Let's Get Honest! Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History

Identify the Entities, Find the Funding, Talk Sense!

Table of Contents 2020: FamilyCourtMatters.org’s Just Ten Posts (Jan.-July) and Its Only Page [Publ. May 18, 2021..]

leave a comment »


I am an investigative blogger — not an “investigative reporter” — and a domestic violence and family court survivor who chose, early on, to depart from the standard type of reporting and storytelling encouraged by most advocate groups, including “protective parents” and others.  I talk and research entities involved in fighting over the role of the family courts and how to handle abuse within them.

have been blogging (here) since March, 2009.  Since mid-2022 I have been more active on “X” (formerly known as Twitter); much of that quotes or links to this blog.  @LetUsGetHonest

~~||~~ (This button added Dec. 18, 2025 also on my X account), “@LetUsGetHonest” See its “About” page for why.)
Buy Me A Coffee ~~||~~


Title: Table of Contents 2020: FamilyCourtMatters.org’s Just Ten Posts (Jan.-July) and Its Only Page [Publ. May 18, 2021..] (short-link ends “-cKH”** about 5,500 words)

This post is marked “sticky” (pinned to the top) .  Protocol to make a shortlink from the case-sensitive, unique to each post or page three final characters see my “Front Page” (“FamilyCourtMatters.org“).

This is now the topmost of 14 sticky posts accessible through the “Current Posts” doorway (page) to this blog. Some posts are marked sticky to provide access other years’ tables of contents, others just because I consider them basic or important to this field. For example:

Of those 14 sticky posts from January, 2017 forward, I found two I’d like to feature here. The first one (despite its wordy title) was top of the blog when I restructured it, with a “Let’s Talk!” message.  The two posts, both from April-May 2018, and so about three years old now, are:


May 2, 2018

Post Title In 2018, Clamors to Fix, Reform, or Make Kids Safe WITHIN Family Courts STILL (Abusively, Territorially, and Intentionally) Limit Possible Answers by Censoring Terms Admitting Other Historic Evidence — About The Courts (not “Batterers!”) AND Government Itself — while Coaching (even Certifying) Others to Imitate. (Published May 2, 2018) (case-sensitive short-link ending -8Ly,” about 10,700 words)


April 19, 2018

Post Title:Q1, 2018 Posts and “You Are Here,” on my Blog. Meanwhile, WE are Here, Collectively. (Or, From ‘Hewers of Wood + Drawers of Water’ To Functionally and Financially Illiterate** Consumers of Information, Products, and Social Services). (Publ. April 19, 2018) [Case-sensitive, WordPress-generated shortlink ends “-8X8” and this post ends after about 11,000 words]

**Explained more below in this post, and in a typical post. No apologies for failing to sugar-coat the news. Or for long sentences in the next few indented paragraphs, summarizing my understanding and explaining that comment. With additional “show-and-tell” relating to the rest of this post (and blog).

[Several Paragraphs Removed here, post in edit, July 24, 2021. They may resurface as separate post, but I feel are too expressive and personal in nature (as well as in need of some better copyediting) for this context…. //LGH]


This blog is in part (and part — not all!) of my learning curve in defining WHAT’s taking place (however, you may characterize it as “right” or “wrong” or “good” or “bad.”  Unlike my summary expression here (which I take responsibility for as my experience), most of this blog — according to blog purpose — is to get both men and women (whether involved in the court or bystanders) AND the public witnessing all the chaos — to take a closer look at things that are NOT “hearsay” and “he said/she said” and start talking about those.

Policies to stop domestic violence, poverty, child abuse, and “fatherlessness” and to promote, basically, almost anything, including marriage, same-sex or “man and woman only,” and (fill in the blank if it’s a CAUSE:_____) require resources, typically run through tax-exempt organizations and profiting consultants, media experts, subcontractors, and sub-grantees.  These resources are a combination (overall) of public, private, or both — but the “public” can be easily hidden within a single tax return, as can inter-relationships.

