Let's Get Honest! Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History

This post title is taken from a screenshot below:  Explaining my Inspirat’n for asking, on March 8, Internat’l Women’s Day, Should the USA Join the Commonwealth of Nations?… (The WordPress-generated, case-sensitive shortlink ends “-6bm”)

This segment came from my just-published post with (otherwise identical) case-sensitive shortlink ending “-5VC.” It is closer to the original sentiment, but after four more days of my detailing and posting the proof in annotated- images, discovering new (hot) leads on the “show me the money” trail, this earlier section ended up, typically, at the bottom of a very long post.  In the process of moving, there have been “add-on” sections to build some documentation and depth onto the originally expressed premise, which you’ll find in its most basic form closer to the bottom of this post.

I am deeply concerned about this situation as expressed in the longer title (published March 12),…

Should the USA join the Commonwealth of Nations?  And if not, Why Should We Allow our Elected Federal and State Officials to sponsor Coordination of Child Welfare, Domestic Violence, and Family Court|Custody Practices, as Ordered (Ordained?) by Appointed (not elected) Experts To Promote Their Personal Beliefs, Practices, and Profits? (A Few Reminders of Who’s Who) [Started 2-17-2017, published 3-12-2017, with case-sensitive short-link ending “-5VC”].

…THIS one is a reminder of who and what the Commonwealth of Nations is, when it started, the first holder of the title “Secretary-General” of that Commonwealth and of some parallel developments during the same timeframe in the USA, roughly paralleling the push for civil rights, and women’s rights (to prevent discrimination on the basis of race or gender), several assassinations of high-profile leaders in those areas (including two Kennedy brothers, one a President, the other Attorney-General, which I’m going to assume a general awareness of and not document further here) and Martin Luther King, Jr. [more links below on MLK, Jr.] and Malcolm X (From history.com –at the time of his death, after returning from a trip to Mecca and one year founding the Organization of Afro-American Unity, “El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz”) after these movements met the national attention through both marches –including a march on Washington D.C.–and televised coverage, and around all this, and these times, the expansion of children’s/fathers’ rights organizations as coached by nonprofits and public officials, into realms where the Civil Rights Acts of 1957, 1964, and accompanying movements, would, could, and did not reach — and still do not.

I’m inclined to believe based on my research so far (which includes a gut-instinct response to readings over so many years), it’s “would not” (intention seems built into the design) vs. a “could not.”  At this point, the “did not” is not really debatable. (Those Civil Rights Acts and accompanying movements including “affirmative action,” establishment of various Commissions and Councils on Equal Employment / Civil Rights, and corresponding presidential executive orders + memos to department heads) left major gaps and loopholes to allow discrimination (both racist and sexist) to continue.  What’s more that progress occurred in a context of countering movements in other venues to “turn back the clock” particularly on women, particularly mothers.

(Image of a 1995 Briefing found on a Purdue.edu/HHS website with apparently upload date June 2015, that is, twenty years later.  I’ve posted on this before).

Policy Institute – Family Impact Seminars (p1, cover page), “Disconnected Dads — Strategies for Promoting Responsible Fatherhood” (Purdue being in Indiana)

http://tinyurl.com/2002HandbkFathrInvolvmt-MultiD = condensed link for this and next 2 images (cover page is 3rd image) from a Google Book published originally 2002, authors two women one NYU, the other NICHHD, updated 2008, in both NJ and London. Get used to some of the author names; and the jargon of the field; their careers have been helped by expounding and publishing in the “fatherhood” field. THIS book cited “DisconnectedDads” (above) on p.588 (=how I found it).

…As I learned this century, seeking protection and a safe exit from a dangerous marriage, and Not Without the Children.  Current HHS/ACF/OFA leadership Susan Golonka had prior associations with Theodora Ooms, as I blogged recently.  Now (well, at least up until the Donald J. Trump White House Administration, after which HHS leadership status is “tba” and might get “drained” along with several dozen US Attorneys….) providing guidance to the very Program Office which is administering the “Federal Family Values” (HMRF) funding into state, local, tribal governments as well as into private, nonprofit (often) hands, basically for public propaganda on the patriotically correct and not-so-correct (translation:  single-mother-headed) family + household composition and hierarchy of controls) (I posted some recently; this is a reminder of the chain of events and entities associated with what you see just above):

(not much room on the image to make notes; see link above for full-sized!) This shows the Golonka/Ooms connection; next image shows where Golonka is today (unless new Pres. Trump has already appointed someone new).

