Reader Warning:
Format of these posts — I am simply researching (looking up) as I go, and posting what I find, with commentary. There is a narrative. If you want the list of the grants in question, scroll down to the bottom.
Topics in this post include:
- Criticism of TAGGS database & data entry of these grants. (misspelling of project names, in particular)
- Simple instructions, however, on how to run basic reports from it.
- Proof that USASpending.gov & TAGGS do not match, USASPending either omits real grants, or HHS fabricates (over-reports). Any thorough look would require using both of them, checking the nonprofit registrations (on a nationwide databse if possible), checking state corporate & nonprofit registration, and comparing with what their websites say, particularly about the history of the company. Lastly, who is on the board of directors (and what else have those people been up to / associations), and if you actually look at the 990, this tells where they are reporting the money flow. In a very real sense, unless we have looked at a nonprofit’s 990 form, we really don’t know them.
- I looked up one particular “Fatherpood” grant, and the umbrella D.C. organization that goes with it.
- Extensive section discussing some leading personalities in the socialization of America: Organizations Children’s Defense Fund (Marian Wright Edelman), “Stand For Children Leadership Center” (DC nonprofit) including its leader Jonah Edelson, background of one corporation (Bright Horizons) and one or tow individuals (Jill Iscol) on the board, and Geoffrey Canada/Ron Mincy (who have worked on similar projects).
- The background organization, really, behind HEAD START (Bank Street College of Education, basically). This came up when looking at Jill Iscol’s background.
- I point out, as the history shows, that if one is going to promote theories about how children learn and “early childhood education,” one needs children to test them on — this is one reason it’s so common to find a child care center near a “family studies institute” or (Cornell) “Family Development Center” — at the university level.
- Historic figures behind this include Patty Smith Hall (unmarried, not a parent, and apparently not heterosexual); Lucy Sprague Mitchell, Harriet Johnston (I may be misspelling names — they are below), and others characterized as a “bunch of intellectuals” out of Greenwich Village.
- What I saw — and have been seeing for months/years in this process – is that the desire to control the training of young children, is indeed the desire to control and reform the world, and should be dealt with accordingly by people with enough humility and perspective to understand, this is not appropriate for anyone. Particularly in the U.S..
What I would call some very unique, if very questionable, studies being done (now, through HHS system) on children in attempts to stop child abuse — and/or predict their “socio/emotional outcomes.” Quite frankly, I’ve had enough of this; it’s not all it’s cracked up to be.
And finally, at the bottom, is another printout of a Grant Series. The post is raggedy and scraggledy (with long incomplete expressive sentences, sometimes missing a predicate) — but I am going to post it anyhow. I believe the information is interesting enough for someone of similar interests to grab part of it, and do his/her own lookups.
Personally, I believe that untold numbers of the HHS grantees are simply front operations, that enable money laundering. I say this because they cannot maintain a corporate name very long, have multiple people, for example, on a central (umbrella or founding) organization board — and then these people form splitoff nonprofits (sometimes also getting HHS grants) — under their names, and the various groups refer to each other (as if independence existed) to further boost their image. That, FYI, is an AFCC pattern through and through. One of the chief groups that led me to come right out and say this was the “California Healthy Marriage Coalition” (CHMC) — which hails to San Diego County, Southern California + Sacramento Healthy Marriage Project?” – -hailing to Sacramento, Northern California. These guys are absolutely unbelievable. Check the street addresses and personnel. San Diego & Sacramento (State Capitol). Watch out!
Over time, the chronological development of the groups — and their ever-changing rhetoric (exhibiting planning, as one phrase gets discredited, another is in the wings and in the works. Right now, it’s “relationship skills” near the forefront, but Parenting Coordination appears to have been legislated in many states, which is bad news for good Moms, for sure.
OK, HERE WE GO:
The structure & contents of site “TAGGS” is a real window into what US policymakers think of the commoners, i.e., those who work for hourly wages with taxes deducted upfront to fund social science research — much of it “discretionary” “demonstration” and allegedly “new” grants. Another commentary on what someone thinks of the “commoners” is how careless, incomplete, and inaccurate — that’s not including the intentionally obscure and deceptive facets also. It is an appearance only of “transparency.”
The 2011 Total of CFDA 93.086 (Healthy Marriage/Responsible Fatherhood) grants, per this site (run just now) is:
I have been running searches (of all types) on this website for most of the time I’ve blogged here. It should be telling details of how public money, allocated to the Health and Human Services Department, is being spent, and on whom. So many of the marriage, fatherhood, AND “domestic violence prevention” organizations, when closely examined, are not even legitimate — their incorporation status is lost in one state, and they simply head off to another, networking through the usual court-related associations set up years ago.
I believe a general overview of specific grant series paint a picture, even if one doesn’t study all the details (although groups local to you, I’d want to!). For example, look at the project name of this first sample (the rest, below):
(would display with the navy-blue header row, except I pasted, rather than “dragged” the info onto the blog. Same source as above).
Recipient: *FAMILY SERVICE OF WESTCHESTER
Recipient ZIP Code: 10606-3003
WTHell is a “Fathers Court”? Is there a Corresponding Mothers’ Court? Should we then eliminate the concept of “Children’s Court”? (that won’t happen — the word “children” in almost any combo is a huge grants draw….). Can we separate childless couples into a “Marriage Court”? And, if so, why should all the unmarried and childless, (or they raised kids without going through family court hell, and are continuing to contribute to society, while this system allows, almost indiscriminately, group after religious or simply elitist group, to skim the profits, collected via the IRS and supplemented by large corporations or foundations (Ford, Annie E. Casey, etc.)?
FK sounds like a new series. For the record, here’s the nationwide total of the “FK” series a quick TAGGS run for 2011 only: to run this (takes seconds, only) is easy:
- Go to http:///TAGGS.hhs.gov
- Click on the DropDown menu tab, “Search by AWARD keyword or number.” It should look about like this, or at least have these 3 fields:
- Select year – -and FYI, you can also type in a partial “Award#” — I do this all the time to get a feel what that grant series is. In this case, I chose Award # “90FK” and year 2011, then hit “search.” Searching by Award “keyword,” even if you typed in simply “Fatherhood” would miss a number of $1 million+ grants, simply because (this seems an ingrained TAGGS data entry “tic” it’s so commonplace…..) the word “fatherhood” is often misspelled on this database!
SEE?
Notice, both of those are $1.5 million grants, and from groups that have been around for a while. Whoever, the 2nd one above (DC zip code) is, this is their total grants since 2006:
Showing: 1 – 6 of 6 Award Actions
They got $500K per year (2006,7,8,9,10) on a “90FR” grant, and this year, switched to receiving a “90FK,” with triple the amount and a fancier project name — misspelled. Let’s hope that whoever is entering these names isn’t also entering information that involves a decimal point on accounts receivable or payable for our government. More likely, someone is being pressured (too much) to help cover up the abuse & mis-use of these funds, by making them harder to track by names. (recall that the last series of 90FM names had ALL the Principal Investigator last names omitted (the “FN” field was doubled). Either this or there is NO proofreading or fact-checking in the Taggs submission process whatsoever — not too encouraging, considering the amount of money they are reporting on.
I’ve done data entry (and AR/AP before) and had I messed up that many words (and obviously failed to spellcheck, or had spellcheck function consistently set to “off”), I’d lose my job. As you can see, I haven’t been working in government. (Disclaimer: this blog is volunteer, and I do not spellcheck, or copyedit and have a post explaining this, and why).
If I took this number over to USASPENDING.gov, no doubt we’d get a different total, even if selecting grants only & HHS only. I do not know what result would com if (this would be another step) I went to Washington DC and checked their incorporation, or NCCSDataweb.org and looked for a nonprofit filing. (not today…)
Oh well — since you insisted — here’s the data:
http://dccollaboratives.org/
Read the description: This is a 501(c)3 of 501(c)3’s. . .
Our Mission
The Healthy Families/Thriving Communities Collaborative Council (HFTCCC) brings together community leaders to create and sustain a District-wide network that empowers families and communities to improve their quality of life.
Perhaps it would be wiser to figure out what “disempowered” families, including mothers, — confront it, and stop it. As Washington, D.C. is one of the most powerful places on the planet (not including the centers of Finance…), in one of the formerly? most powerful countries in the world, one wonders how, when, and why it became filled with such disempowered families. Apparently there was a power grab somewhere along the way. Address that — and families will be more empowered.
{{Judging by the HHS funding, the word “families” means “fathers” which is common usage among grantees.]]
We are a 501(c) (3), organization that provides leadership, advocacy, resource development, technical assistance, and training to the six Healthy Families/Thriving Communities Collaboratives. The six Collaboratives are independent nonprofit organizations that operate across the District of Columbia in communities facing intergenerational economic, social and safety challenges. Since the mid 1990s, the Collaboratives supported by the Collaborative Council, have joined with community members – residents and institutions alike – to re-weave the social fabric. Each community solution is tailored to the needs of the community with Collaboratives and their partners offering a range of unique services and supports to children and families.
If they are being trained — and the purpose of most HM/FR grantees can be summarized in one word: TRAINING — then they are not independent, but just have the appearance of it, any more than your local county child support agency is independent of the others, rather than connected also at the HHS/ACF/OCSE level and by welfare law….
[[After describing a forum to report results, based on surveys…]]
Attending the forum to respond to the data presented were Beatriz “BB” Otero, deputy mayor for Health and Human services; Deborah-Portia Usher, interim director,Child and Family Services Agency; HyeSook Chung, executive director, DC Action for Children; and Elizabeth Black, senior associate, Center for the Study of Social Policy.
Deputy Mayor Otero said that city agencies and community-based organizations must do more to support at-risk families.
The street address exactly matches the “DC Children’s Trust,” and, for example, a Parent Training center for adoptive & foster parents.
1112 11th Street, NW
Suite B
Washington, DC 20001
The DC Children’s Trust’s mission is (per its Facebook summary).
he mission of the D.C. Children’s Trust Fund is to foster the well-being of the District’s children and their families by leading the way toward the prevention of child abuse and neglect. The Trust serves as a catalyst for prevention efforts by leveraging private and governmental resources, providing resources and technical assistance to community-based organizations, schools, and churches to strengthen families and thereby reduce the risk of child abuse. A major objective of the Trust is to define and develop standards for primary prevention for the D.C. community at-large.
Clearly, the standards emphasize getting promoting responsible fatherhood grants in order to teach groups how to prevent child abuse (cf. Footloose in Tuscaloosa post). This, FYI, is national policy, OCSE /Welfare policy and at some level, could be called HHS policy. In order to prevent abuse of children by fathers & mothers, train fathers and get them back in the homes. Period. Children’s Trusts help direct funding, they are often public/private partnerships. Under “products” ( a long list) I see “Parents Anonymous Grant,” which I recently blogged, right? (cf. “Circle of Parents” is basically a NFI mouthpiece; the work together).
At the same address is:
NOTICE — 1996 = established right after welfare reform made father-promotion grants available, block grants to the states (and presumably DC) to enable diversionary programs as a long-term solution to end poverty and child abuse.
History
East River Family Strengthening Collaborative, Inc. (ERFSC) was established in 1996 and is one of seven neighborhood based collaboratives in the District of Columbia participating in the Healthy Families Thriving Communities Collaborative Council. This program, spearheaded by the DC Child and Family Services Agency, received its planning grant in April 1996 and its implementation grant in August 1997.
ERFSC is also an expansion of the Child Welfare Working Group of the Rebuilding Communities Initiative (RCI) spearheaded by Marshall Heights Community Development Organization. RCI embodies a system reform agenda for which the central goal is the improved and sustained well being of children and families.
. . . as defined by the same groups….
ERFSC has operated as an independent stand-alone organization since October 2000. This organization evolved out of a seven (7) year old Child Welfare Initiative funded by the District of Columbia’s Child and Family Services Agency and the Annie E. Casey Foundation in 1996. For the first five (5) years of its inception, the Marshall Heights Community Development Organization, Inc. (MHCDO) provided fiscal agency responsibilities. In October 2000, ERFSC received its 501©3 to serve as an independent non-profit agency.
Where are the tax returns for the years 2002, 2003-4-5-6 & 7?
Your query: ( Organization Name: east river family strengthening collaborative , State:“DC” , Zip: None Chosen , EIN: None Chosen , Fiscal Year: None Chosen )
4 matching documents retrieved (4 displayed)
{There are many directors, and about 3 of them (per 2009 Tax Return) are working 40 hours a week — for nothing. Only Mae H. Best is paid ($115K), so here is her bio — notice the Youngstown, OH connection:
Contact ERFSC’s LEAD STAFF:
Mae H. Best, LICSW (Executive Director)
Mae H. Best has served as the Executive Director of ERFSC since June 2001.
(Website says they became a separate 501(c)3 in 2000. Looks like one of the first things that happened thereafter (or the Foundation 990 Finder is wrong) was to not file tax returns for several years. I will check another source, and retract statement if they show such returns).
Under her leadership the organization has grown from a budget of a little
over $700,000 to $4,000,000 which includes contracts with city government agencies
as well as foundations. Mae’s previous work has included stints with Child and Family
Services Agency as Director of Resource Development and Director of Adoptions;
Director of Homes for Black Children at Family and Child Services Agency and Project
Coordinator with the National Council on Adoptable Children. Prior to relocating to Washington DC,
she worked for the Mahoning County Children Services Board in Youngstown, Ohio.
Mae received her Master’s in Social Work from the University of Illinois and her Bachelor’s
in Social Services from North Carolina A&T State University. Mae has one son who is
a Special Education Teacher in the District of Columbia and an R&B artist.