So it gets to be more a matter of, how much do we know and will we bother to find out, about who runs the money through which conduits.  It gets to be about taxes, tax-exemption, and databases (run either by governments — who sometimes also outsource them) describing what entities (public or private) operate, where, and how lawfully and honestly do they do so.

It should be understood that governments (in particular the U.S. government) still seem to hold the income-producing assets in the form of investments, and in the form of control of persons who work and pay taxes (i.e., the power to tax).

We should understand in the U.S.A.**– “how things work” and why some centers of power expand, others disappear over time — and along with them, strands of relevant truth.  In particular here, about the family courts and the issues they handle.

(**Those not living here but dealing with the same causes as so concern me here  — how to safely, with children, leave violent relationships, i.e., CONTINUE to survive — when institutions provide obstacle after obstacle to doing so, would also do well to understand these things, and be aware of what people talking shared rhetoric do NOT mention, as has been established here, the negative impact of court privatization and how federal policies towards family courts incentivize certain “outcomes,” but when individual parents, impacted by exactly those outcomes (i.e., the system and incentives worked, as planned) the same federal courts can and often do claim “not our jurisdiction” and bounce the cases back to state level.  So there’s a dichotomy of responsibility).

I found learning all this, as well as the understanding to be fascinating, interesting, and definitely a “transferable skill.”  My technical skills as a self-taught blogger and (to the degree any such skill exists) social media user (Twitter, mostly), lag far behind, but on these topics, I have confidence on what is, in fact, taking place.

And we are not amused…

[“Stakeholders v. Shareholders” Paragraphs Removed here, post in edit, July 24, 2021, which had been added mid-June, 2021…  //LGH]

@@@###

Post in edit, July 25, 2021 …

Many more Paragraphs removed from here, currently (as of that date) resting in draft status elsewhere …  //LGH]

This time (again) I chose to make some peace with my internal urge to speak by getting some expressions, points, observations, off my chest. To skip that section, scroll or page-down below the text (in this color scheme) and the few paragraphs just below it.

Look for the table:  here’s a sample with the first row, showing how it’s organized:

2020 FAMILYCOURTMATTERS.org, The Year in Posts & Pages,* 2020 (with approximate word counts for each and “tags” for some. “Pages” highlit yellow and so marked) URL: short-link ends:
Jan. 3 Arizona! (Career AFCC Academics’ Self-Disclosure Habits, Home Habitats/Economic Niches, cont’d.) [Started Nov. 13, 2019, Publ. only Jan. 3, 2020]..(with Footnote “Just a Few PRWORA-Explaining Posts from my Blog” about 7,000 wds) -bAu
N/A

Until I publish some more this year, the same basic posts (up to the last ten) will appear also under the “Last Ten Posts” widget on the narrow right sidebar, a few inches down on the right side.

[[SECTION REMOVED HERE Dec. 15, 2023, to shorten this page//LGH. I’ve left a footprint here only]]

BROWSING THE BLOG: SUBJECT MATTER OVERVIEWs and NAVIGATION:

Shortcuts to key posts, including the widget marked “The Ten Most Recent Let’s Get Honest Posts…” remain on the right sidebar.  More patient readers or those who prefer to browse can instead scroll down below the sticky posts to get to the last one published. Access to “Pages” is different (why I started including them in the Tables, plural, of Contents); see my Front Page for more info.Personally, I recommend browsing this, and prior year’s Tables of Contents (all are marked “sticky”), and other Sticky Posts  first.  Anyone who hasn’t already done that, or done so recently probably needs basic concept, and points of reference reminders, which I tend to include in most posts, but cannot re-hash every single one.  I’ve developed them over time by just staying on this process and, generally, reporting on the field in media, but my main focus is tracking the economic landscape of it through along both government (especially in the USA) and corporate, that is, along both public and private sectors, especially the tax-exempt sector so deeply in bed with the government sector, in any country.

