 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $1,899,487.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,899,487.00 | |||||
Recipient: AVANCE – AUSTIN CHAPTER Recipient ZIP Code: 78704
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0063 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $261,825.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $261,825.00 | |||||
Recipient: AVANCE – CORPUS CHRISTI CHAPTER Recipient ZIP Code: 78415
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0071 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: AVANCE – HOUSTON CHAPTER Recipient ZIP Code: 77092
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0084 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $236,851.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $236,851.00 | |||||
Recipient: AVANCE, INC. – EL PASO Recipient ZIP Code: 79902
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0100 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Alliance for North Texas Healthy & Effective Marriages Recipient ZIP Code: 75246
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0072 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $903,425.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $903,425.00 | |||||
Recipient: Archuleta County Department of Human Services Recipient ZIP Code: 81147
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0055 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $200,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0055 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $200,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Arizona Youth Partnership Recipient ZIP Code: 85741
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0136 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: BARAGA-HOUGHTON-KEWEENAW CHILD DEVELOPMENT BOARD, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 49931
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0018 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 45230
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0100 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0100 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: BEST FRIENDS FOUNDATION Recipient ZIP Code: 20015
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0058 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $500,724.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,724.00 | |||||
Recipient: BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES Recipient ZIP Code: 49501
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0057 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0098 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $499,980.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $999,980.00 | |||||
Recipient: BETTER FAMILY LIFE, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 63108
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0023 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $1,097,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,097,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: BILL WILSON CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 95052
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0096 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $243,469.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $243,469.00 | |||||
Recipient: BOAT PEOPLE S.O.S. INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 22041
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0032 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $545,806.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0038 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $795,806.00 | |||||
Recipient: BOONEVILLE MUNICIPAL SEPERATE SCHOOL DISTRICT Recipient ZIP Code: 38829
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0036 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $532,675.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0036 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $532,675.00 | |||||
Recipient: Brighter Beginnings Recipient ZIP Code: 94601
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0099 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CAMBODIAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 90806
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0065 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $450,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $450,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CATHOLIC CHARITIES Recipient ZIP Code: 67214
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0112 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $530,368.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $530,368.00 | |||||
Recipient: CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE COUNTY, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 92705
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0080 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CECIL COUNTY GOVERNMENT Recipient ZIP Code: 21921
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0018 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CENTER FOR SELF-SUFFICIENCY, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 53211
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0013 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $1,096,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,096,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CENTERFORCE Recipient ZIP Code: 94901
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0004 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $481,554.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $481,554.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHARACTER COUNTS IN MAINE Recipient ZIP Code: 04116
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0122 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHILD & FAMILY RESOURCES INC Recipient ZIP Code: 85716
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0059 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Recipient ZIP Code: 03101
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0077 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $315,830.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $315,830.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHILD ABUSE COUNCIL, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 33609
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0052 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHILD AND FAMILY RESOURCE COUNCIL Recipient ZIP Code: 49503
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0038 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0038 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $1,016,258.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,016,258.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHILD DEVLOPMENT RESOURCES, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 23127
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0043 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $249,999.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $249,999.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHILD, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 78751
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0078 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $511,133.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $511,133.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHILDREN’S FRIEND AND SERVICE Recipient ZIP Code: 02903
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0030 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHILDREN`S AID SOCIETY IN CLEARFIELD COUNTY Recipient ZIP Code: 16830
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0118 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $226,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $226,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHILDREN`S INSTITUTE , INC Recipient ZIP Code: 90005
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0076 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-25-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0076 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0088 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $1,000,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHOANOKE AREA DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 27869
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0001 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $245,296.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $245,296.00 | |||||
Recipient: CHW DBA CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 90015
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0071 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CIRCLE OF PARENTS Recipient ZIP Code: 60611
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0098 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $1,000,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0098 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 06-06-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,000,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CJH Educational Grant Services, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 27620
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0059 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Recipient ZIP Code: 80236
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0085 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $2,000,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $2,000,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY Recipient ZIP Code: 80523