This article (scroll down) has a paragraph identifying this neighborhood nonprofit as having grabbed some of the “Promise Neighborhoods” funding, which is described, and modeled ? after Geoffrey Canada’s “The Harlem Zone.”
January 9, 2011 (published in ‘Circle of Philanthropy,’ by By Suzanne Perry)
Against Tough Odds, a ‘Promise Neighborhood’ in D.C. Gears Up
The Parkside-Kenilworth neighborhood is just a few miles from Capitol Hill, though it’s unlikely that many members of Congress have ever visited there.
The neighborhood, tucked away in a far eastern corner of Washington, bears all of the hallmarks of poverty: high rates of crime, teenage pregnancy,single mothers, and unemployment—and low-performing schools.
To be consistent, this should have been labeled “father absence” which is a cause of poverty, right. SIngle mothers in different context might not be so poor; however when stuck in a poor enclave right next to Congressional Districts, than something ain’t right, obviously. The only gender mentioned in association with this list of bad things is female, but I’m sure residents are both female and male….
But community leaders have embarked on an ambitious project to turn the area around—with help from money that members of Congress approved last year. Led by Irasema Salcido, an educator who was dismayed at the obstacles that hindered her students from learning, the project snatched one of 21 grants offered by a new federal program called Promise Neighborhoods.
. . .
The grants, totaling $10-million, went to communities that outlined plans for providing an array of academic, medical, and social services for children in troubled neighborhoods from “cradle to college”—a model that was pioneered by Geoffrey Canada, founder of Harlem Children’s Zone, in New York.
Mr. Canada’s approach has won widespread acclaim, most recently in the documentary film “Waiting for Superman,” and strong support from President Obama, who proposed the Promise Neighborhoods program while still on the campaign trail.
This should be a separate post. Mr. Canada — clearly an astounding person —
Geoffrey Canada (born January 13, 1952) is an African American social activist and educator. Since 1990, Canada has been president and CEO of the Harlem Children’s Zone inHarlem, New York, an organization which states its goal is to increase high school and college graduation rates among students in Harlem.[1] He is a member of the Board of Directors of The After-School Corporation, a nonprofit organization which describes its aim as to expand educational opportunities for all students.
His parents divorced when he was about 4, with 2 older and 1 younger sibling, and apparently didn’t support the family. Nevertheless, being sent away to live with his Long Island grandparents in his teens, he went on to be recruited by (win an award from) the Fraternal Order of Masons, and get degrees in Psychology, Sociology, and finally Education, the last from Harvard. Thank you Mom — I guess you did well! should be a comment, but this is not heard in the publications, is it?
Born and raised by a divorced mother in the South Bronx, he is the third of four sons of McAlister and Mary Canada. His parents’ marriage ended in 1956, after which his father played little part in the children’s life and did not contribute financial support.[2] Canada was raised among the “abandoned houses, crime, violence and an all-encompassing sense of chaos and disorder,” and understood his life’s calling at an early age. His mother sent him to live with her parents in Freeport, Long Island, when Canada was in his mid-teens.[2] He attended Wyandanch Memorial High School, and won a scholarship from the Fraternal Order of Masons during his senior year of high school.[2] He holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in psychology and sociology from Bowdoin College, where he graduated in 1974, and a Master’s degree in education from the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Canada has an honorary degree from Princeton University.[3]
Role with the Harlem Children’s Zone
Starting as president in 1990, Canada started working with the Rheedlen Centers for Children and Families which evolved into the Harlem Children’s Zone. Unsatisfied with the scope of Rheedlen, Canada transformed the organization’s makeup in the late 1990s into a center that would actively follow the academic careers of youths {{both genders??..}} in a 24-block area of Harlem. Due to the success of the new model, the area has grown to 97 blocks.
(There’s a reason I took time to mention Geoffrey Canada, The Harlem Zone, which relates to another major nonprofit run by the son of Marian Wright Edelman of the Children’s Defense Fund, and which (one can see the trend here) is promoting charter schools hard, and has begun to take some serious flack in a few states by program personnel ramrodding their agenda through, over the voices of local, state-based parents and volunteer workers. ). Like Ronald D. Mincy (also of Harvard, but in Economics) here is another prominent African-American male leader whose mother MIGHT have done something right (judging by the degrees, and their current position) — and yet their work — which is helping change society — shows an emotional obsession with the absent father, and an inability to properly credit a mother, or recognize that THEIR OWN SUCCESS comes through struggles but with a single mother. In effect, their work — supported by major foundations which I’ll hazard a guess are not run by any minority whatsoever — (like the Ford Foundation) — has now scapegoated single mothers across the country, and made it not only almost impossible, but also socially unacceptable — and politicially incorrect — to succeed. Children are being REMOVED from such mothers apparently by the thousands, even when after removal, disaster (death in foster care, or in a court-ordered exchange with the noncustodial parent) often happens.
Mixing truths, but framing them according to their personal childhood experience, and buoyed up by federal funding and corporate funding — society is indeed being transformed — and what i see is the continued buoying up of the public education which has failed students according to their color, caste, and neighborhoods (which the unequal system will continue to do, although it also fails those in prosperous suburban enclaves in different ways). We have become (not are becoming) a federally centralized country with a parallel set of government-by-administrative-agency. This is essentially socialism and foreign to the purpose of the country and the Constitution, to which Presidents must swear an oath to uphold and defend, but don’t. Any “Cradle to grave” solution focusing on TRAINING — is indeed socialism, and contrary to LIFE (which has more variety, and also a greater variety of personal goals), LIBERTY (consider the economic angle) and PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. People fork this over when they fail to protest, or even investigate where their own money is being spent. I did this also — while working FT, raising children, and seeking to keep all of us alive from the imminent danger of, their father. It took YEARS to get out (after deciding to get out) and then only to face systems putting us back in — and come to find they are based on childhood longing for the father, positioned in Harvard, MIT (see next) and other high places.
Geoffrey Canada, father-absent resounding success & Harvard (Education) grad, created and expanded The Harlem Zone, and Ronald D. Mincy, father-absent, father-obsessed, Ph.D.’d Harvard (economics) Grad, and director of — well, Logo Below — of whom this naturally reminded me– apparently conducted a vertical study of the Harlem Zone:
Dr. Mincy is an advisory board member for the National Poverty Center; the African American Healthy Marriage Initiative; Transition to Fatherhood; the National Fatherhood Leadership Group; the Longitudinal Evaluation of the Harlem Children’s Zone; The Economic Mobility Project, Pew Charitable Trusts; the Mac Arthur Network on Family and the Economy, and Governor Paterson’s Task Force on Juvenile Justice
Dr. Mincy’s undergraduate and graduate training in economics were at Harvard and M.I.T. He and his wife, Flona Mincy, have been married for more than thirty years and live in Harlem, New York. They have two sons. (Thank God. Can you imagine daughters growing up around all that fatherhood policymaking?)
“The Center for Research on Fathers, Children and Family Well-Being’s mission is to expand the knowledge base on the role of fathers (and father figures) in the lives of disadvantaged children and the processes by which nonresident fathers (and father figures) affect child development and family well-being.”
“Many people ask us about our logo. They wonder why we don’t portray a happy family. We would rather showcase the problem we are trying to solve.
We wanted to show a strong mother, who believes she is capable of taking care of herself and her family. Whatever her beliefs, she often has no other option. Despite her best efforts, the literature shows that children who grow up in two-parent families are less likely than children in mother-only families to do poorly in school, engage in risky behavior, and exhibit anxiety, depression, and aggressive and withdrawn behavior problems.
We wanted to portray a father who is interested in his family but who is ill-prepared to help, unsure if his help is welcome, and unsure about he can be involved.** Although conventional wisdom holds that non-resident fathers are not involved in their children’s lives, the literature shows that at least half of non-resident fathers are involved with their children up to five years of age.
Are there ways of helping these parents work together to meet their children’s needs?
That is our question. That is our mission.”
** (portion in red) — was this Dr. Mincy’s father? Is this is hope — that his Dad really wanted to be involved, but there were just too many obstacles to father-involvement? Is all this really about certain men who ascended to (or were selected & placed, not that they didn’t earn every single degree, but are we allowed to mention the Fraternal Order of Masons (for Mr Canada), are we allowed to mention just how many foundations supported Dr. Mincy?) in VERY influential positions, as the figurehead of the successful black man, who is now — rather than confronting the system-concept which separated families to start with (FYI, it’s called slavery) — and is instead, working for the same TYPE of masters (if not some corporations that went back nearly as far) and doing the same thing to other famlies who share none of their Ph.D. characteristics, and may not even know this has been done to them, and by transforming the welfare system further and further to minimize and curtail “mother-involvement,” ensure that the child support system can be utilized by even mutli-millionaire fathers to separate children from their biological mothers, as well as diverting cash aid to single-mother households by defining success by the number of adult biologically related males in the home?
Why are we allowing groups like Columbia School of Social Policy, or corporations & foundations — to change the forms of government to figure out HOW to produce desired social results? This is nothing other than “Wealth-Makes-Right” and those on the top of society got their because God wanted them to, from which the position of “God” can be fulfilled through social design and planning how others will — or will not– live, bypassing the legal systems, for example, in particular, the criminal code.
Fraternal Order of Masons – interesting…
Freemasonry refers to the principles, institutions, and practices of the fraternal order of the Free and Accepted Masons. The largest worldwide society, Freemasonry is an organization of men based on the “fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man,” using builders’ tools as symbols to teach basic moral truths generally accepted by persons of good will. Their motto is “morality in which all men agree, that is, to be good men and true.” It is religious in that a belief in a Supreme Being and in the immortality of the soul are the two prime requirements for membership, but it is nonsectarian in that no religious test is used.1 The purpose of Freemasonry is to enable men to meet in harmony, to promote friendship, and to be charitable. Its basic ideals are that all persons are the children of one God, that all persons are related to each other, and that the best way to worship God is to be of service to people. Masons have no national headquarters as such, but the largest regional is the Scottish Rite Southern Jurisdiction (35 Southern states), which is headquartered in Alexandria, Virginia.
Although only men (of at least 21 years of age) can be Masons, related organizations are available for their relatives — there is the Order of the Eastern Star for Master Masons and their wives; the Order of De Molay for boys; and the Order of Job’s Daughters and the Order of Rainbow for young girls. The Masonic Lodge has more than a hundred such fraternal organizations, including Daughters of the Nile, The Tall Cedars of Lebanon, The Mystic Order of Veiled Prophets Of The Enchanted Realm, The Knights Of The Red Cross Of Constantine, and The Blue Lodge.
There’s more . . . .
Many allegories and symbols are used in Masonry. The old English Constitution refers to an ancient definition of the ancient craft: “Freemasonry is a system of morality, veiled in allegory, and illustrated by symbol,” [Freemason’ symbols can be made to mean almost anything a person chooses to make them; Master Masons take an oath, “Ever to conceal, never to reveal.”2] It seeks to make good men better through the form of belief in “the fatherhood of God, the brotherhood of man, and the immortality of the soul.”
Masonry was originally a means by which people in the occult could practice their “craft” and still remain respectable citizens. The official publication of “The Supreme Council 33” of Scottish Rite Freemasonry is titled New Age. Some church denominations are also led by avowed Masons. For example, a 1991 survey by the Southern Baptist Convention Sunday School Board found that 14% of SBC pastors and 18% of SBC deacon board chairs were Masons; it is also estimated that SBC members comprise 37% of total U.S. lodge membership. (A 2000 updated SBC report found that over 1,000 SBC pastors are Masons.)
Hardly surprising — we do remember, right, that former U.S. President severed ties with the Southern Baptist Convention over their treatment — and view– of women. While I may not agree with what he’s doing instead (joined a worldwide “Council of Elders” — give me a break!), this part is true:
Carter: Sexism exhibited by male leaders conflicts “with my belief — confirmed in the holy scriptures — that we are all equal in the eyes of God.” Please read — because this is happening in the U.S. today. (article concludes):
The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in Britain and the United States. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for everyone in society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.
It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and out-dated attitudes and practices — as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.
More on “The Elders,” first ref. from the article I quoted>
• Jimmy Carter was US president from 1977-81. The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity.
Guess they’ll have to contend sooner or later with Sun Myung Moon, the True Parent, who I don’t think was on the list — probably he’s not reall good at sharing leadership . This one was conceived by “British billionaire Richard Branson and Rock Star Peter Gabriel” and talks about how, without such piddling matters as “political (i.e., laws), economic (i.e., costs) and geographic (national sovereignty, etc.) constraints” surely this assembly of starpower can fix the world:
The structures we have to deal with these problems are often tied down by political, economic and geographic constraints,” Mandela said. The Elders, he argued, will face no such constraints. . . .Using their collective experience, their moral courage and their ability to rise above the parochial concerns of nations ? they can help make our planet a more peaceful, healthy and equitable place to live, ” Branson said. ” Let us call them ‘global elders,’ not because of their age but because of individual and collective wisdom.” Calling it “the most extraordinary day” of his life, Gabriel said, “The dream was there might still be a body of people in whom the world could place their trust.”
Well, the world is fully of nutcase Messiahs, they are found amongst the homeless, and among the ultrarich. Guess which group probably has done more harm, and been responsible for more human misery, wars, poverty, and genocides, in the long-term?
A little more detail on Mr. Canda’s life, from “blackpast.org” an on-line encyclopedia. His mother was a counselor. He had no sisters…..
Canada was born on January 13, 1952 to McAlister and Mary Canada in the South Bronx, New York City. His mother was a substance abuse counselor and his father suffered from chronic alcoholism. His mother raised him and his three brothers in the South Bronx after she divorced his father in 1956.
