You are reading: 58 More Essays (Pages) on Essentials** of the Family Court Arena. **IMHO, as expressed 2009-2019. (WordPress-generated, case-sensitive short-link ends “-ar9“. //LGH July 31, 2019.  About 8,000 words as updated Aug. 4, 2019)   This title will be repeated a few inches below (that time with a Footnote [1]).

ANY post may be further edited (as in, condensed, or expanded, or both) after publishing. Blogger’s privilege!

re: ‘TWO HELPFUL LINKS’ — Image from TopRightSidebar, ‘GO TO POSTS’ widget, shows TOC 2019 & 2018 + ‘Key Posts 2012-2017’ (LGH, @ Sept. 1, 2019)

I had fun writing these; hope you enjoy reading them.  Browse their titles, pick somewhere and dive in!

The “58 Essays” referenced in the title came from ‘PAGES’ (widget) from off right sidebar with all the links. The list of those titles with links directly to each one, also a 3X3 (nine total screenshots index) of all titles as seen formerly on the sidebar widget are the only illustrated (images involved) items on this post and are at the bottom. Look for images with some colorful lines and arrows, a bit of side-line commentary like these next two:

4

8

All material is my writing except where quoted, and all 58 pages were previously written across that ten-year time span. Now pinned to the top of the blog (designation “Sticky”), this post features them as basic content (and shortens the sidebar considerably). 

As ever, I voice my concerns about and continue to raise awareness of both current developing and longstanding situations whenever/wherever I have opportunity, including while writing this introduction.

Having written too much while creating this administrative/index post, I then off-ramped extra introduction text to:

That post holds key content on current developments and actors seeking to change family court legislation “locally” (within certain United States) and, I see, the battle pro/con “parental alienation” continuing internationally, with some of the same players on the “opposed” side, regarding publication by WHO of another “ICD-11” nomenclature for diseases. … (July 10 2019, Collective Memo of Concern  to WHO … RE: Inclusion of “Parental Alienation“[2]  

I just happened to write the material on my mind while setting up this post.  There are still some opening comments here, though; some navigation, some, just want I want to say: call it my opening spiel.  (That too may be condensed later)…

Cambridge English Dictionary, ‘spiel’ (Cambridge Univ Press)checked Aug 3, 2019.

(It’s a spiel to me because I’ve had to say it so often, was written impromptu and could be an “elevator speech,” depending on for how many floors we were in an elevator.  Not always used in positive sense.  The above link from Cambridge English Dictionary says it’s for “American English” then cites several examples from Wikipedia and “the Hansard archive” (“digitized (parliamentary) debates from 1803), which for some reason, I think is funny.) https://hansard.parliament.uk (see nearby image).

MY SPIEL.

My main concern as a United States citizen and as a human being is that those involved** seem to have little respect for basic concepts of representative government, although plenty of them are lawyers.  It is one thing to exchange ideas on an academic level among universities, or through private networked associations.  It’s another to seek to have those voices drown out and deluge the places where decisions are made as purported “intermediaries” or “the voice of the people” when they clearly aren’t.

**(including but not limited to those both pro AND con on the parental alienation issue (I call it #ArguingPAS), whether or not addressing the World Health Organization’s ICD-11, or whoever determines what does or doesn’t make it into each new version of the DSM  (The American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual).[3])

PLACEMENT ON THE BLOG: This post now becomes the top-most post of ten “sticky” posts on my “Current Posts” home page of this blog near the top, on the right sidebar, also known as:

Once I split it, the count is now eleven “sticky” posts pinned to the top of this blog, below which the current posts will show, most recent on top.

This may not be the best first stop on the blog if you’re new to the it (or the fields it covers), but, hey, we all have our different approaches to taking in new information… so whatever works… and those pages hold solid, under-reported information. Over time, exposure and repetition of key concepts, I expect the main ideas will come through on most posts or pages, no matter where you start.  This is not a book or a weekly newsletter: it’s a blog, and an extemporaneous quality will always be present. I have done my best to keep studying and building scope, depth, adding subject matter relating to the main subject matter, and where possible, getting to the origins (creators) not just administrators of the family court systems.

Reviewing exactly what are those top (with this one) ten (soon to be eleven) “sticky” posts, I see that about half are indexes or tables of contents for specific years. I pin these all to the top partly because of their surrounding summary and still-relevant information, also a snapshot in time (of my understanding and/or current related events) [4].