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0028 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $482,687.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0028 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 03-18-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $482,687.00 | |||||
Recipient: COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSN OF COOK COUNTY Recipient ZIP Code: 60604
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0089 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $450,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $450,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 18109
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0033 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $228,603.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $228,603.00 | |||||
Recipient: CONFEDERATED SALISH & KOOTENAI TRIBES Recipient ZIP Code: 59855
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0007 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FN0007 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $149,940.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0006 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $465,494.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $615,434.00 | |||||
Recipient: CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ Recipient ZIP Code: 97380
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0009 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $149,918.00 |
| 2008 | 90FN0009 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $149,918.00 | |||||
Recipient: COOK INLET TRIBAL COUNCIL, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 99508
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0066 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0066 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $418,832.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $418,832.00 | |||||
Recipient: CORNERSTONE OF HOPE CHURCH Recipient ZIP Code: 46221
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0119 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $350,560.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $350,560.00 | |||||
Recipient: COUNCIL ON PREVENTION & EDUCATION SUBSTANCES, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 40204
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0007 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $259,532.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0015 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $499,968.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $759,500.00 | |||||
Recipient: CRECIENDOS UNIDOS/GROWING TOGETHER Recipient ZIP Code: 85006
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0010 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $275,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $275,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CT ST DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Recipient ZIP Code: 06106
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0031 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $1,000,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0031 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,000,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI Recipient ZIP Code: 65211
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0130 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $499,775.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $499,775.00 | |||||
Recipient: CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Recipient ZIP Code: 44113
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0052 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $533,730.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $533,730.00 | |||||
Recipient: California Healthy Marriages Coalition Recipient ZIP Code: 92024
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0104 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $2,400,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $2,400,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Child Find of America, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 12561
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0020 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Community Marriage Builders, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 47714
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0034 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $543,303.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $543,303.00 | |||||
Recipient: Comprehensive Youth Services of Fresno, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 93726
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0053 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0053 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: DC DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Recipient ZIP Code: 20032
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0087 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $2,000,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $2,000,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Denver Indian Family Resource Center Recipient ZIP Code: 80226
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0081 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-26-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0081 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $198,280.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $198,280.00 | |||||
Recipient: Detroit Workforce Development Department Recipient ZIP Code: 48202
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0073 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY Recipient ZIP Code: 27858
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0017 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $525,161.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $525,161.00 | |||||
Recipient: EAST LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY UNION Recipient ZIP Code: 90022
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0056 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $1,100,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,100,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN Recipient ZIP Code: 79930
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0088 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: ELIZABETHS NEW LIFE CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 45405
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0035 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $1,859,692.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,859,692.00 | |||||
Recipient: Employment Opportunity & Training Center of Northeaster Recipient ZIP Code: 18503
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0060 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $225,608.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $225,608.00 | |||||
Recipient: Exchange Club Center for the Prevention of Child Abuse Recipient ZIP Code: 34981
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0025 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $242,822.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $242,822.00 | |||||
Recipient: FAMILY & CHILDREN’S SERVICE, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 74120
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0007 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: FAMILY RESOURCES INC Recipient ZIP Code: 33733
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0132 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $1,100,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0132 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,100,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: FIRST A M E CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 98122
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0032 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: FIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY HEALTHSOURCE Recipient ZIP Code: 87108
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0061 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $300,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $300,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: FIRST THINGS FIRST Recipient ZIP Code: 37405
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0031 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $1,099,953.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,099,953.00 | |||||
Recipient: FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY Recipient ZIP Code: 54520
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0006 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FN0006 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $150,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $150,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: FOREST INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY Recipient ZIP Code: 65807
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0110 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $940,669.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $940,669.00 | |||||
Recipient: FORTUNE SOCIETY, INC (THE) Recipient ZIP Code: 10011
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0017 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: FOUNDATION FOR A GREAT MARRIAGE Recipient ZIP Code: 54115
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0108 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0124 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,100,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: FOUNTAIN OF LIFE INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES Recipient ZIP Code: 33027