Canada grew up in poverty yet his mother strongly instilled the value of education in him at an early age. In his teens, Canada was sent to live with his grandparents, both ordained Baptist ministers, in Long Island, New York. While living with his grandparents, Canada attended Wyandanch Memorial High School where he received the Fraternal Order of Masons scholarship his senior year. {{SEE above}}
Canada then enrolled in Bowdoin College in 1970, graduating with a Bachelor’s degree in psychology and sociology in 1974. A year later he graduated with an M.A. in Education from Harvard Graduate School of Education. His mother eventually earned her own Master’s degree from Harvard some years later.
In addition, Canada has published two books:
Fist, Stick, Knife, Gun: A Personal History of Violence in America(1995) and
Reaching Up for Manhood: Transforming the Lives of Boys in America (1998).
In 1972, Canada married Joyce Henderson and had two children, Melina and Jerry. They divorced and Canada married Yvonne Grant. They also have two children, Bruce and Geoffrey, Jr. [Contributor(s):
Jackson, Joelle
University of Washington, Seattle]
Are the children from the first wife now fatherless and at risk?
(VERY) BRIEFLY: The EDELMANS & CHILDREn’s DEFENSE FUND (1992 interview with Marian Wright Edelman) speaks about her parent’s Baptist past
….”her childhood home in Bennettsville, S.C. That was the starting point for the self-assured black girl who would emerge from the segregated South to go to Yale University Law School, create the Children’s Defense Fund and propel herself onto the national scene as an impassioned and relentless champion of needy children and families…. It was in that spirit, to promote continuity, that Mrs. Edelman wrote a little book, a “spiritual and family dowry,” for her sons, Joshua, Jonah and Ezra. She has been married for 24 years to Peter Edelman, a law professor at Georgetown University.
The family values talk is just talk,” Mrs. Edelman said, her voice rising, her words accelerating. “People understand what is real and what is hypocritical. Family and moral values are so central to everything that I am.”
The daughter of a Baptist minister, Mrs. Edelman writes in her book that “many of the seeds I am still struggling mightily to harvest for children and the poor were planted during my childhood.” Her father gave sermons, she said, “decrying the breakdown of family and community” and “insisting that poverty of things is no excuse for poverty of will and spirit.”
Being a Baptist still plays an important role in her life. “If I don’t go Sunday morning, I’m not grounded for the week,” she said.
I don’t know how much readership understands the role of the Children’s Defense Fund in policies around today, or how one of her 3 sons’ work intersects with Mr. Canada’s, at the nonprofit, charterschoolpromotion level. I am wondering whether she would be OK with the impact of these social programs on real mothers, today:
Mrs. Edelman met her husband in Mississippi, where she was the first black woman admitted to the bar. She was working as a civil rights lawyer, and Mr. Edelman was researching poverty and hunger for Senator Robert F. Kennedy. Mrs. Edelman and her husband, who is Jewish, raised their sons in the religious traditions of both sides of the family.
In his introduction to his mother’s book, Jonah, who graduated from Yale last spring (1992) and is now a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford, refers to himself as “a cultural mulatto . . . the sheltered bar mitzvah boy who has struggled with his blackness.” … The Edelmans’ eldest son, 23-year-old Joshua, is a Harvard University graduate who teaches history at the Milton Academy in Milton, Mass. Ezra, 18, is a freshman a Yale.
. . .
here have been rumors that Mrs. Edelman, who has worked for years with Hillary Clinton, the past chairwoman of the Children’s Defense Fund, might join the Cabinet if Gov. Bill Clinton becomes President. “I would not,” Mrs. Edelman said, adding that her black friends were urging her to go into Government to increase her power and influence.
“That is not who I am,” she said. “I need to work outside Government, on my own. I love what I do, and I think I am making a difference.”
The nonprofit Children’s Defense Fund, which will celebrate its 20th anniversary next year, is widely respected for its lobbying efforts. Its aim is to bring the needs of children to public attention and to encourage preventive efforts in areas like health care and teen-age pregnancy. The fund played an important role in the formulation of the child-care legislation that Congress passed in 1990
OK — now I will link Jonah Edelman to Geoffrey Canada (finally), through Mr. Edelman’s Wikipedia — and hopefully you will see the connection with these inexorable training grants from HHS — there is an HHS connection in the family line:
Jonah Martin Edelman (born 9 October 1970) is an Americanadvocate for public education.[1] He is the co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Stand for Children, a national American education advocacy organization based in Portland, Oregon andWaltham, Massachusetts, with affiliates in nine states. He is the first Oregon resident to be awarded an Ashoka: Innovators for the Public fellowship.[2]
STAND FOR CHILDREN is no ordinary nonprofit — it was set up to be nationwide from the very beginning and to force social transformation. It is also very well endowed. Currently, this group is facing off with teachers’ unions, (see “Illinois”) and Mr. Edelman was caught boasting about how he got these unions to give away their rights — although the cause is, “improving public schools” – — right? . . .
Jonah Edelman is the second son of Marian Wright Edelman, former civil rights leader and aide to Martin Luther King, jr. and founder and president of the Children’s Defense Fund, and Peter Edelman, former aide to Senator Robert F. Kennedy, former Assistant Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and professor at Georgetown University Law Center.
Edelman was born and raised in Washington, D.C, and received his B.A. in History with a concentration on African-American studies from Yale University in 1992. Edelman attended Oxford University on a Rhodes Scholarship, earning his Master of Philosophy and Doctor of Philosophy degrees in Politics in 1994 and 1995, respectively.
He is, essentially, a blueblood acting like a blueblood, i.e., arrogant — taking charge — and rescuing poor people by redesigning government policy— and insisting it be done “his way” or the highway. When I say blueblood, we know Marian Wright Edelson’s personal background and commitment, discipline, and values. Her husband/Jonah’s father qualifies as blueblood (See “Georgetown” and working for RFK), and former assistant Secretary to the DHHS — – where the fatherhood programs now life — and it appears these were instrumental in some of their beginnings. And may give a better clue to their actual purposes.
Edelman cites tutoring a six-year-old bilingual child named Daniel Zayas in reading while volunteering at Dwight Elementary School during his first year at Yale as a turning point.[3] While still an undergraduate, he ran a teen pregnancy prevention speakers’ bureau, co-founded a mentorship program for African American middle school students, and served as an administrator of an enrichment program for children living in public housing-Leadership Education and Athletics in Partnership (LEAP).
Stand for Children
Edelman was a key organizer of Stand for Children Day, a June 1, 1996 rally at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. attended by 300,000 people.[4] {{KEEP THE LINK…}} Among the speakers at this rally, the largest for children in U.S. history, were
Geoffrey Canada, who later became Stand for Children’s first Board of Directors Chair, the editor of Parade Magazine,
Walter Anderson, who came up with the name “Stand for Children Day,” and
Marian Wright Edelman.
On June 2, 1996, Edelman and Eliza Leighton founded Stand for Children as an ongoing advocacy organization to support rally participants when they returned home. Hundreds of follow up Stand for Children events and rallies took place across the country on June 1, 1997 and then June 1, 1998.
Yes, about that rally:
Education plus politics (about “stand for children’s” role in Denver School Board race)
Edelman, the son of Children’s Defense Fund founder Marian Wright Edelman, began Stand in an effort to marry child advocacy and grassroots organizing. “Stand didn’t start off working on public education at all,” he said, noting the 1996 Stand for Children rally from which it grew encompassed many issues.
The rally, which Edelman worked on at his mother’s request, drew 300,000 people to D.C. for what was the largest rally for children in U.S. history. Stand’s first chapter was founded in Oregon in 1999.
“It’s really evolved organizationally toward public education based on the fact public education is the most salient and fundamentally important issue of so many issues facing kids,” he said. Stand’s grassroots approach is similar to those of two other parent groups in Denver, Padres Unidos and Metropolitan Organizations for People or MOP. But Stand differs in that its members get directly involved in politics – something Padres and MOP, which are non-profit 501(c)3 organizations, can’t do – and it works at the local and statewide levels.
“We don’t choose cities,” Edelman said when asked about coming to Denver, “we choose states.”
WE’RE TALKING ABOUT SOME OF THE FOUNDERS OF THE MOVEMENTS NOW GOING ON IN HHS, where “CHILDREN & FAMILIES” precludes speech of individuals, and where leadership is to be followed, not questioned, when it comes to policy. The intent is to transform the public schools, and if necessary, take on teacher’s unions. I see an article boasting about how their legislators all one, and several “status quo” legislators lost. Grassroots advocacy, organization, and funding, right? Next, there is this one showing alliance / alignment with Mr. Canada. As I have explained, that also = alignment with the fatherhood prominence, and getting more children into state care than Mom’s care, by combining early childhood education + public school (regular or charter) education, both federal projects, while endorsing — apparently — welfare-diversions (like the HTTC above) to transform certain communities:
Friends and Colleagues:
Tuesday’s election saw the emergence of Stand for Children as a multi-state electoral force for students.
By reaching more than 55,000 targeted voters through grassroots volunteer outreach (five times more than in 2008) and strategically investing more than $1 million (15 times more than in 2008) in Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and Oregon, Stand helped protect an overwhelming majority of the legislators, both Republicans and Democrats, who stood tall for students earlier this year.
And here’s something else that’s striking: while none of the legislators we backed lost because of their vote to improve educator effectiveness, Stand helped unseat several legislators who voted for the status quo.
November 24, 2010
Last Thursday, some of you [Stand staff, Board members, Advisory Board members] were able to join in a conference call where we received a mega-dose of inspiration from Geoffrey Canada, Stand’s first Board chair, founder and CEO of the Harlem Children’s Zone, and one of America’s most prominent education advocates.
On the call, Geoff generously affirmed Stand’s incredible recent progress and he challenged us to seize this unique moment in time and work with even greater resolve, perspective, and discipline to save all of those “perfectly normal children,” as he described them, who are falling hopelessly behind in school.
This is grassroots organizing from the top-down, not the bottom-up, and if anything, this organization is ORGANized and visionary; that also apparently runs in the family line, plus (see educations). . . . . (did they attend local public schools, K-12?) . . . . . Checking my Nonprofit status — and actually reading a tax return (great way to learn about a group — read their tax returns if possible) — there is a:
- Stand for Children (oregon nonprofit)
- Stand for Children Leadership Center, Inc. (Washington, D.C. nonprofit),
and apparently (per that tax return) a
- Stand for Children, Inc. — for profit.
The (2002) board of SFCLC (DC group) was:
Stand for Children Leadership Center Board of Directors (from tax return)
-
Who We Are
Founded in 1986, Bright Horizons Family Solutions is the world’s leading provider of employer-sponsored child care, early education, and work/life solutions. Conducting business in the United States, Europe, and Canada, we have created employer-sponsored child care and early education programs for more than 700 clients, including more than 90 of the Fortune 500.
- CNN description (Money.cnn.com, 2008): Average pay: Directors, $54K, teachers, $25K…
-
This corporation (investing in its stock) helped make Tennessee Senator, Lamar Alexander, one of the Top 10 (richest) in 2007. Below this list, I’ll show (I recognized this name. Lamar Alexander also known because of Corrections Corporation of America (CCA, private prison corporation)’s lobbying, and a move to privatize the entire state’s prisons, connected with this legislator.
- Geoffrey Canada President, Harlem Children’s Zone
- Sam Daley-Harris’ President, Results Educational Fund
- Gun Denhart “s Founder & Chair, Hanna Andersson Corporation
- MarianWright Edelman` Founder & President, Children’s Defense Fund
- Daniel Grossman’ Founder & CEO, Wild Planet Toys
- Jill Iscol” President , Jill Iscol & Associates
- Reverend/Dr. Eileen Lindner, Deputy General Secretary for Research & Planning, National Council of Churches, {{Excu UUse me???}}
- Fred Senn Partner/GroupDirector, Fallon
- Dorothy Stoneman Founder & President, YouthBuildUSA
Every one of those corporations / organizations the board of directors sit on has a story, and most likely an interest in education reform. Who are these people, and why have they taken on (with private, not public funding — on this tax return at least) organization to restructure the US Educational system according to their particular vision? For example, because it’s simplest to illustrate, “BRIGHT HORIZONS FAMILY SOLUTIONS” is top dog in employer-provided daycare.
From the site: INSIDERTRADING.PROCON.ORG
Mr. Alexander was 10th richest, right after the 9th richest US Senator in 2007, namely, “9. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) Avg. Net worth of household in 2006: $30,691,003 — and I just love the description of her “Spouse Name and Title:” Bill Clinton, 42nd US President.
#10 – Lamar Alexander, Jr. Avg. Net Worth of Household in 2006: $27,800,155. Spouse name and title: “Leslee “Honey” Alexander, Bord of Trustees, WETA; Member and Vice Chairman, Corporation for Public Broadcasting Board of Directors,”
5 TOP STOCKS OWNED @ 12/31/2007– TOP STOCK: “BRIGHT HORIZONS FAMILY SOLUTION” — $500,001 – $1,000,000.
Senator Lamar Alexander Co-founded “Corporate Child Care Management, Inc.” (now “Bright Horizons Family Solutions). His wife owns more than $1,000,000 stock in it. … Committees he sits on that may present conflict of interest: Health, Education, Labor, Pensions.
For our leaders: Investment income from holdings. For those they set policy for: Jobs, hopefully, child support – -possibly, welfare — likely at this pace — and parenting classes, and public schools. Some design, others support (like, the workers at these various corporations) and if there is not too much civil discontent, all is well in the world. …. While I am here, from the same site, on The (then-Senator) Obama’s household, notes a very lean portfolio, but investment in two speculative stocks he probably wouldn’t have known of except as a legislator — one dealing with mobile communications (and a satellite), i.e.,
SkyTerra (see also Wikipedia)– and the other
AVI BioPharma.(“Advanced RNA-Based Therapeutic Platform)” The commentary,
here: The second company has “strategic alliances” with the DoD, and includes biodefense in its projects; the first, apparently Boeing just helped put a satellite in space .