ABOUT THE BLOG:

My blog tends, and intends, to disrupt and counter the status quo on both sides of the political, gender and religious divides; it’s become more and more important over time as momentum builds in the “Family Court Reform” circles, which includes several academics with long-standing access, apparently, to interns, university assistence in publication on-line, and resources to get in front of a constant flow (so it seems) of newly traumatized or distressed parents, especially mothers (a featured demographic), to promote reforms which refuse to take into account things they’ve known — but won’t discuss openly — and it’s hard to know how many others really know as by and large, mainstream media even blogging on this topic, won’t typically reference, either.

I have been blogging for more than ten years now, but my experiences post-domestic-violence restraining order with kickout, a.k.a., “in the Family Courts (caps intentional), goes back the decade before, that is just before the turn of the 21st century.  That experience was in California, which I finally left — fled, literally, not as a criminal, but as a senior who’d have had to start more litigation to protect myself as a senior, had I stayed — for another state in a different time zone, and which one currently is “NOYB” !!

@@!!@@!!


MORE EXHORTATION, WAKEUP CALLS, AND A BASIC QUESTIONS ABOUT BROKEN FEEDBACK LOOPS:

Whatever the cause and side on the debate, as taxpayers and citizens (I’m U.S.), I’ll keep saying, look at the operations, learn the basic vocabulary and definitions between what’s government and what’s not.  Learn how, from a news article, a website ending “*.org” or “*.com,” or even *.edu, to look up a nonprofit and IF its first or main headquarters are in the USA, DEAL WITH that nonprofit’s Form 990 IRS tax return!

One of the first wakeup calls in that process is realizing where the same does not exist, or where one does, either how (poorly) it’s filled out, or what inter-relationships with other organizations — and governments, whether through direct grants, program service revenues (meaning contracts — paid for services provided, as opposed to grants — with obviously government-supported programs (Medicaid, Foster Care payments, etc.), or tax-exempt bonds from some unit of government, to finance previous debt or some form of construction / real estate purchases for that charity…)…

Unless you are looking at more than one TYPE of information source, other than social media or ANY form of press release or news media (alternate or otherwise) regarding an organization, program, or policy of concern, you aren’t really looking.  The overall context is, your government financing. Another context is private financing.  OF course they not only interact, they also mutually invest.

Be aware (the USA is a large country) which universities are private (can you follow their financials?  ) Ever looked at one?) and which public, and that both types, if they’ve been around long enough, tend to have dedicated ‘centers’ which are not trackable entities (separate from the university) but which certainly DO have revenues, funders, sponsors, and usually faculty interacting with undergraduate or graduate students i.e., volunteer or low-paid work in exchange for mentoring and resume-building.  These are often in the news according to special causes.

Question: Do those undergraduate or graduate students get genuine feedback from ANY survivors of domestic violence or child abuse who survived long enough and cared enough to track the public AND private money through these fields?

Where will their “other points of view” come from if all the service is mediated through mentoring by those already invested in the status quo of developed fields, and how to maintain funding for those fields without regard to continuing feedback from outside the inner circles, those invited to private conferences and roundtables?

There are of course also nonprofits generated with a university address, or by students or faculty there, in addition to “centers.”


(No new posts since August, 2020, the lone page I found was April 13.  A list of my other about sixty pages is as a separate “sticky post”– scroll down from the top of the “Current Posts” page to find):

~ | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~

The table begins right below this line:

Making a shortlink protocol:  Posts begin “Http://wp.me/psBXH” (and add the final 3 characters with hyphen).  Pages begin the same except for a capital “P” in “PsBXH.”  My only post was April 13 and is clearly marked.

For which 3 characters to add for a shortlink, see rightmost column, a convenience mostly for my administrative use (but if quoting a post; please include!). Clicking on post (or page) titles also connect directly to that post (or page). Title hyperlinks are also in short-link format and easily copied and pasted for those who know how to do that.

Publication dates now typically also part of the titles, too.