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0073 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $438,383.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $438,383.00 | |||||
Recipient: FRIENDSHIP WEST BAPTIST CHURCH Recipient ZIP Code: 75232
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0117 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $542,025.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $542,025.00 | |||||
Recipient: Family Guidance, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 15143
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0103 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $1,510,098.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,510,098.00 | |||||
Recipient: Family Service Center at Houston and Harris County Recipient ZIP Code: 77006
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0082 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $477,539.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $477,539.00 | |||||
Recipient: Family Service, Inc Recipient ZIP Code: 01840
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0087 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $227,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $227,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Family Services of Westchester, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 10573
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0036 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $497,812.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $497,812.00 | |||||
Recipient: Fathers & Families Resources/Research Center Recipient ZIP Code: 46208
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0048 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Florida State University Recipient ZIP Code: 32306
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0022 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $530,009.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $530,009.00 | |||||
Recipient: Future Foundation Recipient ZIP Code: 30344
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0045 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $402,632.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $402,632.00 | |||||
Recipient: GA ST DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Recipient ZIP Code: 30303
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0064 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $225,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $225,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC Recipient ZIP Code: 55104
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0068 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 78753
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0051 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-25-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0051 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $240,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $240,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF PITTSBURGH Recipient ZIP Code: 15202
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0063 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $225,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $225,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: GRANATO COUNSELING SERVICES Recipient ZIP Code: 22182
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0006 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $548,932.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $548,932.00 | |||||
Recipient: GWINNETT CHILDRENS SHELTER Recipient ZIP Code: 30515
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0104 | 2 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: HEALTHY FAMILIES COUNSELING & SUPPORT Recipient ZIP Code: 64119
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0008 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: HEALTHY FAMILY INITIATIVES Recipient ZIP Code: 77074
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0081 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $537,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $537,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: HEALTHY START, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 15208
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0103 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $900,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $900,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: HOOPA VALLEY BUSINESS COUNCIL, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Recipient ZIP Code: 95546
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0001 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-26-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FN0001 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $146,750.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $146,750.00 | |||||
Recipient: Healthy Families/Thriving Communities Collaborative Cou Recipient ZIP Code: 20009
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0049 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: High Country Consulting LLC Recipient ZIP Code: 82001
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0025 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $549,952.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $549,952.00 | |||||
Recipient: IOWA FAMILY POLICY CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 50327
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0126 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Identity, Inc Recipient ZIP Code: 20877
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0090 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Imperial Valley Regional Occupational Program Recipient ZIP Code: 92243
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0075 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 03-18-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0075 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $515,615.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $515,615.00 | |||||
Recipient: Indiana Department of Correction Recipient ZIP Code: 46204
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0019 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $249,896.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0101 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $400,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $649,896.00 | |||||
Recipient: Indiana Youth Institute Recipient ZIP Code: 46204
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0086 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-26-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0086 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $999,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $999,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY Recipient ZIP Code: 72761
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0004 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $544,782.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $544,782.00 | |||||
Recipient: Jewish Family & Children`s Service of Sarasota-Manatee, Recipient ZIP Code: 34237
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0068 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $494,943.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $494,943.00 | |||||
Recipient: Kanawha Institute for Social Research & Action, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 25064
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0012 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $497,514.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $497,514.00 | |||||
Recipient: Kentucky River Foothills Development Council, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 40475
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0125 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $490,680.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $490,680.00 | |||||
Recipient: LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 20007
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0072 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0072 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 04-29-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: LAUGH YOUR WAY AMERICA Recipient ZIP Code: 54481
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0005 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $274,933.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $274,933.00 | |||||
Recipient: LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 45206
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0005 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: LIVE THE LIFE MINISTRIES Recipient ZIP Code: 32317
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0077 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $549,985.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $549,985.00 | |||||
Recipient: LONGVIEW WELNESS CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 75601
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0091 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $1,500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA Recipient ZIP Code: 57105
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0097 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0097 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: MARRIAGE SAVERS OF CLARK COUNTY Recipient ZIP Code: 45503
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0009 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $540,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $540,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: MD ST DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Recipient ZIP Code: 21201