We are in a Post-9/11 society, and throughout these TAGGS (marriage/Fatherhood) corporations, major grants involving telecommunications companies with roots in the Defense Industry keep showing up (Example: ICF International Incorporated, LLC got a 2011 grant; it went public & international in 2006). Here’s the “wiki” on AVI Biopharma — note they were going under til got a defense contract (during Obama presidency):
History (Wiki article)
AVI BioPharma opened their own production laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon, in February 2002.[2] The company made headlines in 2003 when it announced work on treatments for SARS and the West Nile Virus.[2][3] In July 2009, the company announced they would move their headquarters from Portland, Oregon, north to Bothell, Washington, near Seattle.[4] At that time the company led by president and CEO Leslie Hudson had 83 employees and quarterly revenues of $3.2 million.[4] AVI had yet to turn a profit nor developed any commercial products as of July 2009.[4] The company lost $19.7 million in the second quarter of 2009,[5] and then won a $11.5 million contract with the U.S. Department of Defense‘s Defense Threat Reduction Agency in October 2009.[6] The company had completed its move to Bothell by this time, but retained their Corvallis facility.[4][6]
SkyTerra is now “LightSquared” —
“A new nationwide 4G wireless broadband network provider that will use a unique combination of satellite and terrestrial technology to revolutionize wireless communications in the United States.” ”
SkyTerra is North America’s leading developer and supplier of mobile satellite communications services (MSS). Since 1996 SkyTerra has been providing reliable wireless voice, two-way radio and data services for a wide range of customers across North America, northern South America, Central America, the Caribbean and Hawaii via its two existing MSAT satellites. Satellite service is the perfect communications solution for remote locations lacking terrestrial coverage and when man made or natural disasters strike. Current customers cover a broad spectrum including public safety, security, broadcasting, natural resources, fleet management and asset tracking. {{AND/Or SPYING….}}
LIGHTSQUARED: The idea behind this is providing (4G at least) “Wholesale broadband access” to the entire country. In Nov. 2010, they launched a satellite from Kazakhstan, and the site mentions:
““The U.S. stimulus plan announced by President Obama has acknowledged the need for the federal government to step in to ensure that the digital divide is filled, thereby ending the denial of broadband access due to where people live… 2010 will be the year that many governments will recognize that broadband connectivity is essential for economic competitiveness, the delivery of public services, and an inclusive society, and they will step up to the plate to close the digital divide.”
It is waiting? for FCC approval of its service; there’s claims it would jam GPS. Fascinating reading — and here’s an article on the debate between FCC (Congressional favorite) this new one — only slightly technical. Recommended read– it plays into the job market, digital divide.
SkyTerra Wikipedia
The new company has operations in both America and Canada, providing service to both countries and the Caribbean. MSV changed its name to SkyTerra in December 2008. The company was traded Over-the-Counter and was listed on the OTCBB: SKYT. SkyTerra (formerly ‘Mobile Satellite Ventures’) [4] was the first company to receive a Federal Communications Commission license to deploy Ancillary Terrestrial Component (ATC) technology.[5]
In 2005, SkyTerra purchased 50% of Hughes Network Solutions, a subsidiary of the News Corp.-owned DirecTV Group, for $157.4 million, which SkyTerra held under its subsidiary Hughes Communications.[6][7] In January 2006, DirecTV sold its remaining 50% share in Hughes Network Solutions to SkyTerra for $100 million.[8] Hughes Communications was spun off as a separate company in February 2006, with SkyTerra divesting its entire stake in the company to its shareholders.[9]
TerreStar Corporation, formerly Motient Corporation, was the controlling shareholder of TerreStar Networks Inc. and TerreStar Global Ltd., and a shareholder of SkyTerra Communications.[10]
SkyTerra was acquired by Harbinger Capital Partners in March 2010 and became part of LightSquared in July 2010.[11
MSV satellite telephony
Most of current products and services are aimed at emergency services, law enforcement, and companies that specialize in transportation. However, MSV and Boeing are developing a satellite telephony network for consumers.
The use of Boeing’s GeoMobile platform will allow for coverage of the entire United States with a single satellite. This new approach to satellite telephony has already been validated with the Thuraya network. MSV’s satellite will use an even bigger antenna than the Thuraya spacecraft (at 22 meters in diameter, it will be the largest commercial reflector dish ever used in space)[12], allowing it to communicate with phones no larger than modern cell phones thanks to the fact that the large antenna gain allows the handset to operate at a power output comparable to regular cell phones. This is now possible since the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) allowed satellite operators to create terrestrial cellular networks using spectrum previously restricted to satellite use.[13][14][15]
The Satellite road aboard a Russian Satellite, launched last November, per the Nasa article: !!!
November 14th, 2010 by Chris Bergin
International Launch Services (ILS) have launched the SkyTerra 1 telecommunications satellite via their veteran Proton-M launch vehicle and Breeze-M upper stage on Sunday. Lift-off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan was on schedule at 17:29 GMT, ahead of over nine hours of flight until the spacecraft was placed into orbit.
. . .The 5,400 kg Boeing Space and Intelligence Systems built 702HP satellite is designed for geomobile services, which will be a “major step in LightSquared’s creation of its next-generation, nationwide network that will be among the world’s first to combine satellite and terrestrial technologies,” according to the customer.“The Light-Squared network will enable the company to offer 4G speed, value, and reliability which enables universal wireless connectivity throughout the United States.
“The company’s next-generation satellite system allows users within the United States to use standard handsets or other devices, equipped with the LightSquared chipset, to access the satellite system with high link availability and long battery lifetimes, with devices that have the same form-factor and functionality as conventional handsets and devices.
“Further, the combination of the LightSquared satellite system and the LightSquared 4G terrestrial network provides an unprecedented level of coverage throughout the United States.”
Proton Launch:
(Somehow this isn’t as comforting as it is probably supposed to be….)
The Iscol Family (apparently husband made his money in mobile communications…)
<>STAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP, JILL ISCOL
It’s hard to know where, on the web, to start. Cornell, Yale, New York City? The portion of Cornell University this husband/wife pair is currently funding / running? Their connections with Hillary Rodham Clinton? Well, while we’re on the topic, how about article from “CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SECURITY.”
In this summary (it’s the entire web page) you can see the policy-making influence with Gores, Family Strengthening projects, and the ability to somehow raise incredible finances for whatever project her heart desires. This is what Yale Graduates do, and the Columbia background also includes a penchant the teaching. Does this look like someone who would be taking input from the lower ranks of society, or dishing it out, according to the personal vision determined with the social & political set she runs in, and they do? Or taking feedback on the impact of these programs on the working class, (or, welfare recipients) which might be at odds from program purposes?
President, IF Hummingbird Foundation
Jill W Iscol, Ed.D, is a social activist, an educator, and a philanthropist.
She serves on the Board of Advisors of City Year New York of which she was a Founding Co-Chair (2002-2009). She is a Trustee of Vital Voices Global Partnership and is currently chairing its newly launched New York Leadership Council. She is on the Board of the Acumen Fund, a global philanthropic organization. She was recently appointed to the New York State Commission on National and Community Service, is a Trustee of Horizons National, and on the Advisory Board of the Center for New American Security in Washington, DC.
She serves on the President’s Council of Teachers College (from 1974-1977, she was Co-Director of its Preservice Program in Childhood Education), and on the Advisory Boards of the Iscol Family Program for Leadership Development {{that’s Cornell, and link tells more about Jill & Ken, after profusely thanking them for generous funding…}} and the Herbert F. Johnson Museum of Art at Cornell University. Until 2009 she served on the Boards of Facing History and Ourselves, and Bank Street College of Education (where she was a faculty member from 1973-1974).
Sorry — I have to point this out Bank Street College of Education began with a single person’s idea in 1916, and a humanist (as oppose to, say, Deist) idea to study children and figure out what produces the best results, according to humanist definitions and in the process of creating a better world. This intense obsession — and it IS an obsession — with getting children away from their natural parents (while preaching marriage and family throughout) — didn’t start yesterday. Particularly one sees the institutes throughout the country wishing to “study” children in order to do a better job than previous generations. This is reflected to date in Obama Administration’s expansion of Head Start, Early Head Start, and push to get mothers out of the home and back to work, and kids into daycare centers where HHS will pay for “Child Development Scholars” to take notes, etc. etc. Consider — this was before women got the vote!
- Bank Street: A Brief History
In 1916, educator Lucy Sprague Mitchell and her colleagues, influenced by revolutionary educator John Dewey and other humanists, concluded that building a new kind of educational system was essential to building a better, more rational, humane world.
Beginnings: The Bureau Years
1916: The Bureau of Educational Experiments (BEE) is founded in New York City by Lucy Sprague Mitchell, together with her husband Wesley Mitchell and colleague Harriet Johnson. Their purpose is to combine expanding psychological awareness with democratic conceptions of education. With a staff of researchers and teachers, the Bureau sets out to study children–to find out what kind of environment is best suited to their learning and growth, to create that environment, and to train adults to maintain it.
1919: The Bureau of Educational Experiments establishes a Nursery School.
(The next three bullets, quotes from a “Harvard Educational Review” very laborious review of a book on the development of Preschool in America)
- “Patty Smith Hill, progressive kindergartner of Louisville, Kentucky, studied the works of John Dewey and Francis W. Parker and then challenged the strict kindergarten pedagogy based on Froebel’s theories. {{German, childless??, Pedagogue, 1782-1852!}} Hill taught at Columbia Teachers College and co-founded the Institute of Child Welfare Research there in 1924.5 Caroline Pratt, who founded the innovative Play School in Greenwich Village, and her life partner, Helen Marot, were a part of a Greenwich Village group of intellectuals.6 Pratt collaborated with Lucy Sprague Mitchell and Harriet Johnson in New York City in the 1910s, “where they developed a radical preschool pedagogy designed to counteract what they saw as the psychologically and politically oppressive environment of the private family” (p. 135). “
- A stark contrast to kindergartners’ encouragement of parental involvement is the practice of early-twentieth-century progressive educator Caroline Pratt, who “saw parents as obstacles to their children’s education, not as partners“ (p. 139). Though Pratt may have been an anomaly among early childhood educators, her stance represents one of the many ways parents were treated and perceived by educators who often were not parents themselves.
- Her history is a chronicle of preschool-aged children’s access to education in the United States since the early nineteenth century, starting with the advent of infant schools, schools designed for lower-class children whose parents were considered unfit to teach them at home.
Your basic “Children as lab rats” concept, but of course for a noble purpose. A Tulane University “Child Development Center” history page describes the Patty Smith Hill Influence, in fact, mentioning the 1969 Chicago University “Lab School.”:
Newcomb Children’s Center originally started as a nursery school for Tulane faculty and staff when Edith Rosenwald Stern, a young parent and community activist, spearheaded a group of six mothers in the endeavor to establish the preschool in 1926, a time when these were not commonplace in the United States. She was the daughter of Julius Rosenwald, founder of Sears Roebuck and Company, and had attended the University of Chicago Lab School, where a preschool had been initiated in 1916. (daughter of successful businessman….)
Stern became acquainted with Patty Smith Hill, a leader of the American Kindergarten and Nursery School Movement, during a visit to Columbia University’s Institute for Child Welfare in New York. This relationship led to a broad scope of beneficial effects on Stern in terms of its philosophy and methods of teaching. From its inception, the School has encouraged hands-on learning by the children with guidance from a caring staff of teachers and active parents.
Lucy Sprague Mitchell (from a 2006 “Education Update” site), in short, another blueblood (Radcliffe, UCBerkeley Dean of Women) gets together with others to change the world, starting with studying how to produce a better child:
Lucy Sprague Mitchell came of age at a time of great changes in the United States. The country was becoming increasingly industrialized and urbanized; waves of immigrants were arriving, and poverty—especially urban poverty—was on the rise. These changing conditions inspired an intense period of social and educational reform between 1890 and 1920, led by pioneers, many of them women, who believed that the world could be changed. An age of often appalling social conditions was also an age of great optimism for people who wanted to remake the society America had built.
A graduate of Radcliffe, and the first Dean of Women at the University of California at Berkeley, Lucy Sprague Mitchell knew that she wanted to be a force for change, and shared the optimism of the reformers that change was possible. She herself saw in education the best possibility for a more just and humane world.
With several like-minded women, she established the Bureau of Educational Experiments to determine how children grow and learn by carefully studying and recording their behavior, their language, and their interactions with each other and with their environment.
(I continued looking — got that “childlike curiosity” still, I guess) — this person who never had a formal education til she was 16, was into early education for the purposes of studying how children learn . . . she had a domineering father . . . . this Bureau of Educational Systems was subsidized by a cousin’s inheritance . . . and the methods included:
Lucy Sprague Mitchell’s impact on the educational system in America is all the more surprising considering that she herself did not receive a formal education at school until she was sixteen years old. Lucy’s progressive-some might even say radical-approach to reforming education might be less surprising. Although she grew up with a domineering father in a repressive atmosphere, she also benefited greatly from her father’s own interest in education reform. As a result, young Lucy was not only exposed to the reformist ideas of such philosophical heavyweights as John Dewey and Jane Addams, she actually met them! . . .
. . .what was radical then is now thought “essential to knowing how to teach” children. The interdisciplinary approach to classroom management, the study of student behavior, psychological profiles recorded and updated, family background and environment checks: all of these were incorporated by Sprague Mitchell into how educating children was conducted at the Bureau.