(Footnotes [1-4] are several paragraphs below, not at the very bottom of this post.  My practice: If an explanatory comment is short enough, I’ll often just use “*” or “**” and include it at end of or right below a paragraph) I include cites in the text or with the quote.By contrast, footnotes are more often expansions or commentary, and sometimes become their own separate posts, individually, or as a group.  I have a few posts named “Footnotes to: _____”  I added two footnotes while revising this blog, to expand on a specific topic.

NEED A SHORTCUT?  SCROLL, SWIPE, OR PAGE-DOWN TOWARDS THE BOTTOM UNTIL YOU SEE IMAGES:  (THE FIRST AND ONLY IMAGES THUMBNAIL SCREENSHOTS (3 rows of 3 each), A VISUAL INDEX OF THE PAGE TITLES.  THE PAGE LINKS AND FULL TITLES ARE BELOW THEM.  To break up the links even more, I put in dividing lines and the corresponding screenshot (from where they used to be on the sidebar) with some stars, arrows, and comments (on the images).

If you are NOT from the USA, I hope you will understand that with our (it seems) radically different tax system, i.e., the IRS (vs. the VAT system, which I don’t pretend to understand, although I understand it seems more incremental, built-in than the income tax on all taxable profits, whether of a corporation or of an individual), USA-domiciled charities must produce — with some types of exceptions — not only audited annual financial statements (depending on their size) but also tax returns and cough ’em up for the public.  People and private businesses must too, but those are not expected to be coughed up for the public.  The tax returns of tax-exempt organizations are — however certain major categories are still exempt, as in the religious.  So at no time is a total financial picture really available.

But those tax returns are full of clues and indicators for any organization and for organizations functioning in a coordinated fashion — which the response to domestic violence, child abuse, preventing them both, not to mention divorce, custody/visitation (whatever it’s called), CRIME (however categorized) and payment of child support, works.

By “charities” we are talking: their exempt-purpose revenues are federal income-tax-exempt, and if they continue to meet standards, a greatly reduced tax on NON-exempt-purpose revenues (from all those assets held, where it applies) is the incentive to form more and more of them, especially the wealthier one is.  I gather the general idea is that by working side-by-side with government to cover services it doesn’t naturally cover, but people need, a tax perk is granted.  Actually producing those services in a neutral and legal manner is another thing.

With this situation it IS possible to look up and look for those tax returns, corporate filings, and to a degree (though convoluted) perceive the flow of money THROUGH some TO another, also TO and FROM government in the forms of grants TO and FROM government entities.

Because of this expectation that some accounts we can read should and by law must be made available, where they’ve been late, missing, absent, or simply not credible, that reflects on any filing entity’s design.  over time it becomes clear that neither the private nor the public sector (i.e., granting and financial-statement-reporting to the public) has a consistent intent, held to and followed through on, of giving the public a legitimate account of its activities, operations, and their costs — as opposed to sales pitches for the same, forever.  {{I am not a certified public accountant (CPA) nor a lawyer and that was not tax or legal advice..It’s an individual thinking about a common situation and expressing an opinion on it!}}

Having spent some (I’m too old now to spend “enough!”) time on various other countries’ databases, while struggling with SLOW internet personally and NOT interconnected reporting databases, in the era of internationally connected HIGH-speed networks for: governments, educational institutions, research institutions, and I gather the military and probably health / medical institutions, I realize also that there may be major differences in the requirement to produce audited financial statements of government entity balances (assets & liabilities | revenues & expenses) and both naming and posting the actual account numbers associated with all legislated use of tax receipts for public benefit.

I believe that if we are living in a country and supporting it with our life energies through productive work, OR supporting/justifying its expenditures for in ANY way needing some help or protection from that country (or, state) we deserve to see the financial trail and be given an account.  I see that the current setup makes that nearly impossible — but the concept still exists.  That it’s nearly impossible works to the advantageous of the criminally minded, and against those seeking to operate legally within the constraints of any government’s laws.

