(1)

• Mothers, supposedly — go to A battered MOTHERS conference.  BMCC, New York, weekend of Jan. 6th-9th.

Look up “Battered Mothers’ Custody Conference” (8th year).

(2)

• Fathers, supposedly — should go to a FATHERHOOD summit (conference) .  Minnesota, a Monday-Tuesday combo, January 24th-25th.

  Possibly because Family Law professional attendees, can get professional CLE credit for attending on a weekday, while some people, attending, might lose a job for absenteeism.  Pay close attention to the repetitive use of the word “father” throughout this conference, because in the 3rd one, some of the same characters are likely to be found at, or helping present at, or sponsor, etc.  a conference claiming Gender has nothing to do with all this. (See #3, below)

  
  

Look up Minnesota Fathers or Minnesota Fatherhood {& family services} Summit.

Presenter Michael Hayes figures in this post.  I could’ve picked on anyone, just happened to land on him because another mother already did some groundwork blogging on the issues, she found him spilling the beans in Texas.  As seen on the brochure, he was one of three trophy, I mean, keynote, speakers:

Michael Hayes, Deputy for Family Initiatives in the Child Support Division of the Texas Office of the Attorney General (OAG). Mr. Hayes has extensive experience in the development of policy, partnerships, and projects that support family stability, paternity establishment, father involvement, and child support program improvement, including directing the Texas Fragile Families Initiative. He has been instrumental in the development of the p.a.p.a. (Parenting and Paternity Awareness) curriculum in Texas, now mandated to be used in every Texas high school health class, and in reformulating the Access and Visitation grant program in Texas.

To this day, from officialdom in the Domestic Violence, and/or Protective Mothers movement (as opposed to in, obviously the Fatherhood movement, who this grant system helps, as it was intended to) almost no one lets on to distressed mothers, that it exists!  I’ve seen it in some webinar conferences among professionals in the DV field — but Moms participation is NOT solicited for these conferences.  I can see why not — we’d blog it!   So, while women seeking DV orders are not even informed that this program EXISTS, a man in texas is smoothly reformulating it.  Every remains so sure that the real cause of domestic violence, and troubles for children growing up is that they just don’t have a man — and not just any man, but their DNA-Dad — in their lives.  How do you think a stepfather might feel about that?

To learn more, please visit: http://www.mnfathers.org/summit.html

[[Feb. 2017 update images & info. immediately below… partial only…Actually,

that would just change the entire character of this 2011 post.  I’ll take it elsewhere and publish ASAP.  (Was back here reviewing which post to put in 2017 Beginning-of-Year Retrospective.  For a long time I’ve been proud of boiling down the “fields” to these three and tying all three into their public support.  Over time, some more expertise in both presentation — and investigations– of course has been developed. And, I’ve gotten faster at it, as well as developed a wider perspective on just how many and what types of fatherhood (and DV) organizations are involved, and operating in what manners to continue their mutual fields of expertise, whether or not it actually saves lives or reduces the occurrence of family, domestic, interpersonal, spousal OR child abuse, which is to say, violence.  

Personally, I think it’s making the situation worse…

I’m leaving in a few images from MFFN’s latest (2013) annual report, and its tax returns, which the website didn’t bother to cough up for readers.  //LGH/2017]]

MFFN last 3 annual returns not uploaded (perhaps because money ran out and it’s been operating in the negative? See tax returns, shown below).

Total results: 3. Search Again.

Here’s a link to their initial filing (2005).  You can see throughout the address changes and sudden drop-off of revenues (about 2013) there is a use of basic boilerplate text on WHAT is being done, that next to no employees (most of the time) existed, although an Executive Director did for a while, and that (see that 2005 return, expenses details) some money is going to “Contractual Services” for distributing all the product (or, whatever…) but under the maximum amount allowed before any requirement to name the independent subcontractor.  Throughout probably — and certainly on the last shown Annual Report — there seem to be civil servant employees on the board (though unpaid).

In 2005 it was at 1700 NE Second St NE #208, Minneapolis.

2006 tax return (and address change to 161 St. Anthony #845, St. Paul, MN.  Which looks like a Best Western.

Read the Details on this one, incl. What’s nearby:https://www.bestwestern.com/en_US/book/hotels-in-saint-paul/best-western-plus-capitol-ridge/propertyCode.24104.html

“…OVERVIEW DETAILS

The iconic St. Paul Cathedral dominates the southern view of our hotel. Being across the street from the State Office Building, the Department of Transportation and the State Capitol business travelers make our hotel their home away from home.

Our Saint Paul hotel is favored by employees of Saint Paul College, the McNally School of Music and Macalester College, too. Visiting students and staff with St. Catherine’s, Hamline, the William Mitchell School of Law, St. Thomas and Concordia also favor our property. If you’re here for business with Regions Hospital, Gillette Children’s Hospital, St. Joseph’s Hospital or United Hospital, you’ll be close to your destination. Visitors of Bethesda Hospital, the Children’s Hospital and the Department of Human Services can also take advantage of our superior location.

The MFFN 2006ff tax return signer was Paul Masiarchin.  I looked him up.  In 2011 (same year as this post, originally) he, featuring as his ONLY prior nonprofit experience in this blurb, working at MFFN, as “MCN Hires Paul Masairchin to run Performance Management Leadership Institute.”   Further lookup shows (2006) him already involved in presentations at Twin Cities Men’s Center (<==link to history page.  Also see next two images, from 2005-2006 timeframe):

(3)

• Referees, Umpires, or any other paid professionals, should go to the Association that is promoting the terms “high-conflict” to describe assault and battery, and “mental health” to characterize unruly (not submissive enough) mothers, as has happened probably since time began.  All such truly committed court professionals should (and many will) go to an “AFCC” conference.  That would be in Florida, June, 2011.  At this  conference, now that fatherhood-based grants are entrenched in the CFCCs around the country, the topic will be — in a cruel twist of a Title by Tina Turner, who got OUT of that, and became the true star she always was with no more IKE– “what’s Gender Got to DO with it?”