Wikipedia on Bank Street College of Education directly ties this group to Head Start. (Bank Street was simply the Greenwich Village location of the Bureau of Educational Experiments when it started):
Bank Street was founded in 1916 by Lucy Sprague Mitchell as the “Bureau of Educational Experiments”. (Mitchell was the first Dean of Women at the University of California, Berkeley). Its original focus was the study of child development and education, but, after two years, it was clear that actual living subjects, i.e. children, were needed, so in 1918 a nursery school was opened. This nursery school is the direct predecessor of today’s School for Children. It wasn’t until the 1930s that Bank Street began to formally train teachers, the start of today’s Bank Street College of Education.
The little kids are brought in to test theory on, but the place started with theory. Of course, little kids in nursery schools is something of a controlled situation, and in fact, studying a young child in isolation from its parents makes next to no sense to me. See my post “monkeying with mothers.” Same mentality!
In 1965, Bank Street developed the “Bank Street Readers” line of books, which were unique due to their featuring of racial diversity and urban people of contemporary culture. Also in the 1960s, the Bank Street faculty played an important role in the creation of the federal Head Start program.
Some things never change. I found a grant (from another organization currently, I think, associated with a group attempting to eradicate no-fault divorce in Ohio, National Council of Family Relations, in cooperation with Utah State University. Or, at least in the same grant series. Some ideas just refuse to die, including that the best people to change society are those at the top — although typically it’s those who are starting wars, and sending the masses of lower class youth to go die in them, not to mention locking them up the disproportionately to the white-collar criminals…. and then (Lamar Alexander) getting rich by buying stock in the private prisons that oppress them — which they do, resulting in lawsuits for sexual assault and more. (CCA).
| Fiscal Year |
Program Office |
Grantee Name |
State |
Award Number |
Award Title |
CFDA Number |
CFDA Program Name |
Award Class |
Award Activity Type |
Award Action Type |
Principal Investigator |
Sum of Actions |
| 2011 |
OPRE |
UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY |
UT |
90YR0035 |
DADS’ PARENTING INTERACTIONS WITH CHILDREN-CHECKLIST OF OBSERVATIONS LINKED TO OUTCOMES (PICCOLO-D): DEVELOPING A MEASUR |
93600 |
Head Start |
DISCRETIONARY |
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH (INCLUDES SURVEYS) |
EXTENSION WITH OR WITHOUT FUNDS |
LORI ROGGMAN |
$ 0 |
|
Notice the nature of this grant, that it’s at a University, and that it’s funded under “Head Start.” This year, 2011, there were 26 “90YR” projects — ALL at Universities, across the country — and $4.78 million worth — testing, measuring, responding, and attempting to predict human behavior according to certain variables. I really should post them. For example, UCLA Board of Regents wants to get better at predicting children’s behavior (good luck with that one!):
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-LOS ANGELES, BOARD OF REGENTS
Recipient ZIP Code: 90095
And Utah State has its
And Ms. Roggman’s Background:
Lori Roggman
Lori Roggman
Staff Biography
EducationPh.D., 1988, University of Texas (Developmental Psychology)
M.S., 1981, Utah State University (Family & Human Development)
B.S., 1972, Utah State University (Psychology)
Teaching
Undergraduate: Parenting/ChildGuidance, Infancy/Early Childhood
Graduate: Human Development Theories (6060), Frontiers of Human Development (7060), Topical Seminars on Language Development, Attachment, Play, Fathers.
– – – – Ah Well . . . . .
Since its creation in 1989, Ms. Iscol has been President of IF Hummingbird Foundation, a family foundation which supports efforts to strengthen democracy and to reduce the social injustice, economic and educational inequities that would threaten it.
From 1997-2001, Jill served as the Chairperson of the Annual Family Re-Union Conference, moderated by then-Vice President Gore and Mrs. Gore, for which she planned and coordinated three annual conferences and raised significant funding for ongoing policy development process aimed at formulating better ways to strengthen family life.
Jill planned and participated in the White House Conference on Partnerships and Philanthropy in 2000. She was Co-Chair for Hillary Rodham Clinton for Senate’s New York Finance Committee, which raised a record 29 million dollars. She was Vice-Chair of Senator Clinton’s New York and National Finance Committees in 2006 and a National Vice-Chair of Hillary Rodham Clinton for President’s 2008 Finance Committee.
Ms. Iscol received a Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, from University of Pittsburgh (1967), a doctorate from Teachers College, Columbia University (1976), and a Master of Philosophy in Sociology from Yale (1990).
This is part of the “FAMILY LIFE DEVELOPMENT CENTER” at Cornell…. (NOTE: the “HTTC” far above — the DC-based Collaborative I found on the TAGGS list — has a curious link to “Family Development Institute” and is taking personal information for anyone wanting to get credentialed as one: Guess you can learn how to raise (“develop”) a family, if you get credentialed for it here; wonder who pays how much for the training. SAME CONCEPT AT CORNELL — in fact overall, this is the concept. I call it “Designer Families,” although what often seems to result is family breakup, for a better, state-approved “design,” from my experience (and I’m well networked with similar cases….) (I also did a search on ‘Fatherhood” then “motherhood” at the School of Human Ecology with the usual results: fatherhood 15 to motherhood 8. Several of the faculty appear to have come from Fragile Families studies, and some prior HHS connection. The last reference to “fatherhood” was an article by (AFCC professional?) Robert E. Emery, and discussing Custody Evaluations. Others of course discussed child support….)
Welcome
Since 2001, the College of Human Ecology {{at Cornell…}} has been very pleased to be the home of the Iscol Family Program for Leadership Development in Public Service. Established with the generosity and foresight of Jill and Ken Iscol, this program is intended to give undergraduate students inspiration and direction in translating their knowledge, idealism, and optimism into concrete action to build better communities for families and children.
. . .The Iscol Family Program serves the entire university and for the last 3 years has collaborated with the Entrepreneurship at Cornell program.
THIS is now, East River Family Strengthening Collaborative Executive Director, as quoted in the “promising neighborhoods” article at “Circle of Philanthropy”
When we get the little ones in pre-kindergarten, they come to us not even knowing how to hold a pencil or pen.”
And even when the children are getting the proper instruction in school, the neighborhood’s poverty affects their ability to learn, says Mae H. Best, executive director of the East River Family Strengthening Collaborative, a social-services group in the neighborhood that is participating in the Promise Neighborhood project. Poverty steals children’s attention from the classroom, she says. They may not be eating at home, they may be worried that they are going to be evicted, they may hear their parents complaining about lack of work. * * *
**omitted — they may hear or witness their parents fighting, or one being assaulted….
“Everything is generally related to financial resources—the lack thereof,” she says.
{Annie E. Casey Foundation is one of the major funders of fatherhood studies; I have been studying this for over 2 eyars. They show up EVERYwhere, including in groups allegedly preventing family violence, and providing “resource centers,” (Websites, and the paid-for studies that can be downloaded there, and training opportunities), such as “Family Violence Prevention Fund.” Excuse me, I forgot their recent federally-assisted web facelift, physical move (to the SF Praesidio) AND name change. How, instead of the grandiose promise of preventing Family VIolence (which I see no evidence they are), they are expanding the scope: “Futures Without Violence.” AS I recall (you can check), Annie E. Casey funds this, and probably the “fragile families” study as well.
I like that they state their timeline and incorporation history. That’s good. Notice the “letter to the community” starts with “father absence.”
Letter to The Community
Help Us Make Ward 7 Stronger.
Dear Friend of ERFSC:Imagine a family situation where the father is absent, the mother is unemployed and the children are barely making it in school due to lack of attention and necessary resources. Now consider the stress and embarrassment of not having the “right clothes” to wear to school, a healthy lunch to edify the children’s minds, and a single parent who is so busy trying to make ends meet, that she involuntarily neglects her children. Surely you can see how a family situation like this can negatively affect the mother’s mental health and the children’s self esteem and impact their ability to learn. Surely you can envision how this situation can get worse and result in children who fall into the juvenile system or worse!
I imagine there is not a single person on this board, or among the families served, who is completely and totally unaware that:
- Some fathers are absent because of domestic violence, and might have done some jail time for this.
- African-Americans are over-represented in the jail populations across the U.S., and probably here, too.
To rephrase Daddy’s in jail as putting him back with his family (without addressing the “why” of incarceration, which could range from violent criminal activity not a good role model for kids, to drug-related criminal activity not a good role model for kids, to racism, to the fact that there’s a huge corporate lobbying industry behind expanding the prison system (search CCA on my site, “Corrections Corporation of America” – -to possibly even child support arrearages, if combined with other things . . .at what point is it NOT good to reunite that family, and instead allow the female-headed household to be strengthened without letting an abuser back in?
“With your generous donation, we can open up many windows of opportunity and give our residents a life beyond their limited boundaries along with the tools, the hope and the desire to strive for empowerment. By making a donation, you will not only be contributing directly to the success of these families, but will also be playing an active role in the overall sustainability of ERFSC.
You may donate right here on our Web site or send your donation check to our office”
Look who is funding the individual agency, and the umbrella agency here — and below, it’s clear the money (a) comes from welfare that might otherwise actually REACH the household in question, instead of being DIVERTED to fund non-taxpaying entities which set up slick and donations-collecting websites so they can take credit for any social services provided. . . . Moreover, between TAGGS & HHS — it’s clear one is under-reporting or the other is OVER-reporting. Think about that before you donate, because this is common practice in the field:
USASPENDING has reported (per this DUNS# — which is not always specific only to one organization, i understand — but at least an identifier) only 3 of the 6 grants, or about half of their total. No data pre-dating 2009 exists. We can also see that this money is most DEFINITELy coming out of TANF, or “Temporary Assistance for Needy Families”
I.e., someone’s food and cash aid. It is more important to have healthy, stable marriages — or try to — than for children to eat and be clothed if not living with their biological Daddies. . . ..
- Total Dollars:
- Transactions:
Transaction Number # 1
Federal Award ID: (Grants)
|
|
Date Signed:
September 28 , 2011
Obligation Amount:
$1,533,518
|
to search D.C. corporations, apparently you have to create a user account. I don’t want to do this, so let’s check out just the umbrella nonprofit, and this one:
HTTC: Unlike most households, their assets are steadily increasing. View a tax return, and subtract $500K per year (minimum) from the “government grants” and see if it is a well-run organization that could stand on its own, and note the ration of grants to program service income, and the executive pay, etc. That’s what I do when viewing tax returns. Notice — they got $500K in 2006. Where is the 2006 tax return?
TOTAL of “90FK” awards for 2011:
TOTAL of “90FM” awards for 2011:
Why Think when you can Hyperlink?
The heart of the “Healthy Marriage/Responsible Fatherhood” grantee system is an attempt to get the entire nation (at its expense) in front of trainers and facilitators to — for the sake of our country — submit to indoctrination in what, and how, to speak (i.e., think) about themselves, their children, their neighbors, poverty, work, and their place in this world.
The “CIRCLE OF IDEAS” circulating through this system is getting smaller and smaller, while the ripples from having thrown this stone into the pond of plurality are still spreading. Ig pushed in t is intentional domination and restriction of a nation’s vocabulary — for profit — to subdue and restrict its thinking about cause & effect, particularly so as NOT to connect this type of corruption with incidents of murder/suicide, kidnapping, child molestation, threats, stalking, or ongoing, chronic stress and work attrition — even when the connection is open, upfront, and obviously in the custody context.
In Liberia, women of different faiths united (risking their lives) to “Pray the Devil Back to Hell” and changed the course of the country’s history. They did not want any more excuses for terrorism and attempted genocide. I do believe that in the USA we are going to have to do this too, ladies and men of conscience. Not through Occupying Wall Street — but through sitting one’s behind down on some paperwork (or accounting) of this travesty — and THEN boycott something that is profiting from this enterprise at our children’s futures’ expense.
Recent events in California include: a little girl not returned on visitation; Daddy kills herself and himself. This mother had her child at age approximately 44? (Samaan/Fay). 8 people killed in Seal Beach, California hair salon, one man in the salon, and one outside it, who was sitting in a car — the rest were women. And recently in Richmond, California, a brawl broke out in City Hall, surrounding the “Office of Neighborhood Safety.” Gang members were being paid to attend classes.
I have not blogged this yet, but as I am networked with “Parents” (mothers and grandmothers) across the country who are tired of THIS war, I became aware of an incident in Trumbull County Ohio which totally baffles the mind — until one explores the funding stream, and the organizaing element of “Fatherhood” at the state level. Yes, you danged well bet there is a connection! And I am tired of this propaganda, and excuse-making. I am tired of, when the closer I look, the more questions come up — WHERE is this entity incorporated? Why, when the web page is so fancy, and obviously well-funded — can one so many times not find the nonprofit’s EIN# and tax return — and why when those ARE found, they tend to fall into two categories:
1. The organization would not exist without HHS (and/or DOJ) funding, and is being propped up by them.
2. The organization disappeared (took the money and ran) and no one has caught up with it after an initial, small grant.
3. The organization is itself a FOR-PROFIT and HHS has chosen its (fatherhood promoting, family-strengthening) curriculum as one of about a dozen favored solutions to produce world peace (stop abuse, elmiinate poverty, or make irresponsible men responsible through bribes, or a system of bribes/extortion, etc. — i.e., “training” — and the HHS has helped this organization get all set up, create its private market niche or brand, and then certify or license “train the trainer” seminars (tax deductible) to spread it all over the place. . . . . And is doing this through the already present systems of social welfare, such as TANF, Child Support, Child Abuse Prevention, you name it. For example “Boot Camp for New Dads” is pushed to hospitals where children are being born. And the PR firm “Public Strategies, Inc.” in Oklahoma – which as basically “made” by the Healthy Marriage Initiative (it seems to have almost no other clients) actually got another GRANT?