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0091 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $899,991.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0092 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $441,514.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,341,505.00 | |||||
Recipient: MODEL CITIES – EL PASO Recipient ZIP Code: 79935
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0053 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $499,758.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $499,758.00 | |||||
Recipient: MOREHOUSE COLLEGE Recipient ZIP Code: 30314
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0066 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $549,147.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $549,147.00 | |||||
Recipient: Madison Cty Com Health Centers, Inc Recipient ZIP Code: 46015
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0039 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $546,983.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $546,983.00 | |||||
Recipient: Meier Clinics Foundation Recipient ZIP Code: 60187
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0011 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $2,000,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $2,000,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Metro United Methodist Urban Ministry Recipient ZIP Code: 92116
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0016 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $268,349.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $268,349.00 | |||||
Recipient: Minnesota Council on Crime and Justice Recipient ZIP Code: 55406
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0028 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $400,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $400,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Montrose County Health and Human Services Recipient ZIP Code: 81401
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0079 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $249,552.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $249,552.00 | |||||
Recipient: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MARRIAGE ENHANCEMENT Recipient ZIP Code: 85022
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0040 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: NATIONAL FATHERHOOD INITIATIVE Recipient ZIP Code: 20877
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FB0001 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $999,534.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $999,534.00 | |||||
Recipient: NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY Recipient ZIP Code: 10017
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0090 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 06-06-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0090 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $495,285.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $495,285.00 | |||||
Recipient: NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF CONCERNED BLACK MEN, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 20006
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0047 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY REGENTS Recipient ZIP Code: 88003
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0135 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $494,996.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0057 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $218,336.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $713,332.00 | |||||
Recipient: NJ ST DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Recipient ZIP Code: 08625
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0026 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $394,248.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $394,248.00 | |||||
Recipient: NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES Recipient ZIP Code: 97213
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0079 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $1,100,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,100,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: NW Marriage Institute Recipient ZIP Code: 98682
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0041 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $275,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $275,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: New York Youth At Risk, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 10038
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0093 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $225,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $225,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Northwood-Apppold United Methodist Church Recipient ZIP Code: 21218
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0062 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $400,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $400,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Nueva Esperanza Recipient ZIP Code: 19140
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0069 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES Recipient ZIP Code: 48053
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0070 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $200,170.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $200,170.00 | |||||
Recipient: OAKLAND/LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY Recipient ZIP Code: 48056
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0010 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $368,555.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $368,555.00 | |||||
Recipient: OH St Governor`s Office of Faith Based & Comm Initiativ Recipient ZIP Code: 43215
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0109 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $544,140.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $544,140.00 | |||||
Recipient: OK ST DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES Recipient ZIP Code: 73125
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0030 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 03-18-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0030 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $549,791.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $549,791.00 | |||||
Recipient: OPERATION KEEPSAKE Recipient ZIP Code: 44087
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0021 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 03-18-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0021 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $459,419.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $459,419.00 | |||||
Recipient: OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIAL CENTER OF AMERICA, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 19122
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0016 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Osborne Association, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 10455
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0050 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $448,856.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0050 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0056 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $698,856.00 | |||||
Recipient: PAIRS FOUNDATION Recipient ZIP Code: 33332
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0029 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $990,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $990,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: PARENTS PLUS Recipient ZIP Code: 54952
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0113 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $549,629.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0113 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $549,629.00 | |||||
Recipient: PEACE, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 13202
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0107 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $465,937.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $465,937.00 | |||||
Recipient: PEER ASSISTANCE SERVICES, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 80231
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0020 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $525,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $525,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 90003
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0092 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: PITTSBURG PRESCHOOL COORDINATION COUNCIL, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 94565
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0012 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER OF STARK COUNTY Recipient ZIP Code: 44708
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0055 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $535,075.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $535,075.00 | |||||
Recipient: PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL OF WESTMORELAND FAYETTE INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 15601
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0075 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0075 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: PROJECT S.O.S., INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 32224