Americans, it seems to me (speaking of those I’ve been around, deal with, or hear of through, for example, major media reporting, work, social networking, school (when I was in it), etc., have been groomed to NOT look for those financials or talk about them, NOT notice which non-profit entity is referenced (to the point of looking it up, identifying: age, size, location, leadership, and filing habits, including frequent name changes, or movement of assets from one to another, disrupting the traceable path).  We ought to be looking at these things and able to talk about them, but have been coached, distracted, discouraged, and — for those who attempt to look — often obstructed from finding out TIMELY things we ought to know.

That’s my spiel.  Now here’s the post:

 The nine-image thumbnail index gallery, and names and links to the 58 Essays (Pages).

OK, and bit more spiel.  (After these four quick footnotes from above).

ABOUT THE LIST:

These links represent pages spanning ten years of this blog. Their dates and links are not automatically added to “Archives” (the calendar widget at top right of blog) so the only way to be aware of them is:  if reading a post which includes a link; running across it in some on-line search on a topic a page happens to cover (some topics I write on are so under-reported, that happens more often than you might expect for someone not using press releases, etc.); or you really scroll far enough down on that sidebar to see the whole list with its VERY long and often sarcastic (though specific, descriptive) titles.  Now that I’ve removed that sidebar widget, this is your best route to the full list.  Unlike most tables of contents, which only show a slice of the whole (whether one year’s worth, or just a bit more than it), these span ten years.

Some of them also may pre-date anything on the Tables of Contents I’ve posted, none of which go back further than (as I recall) about September, 2012.

Here’s one:

[SAMPLE PAGE TITLE:  The Longest on the List]

When I get that long, I’m upset about something and want its true colors and components emphatically identified.

RE:  “Nearly Twice That..“:  It took this long for me to notice the math error in the title:  9/11 was in 2001; PRWORA was in 1996, only five years earlier.  September 2017, when this page was published,  would’ve been about twenty years (not “nearly twice that” or 32 years, etc.)  The point being, however, many years had passed since welfare reform…and to wake up about it.

The post introducing it, also quite long, was published Sept. 15, 2017, and has some detailed drill-downs on involved nonprofits.  And some rants.  It was a Labor Day Weekend.  However, go for the images on that page for a window into what I’m documenting here.  (WILL RETURN WITH THE LINK, or use ARCHIVES (displays as calendar) drop-down (to pick month and year) function on top right sidebar.

Two posts published in Sept. 2017 (which go with the very long page title, above):

#1.

and, #2.., Published it seems 9/15/2017:

The above post is embarrassingly long, but also a function of the stress of those times (and, it notes, a season of over 100′ heat, prolonged, for No. California where one choked on the air, literally)… If you go there, scroll down to the annotated images section, which “payload” shows tax returns and board of directors connections to, for example, the National Fatherhood Initiative, Inc. or a California-based Collaborative Courts agency, and more, including one board of directors tie (by marriage) to leadership in El Salvador involved in privatization of the country’s utilities of more than one, kind, “the Washington consensus” etc.  In other words, it’s about far more than the name would imply — promoting certain behaviors within personal relationships among all people…. It is indeed a drill-down on several entities’ tax returns and several different court-involved situations. (Not recommended for cell-phone viewing unless your phone is huge).

From the PAGES list, I’d like to feature two three other “runner-up” extra-long titles as particularly relevant to what I’m blogging these days, what with some of that involving (again) the state of Maryland and within it, Baltimore.  The other one deals with common nonprofits whose names and existence we (minimum: in the USA) should by now understand. In alphabetical order:

OTHER, ALSO LONG, SAMPLE PAGE TITLES:

(All four titles also shown, alpha by title, in the list below).

For the page “Belated Lessons from Baltimore and San Francisco’s” (“Belated” because the reforms were passed outside the normal legal processes in the 1990s, i.e., having failed a legislative pass, they were executed by previous agreement as an Administrative rule (!)), a more thorough resource would be the related post/s, published late December, 2013.  I remember writing this up, but on checking that page, see that the main content was on the post — not the page.  I located (among my 809 now published) three related posts from Dec. 2013.  The first one listed has the most introduction tying it to this page and current events.  The second, with some overlap, features more how current law students/interns seem to be mentored now that the center is in place, and the third shows some of the big money and craziness behind it (i.e. “Rx” billions).