This, friends, is not what government is for — this is a “Metastasized” government which is eating away the substance of the people that are sustaining it in money, in time, and in labor — and by consuming products it declares we need, when we don’t. Has anyone ever calculated the huge profits made simply to detox people from chronic stress, and the illnesses that that state produces in a human body?
Those who buy into this program will likely have income, including potential retirement income; those who do not will be subjected to it, with the exception of those who designed the curricula, who are probably laughing their way between an offshore bank to the next product idea, or (like ICF International Inc., LLC) buying out lesser companies and figuring out how to expand from their Billion-$$ Business with the US Government, one of the largest spenders (and debtors) in the world.
HERE IS THE SYSTEM:
Middle class pays for it, and if entangled in it, pays (for example, in the courts). Many of the middle class have jobs working in the institutions that market these trainings and are used to SELL curricula to fix poverty (etc — create utopia, basically).
People who have slipped out of or were never out of the lower economic sector — who cannot directly pay for classes — will be forced to take them anyhow, and the implicit “bargain” with the middle classes (from policymakers) is that by forcing the poor rabble into them (through extortion) they will be therefore off the streets and not on YOUR doorstep, so continue to produce wages and taxes that will be distributed to the fatherhood and marriage promoters nationwide, i.e., those who step to our tune.
The HHS GRANTS PROVIDES THE HYPERLINK ADVANTAGE, AND PRE-FAB ASSOCIATIONS:
Most resource centers, examined, are primarily on-line database storage.
The Hyperlink advantage — Federal Help to set up Resources, Visually Engaging Websites, with Official-sounding LInks to the “upline,” and cute new Acronyms for the latest way to market the same material, for example, “FRIENDS” (see last post or so) with the radical concept that Parents might actually know something about their own families. This fact sheet from a Florida group cites Fatherhood grantees “Circle of Parents”(tr) and “Parents Anonymous(tr)” and declares that we are all in this together, and those who have taken control of our families, and are paid to do so, now wish to “collaborate” and “Share leadership” with the actual parents. This being a totally foreign concept to social workers and social scientists in general, SOMEONE had to copyright the concept and run trainings on how to let parents back into the decisionmaking process about their kids and their lives. Get this, from “Factsheet #13” (address to whom?)
Principles of Shared Leadership
␣ Parents and staff members are equal partners
␣ No one person has all of the solutions; it depends on how people act together to make sense of the situations that face them
␣ Mutual respect, trust and open-mindedness ␣ Collectiveactionbaseduponsharedvision,ownership
and accountability ␣ Consensus building instead of a democratic process
Or, here is a “PARENT LEADERSHIP AMBASSADOR FACILITATOR GUIDE” by Circle of Parents & “Friends” — actually by YOU (i.e, USA working citizens), as it cites an HHS grant. Or names a month after its copyrighted concept self: Did you know that
“February was designated as National Parent Leadership Month® by Parents Anonymous®, Inc.”
(which I found out on a site from an organization that my colleagues, family, and friends’ taxes paid to set up and propagate, also trademarked: “Circle of Parents(tr)” Get the picture yet? Here’s the portion of what was taken away from Parents which this proclamation (modeled after the Declaration of Independence, but entirely foreign to it in purpose and process):
Preamble:
National Parent Leadership Month® – 2011
Parents across the nation are working in partnership with practitioners and policymakers to create positive changes in their lives, the lives of their children and the lives of other families. They are doing this quietly and effectively and it is important to honor these parents.
How sweet — PPP — Parents, Practitioners and Policymakers. Maybe you can register the trademark “P3” (get a triangle, to imply that we are somehow equal participants, and this is not, instead a basic pyramid scheme run with IRS help….). No thank you — give me back the wasted HHS funds, and keep your gold stars; we are not in gradeschool any more.
I notice, despite all the “fatherhood” words flying around (although not in this PR piece), there’s still no mention of “mother” on it. And as I believe I HAVE established, “Circle of Parents” has been bought out by HHS/NFI-elements, and is walking, talking, and publicizing like them:
About Circle of Parents: Fatherhood
FATHERHOOD.GOV
Checkout the new Fatherhood Newsletters
Webinar: Father Factor in Children’s Health
August 2011; Time: 1:19:29
In 2006 Circle of Parents received a grant from the Office of Family Assistance to implement a comprehensive training, technical assistance and community access project to aid local home visiting programs in the provision of support and education to new and expectant fathers. Parents as Teachers, Nurse-Family Partnership, Healthy Families America, Early Head Start and/or Healthy Start homed visiting programs in the states of Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Washington and Wisconsin received $50,000 each to begin services to expecting and new fathers. The project is being implemented in partnership with the Circle of Parents National Network, the National Fatherhood Initiative, the Conscious Fathering Program™ of Parent Trust for Washington Children, PACT Law Center, Prevent Child Abuse America and Leslie Starsoneck, a domestic violence expert.
Through March 2011, 2,280 expecting or fathers of infants, 1,546 fathers of children between 1 and 5 years, 1,057 mothers and 153 other caregivers were served through 710 Conscious Fathering classes and 1,103 Circle of Parents’ groups for fathers.
Funding for this project was made possible through a 5-year Responsible Fatherhood Community Access Program grant received by the Circle of Parents national office in 2006. This grant is funded through the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Families Assistance – Grant No. 90FR0098, CFDA #93.086.
PACT I believe stands for PARENTS (meaning Dads) & CHILDREN TOGETHER — PACT. I could be wrong, but check this out:
(this link leads right to the Hawai’i DHS)
Hawai‘i State Commission on Fatherhood
(etc., etc.)
The last several posts, I attempted to correlate the ACF announcement with actual grantees, and find out WTF (the “W” standing for ‘WHO’) they were. As it turned out, most of the grants were the “90FM” series. I found that most of the top half of the ACF Press Release correlated to the 90FM grant series. That “find” was the result of familiarity with the TAGGS database combined with hunch. Then I compared my printout with the ACF press release. The printout was alpha by grantee institution and the ACF Press Release alpha by state. Complicating it was the name changes of the grantee institutions, but I did check them off, one by one.
There are, however, in 2011 (as of today) $121,077,648 of distributions on the TAGGS database, under a single “CFDA” — 93.086.
There’s been major talk between HHS and, say, the Fathers and Families Coalition of America, or even in the recent 2010 law, about making things more fair to fathers (i.e., pleasing the FR movement leadership) by altering the “FATHER”-related portion of money stolen from TANF & OCSE from one-third to one-half. Accordingly, the HHS/ACF Press announcement of october 3 makes it look well balanced between two themes: Top half, MARRIAGE ($59-odd million) and bottom half, FATHERHOOD ($59-odd million).
In practice, the top half having gone primarily to “FM” which sure looks like faith-based groups, is in effect giving it to fatherhood-propagation anyhow; that’s pretty much what faith-based groups do. IF they weren’t so inclined, they would be just secular social service groups, and as such deal with their difficulties with feminism, women having the vote, women controlling reproduction or contraception, married women having a say in household finances, married women actually reporting what their (likewise married, obviously) spouses were doing to them, or their children in the home, and in general opting out of marriage because of that. They also would line up with the rest of the United States that is NOT “faith-based” or practicing a private cult that disagrees with basic laws (such as cultlike beliefs as, you cannot–really- divorce, or beating up someone to dominate the relationship is normal behavior if it’s done to preserve the “father-leader/mother-breeder” status quo).
Yet this next printout shows an increasing variety of grant streams: FM, FR, FK, FN, & FO are among the new ones. FE (Fatherhood Education) is getting “old,” obviously. From what I can tell, FN is for Native American; FK seems to deal with incarcerated populations, and I haven’t figured out FO yet. Notice not a single of these begins with the word “M” for “Marriage.” Perhaps that letter might be mistakenly associated with “MOTHERS” about which this movement has little to do, except in making sure they are not going to be sole physical custodians, and certainly not sole physical and legal ones, for long, if HHS has anything to do with it.
In this listing, you will also see a number of organizations with grants listed as $0, which I gather means either they’re not getting one this year, or they haven’t yet. CIRCLE OF PARENTS, that I landed pretty hard on last post (today’s revision) is among the $0 ones.
THESE CHARTS ARE FOR SCROLLING, BUT THE LINKS ARE ACTIVE — CLICK TO LEARN MORE ABOUT ANY GROUP OR GRANT. TAKE A LOOK AT THE TITLES — of the PROJECTS and of the GRANTEES. Compare with the $$. Ask: WTF are they doing? and perhaps look locally, and demand some explanation, or trace the funding in your area.
AGAIN — for comparison — here’s the official announcement:
Healthy Marriage / Responsible Fatherhood 2011 Grantees = $59,997,077 + $59,396,652 = $119,393,729.
As of October 22, 2011 evening, I searched the code “93.086” which represents this category of grants — and got $121,077,648.
A difference of $1,643,919 in just a few weeks (could be legit) — but take a look.
At the bottom I talk some about a Community Action Group in Ohio (WSOS). Research is incomplete on this, and I may not have all the facts straight, but readers can fact-check themselves as well. I am trying to answer the larger question about the relationship between “Community Action Programs” in this state and their fundings.
In general, perhaps without my narrative of any guidance, readers might get a general idea of what titles programs are getting how much money, and where. This listing is not by state, but alpha by Grantee — which gets interesting as we already know Grantees have creative name-changing habits already, plus TAGGS has opted some creative spellings of existing names. I figure this is just part of the game. Here we go:
This report ran “AWARD SEARCH” “YEAR 2011″ CFDA 93086” from dropdown list and comes out in 4 segments: 50 entries per page, plus the last few:
Showing: 1 – 50 of 178 Award Actions
Page: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Recipient: *FAMILY SERVICE OF WESTCHESTER
Recipient ZIP Code: 10606-3003
Recipient: ADVOCAP, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 54936-1108
Recipient: AL ST OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
Recipient ZIP Code: 36104
Recipient: ASSOCIATION OF VILLAGE COUNCIL PRESIDENTS (ONAP)
Recipient ZIP Code: 99559-0219
Recipient: AUBURN UNIVERSITY
Recipient ZIP Code: 36849
Recipient: AVANCE, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 77092
Recipient: Alliance for North Texas Healthy & Effective Marriages
Recipient ZIP Code: 75246-1754
Recipient: Archuleta County Department of Human Services
Recipient ZIP Code: 81147
Recipient: Arizona Youth Partnership
Recipient ZIP Code: 85741-2259
Recipient: BEECH ACRES PARENTING CENTER
Recipient ZIP Code: 45230-2907
Recipient: BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES
Recipient ZIP Code: 49501-0294
Recipient: Brighter Beginnings
Recipient ZIP Code: 94601
Recipient: CAMBODIAN ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 90806-2708
Recipient: CANGLESKA, INC.
Recipient ZIP Code: 57752-0638
Recipient: CATHOLIC CHARITIES
Recipient ZIP Code: 67214-3504
Recipient: CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD
Recipient ZIP Code: 06105-1901
Recipient: CATHOLIC CHARITIES/DIOCESE TRENTON
Recipient ZIP Code: 08618-5705
Recipient: CENTERFORCE
Recipient ZIP Code: 94901-5516
Recipient: CHAUTAUQUA OPPORTUNITIES, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 14048-2754
Recipient: CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Recipient ZIP Code: 60604
Recipient: CHILDREN’S FRIEND AND SERVICE
Recipient ZIP Code: 02903-4011
Recipient: CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES-SCH OF PHYSICAL THER
Recipient ZIP Code: 90027
Recipient: CHILDREN`S AID SOCIETY IN CLEARFIELD COUNTY
Recipient ZIP Code: 16830-3323
Recipient: CHILDREN`S INSTITUTE , INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 90005
Recipient: CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE
Recipient ZIP Code: 59521
Recipient: CIRCLE OF PARENTS
Recipient ZIP Code: 60611-3777
Recipient: CO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Recipient ZIP Code: 80203
Recipient: COEUR DALENE TRIBE
Recipient ZIP Code: 83851-0408
Recipient: COMMUNITY PREVENTION PARTNERSHIP OF BERKS COUNTY
Recipient ZIP Code: 19601-3303
Recipient: CONFEDERATED SALISH & KOOTENAI TRIBES
Recipient ZIP Code: 59855-0278
Recipient: CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ
Recipient ZIP Code: 97380
Recipient: COOK INLET TRIBAL COUNCIL, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 99503
Recipient: COUNCIL ON PREVENTION & EDUCATION SUBSTANCES, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 40204-1743
Recipient: CRECIENDOS UNIDOS/GROWING TOGETHER
Recipient ZIP Code: 85004
Recipient: California Healthy Marriages Coalition
Recipient ZIP Code: 92024-2215
Recipient: Center For Self-Sufficiency, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 53211
Recipient: Child family Services of Eastern Virginia
Recipient ZIP Code: 23517
Recipient: Community Marriage Builders, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 47714-1863
NEXT! – PAGE 2 of 4
Recipient: Connections To Success
Recipient ZIP Code: 633012634
Recipient: County of Montrose
Recipient ZIP Code: 81401
Recipient: DC DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Recipient ZIP Code: 20032
Recipient: DOUGLAS CHEROKEE ECONOMIC AUTHORITY, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 37816-1218
Recipient: EAST LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY UNION
Recipient ZIP Code: 90022-5147
Recipient: EDUCATION ASSISTANCE CENTER OF LONG ISLAND, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 11550
Recipient: EL PASO CENTER FOR CHILDREN
Recipient ZIP Code: 79930
Recipient: ELIZABETHS NEW LIFE CENTER
Recipient ZIP Code: 45405
Recipient: Employment Opportunity & Training Center of Northeaster
Recipient ZIP Code: 18503
Recipient: FAMILY & CHILDREN’S SERVICE, INC.