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0074 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $454,332.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $454,332.00 | |||||
Recipient: PUBLIC STRATEGIES INC Recipient ZIP Code: 73116
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0026 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $1,000,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FH0001 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-29-2008 | $3,250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $4,250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient Recipient: PUERTO RICAN FAMILY INSTITUTE, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 10011
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0013 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $900,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $900,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Parents as Teachers National Center, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 63146
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0080 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Professional Counseling Resources, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 19805
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0046 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE Recipient ZIP Code: 98350
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0002 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $150,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FN0002 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-26-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $150,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: RECAPTURING THE VISION, INTERNATIONAL, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 33157
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0043 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: RED CLIFF TRIBE Recipient ZIP Code: 54814
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0003 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FN0003 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $146,672.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $146,672.00 | |||||
Recipient: REGION II COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY Recipient ZIP Code: 49204
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0078 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $203,854.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $203,854.00 | |||||
Recipient: REGION XIX EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 79925
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0042 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $900,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $900,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: RIDGE Project, Inc Recipient ZIP Code: 43527
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0044 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 06-06-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0044 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $412,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $412,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: ROCKDALE HOSPITAL & HEALTH SYSTEM Recipient ZIP Code: 30012
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0014 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $455,510.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $455,510.00 | |||||
Recipient: ROSALIE MANOR Recipient ZIP Code: 53210
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0037 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Read To Me International Foundation Recipient ZIP Code: 96815
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0062 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Relationship Research Foundation, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 92612
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0058 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Resource, Inc Recipient ZIP Code: 55404
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0022 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Resources for Children`s Health Recipient ZIP Code: 19102
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0040 | 2 | ACF | 2 | 09-26-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0040 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER Recipient ZIP Code: 87102
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0067 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $549,961.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $549,961.00 | |||||
Recipient: SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTERS Recipient ZIP Code: 97212
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0121 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $462,919.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $462,919.00 | |||||
Recipient: SOUTH PUGET INTERTRIBAL PLANNING AGENCY Recipient ZIP Code: 98584
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0004 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $150,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FN0004 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $150,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY AND A&M COLLEGE Recipient ZIP Code: 70813
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0027 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $249,548.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $249,548.00 | |||||
Recipient: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 78704
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0034 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $460,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $460,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: ST MARY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY Recipient ZIP Code: 70538
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0094 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $230,092.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $230,092.00 | |||||
Recipient: SUNY, STONY BROOK Recipient ZIP Code: 11794
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0131 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0131 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $549,910.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $549,910.00 | |||||
Recipient: SUQUAMISH & KLALLAM HEALTH PLAN Recipient ZIP Code: 98346
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0010 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $150,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $150,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Sacramento Healthy Marriage Project Recipient ZIP Code: 95821
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0015 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-26-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0015 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $549,256.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $549,256.00 | |||||
Recipient: Scholarship and Guidance Association Recipient ZIP Code: 60603
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0042 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $483,333.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0137 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $242,770.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $726,103.00 | |||||
Recipient: Shalom Task Force Recipient ZIP Code: 10274
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0106 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $480,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $480,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: Shelby County Division of Corrections Recipient ZIP Code: 38103
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0067 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0067 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0095 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $485,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $985,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: South Coast Business Employment Corporation Recipient ZIP Code: 97420
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0023 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $400,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $400,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: St. Louis Healthy Marriage Coalition Recipient ZIP Code: 63103
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0133 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $1,099,882.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0133 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 06-06-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,099,882.00 | |||||
Recipient: TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE Recipient ZIP Code: 99701
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0005 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $146,016.00 |
| 2008 | 90FN0005 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-14-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $146,016.00 | |||||
Recipient: TEEN-AID, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 99207
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0102 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $495,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $495,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: TEXAS ARMS OF LOVE (dba, PEOPLE OF PRINCIPLE) Recipient ZIP Code: 79761
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0102 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $425,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $425,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: TEXAS HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION Recipient ZIP Code: 78711