Marriage/Fatherhood programming is now being run through (at a minimum) HHS. The several images above (and one below) trace some of the background (incl. specific personnel, working typically for Nonprofits which can get an audience with the nation’s governors that few individuals could get around THEIR private causes…)

|~Annotated Image 1 of 2| HHS OFA About=Ldrship (pgLastRevwdApr19’2016) shows DeputyDir Susan Golonka came nonprofit NGA CtrBestPrax since 2010 and was representing it during 1996WelfareReform’B4which Famil |~Annotated Image 2 of 2| Golonka (Susan) pre-NGACBP referenced w Theodora Ooms (publ1991) shows prior FamilyImpactSeminar involvmt (GoogleBk on HeadStart, p90) ~ScrnShot March9 2017@4.44PM (annotated Mar17)

Malcolm X Legacy, Several References, including to “MXGM.org” (small section with more big questions, added right before publication):

• KingEncyclopedia.stanford.edu, (“MartinLuther King Jr. and the Struggle for Global Freedom,”) The “Malcolm X 1925-1965” page.  There is also a “Malcolm-x.org,” a Malcomx.com, and “The Malcolm X Project” at Columbia University, as well as (started in 2001 and in part leading up to publication of a book)
• May 2011 The Atlantic, “The Legacy of Malcolm X: Why his legacy lives on in Barack Obama (Ta-Nehishi Coates)
• April 7, 2011, The Guardian: “Malcolm X: The Man Behind the Myth” (by Hugh Muir)
  • (In 2011 a book by came out:  “Manning Marable, an academic and respected authority on black America…his book Malcolm X: A Life in Reinvention…)
• ?? January 27, 2017 (The only reference to this in several pages of search results, and it was in the NY Daily News):  “Malcolm X’s daughter and granddaughter had stolen a rental car full of abused pit bulls”  Strange….
• MXGM.org (Malcolm X Grass Roots Movement) and CooperationJackson.org (as in “Jackson, Mississippi).  The websites say that “New African People’s Organization” (NAPO) is the parent organization of Cooperation Jackson. See next three images:  [incidentally, so far I found no 501©3s or 501©4s under the above names; they may not exist, or they may not be organized under those entity names…  Possibly part of resisting colonialism is also resisting registration underneath its secretaries of state or with the IRS?  I did, however find some organizations (as nonprofits) referenced on some of the websites — such as The Praxis Project (D.C.) and the U.S. Human Rights Network, both recent (this century).  A look at the Praxis Project board membership and funders (including R.Wood Johnson Foundation) gives a rather less “anti-establishment” flavor to the movement).
  • [Next 3 links: 1) earliest Form 990 for Praxis Project; 2) showing, again, the FoundationCenter.org confused/misleading labeling of the same (notice same EIN# for all three labels; click through to tax return to see that 2 out of 3 of those returns entities do not match those labels), and 3) initial USHRN tax return, legal domicile Georgia |~| ‘ThePraxisProject (DC with strong OaklandCA Presence) EIN#300044814_IRS Initial Filing 2002 showing $½M Startup (See BdDir affiliations) -MXGM’org referenced |~| Form 990Tax Forms|By EIN# showing 3 difft labels for DC The Praxis Project (Last was ‘Black Lives Matter’) EIN#300044814, since 2002 in DC+Calif (printed 3-17-2017) |~| US Human Rights Ntwk (first 990 Return 2006 in GA) showing sole paid officer A. Baraka ($74K) in GA-EIN#202404443 (printed Mar17,2017)  One of these got initial $½ M startup funding. Drill-down not a high priority for me at this time; I was just looking for the entity “MXGM.org” or anything on the website indicating a legal home domicile or other fiscal agent (payments are through PayPal).

malcolmx-grassroots-movemt-mxgmorg-showing-chapter-cities-home– (<==Click to read)

mxgm-cooperation-jackson-showing-2014-2011-un-the-decade-for-people-of-african-descent-initiative (<=Click to read. Filename typo has “2011” for 2024 as on image)

Among the MXGM.org projects, it’s clear the concept to counter colonialism and acquire economic autonomy is also an attempt to install socialism and communism.

Q: Is Socialism/Communism really the only alternative to Colonization along the continued “Commonwealth” model [which I also believe remains racist and sexist both] (further discussed below)??  

Anyone else want more socialism and communism — as seems to be happening progressively and gradually anyhow in this country, eroding “sovereignty” of the USA as different from the country it fought a war against to stop being “colonized” (and then went on to finish colonizing the continent, but at least controlled from D.C. mostly, not the usual trans-Atlantic-Ocean empires)?  I certainly don’t!
Read the rest of this entry »