2020 FAMILYCOURTMATTERS.org, The Year in Posts & Pages,* 2020 (with approximate word counts for each and “tags” for some. “Pages” highlit yellow and so marked) URL: short-link ends:
Jan. 3 Arizona! (Career AFCC Academics’ Self-Disclosure Habits, Home Habitats/Economic Niches, cont’d.) [Started Nov. 13, 2019, Publ. only Jan. 3, 2020]..(with Footnote “Just a Few PRWORA-Explaining Posts from my Blog” about 7,000 wds) -bAu
N/A
Jan. 21 Pay For Success Social Impact Funding (SIF) = Same Old Public/Private Pipelines, Faster Flow: Why Do We Submit? [Too bad was NOT published Jan 21, 2016, but is Now: Jan. 21, 2020] (about 5,500 words) -2Sr
Jan. 21 TAGS Tagged with: [AFCC, AFCC’s street address is near a division (sic) of NCCD in Madison Wisconsin, Big Society Capital (BSC) Oct 2016 SAID Bus School Case Study on SITF + Sir Ronald Cohen’s Leadership in the same in the UK, HBR-Bridgespan’s “Insight Center on Scaling Social Impact” + Sir Ronald Cohen, NCCD (National Council on Crime and Delinquency), NCCD Nat’l Council on Crime & Delinquency taking int’l govt grants (EIN#131624111), Public Private Partnerships, Public/Private Partnerships (as the Food Chain), Public/Private Partnerships – Social Innovation Funding (SIF) through CNCS, SIF = Social Innovation Fund ] N/A
Jan. 25 ‘Divorce Mediation & Domestic Violence’** (per a 1997 NIJ-funded report by Jessica Pearson, Ph.D. of CPR, (and now, FRPN.org) raises the questions: Does the DV Industry USA know about AFCC? (Yes!) Since When? (I DNK). Are These Orgs. Acknowledging This? (Generally, No!). So…? (Know Your Organizations!) [This Nov. 19, 2019, off-ramp from Post ‘Oh Arizona!,’ Publ. Jan. 25, 2020′] (about 10,000 words) -bE7
N/A
Feb. 12 Major Transform/Reform Campaigns [Regardless of Cause] Involve Branded, On-line Media Platforms. Keep an Eye on Who Owns Which Brands & Platforms: Do Periodic Drill-downs.. [Publ. Feb. 12, 2020, but Media Drill-Downs from my Feb. 2018 Page ‘Consolidated Control of DV Advocacy’]. (about 12,800 words) -c9y
Feb. 12 TAGS CLICK ON ANY TAG FOR MORE, SIMILAR POSTS.  Some of the longer ones probably unique to this post.Tagged with: [“Keep Your Eyes on the Assets” – Remember to do the Drilldowns, 1996 Welfare Reform, Bendheim-Thoman Center for Child Well-Being at Woodrow Wilson School (Princeton Univ), Bendheim-Thoman family + Leon Lowenstein Foundation (EIN#13-6015951) + Columbia connex for Thoman-Bendheim, Brookings Institution EIN#53-0196577 – ½ $Billion @ YE2014, Brookings Sponsorship of Haskins-Sawhill CFCC combo, Buying and Selling Major media, CMP Media (formerly published InformationWeek and other titles), CRFCFW=Columbia University School of Social Work’s “CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON FATHERS CHILDREN & FAMILY WELL-BEING” (Ronald D. Mincy PhD), Cynthia Osborne (UTexas Austin CFRP), Domestic Violence Coordinating Councils (as a control tactic), Expanding the Welfare State from TANF forward, FRPN – Fathers Research and Practice Network (at Temple Univ in Philadelphia but see also CPR (Pearson – Thoennes) in Denver + HHS grant 90PR0006, Global focus on VAWA obscures existence of HHS-backed Fatherhood.gov and 1996 Welfare Reform, Irwin Garfinkel (Columbia Population Research Center) married to Sara McLanahan and formerly director of UWisconsin-Madison’s IRP, Isabel Sawhill + Ron Haskins (MDRC Brookings Urban Institute Moynihan Prize etc), Jessica Pearson and Nancy Thoennes (1998 Stanley Cohen Awardee + Denver-based CPR), NOW founded 1966 in part in response to Moynihan Rept of 1965!, The Future of Children, The Moynihan Report (1965)]


2020 Comments: I see I was enthusiastic about communicating certain concepts, centers, and specific professionals via tags, here!  Looking into these individually and into how they connect is stll highly encouraged.  We need to understand the role of specific academics within specific university centers — and in the family court arena as drawing (USA) off Welfare Reform Block Grants to the States (and some direct for Healthy Marriage/Responsible Fatherhood PR campaigns) Columbia, Princeton, Temple, UTexasAustin are directly promoting specific fathers’ rights policy.