In this description, and I’m quoting sources, not making it up: family courts were indeed modeled on drug courts with an emphasis on referrals to extra services for ALL, ideally.  One of the largest tax-exempt foundations specifically backing this (in the billion-dollar range, just its main foundation alone, not all of them together) had a family line notable for substance abuse, drug problems, and dysfunctional relationships — possibly because so few of them had to grow up earning a living the normal way.  This organization also goes back to the Civil War and, as it turns out, even cheated a famous nurse (Clara Barton) out of the famous red cross logo.  Real nice…

I guess it only makes sense if one’s going to be pushing drugs for profit (huge profits) on people of all ages, especially the most vulnerable, one might need drug courts to also order therapy and counseling for them.  An endless cycle of revenues…   While one has the drug courts thing going, why not add “family courts” then combine them all into a UNIFIED family court, such that anyone walking  — or dragged in when an ex-partner files — for any reason might be court-ordered into therapy, evaluations, etc. That seems to be the outlook I had at least when writing the third post above.  Not sure I disagree six years later, either….

(MOVING ON WITH THE POST GENERAL TOPIC):

As a sole blogger/writer/blog administrator, I don’t really want to repeat myself when something was explained well the first time and could be linked to instead. PAGES arise when I either decide to emphasize a topic that otherwise might be lost in the parade of posts, or sometimes to complement a post but provide a more stable way to link to it. Some (not most) were just ways to expand a few comments without interrupting the flow, i.e., I’d enclose the link to that page on the post.

While this helps me administratively, I also I figure, why not share this information?  Sharing as I go is a policy, generally, I have with what I’ve been discovering during and after my journey (sic) through (sic) the family court system. With all the networking, investigative blogging, problem-solving and shocked observations at what is just not talked about at the policymaking level, as some of the top sticky posts emphasize:  Censorship of key elements, actors, and how they inter-act (literally)* continues, it makes sense to keep communciating.

*Public versus private personas involved.  When it comes to analyzing situations and institutions where life itself is at stake, but lives continue to be lost (“roadkill”) or simply destroyed, I’m not interested in the persona.  I want to hear the truth of the matter, not theatre, spectacle, or staged debates from the audience.  See my username which reflects that intent.

I’ll continue adding more examples, or noting new progress — usually along paths already discerned through paying more attention to the public/private entities (across state and sometimes national borders) than the “table talk” — but  I don’t want to re-teach the basics so often I can’t get new posts out timely.  Some better way to refer to them is needed.  Seeing these may help me just refrain from doing it again on each upcoming post.

Documenting the progress also helps me not go “bats” when dealing with new crops / rounds / cohorts of angry parents who want action now without looking at the previous actions already taken:  “So long as it has a good branding, defuses some energies, and uses the right-sounding language, it MUST be good — right?”

Far from it.  Wrong!

In my experience when those intent to fix and improve lives over which they have no natural jurisdiction — for good reason — obtain that influence through other, more devious means, it rarely turns out well for those “fixed.”  The definition of “improve” is highly subjective, and while resolving all conflict, world peace, and violence-free futures (and crime-free societies, no poverty and all the things we can may love to IMAGINE, and should) the level of violation of basic personal boundaries, human rights, law, due process, and (may I add here) common sense in the achievement are wearing thin as justifiable means to the alleged ends.

Credibility, at least to me, in all forms of government, has worn thin. My advice to most is, don’t go riding in the car with strangers.  Do your homework before joining a cause, and get a birds-eye view of the context (the organizational, governmental “biosphere”) before joining those always looking for new fields (populations) to plow.

I am two decades post-domestic violence restraining order (in just a few months), and before that order had expired, I was again neck-deep in a different form of abuse, apparently for trying to leave abuse female at JUST the wrong time (after USA’s 1996 Welfare Reform stigmatizing single mothers, regardless of why many of us became single) and having, previously as a working citizen parent or non-parent, minded my own business, focused on that work — not politics, and not economics, social science.  I was happy to do so also.

As this blog documents in part, in the 1990s, some states were still setting up their own family court divisions to divert criminal cases (“differentiated domestic violence”) into venues which would forget about the criminal past and order relationships and behavioral modification services instead. “Such a deal,” for those who got in on it.

In California, where I lived, those court services and the courts themselves also increasingly centralized control at the top (California Judicial Council) and substantial power into the Administrative Office of the Courts. etc. This coincided with the years before and especially after Welfare Reform, and it’s unreasonable to believe that the two major processes were unrelated.

