Posts Tagged ‘CPPA=California Protective Parents’ Association (1999ff – EIN#943341470 Cal Entity #2178228 RegAgent @post publicatn) Karen Anderson’
A Different Kind of Attention Develops Sound Judgment [Original, March 23, 2014. Reformat + Reminders March 14, 2017][+July2017]
Post title with case-sensitive, WordPress-generated short-link ending “-2qM”:
A Different Kind of Attention develops Sound Judgment [Original, March 23, 2014. Reformat and Reminders March 14, 2017, Three Years Later]. The post is too long. On the other hand, I take on key entities involved, do some drill-downs, and put timelines and participant names to cover-ups.
Apparently I am not showing solidarity within “the movement,” said a comment below (see “Comments”). I responded to the assumption that the “movement” (coalitions, groupings of professionals towing traumatized parents around for show-and-tell, and encouraging them to tell their stories as a platform to the reforms wanted by the groupings of professionals [“Let’s get yet more Technical Assistance and Training (domestic violence consultants — aware of the custody issues) in there” — like us and our friends”] was really “the movement” and that those so engaged had battered mothers’ or the public best interests even as a priority.
Post in Update Process. Recent (Oct. 2014) introductory material will may be reduced shortly.
I tend to revise published posts as my understanding increases, and often in the process or drafting a related one. Here, I felt inspired to elaborate some more on the role of the Ford Foundation, Center for Court Innovation, MDRC, and the economic influence on setting in motion systems-change elements (including court changes) at public expense.
This is a recent find when I was explaining and showing the Center for Court Innovation to a person completely unfamiliar with it. It didn’t take too long for the individual** to “get”once the tax returns and other materials were shown in person. It probably also helped the understanding process that the individual was familiar with project development and budgets, and hadn’t been indoctrinated NOT to talk finances or economic systems through any court advocacy group which is more interested in selling books, promoting conferences, and getting in on the “train the trainers, educate the judges” routine…. **Incidentally, said individual was a man, not a woman with a cause, or in trauma or fight-or-flight mode regarding the safety or even location of minor children. Not a father with either of those two situations. Just a guy.
It’s not rocket science– it’s just a different kind of attention, and but, yes, it still takes sustained attention and awareness of what kind of information one is focused on absorbing.
NYC 2014 BUDGET — READ! Center for Court Innov got $400K (Fund for City of NY not mentioned), Man Up, LIFT, Vera — ec (439pages…) About 61 pages of summary, followed by a few hundred of fine-print detailed tables, “Appendix A”. <===CLICK THE LINK TO SEE IT ALL.
Qualifiers (added 2017, now that I can do screenprints) — this Report is a Schedule C, dated June 2013, of Adjustments to the FY2014 Budget for the City of New York.
I wish to point out the use of the name “Center for Court Innovation” associated with the EIN# for “Fund for the City of New York,” which this document shows…instead of the EIN# & legal business name “Fund for the City of New York,”
In, fact the Fund (in association with this “Center”) was identified a few times up front (the phrase “Fund for the City of New York” does occur repeatedly throughout the document, the words Center for Court Innovation” just a few times. However, that “CENTER” is not its own entity, neither government nor business, but (as described on its website) a joint project from the Unified NYS Court System AND the (tax-exempt foundation) Fund for the City of New York.
Here are some screenprints from the front of that budget, and a few showing the use of both the Fund for the City designation (with EIN#) and the “Center for Court Innovation” (without; in fact an “initiative” is actually named CCI). MY main point is — be aware of this powerful combination, and of the CCI, as its intents (tax returns and related entities do show) are to test programs, then go national (outward from NY) and international with them. Click any image (in this section on FCNY+CCI) to enlarge; you have the NYC 2014 Budget (Sched C Adjustments) link above.
Among those shown, the light-blue captioned image here, top line of the chart refers to a certain Adolescent Portable Therapy Program under agency DOP (Probably Dept. of Probation) The second row reads “Alternatives to Incarceration (ATI) and was recommended to receive much funding, and the third, “Center for Court Innovation,” $400,000.
I also took a closer look at “Adolescent Portable Therapy” in NYC and who’s referring youth and their families into it.
The light-blue caption (Image referencing “Adolescent Portable Therapy Program”) in association with the CCI initiative under “Criminal Justice Services” (from that Budget Adjustment Schedule C).
Enough was found to move to a separate post, however I’m leaving one of the referring agencies, nicknamed “CASES” and showing its recent increases in Total (Gross) Assets for a joint of reference.
Total results: 5.** Search Again.
ORG. NAME [“CASES”] | ST | YR | FORM | PP | TOTAL ASSETS | EIN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services | NY | 2017 | 990 | 44 | $8,879,354.00 | 13-2668080 |
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services | NY | 2016 | 990 | 38 | $8,330,660.00 | 13-2668080 |
(**Above: I added two more years, YE2016 and 2017, of search results during Aug. 2018 (slight) post cleanup).
ORG. NAME [“CASES”] | ST | YR | FORM | PP | TOTAL ASSETS | EIN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services | NY | 2015 | 990 | 39 | $8,229,096 | 13-2668080 |
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services | NY | 2014 | 990 | 32 | $5,288,689 | 13-2668080 |
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services | NY | 2013 | 990 | 31 | $3,916,408 | 13-2668080 |
Written by Let's Get Honest|She Looks It Up
March 23, 2014 at 9:26 am
Posted in 1996 TANF PRWORA (cat. added 11/2011), Checking Out a Nonprofit (HowTo), Who's Who (bio snapshots)
Tagged with (now ret'd) Justice Judith S. Kaye, 1982 Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for the Courts of the City of NY-Judge Betty Weinberg Ellerin, Anna Freud, APT - Adolescent Portable Therapy, BMCC CPPA CJE et al., CASES -- Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services (EIN#132668080 in Brooklyn NY), Center for Court Innovation, CPPA, CPPA -California Protective Parents' Association (EIN#943341470 Cal Entity 1999ff #_____, CPPA=California Protective Parents' Association (1999ff - EIN#943341470 Cal Entity #2178228 RegAgent @post publicatn) Karen Anderson, Ford Foundation (EIN# 13-1684331 990PF) FY2015 assets $12B ($10B held in "Investmts-Other"), Fund for the City of New York (1968ff EIN#13-2612524) 2015 assets $115.8M Ford-Sponsored, Hon. Betty Weinberg Ellerin (r't'd) @JAMSADR.com (in 1982 Deputy Admin Judge in NY), Isabel Sawhill + Ron Haskins (MDRC Brookings Urban Institute Moynihan Prize etc), Judge Jonathan Lippman named NY Chief Administrative Judge effective 1-Jan-1996 (Judge E. Leo Milonas stepped down after just 2 yrs), Justice E. Leo Milonas, Karen F. Winner Esq (NY Bar 2009 also BMCC presenter), MDRC (EIN#23-7379473 since 1974), OCOF Our Children Our Future Charitable Foundation - Cal Entity# 2076539 (Suspended shortly after formed) trawling for trauma (Parent's stories) w| CPPA