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0019 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $900,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $900,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY-SAN MARCOS Recipient ZIP Code: 78666
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0128 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $497,641.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $497,641.00 | |||||
Recipient: THE DIBBLE FUND FOR MARRIAGE EDUCATION Recipient ZIP Code:
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0024 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: THE FAMILY HEALTH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 20706
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0084 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $500,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $500,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: THE HIVE CREATIVE GROUP Recipient ZIP Code: 36303
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0093 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN, INC` Recipient ZIP Code: 06105
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0045 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: THERAPY HELP, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 80220
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0123 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: TLINGIT & HAIDA TRIBES CENTRAL COUNCIL Recipient ZIP Code: 99801
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FN0008 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $150,000.00 |
| 2008 | 90FN0008 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 09-26-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $150,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: TRINITY HEALTH-ST JOSEPH MERCY-OAKLAND Recipient ZIP Code: 48341
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0099 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-17-2008 | $545,730.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $545,730.00 | |||||
Recipient: The Family Life Line, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 87124
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0115 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $495,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $495,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: The South Carolina Center for Fathers and Families Recipient ZIP Code: 29204
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0021 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $499,456.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $499,456.00 | |||||
Recipient: Trinity Church, Inc Recipient ZIP Code: 33168
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0060 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $550,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $550,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 49201
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0138 | 2 | ACF | 0 | 02-11-2008 | $1,099,461.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,099,461.00 | |||||
Recipient: UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL ASSOCIATES Recipient ZIP Code: 10467
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0086 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $495,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $495,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES Recipient ZIP Code: 72205
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0041 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 08-26-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0041 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA Recipient ZIP Code: 32826
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0003 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $273,293.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $273,293.00 | |||||
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE RESEARCH FOUNDATION Recipient ZIP Code: 40292
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0002 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $542,920.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $542,920.00 | |||||
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL Recipient ZIP Code: 27599
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0094 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 06-06-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FE0094 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $530,482.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $530,482.00 | |||||
Recipient: UPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 51342
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0082 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $225,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $225,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Recipient ZIP Code: 84322
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0129 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $417,324.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $417,324.00 | |||||
Recipient: Urban Ventures Leadership Foundation Recipient ZIP Code: 55408
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0033 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION Recipient ZIP Code: 05401
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0029 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 07-31-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0029 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC Recipient ZIP Code: 92084
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0024 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: WAIT Training Recipient ZIP Code: 80111
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0051 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-26-2008 | $1,010,330.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $1,010,330.00 | |||||
Recipient: WAYNE METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY Recipient ZIP Code: 48192
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0008 | 2 | ACF | 2 | 06-06-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0008 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: WELD COUNTY RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Recipient ZIP Code: 80632
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0134 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $974,358.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $974,358.00 | |||||
Recipient: WOMEN’S OPPORTUNITY AND RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, INC. Recipient ZIP Code: 59802
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0054 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $212,399.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0054 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 06-06-2008 | $0.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $212,399.00 | |||||
Recipient: WSOS COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 43420
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0011 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $249,492.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $249,492.00 | |||||
Recipient: YORK COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CORPORATION Recipient ZIP Code: 04073
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0014 | 2 | ACF | 1 | 06-06-2008 | $0.00 |
| 2008 | 90FR0014 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $245,333.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $245,333.00 | |||||
Recipient: YOUTH DEVELOPMENT, INC Recipient ZIP Code: 87105
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0047 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-25-2008 | $900,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $900,000.00 | |||||
Recipient: YWCA OF SAN ANTONIO Recipient ZIP Code: 78205
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FE0127 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $529,585.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $529,585.00 | |||||
Recipient: YouthLaunch, Inc. Recipient ZIP Code: 78731
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0069 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-14-2008 | $243,315.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $243,315.00 | |||||
Recipient: enFAMILIA, Inc Recipient ZIP Code: 33033
| FY | Award Number | Budget Year of Support | Agency | Award Code | Action Issue Date | Amount This Action |
| 2008 | 90FR0039 | 3 | ACF | 0 | 09-22-2008 | $250,000.00 |
| Award Subtotal: | $250,000.00 | |||||
| Total of all awards: | $118,310,126.00 |
FOR OUR NEXT “CLASS” WE WILL LEARN HOW TO EXAMINE ONE OR TWO OF THESE GRANT RECIPIENTS. ///
Let's Get Honest! Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History 
Finding a Firm Place to Stand, Prying Loose Violence and Abuse
leave a comment »
http://www.sddvc.com/pdf/2008finalwithsignatures.pdf
This is out of San Diego: Law Enforcement Protocol:
“The California State Legislature has declared that:
(1) “[S]pousal abusers present a clear and present danger to the mental and
physical well-being of the citizens of the State of California.” (California
Penal Code section 273.8.)
(2) “A substantial body of research demonstrates a strong connection between
Domestic Violence and Child Abuse.” (California Penal Code section
13732(a)).
“The decision to prosecute a batterer lies within the discretion of the District Attorney
and the City Attorney. Victims do not “press charges”, “drop charges” or
“prosecute” their batterers.