Now that the “powers that be” in the USA (and in my own family line) have had their say — devastating — and to the last breath (as to one individual) shown no remorse for it — I am certainly not through having mine, even if only on this blog and social media.

“It’s been real” learning how so many systems work and what languages and practices they share. 

LAY-OUT (Format):  First, I just took several (9) images, from top of the ‘PAGEs” menu to the bottom.

All imageshave a date and time stamp at the top (the year, not shown, is 2019).  Images have been numbered and labeled, some of them annotated (comments on specific pages), and put into a nine-image “thumbnail index” gallery, an alternate way to break up and read the titles, and perhaps pick from among them which ones to read.

Then, Below that, I am JUST copying the links to the pages without re-arranging the order.

This is a minimal task. Moving all the links on the “PAGES” widget is a straight “copy and paste” in one motion, which the blog software allows.  Most of these pages will not have short-links.  To read any one, click on it.

Some, not all, have published dates as part of post title.  The more recent (2012ff) the more likely — because of the learning curve and constant accumulation of more information (data and types of data) deepening perspectives —  to contain significant and easily searchable system details.  I got somewhat better over time (like to think anyhow) at putting the puzzle together, and illustrating the various categories of entity, sometimes by key themes, sometimes listing particular organizations on a specific federal grants stream, sometimes focused on a single state or geography (i.e., metropolitan area).

However, earlier posts also outlined key principles, I believe, the moment I was introduced to the very types of searchable terms and tools most often omitted from coalitions of protective parents, violence prevention, social science, and official family court-produced literature aimed at pro-se litigants (cf. “litigants in person,” I believe, in the UK, or at least England & Wales).

I had fun writing these; hope you enjoy reading them — at least their titles.  Pick somewhere and dive in!

THE THUMBNAIL IMAGE GALLERY INDEX (click on any image to navigate to the others), in 3 rows of 3 images each.).  This image gallery is just a point of reference, not really meant for viewing.  Clicking on images won’t bring you to any pages. These are for browsing only; and they are in order:  From left to right (row by row) = from top to bottom on the list. For links, look further down on this post.

“PAGES” contents copied from Right Sidebar Widget (near the very bottom) “As Is”

= in the order shown above, which seems to be alpha by title, with some pages bearing symbols (“*” or “-“) to keep them on the top of the list, I see.  I inserted dividing lines to match the images above.  As you can see, while doing those dividing lines, it was an easy task to add the corresponding image (from above) for each set of posts.

The single yellow-highlit page title focuses attention on University of Baltimore School of Law’s CFCC (correlated to San Francisco’s — same name, different setup).  Individuals working with that CFCC’s predecessor were influential in setting up (and pushing through over legislative, i.e., the people’s objections) the area’s family court division.  About that, see next mini-section, which contains the “related posts” inset box I also showed above.

MINI-SECTION before “PAGES” LIST:  “Baltimore & San Francisco”

(Setting up Family Divisions (Maryland) | Pushing Through Unified Family Courts, Timeline and Cast of Characters, Tactics; the “CFCC” naming convention.) 

1

• * …more from Let’s Get Honest.. PROOF of Cults in the Courts; my Christmas 2013 Appeal for Help!
• *** ABOUT THIS BLOG (@11/2011) There’s (still) No Excuse For Abuse, Including Economic Abuse of Taxpayers to Allegedly ‘EndAbuse.’
• **ABC’s of AFCC etc. ***READ THIS FIRST (the shady/shaky foundation of Family Law)
  • My Comments, Your Blogs: #1-Dastardly Dads 12/23/2010 & Suggestions for an Oregon shelter..
• -My Comments, Your Blogs #2 {01/21/2011}, @ Rightsformothers.com “Whoa…Wait Just a Minute, Scott Stapp!” [2010, Jul 12th]
• 2011 Healthy Marriage/Responsible Fatherhood Grantees: Why we need to Speed-Date ALL the Recipients, ASAP [Published Oct. 16, 2011; “Tweaked” a bit for format Jan. 7, 2019]
• 7 Posts from December 2017 (Intro, Links, + Extended Post ‘Abstracts’ + Images @March 14, 2018)