Columbia/CRFCFW/Ronald D Mincy Irv Garfinkel ~Princeton/Brookings (TheFutureOfChildren) SaraMcLanahan (the Center) + Ron Haskins+Isabel Sawhill (@ Brookings) “TheFutureofChildren” project) ~ UTexasAustin/CFRP/Cynthia Osborne (who got her PhD at Princeton, probably mentored by some of the above) and for Temple U in Philadelphia, the non-entity, FRPN (Jessica Pearson, Nancy Thoennes of CPR in Colorado) with others, gets “marriage/fatherhood”-focused HHS grants.  The grants go to Temple, not the smaller Denver-based 501©3 and so are harder to track.

N/A
@?@ No Posts Published in  March (computer down).
PAGE APRIL 13 THIS IS A PAGE NOT A POST (see right column for full shortlink):

This will not appear on the “Most Recent Posts” widget because it’s not a post…

http://wp.me/ PsBXH-cew
April 13 So Many Web Addresses End “.org,” Even This One. But Notice Which Entity, If Any, Is Behind Each, How Transparent, Who’s Backing It. RE:’EJUSA.org’ and ‘TheAppeal.org’: One of Those Makes You Work Much Harder Than The Other to Find Its Owners/Backers. [Draft: Feb. 24, Published April 13, 2020].(About 6,000 words) -cdj
April 13 TAGS Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , N/A
May 13 The Giant APA and ABA Typify The People’s Problem: Distinguishing PUBLIC (Gov’t Holdings and Operations, i.e., Assets and Cash Flow) from PRIVATE (Corporate Holdings and Operations, i.e., Assets and Cash Flow) So As To Hold Gov’t Accountable to Those It Taxes: the People Employed in Public and/or Private Sectors (Moved Here Dec. 25, 2019)(case-sensitive short-link ends “-bXO,” last letter “O” as in “Ohio” not the symbol for zero (“0”) and about 10,000 words)(On post, see title clarifications for “Giant” and “Gov’t.” Plenty of organizations []tax-exempt foundations] are far larger than the APA and ABA — but their unified influence on government?  Maybe not.)

~~>I consider this an important post to work through until its basics are understood.  See next excerpt (quoting APA self-description) from near top of post. Yellow-highlighting and some bold font added during the copy.<~~

https://www.apa.org/about/apa/archives/apa-history

APA was founded in July 1892 by a small group of men interested in what they called “the new psychology.” The group elected 31 individuals, including themselves, to membership, with G. Stanley Hall (1844-1924) as its first president.

APA’s first meeting was held in December 1892 at the University of Pennsylvania. The basic governance of the APA consisted of a council with an executive committee. This structure has continued to the beginning of the twenty-first century: Today, APA has a Council of Representatives with a Board of Directors.  …


Realizing that the growth of applied psychology represented a potential threat to its preeminence, the leaders of APA reorganized during World War II. Under this reorganization plan APA merged with other psychological organizations resulting in a broader association organized around an increasingly diffuse conceptualization of psychology.

Now the association’s scope included professional practice and the promotion of human welfare as well as the practice of the science of psychology. This flexibility in scope has remained to the present.

Psychology boomed after the end of World War II with the greatest increase in membership coming between 1945 and 1970….

-bxO
May 13 TAGS For “The Giant APA and ABA Typify the People’s Problem” postTagged with: [, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] N/A
May 17 Privatization, Functionalism, the Complete Mental Health Archipelago.  It’s Here, So Why Should We Still Care? (May, 2020) (about 7,300 words”).  See also nearby (and just-[re-]published May 13) “The Giant APA and ABA Typify The People’s Problem…” which this came from)..