Ay, there’s the rub. So, they go get civil or family court restraining orders, which are less respected. Or, they go to their family, friends, faith institution, etc. Then they find out what their: family, friends, faith institution, etc., are about. And the years go by, the kids grow up. . . . . .
Ay, there’s the rub.** So, they go get civil or family court restraining orders, which are less respected. Or, they go to their family, friends, faith institution, etc. Then they find out what their: family, friends, faith institution, etc., are about. And the years go by, the kids grow up. . . . . .
3. How it feels (reflect, describe, (OK, complain)):
2. Paradigms, Tools to Pry Loose, Places to stand and the Lever of Language
2A. Dude, it’s about the money. That’s the paradigm to understand in understanding the family law system. This means child support and federal grants have to be examined as well, as well as job referrals, and private conflicts of interest among professionals on the same case.
2B. Anything that is obviously, over time, a moot point, then this is not the reigning paradigm, even if you wish it were or thought it should be. Another one is actually primary. is the goal to change the system or win your case
(and which first? Because one timeframe is shorter than the other. This is where many organizations, with a cash flow, employees, business offices, and a little momentum, have a different world view than mothers, who have fast-growing children and fast-changing situations personally.)
2C. GENGHIS KHAN: Who was he? Who was his army? How did they conquer so much territory?
“The Devil’s Horsemen.”
The conquering Mongols were most feared by their victims as “the devil’s horsemen” who carried everything before them and left nothing behind.” (Genghis Khan & the Mongol Conquests, 1190-1400 [page 8]) The “invincible” Mongolian Army faced little opposition, physical, nor mental, until they began campaigning in areas outside of the steppe regions.
. . .
The first problem that the Mongols and their current leader Genghis Khan overcame, was the complex planning needed in order for them to defeat their more organized, and better equipped foes. “New military technologies therefore had to be learned and relearned
. . .
At Xiangyang in 1272 Khubilai Khan was forced to send to his kinsmen in the west for counterweight trebuchets, the latest thing in siege catapults, to breach its walls.” (Genghis Khan & the Mongol Conquests, 1190-1400 [page 9]) The need for a more strategic way of fighting allowed the Mongols to evolve. Without that evolution, the Mongols would never have been able to stand up to their well-trained, well-organized enemies. This extraordinary skill to adapt, and thus survive, helped the Mongols not only in the physical aspects of warfare, but the psychological. Becoming an enemy that has the ability to adapt and thrive in any situation and on any terrain earned the Mongols the title of “the Devil’s horsemen”.
The Mongols
by antonio2godoy</a>” href=”http://socyberty.com/author/antonio2godoy/” mce_href=”http://socyberty.com/author/antonio2godoy/”>antonio2godoy in History, March 29, 2009
This is an a little description of what the Mongols were like under Genghis Khan’s rule.
Another place to stand to move the world.
When I finally Decided to Leave / Moot Points.
The engraving is from
Mechanic’s Magazine
(cover of bound Volume II,
Knight & Lacey, London, 1824)
Courtesy of the
Annenberg Rare Book &
Manuscript Library
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, USA
“Give me somewhere to stand and I will move the earth.”
Greek Mathematical Works, by Ivor Thomas, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1941, vol. II, p. 35
First, analyze the situation accurately. Accurately, the chances of a court order being respected in my situation, or someone doing something about this (even if officially asked to in a motion) are nil. Most times, while I went about this, a guerrilla attack (and clearly purposed as such) came from another “gang” member offended by the principle that my motions should disrupt their equilibrium, the equilibrium of the self-anointed, self-evaluated, self-selected, with zero accountability. Point 1. The lever must be long enough and not break under the weight. The longer the lever, the less weight need be applied.
Where to stand? I say, look at the finances. Do not approach a crook and talk about ethics! Do not talk about someone drunk with power and talk about the immorality of using their power! Talk in terms they understand, not your own paradigm! How do you think we got into this place to start with?
WOMEN NEED A PLACE TO STAND IN THIS LIFE. WE NEED TO MAKE AND DEFINE THIS PLACE IN FAIR NEGOTIATION WITH MEN. WHEN CHILDREN ARE INVOLVED, THIS FAIR-NESS IS EVEN MORE CRUCIAL.