2

• A Brief Reminder of the History of Money, Banking and Other Significant Events When the USA’s (Other) Major Tax-Exempt Foundations Were Being Established [Page added 11-13-2016]
• A Stunning Validation //Emotional Tyranny,The Assault on Truth, Psychoanalysis
• Abolishing Representative Gov’t through Presidential Executive Orders: How 50 States became 10 Federal Regions
• About My Blog Motto (formerly on Vital Info/Sticky Links post, moved here May 26, 2017)
  • The Oppressive and Hypocritical PRWORA 1996 AND Previous (1960s forward) Section 1115 Waiver-Based Massive Social R&D continues under the Presiding Political Power Elite
• Bank Street College of Education and School (Fast-Tracking FYI on its 100 year Progressive, Experimental Laboratories involving Young Children, History)[published Apr30 2017]

3

• Belated Lessons from Baltimore and San Francisco’s CFCCs: How “Centers” Coordinating Planning and Advance PR with Private Trade Associations can Effectively Monopolize ANY Field of Practice and Bill the Public for both Startup, Capital Infrastructure, and Ongoing Operational Expenses. (Page Added 6/4/2017) (SEE NEARBY NOTES:  THE RELATED POSTS (vs. this single PAGE) MAY BE BETTER & HOLD MORE THOROUGH DRILL-DOWNS): Here (“-2cT”) and Here (“-2cI”) + HERE (“-2cp”) re: Johnson&Johnson/RWJF (major pharma role in sponsoring/promoting those Unified Family Courts to order more services) .
  

  ---

• Caught in the DMZ of PAS, IPV, NFI, VAWA and other thrown stones? Let’s pause for some fun…
• CCA-Private Prisons, Slave Labor, Shareholder Profits
• Censorship By Omission = Intent to Bypass Informed Consent = Tossing the Truth Overboard =  Characteristic of Bullies, Abusers, Criminal Enterprises (RICO)~~>Symptoms of Ulterior (likely profit-oriented) Agenda and/or Previously Compromised Persons. It’s just ‘OFF’!! [Published Apr 26, 2018, as insert to Top Sticky Post)]
• Corporations (usually starting with tax-exempt ones) Coordinate Campaigns named after a Cause, but We (the Public) should Coordinate to Get and STAY Cognizant of the Corporate(and Gov’t Entity) Contexts. [Page added March 28 2018]

4

• Do you Know Your NGA? Post-PRWORA, 1998 Stealth, Coordinated Expansion/ Diversion of Welfare Funds based on Sociological, Quasi-Religious Ideology on the Ideal Family Structure (the offspring of The 1965 Moynihan Report), Facilitated by (A) At least 39 of the Nation’s Governors and (B) as Coached by Wade Horn ℅ The National Fatherhood Initiative (Page Added Sep. 2016, Published Apr. 27, 2017)
• DV LEAP’s New Website Still Derails OPEN (Uncensored) Discussion of The PROBLEM, Digging A Deeper Hole for Survivors of Abuse and Their Children. (Started Jan. 27, 2018)
• Extra Narrative, Goes with 2017 “Dear Readers” post (@Jan. 17, 2017) CalSWEC, CFPIC, CWDA (Following where the Facts Lead, No Matter How Daunting the Destination, or How affluent, how well-entrenched, and how well-networked the public institutions or private entities living there).
• Father’s Rights –& Duties, German-Style? ???
• Fathers’ Rights & Domestic Violence, Aussie Mantalk @2006
• Federally Funded Marriage/Fatherhood Programs Still Flourishing 2006-2010

5

• Finally (2012)– A Trial Court that tells mother to “get lost,” gets reversed on appeal [AH vs. CM]
• Fitts Facts: Segments and Illustrations from “Dillon Read and the Aristocracy of Stock Profits”
• For Current Posts, Most Recent on Top,** Click Here (**Displayed Below/After Several “Sticky” Posts: Some are Tables of Contents”)
• For example, National Children’s Alliance, Alabama-based (legal domicile) and its network of CACs and Statewide CAC Coalitions (FY2014 Grantees) [Published Jan. 2, 2018].
• GRANTEES — TAGGS — “Catholic” @ 02/2012
• HHS Grantees, Just Georgia, Just HMRF (CFDA 93086), May 13, 2016, Report Run. Take a look!
• How and When Problem-Solving (make that ‘Collaborative Justice’) Courts were Institutionalized and other Consolidate/Coordinate/Standardize/PRIVATIZE Stories at Courts.CA.Gov [published Sep. 18, 2017]
• ISIS and HHS grants in Dakota County, MN, Hmmm…. (@March 2013)