Blog ends w/ reminder:  “A BUDGET IS NOT A BALANCE SHEET.” In this row: blog excerpt, from the top:  

Others have applied the phrase “Gulag Archipelago” to prison and other institutions across the US, or used the word “archipelago” with other adjectives [1] but my usage here is “Mental Health Archipelago.”

Click a second time on blank page icon to load the pdf)  Almost amusing.. An NSF grant (2009) helps promote the integration of “evolutionary psychology” into all academic disciplines, and comments on how the idea of “shifting the theoretical underpinnings of psychology” is meeting resistance.  Psychology (its representatives, including the APA) is ALWAYS seeking more prestige and r.e.s.p.e.c.t. when compared to other academic fields.

I just re-posted and updated (again, The Giant APA and ABA Typify The People’s Problem <~link) [2] on the size and extent of at least three American “psych” organizations (for psychology, psychiatry, and psychoanalysis, with the even larger legal association, the American Bar Association).  All of “[2]” is added the day after I published this post and relates more to the previous one, except to show how late filing and/or posting of tax returns enables the “chameleon corporation” activity.  Where is the concern for the public in all this?

-cmj
May 17 For “Privatization, Functionalism, the Complete Mental Health Archipelago…”Tagged with: [*** (Apparently I made none.  May add some after I publish this Table of Contents… I see that the blog posts tags from several posts from July, 2017, which it recommends reader review for previous treatments of this topic.) ] N/A
May 20 For Political Clout, Big Isn’t Always Best, as the National Fatherhood Initiative, Inc. (1993ff, EIN# 23-2745763) and its Disproportionate Influence for its Small Size and Financially Fuzzy IRS Tax Returns Show (Started Jan. 20, 2020, Published May 20). (Case-sensitive, generated short-link ends “-c80,” that final character is a “zero” not capital “O”as in “Ohio.”) (about 5,200 words). Minor copy-editing revisions May 29.

“Explanation: Reviewing my most recent posts in draft status today, I chose this one and published as written with few changes. || This post holds some text I’d compiled in 2016 on a Page (published separately April 27, 2017 but before then on my home page, Sept. 2016), then moved here as a draft post, with updates, January 23, 2020 and SHORT intro. It had since then remained in draft status. //LGH 20May2020″
-c80
May 20. TAGS [Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ] N/A
May 20, DRAFT (When Posted, this’ll show in 2021, but I’m showing, the topic was on my mind at this time.  I think it’s an important topic, or wouldn’t report it here.  Plan to post this month.  It’s short but pungent. (May, 2021//LGH)).

-chD
May 20, DRAFT Tagged with: [***] N/A
June 26

Think About It: Will Any of These EVER Admit to AFCC’s Influence AND US-based Fatherhood | Access Visitation agenda for the (AFCC-promoted, specialized) Family Courts? (My Sentiments + Evidence May 29, 2020, Updated and Published June 26). (short-link ends “-crl”{<~last character “l” as in “lovely”), (almost 21,000 words!).

-crl
June 26 Tagged with: [*** Untagged.  I should change that!//LGH] N/A
July 8 CBMA and CFUF in #BlackLivesMatter: What’s Up Now, 2020, with (Famous-Foundations-sponsored-) Campaigns for Black MALE Achievement and (Still U.S. Gov’t-Sponsored-) Centers for Urban Families (fka “Fathers”)? [Started June 20, 2020, Publ. July_8]. -cVS
Tagged with: [***Untagged.  I should change that!//LGH] N/A

MY LAST POST OF 2020 WAS ABOVE, JULY 8.  I PUBLISHED ONLY ONE PAGE (APRIL 13, ABOVE).

N/A

~#~#~#~

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2020 ENDS HERE.

Written by Let's Get Honest|She Looks It Up

May 18, 2021 at 7:00 am

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.