YOUNG WOMEN NEED TO BE TOLD SOME HARD TRUTHS — THERE ARE MEN THAT WILL GO FOR YOU TO PRODUCE A BABY (THIS CAN ALSO BE TRUE OF THE YOUNG MEN). PARTICULARLY IF YOU ARE YOUNG AND FERTILE, AND HE’S ON A REBOUND. OR IF YOU ARE OLDER AND AFFLUENT, IN THIS CASE, YOUR HOME IS NEEDED FOR A NEW HOME FOR HIS KIDS FROM THE FIRST WOMAN. OR, ALTERNATELY, YOUR CHILDREN FROM A FORMER MARRIAGE MIGHT DO, TOO.
i feel this is just as applicable to professional women in their late mid to late 30s/early 40s as others. Until our society starts VALUING women as people and as women (including mothers!), the whole climate isn’t healthy enough all round, and people need to know in the river of life where the rapids and sharp rocks lie. This differs by culture and community, and it AIN’T up to Washington D.C. and a bunch of economists and human behavioralists drawing research from shelters, prisons, and head start outfits, to set the standards! (OR, churches, dammit! The average church these days, I’ll speak for Protestant, is basically a cult. In every sense of the word. Marketing spirituality and social connection and good feelings, for a price, allegiance. . . . And money, and services).
So now we get too MOOT POINT. This post is just about a moot point today: I’ll revisit it in a while.
Idiom: Moot Point
Category: Law
View examples in Google: Moot point
Wiktionary:
Moot point (http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/moot-point.html)
Meaning
An irrelevant argument.
Origin
Some may disagree with the above meaning and argue that it means ‘a point open to debate‘, rather than ‘a point not worth debating‘. That former meaning was certainly the correct one when the term was first coined, but that’s going back a while.
Laurence Humphrey, the president of Magdalen College, Oxford, wrote Nobles or of Nobilitye, a manual of behaviour for the English nobility, in 1563. In that he wrote:
In medieval England, moots, or meets, were assemblies or councils where points of government were debated. The country was split into juridicial areas called hundreds and administered via assemblies known as hundredmotes. The form of government has long since vanished but the term hundred is still in use as the name of the procedural device which gives consent to MPs’ resignation. British MPs aren’t allowed to resign and, when members wish to leave Parliament they may do so by applying for the notional position of Crown Steward and Bailiff of the Chiltern Hundreds. In such assemblies points which were put up for discussion were said to be mooted.
Here is one WHOPPER of a “moot point.” I used to think that bringing this one up would make a difference. I was so glad to see this written here. But, it’s a moot point — in practice no one actually believes this. If they did, too many programs would have to shut down.
Let’s go over this again:
http://www.sddvc.com/pdf/2008finalwithsignatures.pdf
This is out of San Diego: Law Enforcement Protocol:
“The California State Legislature has declared that:
(1) “[S]pousal abusers present a clear and present danger to the mental and
physical well-being of the citizens of the State of California.” (California
Penal Code section 273.8.)
(2) “A substantial body of research demonstrates a strong connection between
Domestic Violence and Child Abuse.” (California Penal Code section
13732(a)). ”
Now, same document:
“The decision to prosecute a batterer lies within the discretion of the District Attorney
and the City Attorney. Victims do not “press charges”, “drop charges” or
“prosecute” their batterers.
So, those offices bear looking at. When they don’t prosecute for any of those (or child-stealing, case in point).
Ay, there’s the rub.** So, they go get civil or family court restraining orders, which are less respected. Or, they go to their family, friends, faith institution, etc. Then they find out what their: family, friends, faith institution, etc., are about. And the years go by, the kids grow up. . . . . .
SHARE THIS POST on...
Written by Let's Get Honest|She Looks It Up
September 8, 2009 at 4:07 PM
Posted in Cast, Script, Characters, Scenery, Stage Directions, Domestic Violence vs Family Law, History of Family Court, Vocabulary Lessons
Tagged with Clear and Present Danger, domestic violence, family annihilation, family law, HHS-TAGGS grants database, Intimate partner violence, OCSE (Office of Child Support Enforcement), social commentary, trauma, U.S. Govt $$ hard @ work.., Victims do not prosecute