6

• LGH Top Picks, Themes, Tables of Contents, and Why My Gravatar is a Blue Jay Taking Flight (Publ. Jan. 27, 2018).
  • Consolidated Control of DV Advocacy by Feminist Leadership Refusing to Identify, by Name and Financing, The Opposition Entities. Subtitle: Personal Relevance to a Post-DV-Intervention, Unprosecuted, Child-Stealing Event by Ex-Batterer case in the SF Bay Area. [Publ. Feb. 2, 2018]
  • How Local (Truly Representative) is ANY Government Entity with All These Kinds of Nonprofits? (THE Power & Class Divide: Taxed vs. Living off/Managing The Taxed) (Page started Dec. 11, 2018, from Front Page)
  • New To This Blog | Want My Position Summary or a Review? These Ten Key Posts From 2012-2017 should help. (Publ. Jan. 27, 2018, Under 1,500 words)
• More Extra Narrative from “Dear Readers (2017 Themes)” Post — CAFRs (like, see USDOT’s 2016 one), Federal Agency Database Functionality Issues, Smart Cities|V2V|USA, Who?What is SXSW (and, for comparison, London-based global B2B Events Organizer/Conglomerate UBM)**

(**This post title as you can see overlapped between Image 6 and Image 7)

7

• Nine-Paragraph Summary of my Personal, Experiential “Understanding Government” Process (3-16-2017) (See nearby, related posts)
• Opus Dei: News, SOME Background, and Ramifications
• Parenting Coordination — Invented, Promoted, only Slightly Demoted.. (May, 2013 recap)
• Sixteen Years ‘Post-9/11,’ and Nearly Twice That ‘Post-PRWORA’, Yes I’m still asking Ordinary People to Modify Their Own Behavior(!) –> To Accept Individual ‘Response-Ability’ (for a change!) To Look Up, Look at and Compare: IRS Forms 990; Federal Grants; and State-level Corporate filings… To Consider Database Organization (for all of the above)… To Recognize White-collar Crime within the P3* sector, and To Reject, Protest, and Resist Propaganda, including ALL Irrational Excuses for P3*-Engineered Global Paradigm Shifts.

8

• State-by-State Charity Lookup Links (from SimpleCharityRegistration.com’s March 2017 WordPress post). [Published 11/11/2017].
• The “Social-Sciencification” of America (Roosevelt’s Reorganization Act of 1939, the EOP, and: Brownlow, Merriam, Gulick– and Ruml)
• The tensions continue between [functionalism and citizen’s rights to know] –and they didn’t start yesterday! (This Page as Footnote to a Post, however, started 5-15-2017)
• Understand “Children’s Law Centers” (NCLN – Eight nonprofits Get Organized) and “Children’s Rights,” in general
• Understanding University Models [Preface to the Post ” ‘Human Ecology’ (Colleges of), Psychology, and Cornell. Why The History of the American University System Still Matters.”) published March 4, 2018].
• USDOJ Tobacco Lawsuits and Settlements (Just a~First 5~Footnote to the 2016 TOC Intro.)(publ. 12-15-2016)
• Welcome to My Blog (Extended Intro moved Jan. 6, 2019 from May 2, 2018, Top Sticky Post on the Blog to this Page).

9 (of 9 images)

• WHY? Should I Stop! Look! and Listen! (to such long posts)? [May 11, 2019]
• Lessons from Antioch (Dugard, Probyn, Garridos, 1972-2009)
• Look Up a Nonprofit (Impromptu How-To // Checkpoints) ~
  • Look It Up, or We Continue Losing Ground (Pep Talk), and The Carlyle Corp.
• Moms are Parents, too.
• Why this blog — points of reference
• “Let’s Get Honest” about Your Tax Dollars (USA)
  • About those Birth Certificates (a little history)
• First battered at home and then by the State (Great Britain/US)
• This Morning, in a Courtroom

The End” (of the migrated “PAGES” menu from my bottom-right sidebar, as of July 30, 2019).

Thank you for your time and remember, if you quote me, include the link & (also nice would be) at least part of the post title and date published, especially if I am expected to respond based on the contents.

To go back to the top of this post, click the Title again:

58 More Essays (Pages) on Essentials** of the Family Court Arena. **IMHO, as expressed 2009-2019.

– – –