Recipient ZIP Code: 74120-4429
Recipient: FIRST A M E CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Recipient ZIP Code: 98122
Recipient: FIRST THINGS FIRST
Recipient ZIP Code: 37403-3433
Recipient: FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY
Recipient ZIP Code: 54520-0396
Recipient: FORTUNE SOCIETY, INC (THE)
Recipient ZIP Code: 10031-7116
Recipient: FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Recipient ZIP Code: 93721
Recipient: Family Guidance, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 15143-9554
Recipient: Family Resource Center of Raleigh, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 27601-1947
Recipient: Family Service Center at Houston and Harris County
Recipient ZIP Code: 77006
Recipient: Fathers & Families Resources/Research Center
Recipient ZIP Code: 46208-4705
Recipient: Fathers` Support Center, St. Louis
Recipient ZIP Code: 63158
Recipient: Friends Outside in Los Angeles County, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 91101-1632
Recipient: Future Foundation
Recipient ZIP Code: 30344-4137
Recipient: GATEWAY COMMUNITY SERVICE ORGANIZATION
Recipient ZIP Code: 41472
Recipient: GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 55104-1708
Recipient: GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF AUSTIN
Recipient ZIP Code: 78703
Recipient: GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF PITTSBURGH
Recipient ZIP Code: 15203-2102
Recipient: GRANATO COUNSELING SERVICES
Recipient ZIP Code: 22182
Recipient: HAYMARKET CENTER
Recipient ZIP Code: 60607
Recipient: HOOPA VALLEY BUSINESS COUNCIL, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Recipient ZIP Code: 95546
Recipient: Healthy Families/Thriving Communities Collaborative Cou
Recipient ZIP Code: 20001-4330
Recipient: Healthy You, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 363031997
Recipient: High Country Consulting LLC
Recipient ZIP Code: 82001-2758
Recipient: Horizon Outreach
Recipient ZIP Code: 77386
Recipient: I C F, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 22031-6050
Recipient: IRCO-IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
Recipient ZIP Code: 97220
Recipient: Imperial Valley Regional Occupational Program
Recipient ZIP Code: 92243-2943
Recipient: JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY
Recipient ZIP Code: 72761
Recipient: Jewish Family & Children`s Service of Sarasota-Manatee,
Recipient ZIP Code: 34237-5223
Recipient: KEIKI O KA AINA PRESCHOOL, INC.
Recipient ZIP Code: 96819
Recipient: Kanawha Institute for Social Research & Action, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 25064-1433
Recipient: Kentucky River Foothills Development Council, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 40475-2457
Recipient: LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 45206-1780
Recipient: LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA
Recipient ZIP Code: 57105-6048
Recipient: Lexington Leadership Foundation
Recipient ZIP Code: 40504-3154
NEXT! — PAGE 3 of 4
Recipient: MARRIAGE SAVERS OF CLARK COUNTY
Recipient ZIP Code: 45503-4175
Recipient: MD ST DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Recipient ZIP Code: 21201
Recipient: MEMPHIS & SHELBY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Recipient ZIP Code: 38105-5041
Recipient: MID-IOWA COMMUNITY ACTION, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 50158
Recipient: MILWAUKEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Recipient ZIP Code: 53226
Recipient: MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR CITIZENS PROGRAM, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 40066
Recipient: Meier Clinics Foundation
Recipient ZIP Code: 60187-4579
Recipient: Metro United Methodist Urban Ministry
Recipient ZIP Code: 92116-4557
Recipient: Minnesota Council on Crime and Justice
Recipient ZIP Code: 55415-1200
Recipient: Mission West Virginia, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 25526
Recipient: More Than Conquerors Inc
Recipient ZIP Code: 300835318
Recipient: NASHVILLE METROPOLITIAN BORDEAUX HOSPITAL
Recipient ZIP Code: 37218
Recipient: NATIONAL OFFICE OF SAMOAN AFFAIRS
Recipient ZIP Code: 90746
Recipient: NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF CONCERNED BLACK MEN, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 20009-4422
Recipient: NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY
Recipient ZIP Code: 88003
Recipient: NJ ST DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Recipient ZIP Code: 08625
Recipient: NOOKSACK INDIAN TRIBE
Recipient ZIP Code: 98244-0157
Recipient: NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES
Recipient ZIP Code: 97213-2933
Recipient: NW Marriage Institute
Recipient ZIP Code: 98682-2328
Recipient: New York Youth At Risk, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 10038
Recipient: OAKLAND/LIVINGSTON HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY
Recipient ZIP Code: 48056
Recipient: OH St Governor`s Office of Faith Based & Comm Initiativ
Recipient ZIP Code: 43215
Recipient: OK ST DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Recipient ZIP Code: 73125
Recipient: OPERATION KEEPSAKE
Recipient ZIP Code: 44087-1654
Recipient: PARENTS PLUS
Recipient ZIP Code: 54952-0452
Recipient: PEANUT BUTTER & JELLY PRESCHOOL
Recipient ZIP Code: 87105
Recipient: PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE, INC.
Recipient ZIP Code: 19130-2202
Recipient: PHOENIX PROGRAMS OF NEW YORK,INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 10023
Recipient: PROJECT S.O.S., INC.
Recipient ZIP Code: 32216-6241
Recipient: PUBLIC STRATEGIES INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 73116-7909
Recipient: Parenting Center (The)
Recipient ZIP Code: 76107
Recipient: QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE
Recipient ZIP Code: 98350
Recipient: RECAPTURING THE VISION, INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Recipient ZIP Code: 33157-5372
Recipient: RIDGE Project, Inc
Recipient ZIP Code: 43512-2575
Recipient: Retreat, Inc.
Recipient ZIP Code: 11937
Recipient: SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH (SAY), SAN DIEGO, INC.
Recipient ZIP Code: 92123
Recipient: SOUTH PUGET INTERTRIBAL PLANNING AGENCY
Recipient ZIP Code: 98584
Recipient: SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAMS, INC.
Recipient ZIP Code: 78704
Recipient: SPRINGFIELD URBAN LEAGUE, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 62703-1002
Recipient: STARKVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Recipient ZIP Code: 39759-2803
Recipient: SUQUAMISH & KLALLAM HEALTH PLAN
Recipient ZIP Code: 98346
Recipient: Sacramento Healthy Marriage Project
Recipient ZIP Code: 95821
Recipient: Scholarship and Guidance Association
Recipient ZIP Code: 60609-4231
And FINALLY:
Fiscal Year = 2011
Showing: 151 – 178 of 178 Award Actions
Page: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Recipient: Shalom Task Force
Recipient ZIP Code: 10274-0137
Recipient: St. Louis Healthy Marriage Coalition
Recipient ZIP Code: 63108-3302
Recipient: Structured Employment Econ Dev Corp (SEEDCO)
Recipient ZIP Code: 10010
Recipient: Supportive Integrated Services
Recipient ZIP Code: 71101
Recipient: TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE
Recipient ZIP Code: 99701-4871
Recipient: TARRANT COUNTY WORKFORCE BOARD
Recipient ZIP Code: 76103
Recipient: TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY-SAN MARCOS
Recipient ZIP Code: 78666
Recipient: THE DIBBLE FUND FOR MARRIAGE EDUCATION
Recipient ZIP Code: 94707-0881
Recipient: THE HIVE CREATIVE GROUP
Recipient ZIP Code: 36303-1997
Recipient: TLINGIT & HAIDA TRIBES CENTRAL COUNCIL
Recipient ZIP Code: 99801
Recipient: TOLEDO AREA MINISTRIES
Recipient ZIP Code: 436201735
Recipient: TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY IN ROANOKE
Recipient ZIP Code: 24001-2868
Recipient: The South Carolina Center for Fathers and Families
Recipient ZIP Code: 29204-2413
Recipient: UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 49201-1223
Recipient: UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL ASSOCIATES
Recipient ZIP Code: 10467-2401
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES
Recipient ZIP Code: 72205-7101
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA
Recipient ZIP Code: 32826
Recipient: UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE
Recipient ZIP Code: 37916
Recipient: UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY
Recipient ZIP Code: 84322
Recipient: Urban Ventures Leadership Foundation
Recipient ZIP Code: 55408-2410
Recipient: VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION
Recipient ZIP Code: 05405-3401
Recipient: WAIT Training
Recipient ZIP Code: 80237
Recipient: WSOS COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 43420-3021
Recipient: YOUTH & FAMILY ALLAIANCE
Recipient ZIP Code: 78704-7046
Recipient: YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES OF CANADIAN COUNTY, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 73036
Recipient: YWCA OF SAN ANTONIO
Recipient ZIP Code: 78240-1480
Showing: 151 – 178 of 178 Award Actions
Page: « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Comment re:
Recipient: WSOS COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION, INC
Recipient ZIP Code: 43420-3021
This is the ONLY agency where an HHS grant (apparently) goes directly to a certain OHIO County where a recent child-rape in a supervised visitation center has been making headline news. In exploring the situation — and the institution — it turns out that the institution where it happens was 75% government funded, with HALF the funding being a special “Children’s Levy” to the state, and the other 22% “Federal Funding.”
OHIO — like a few states — has an actual “FATHERHOOD COMMISSION” which does what Fatherhood Commissions do, primarily directing grants towards saving families by keeping Dads involved. Part of the streamlined funding (or, “Flexible Funding” as it’s called), enabling them to get the money FAST to serve children and families — like this 13 month old girl that was raped and molested by her biological mother and father, who got access too her (despite Daddy already being a registered juvenile sex offender) by taking “parenting classes,” and like her older sister — removed from Mom the day she was born, put in foster care, and there bludgeoned to death by a foster care mother, now in prison I gather, before she turned two. In addition to the funding to provide supervised visitation access centers where by abusers can REALLY bond with their offspring, the state of Ohio now has to pay for jail space for mother and father, and public defenders, as the outrage is normally wanting the couple to go to jail for life.
I looked at the docket for the father and mother, and find out that while the father’s attorney has been REAL pro-active (insanity plea, etc.) — and that it’s $27.00 per action — the mother’s, if any, appears to be doing nothing. I have YET to locate a single tax return for the outfit that failed to supervise here, but we hear (so far) that the citizens attempting to get into the Board meeting for the public-funded organization were turned away at the door. To date, in looking at the “FCFC” setup (hard to understand unless you explore Ohio’s “FAMILIES AND CHILDREN FIRST” site), there are precious few FCFC’s (out of 88 counties in the state) which actually filed — with the state of ohio — as one, resulting in a public-access tax return stating how much money they got, WHAT THEIR BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ARE PAID — and where it went.
This organization’s primary business is HEAD START — HANDICAPPED TRAINING & TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FULL AND HALF DAY, with occasional RURAL FACILITIES and just a tad of ‘PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD.”
This group must’ve given money to some non-TRumbull County recipients, judging by the results searching awards by LOCATION, and choosing Trumbull County. Be patient, I’ll explain. This is selecting no year: I already know all awards to this county (directly from HHS) were ACF awards, from the same basic Location Search / Group by Agency:
County = TRUMBULL
State = OHIO
Summary = Recipient
Showing: 1 – 7 of 7 Recipients
S
These awards (if you click on it) are in the exact same category and project name as the WSOS ones, above:
Trumbull Community Action program is labeled as a nonprofit PRIVATE org. under TAGGS, for what it’s worth (WSOS as nonprofit PUBLIC,e tc.)
AWARD ACTIONS
Showing: 1 – 50 of 64 Award Actions
Page: « Previous 1 2 Next »
Their website explains Community Action Programs as part of the 1960s War on Poverty, generally; explains that in 2002, they got Head STart funding, and in essence, they are a middle-man contracting with the government to provide services. the WSOS apparently represents 4 Ohio Counties (out of 88 available). I”m not quite sure how ‘TRUMBULL” county fits in there, but WSOS grants are apparently going there.
The program under which “HELP ME GROW” classes appear to take place includes the place where the child was raped during a scheduled visitation. (Cell phone images were found, so whether or not it took place is not in question).
2002
|
- Literacy – PRC Ottawa County
- Skills for Life Ottawa County
- Help Me Grow
|
|
|
2003
|
- Help Me Grow Ottawa County
- WSOS secures funding for Early Head Start program
|
Apparently the WSOS stands for 4 different Ohio Counties: Odd there is no “T” in that acronym, seeing as Trumbull is getting the bulk of their HHS monies:
 |
|
|
1965
|
Officers of the Seneca, Sandusky, and Ottawa County Community Action committees meet in Fremont and draft a joint constitution that created SOS Community Action Commission. |
|
2002
|
- Literacy – PRC Ottawa County
- Skills for Life Ottawa County
- Help Me Grow
|
|
|
2003
|
- Help Me Grow Ottawa County
- WSOS secures funding for Early Head Start program
|
Funding sought to help unemployed fathers in nine Ohio counties
If a $560,000 proposal to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Family Assistance is funded, 200 families in Wood, Sandusky, Ottawa, Seneca, Hancock, Crawford, Marion, Richland and Morrow counties will receive assistance to help them achieve economic stability during the next three years.
The Board of Directors of the WSOS Community Action granted approval to submit the proposal along with four other new proposals.
The grant, called the Responsible Fatherhood grant, will provide access to employment, education, training, intensive family-centered case management as well as a range of other support services customized to each family – all with the goal of helping the family achieve economic stability.
WSOS will also apply on behalf of the Sandusky County Homeless Coalition for $2,550 from the Sandusky County Community Foundation. The funds will be used to provide 60 needy county residents to secure driver’s licenses, birth certificates, and state identification cards necessary for them to obtain or retain employment.
The two other proposals will be made by the Community Development Department to assist Ohio communities. One proposal will seek $105,000 from the Governor’s Office of Appalachia that will be used to provide leadership training to small community water and sewer personnel for one year. The Ohio Water District Association (OWDA) will provide matching funds up to $45,000. Another proposal for $250,000 to the same office will provide technical assistance to small communities for GPS data collection and GIS mapping. OWDA will again provide matching funds of $38,000 while the participating communities will contribute another $247,194.
“Strengthening leaders, organizations, and networks to build a stronger domestic violence field“*
OfflinePosts: 1,704
(I’m sorry to see that this foundation has taken up with a PAS specialist, in “Transitioning Families”
Justice Programs Office
The Family Justice Center Alliance aims to create a network of national and international Family Justice Centers and other models of co-located, multi-agency service centers for victims of family violence and their children with close working relationships, shared training and technical assistance, collaborative learning processes, and coordinated funding assistance.
On October 13, 2011, the Department of Justice issued the following 
The new commission will take a broader approach to strengthening families by detailing comprehensive statewide strategies for Florida to promote safe, violence-free, substance-abuse-free, respectful, nurturing and responsible parenting; including connection or reconnection of 
income that may be materially affected by their official acts. Agency employees, including some public officials who are designated in a conflict of interest code are required to disclose certain financial interests according to the disclosure categories assigned to that position in their agency’s conflict of interest code.
,published Friday 7/29/2011 in Syracuse.com)
Let's Get Honest! Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History 
How Much Mileage Can DV Advocates get out of the press on San Francisco’s Ross Mirkarimi/Eliana Lopez case?
with one comment
This has been headline news for how long? It definitely brings up mixed feelings on my part — knowing how many women are receiving far more severe battery, false imprisonment, endangering children and intimidating witnesses throughout the Bay Area, and have been for years — many years. While each time there is some press, someone from one of the organizations gets quoted.
March 31, 2012, last Saturday, Section “C,”* an article laid out at top of the page, full width, and by Columnist C.W. Nevius), reads:
(*Bay Area section of the SF Chronicle)
**not sure this is the same “Myrna Melgar, just included the LinkedIn profile which shows her professional/civic leadership in the area. It probably is)
This is the Bay Guardian article, and it seems well written enough. I’m glad someone filled in a few of these details, including a factor that until 5 Mr. Mirkarimi was raised in a bi-cultural family (Russian Jewish mother/ Iranian Muslim father), and then was separated from his father. There seems to be a sense of father-absence here:
(The bulk of my post is addressing topics raised in this article, particularly a certain reference to a Canadian sociologist for insight into this Californian incident).
Whirlwind romance, charmer? Another article (reporting on this one) adds:
Heather Knight Thursday, March 29, 2012
(He got his girlfriend knocked up in the course of leisure? or business? Not mentioned — were they married at the time?
(Michael Macor/The Chronicle)
Eliana Lopez, wife of San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi, speaks to the news media about the three misdemeanor charges against her husband, on Friday Jan. 13, 2012, in San Francisco, Ca
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/28/BAS31NRKL3.DTL#ixzz1qv1dHpDm
Bay Guardian Op-Ed, cont’d.:
Now, about prosecuting the low-level domestic violence against the wife’s wishes:
I don’t know Ms. Melgar’s life story (or whether she’s currently married — sounds like not). However, there are TWO ways the District Attorney’s Office can disempower women — if this is correct, prosecuting against the woman’s wishes when it’s supposedly a “minor” event. Or (and this was my situation and MANY other women’s) NOT prosecuting them despite severe domestic violence, when prosecuting them might save a life, or save ongoing destruction of life. See
And in this politically charged event — MADE TO ORDER for anyone who didn’t want Mirkarimi’s Progressive Politics disrupting the city (notice — nothing to do with domestic violence in that phrase) — because the events had some validity.
INTERJECTION — information from Purpleberets.org — and the topic is well-covered at the Sonoma County (Northern CA, not too far from SF) “Women’s Justice Center.” This is talking about much, MUCH more severe cases where DA refused to prosecute. (And if you know my blog, the case underlying it — and which eventually led to my blogging habit — was when district attorneys in TWO Counties refused to stop a child-stealing in action, or to prosecute it — ever. The general practice over a number of years (by law enforcement, specifically — I’m talking police in a number of cities, county sheriffs in more than one, and the district attorney’s office. As it turns out later, the person in charge of the “Alameda County Family Justice Center” (a hybrid creation by DA’s office and others modeled on San Diego’s one which came out of the City Attorneys’ Office — I’ve blogged this plenty elsewhere), Ms. Nadia Lockyer, then went on to win the position of County Supervisor (with help of a $1 million campaign funding and very, very, very well connected spouse 30 years her senior) — had a substance abuse problem, started an affair with someone (closer to her age) she met in rehab — himself getting off ‘meth’ — and had an incident requiring 911 assistance in a Newark (California) motel early a.m. This is the Bay Area leadership . . . . . it’s typically about politics and careers — and NOT about preventing violence against women and services to them. In the larger scope.
So, re: the immense power of the District Attorney’s Office: Written, I believe, around the year 2000:
California Passes Tough New Domestic Violence Laws — by Maria DeSantis, director Women’s Justice Center
Back to Myrna Melgar’s article, minimizing the incident:
It seems Myrna is oblivious to the fact that, through the family court, if Eliana did decide (later) to go to Venezuela without her husband’s assent, he could — in a moment, and don’t think such a person is unaware of this — charge her (or find someone to charge her) with parental kidnapping, put an arrest warrant out for her, and in the meantime get practically ANY family law judge in San Francisco — unless they had a personal grudge or other political reason to not do this — to switch sole custody to him, demand some sort or extradition, and/or have her thrown in jail if she came back to work things out. And don’t think that this isn’t a possibility. Maybe they would’ve worked it out — or maybe not. But one thing’s for sure — I read a LOT of material put out by domestic violence groups, and have networked with hundreds, literally, of mothers over the years, and most of them were completely ambushed by the concept that appealing to domestic violence laws to protect themselves and kids, even if they were IN a battered womens’ shelter — was no shield at all for later transfer of their children to their abusers. This is literally a third line of advocacy, now — “protective parents.” So, while it did not NOW rise to that abusive level, it certainly could’ve later.
In contradiction to the concept of “no-fault” divorce law…
**Jargon translation: wife-beating is no reason to restrict a child who witnessed this having access to their biological father. Let us do supervised visitation, etc. — hence (in the US) HHS “Access/Visitation” funding, with help from the (also international) Children’s Rights Council, which developed the term “access” to replace the term “visitation.” This model will be ADMINSTRATIVELY or PRACTICALLY begun (or has been already) and then other highly placed individuals (state by state in the US) will suggest — hey, why not make it a law? (Example: PA: Commission on Justice Initiatives: Changing the Culture of Custody).
PRAXIS means “practices.” Who is practiced upon? (Sorry, this wasn’t brought before our voters — except it went through the US Reps House Appropriations Committee, I guess. . . ..
Not before endorsing and propagating a system of educational institutions — taking public funding — based on social theory, and which have attracted a host of inappropriate misappropriations of public employees times, and which set up a built-in HIERARCHY — the exact OPPOSITE of what women, particularly mothers, leaving abuse need. This hierarchy is a lose/lose situation for any person imagining he/she has enforceable, legal rights in the USA — as an INDIVIDUAL. It sets up the hierarchy of the TEACHERS (for hire // mercenaries) versus the “TAUGHT.”
The social science THEORY that one can educate or train men out of violence is just taht — a theory. It is also contrary to the american (USA) form of government, which is to expect people to keep an identifiable law, and maintain a fair process of assigning punishments for those who choose not to. This means all people can be informed of WHAT their laws are — and leaves no room for speculations on the social impact of father-absence, single-parenthood, or even violence against women — and then millions of $$ which the public (and private interests) fund to tinker with the demonstration projects each time they get it wrong.
Back to the C.W.Nevius article (top of post), which continues:
FYI, I do not live in San Francisco (some may wonder), but have lived in the area for over two decades, and worked frequently in the city and in surrounding counties — both during and after my “domestic violence” marriage. I notice that whenver there’s a high-profile event, here is this SF DVConsortium and Beverly Upton being consulted for help. I never got any help from them, nor did I get ANY help from the Family Violence Prevention Fund, although, they do throw a great conference, and how validating to know that domestic violence is a health risk (like, I didn’t know that?). It did NOTHING to address the ongoing violence enabled by the family law system to any and all mothers who, after doing the right thing, but having for some reasons, very persistent Exes — are thereafter psychologically, economically, legally and in other ways tortured (if not extorted) — in the custody realm.
This group apparently could care less, so long as they get their funds and keep up the reputation for protecting women from violence – without addressing the land mines ahead of them. SEE MY BLOG! no one gave me a federal fund to publicize this, and apparently the more other groups immunize themselves from DV rhetoric, the better it is for BOTH pro and con grantseekers. So, here — for a quick update — this “Consortium” consorts in getting public grants to continue their agenda. I gather this is a progressive agenda because it’s under the umbrella of the (very large) TIDES Foundation, which also sponsored the nonprofit “Stop Family Violence” — which appears (best I can tell) to consist of a website, and one or two professionals who got to fly around to conferences nationwide (Irene Weiser, i forget who the other person was) and now is perhaps inactive, although the website is still up there.
Members of this agency
Obviously this is important work — HOWEVER — notice the collective grants-obtaining clout they have? That must be HOW there has been such coordinated and collective silence on the fathers’ rights grants and movement I report, and so have other UNsponsored INDIVIDUALS. Do they teach women about to file a kickout order about the upcoming Access/Visitation grants (in place, $10 million a year since 1996), how the Federal Incentives to the Child SUpport Enforcement system include running demonstration grants on how to increase noncustodial (father) time with the children, and how if they go on welfare, they are quite likely to be ex-parte consolidated into a divorce action, and thrown to the family court wolves, whose funding is MUCH larger?
NO — not last I heard.
Do they say anything about the organization AFCC, which practically runs the local Family Courts, let alone the Family Court Facilitators’ offices where people NOT as well-off financially (probably) than Ms. Lopez will end up seeking remedies? AFCC publishes most of the brochures available there — and (I checked in recent years) the coverage of domestic violence issues is highly diminished. So, what does that say about women’s right to know and make an INFormeD decision about whether to confront their batterer (sometimes with a civil protective order — not even mentioned in these dialogues), or call the police and hope a criminal one is instated?
LASTLY (and that’s enough for today!), I wanted to also show the Mayor Ed Lee catering to the FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE organization, which currently owns prime real estate (or owns the organization that owns the real estate) in the SF Praesidio. Futures without Violence, indeed. The antidote to tyranny in our country (whether by domestic individuals within their family walls, or outside them by public officials) is a balance of powers between (1) the government and (2) the people, and fair enforcement of crimes against the state which jeopardize the safety of the public — which domestic violence DOES, and there’s plenty of evidence in the form of innocent bystanders shot, businesses disrupted, as well as responding police officers. We live in one of the more violent countries in the world, in many levels, and despite decades of advocacy by DV groups, their inherent demand for public funds to “coordinate services” and educate — the world, essentially — they are not open to criticism from the street level about this agenda.
TOO BAD – it’s here, it’s coming and I’m not going to stop, if I can help, this outrage. I have one-third of my adult life thrown down this rabbit hole ,and the concept of betrayal is absolutely high. MSM is owned, and is never going to tell the whole story. More bloggers are needed — bloggers that cite their sources where possible, and make sure that this situation is no longer covered up, or specially framed when it comes time to renew the funding for the VAWA act and the counterintuitive simultaneous funding of the next round of fatherhood/marriage etc. grants. No wonder this keeps going on, perhaps — our society is so stressed and compartmentalized, and has been already pre-trained to have their income taxes garnished, so garnishing wages for child support is a short step away. No privacy, no safety, and no justice. Just more debt!
My parting shot, I think: The Mayor that wants Mirkarimi out references Futures without Violence. Label this: “You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours!”
Ed Lee addresses domestic violence conference
Rachel Gordon
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/03/30/BASJ1NSMGF.DTL#ixzz1qux42sTZ
(STATE CHARITABLE RETURN FOR 2009) FORM RRF-I INFORMATION REGARDING GOVERNMENT FUNDING STATEMENT 14 ART B, LINE 6
SHARE THIS POST on...
Written by Let's Get Honest|She Looks It Up
April 2, 2012 at 2:43 PM
Posted in 1996 TANF PRWORA (cat. added 11/2011), Cast, Script, Characters, Scenery, Stage Directions, Domestic Violence vs Family Law, Funding Fathers - literally, Healthy Marriage Responsible Fatherhood (cat added 11/2011), Organizations, Foundations, Associations NGO Hybrids
Tagged with Access-Visitation, AFCC, Alameda County Family Justice Center, Child Support, custody, Declaration of Independence/Bill of Rights, domestic violence, Esta Soler, family law, fatherhood, Feminists, Futures Without Violence (FVPF) 2010 return $11mil revenues $36mil assets rejected-Sched B omits names&addresses of contributors, FVPF becomes Futures without Violence, Intimate partner violence, Laureen Snider (Toronto), men's rights, Myrna Melgar, Nicholas Bala (Toronto), Nonprofits investing in Real Estate, social commentary, U.S. Govt $$ hard @ work..