  
  

Look up AFCC What’s Gender Got to Do with it?

(etc.)

The rest of you should all, please, go to work, because I assure you, your income-withholdings are helping support some of these,

through any number of federal funding streams, monitored by the gatekeepers, to make sure none particularly gets all the way through (except maybe a slow trickle, in a few places, that leaked through) to the actual people named on the face of the grant program.  Even the Arizona massacre that happened duing the first conference, of a U.S. Rep, Federal Judge, 9 year old girl, others — is not likely to even slow down this processes, or change these procedures.

Oh yeah– Arizona is a nice place for the AFCC, I believe there’s a chapter there, to help spread some love around and train court professionals.  Not to brag, but I found an OHIO based task force (fatherhood commission stuff) flying out to Phoenix to attend classes by some AFCC participants and presenters to learn how to fix families, right (submit comment if you want me to look up the link.  It dates back to early 2000s).

Families are getting massacred regularly, and as shocked as I am about a judge and a U.S. Rep, and outraged, I am also outraged that it provokes more outrage, on nationwide press, than the regular, relentless deaths that come from families run through this gauntlet and farmed out in the family law gulag.

Such as diverting TANF funds to collect child support (a program in place since 1996).  If that’s what you think the OCSE is doing with some of these grants to the states, I have some land under the Brooklyn Bridge to sell you.

Fragile Families is one of the many phrases starting in “F” that seem to just roll off the tongue and bring out true eloquence (immediately before, during, and after some FR grants become available) that seem to end up with the word “mother” and especially if single, becoming an archaic usage, and women getting “F . . . . ‘ed” by the courts if they don’t get oFFed by their exes, or poverty, first.  This, CitySlickers, is how Families get redesigned and Moms become “long-distance” and “noncustodial,” often enough.  Essentially, this means, with the gradual elimination of the word “mother” and with it the FUNCTIONS of mother, including protection where necessary, they are being used as brood mares.  (Forgive, please, my poor attempts at cowboy analogies in honor of Mr. Hayes fromTexas,… but it helps my blood pressure to release some sarcasm when reading this rhetoric.  ) — but doesn’t it strike you odd that someone would go from a Fragile Families Initiative (look it up yourself, it’s a fatherhood grant) into Child Support Services, at a “Deputy”  level?  where’s the gold medalllion for this posse?

If people get this pattern, they can get a LOT.  The blog post puts the charts in, you’ve seen similar ones here, on my blog.  Just read what they wrote, then watch who they hang with, and what happens. Randijames.Com, quoting Mr. Michael Hayes

I also want to acknowledge the value that OCSE Section 1115 and SIP grants have had for the evolution of child support, both in Texas and around the country. Through Section 1115 grants, our Family Initiatives Section in Texas has been able to pursue the projects I’ve talked about, since these grants may be used to fund certain activities not normally allowed under FFP rules. The creativity and innovation that those grant programs have fostered play a big part in child support’s continued growth and vision. We take pride in how we’ve been able to keep the work going after the grant funding expires by using careful collaboration and coordination. For example, we found we could provide additional services to parents by linking Access and Visitation partners to our child support offices. Once the parents meet with us about the support order, they are escorted to the AV staff so they can develop a parenting plan. We could not have moved as thoughtfully or as quickly without that support.

Thank you, Michael Hayes, for making this so easy for us! I don’t even have to explain it anymore.

And THAT — and not so much PAS theory, my fine-feathered, female friends — is likely how you lost custody, or have now to pay to see your kids.  Audio-Visual/ Access-Visitation, A/V, Access-Visitation.  Not TOO hard to remember, is it

SEC. 469B. [42 US.C. 669b]

1. IN GENERAL—The Administration for Children and Families shall make grants under this section to enable States to establish and administer programs** to “support and facilitate “**noncustodial parents’ access to and visitation of their children, by means of activities including mediation (both voluntary and mandatory), counseling, education, development of parenting plans, visitation enforcement (including monitoring, supervision and neutral dropoff and pickup), and development of guidelines for visitation and alternative custody arrangements (etc.)

{{**support and facilitate– it HAS to read like that, “order” is not within the federal government’s jurisdiction to.  This is just short of — and the mediators, supervisors, etc. understand this clearly, I”m sure.., what their role is.  This role is not, of course, broadcast to custodial mothers coming before them at any stage of the game.}}

{{AND if many, or some , of those programs, judges and attorneys involved in this system, nay, even in open cases that get cases referred to these programs for “services”, just happen to have been on the Board of Directors — or, heck, have been a judge, or an attorney’s brainchild to start with (can you say Kids’ Turn? in SF Bay Area, now internationally minded, at least a few countries, and several states), and promoted heavily in (see #3, above) certain types of conferences as the model curriculum, etc.)-who are we to protest these many coincidences?}}

{{“Both voluntary and mandatory” and “support and facilitate” carry a little different tone, don’t you think? It’s MANDATORY, but these programs are only three in a “supporting and facilitating” capacity.  At public expense.  To help reduce welfare Moms and child support arrears.}}  Child support arrears ARE getting reduced, at least in many cases I’ve seen, including my own — by the means of an electronic eraser.  Their stats look better, my kids lose out on child support, which I was trying to help collect, as the same agency (national level) that was charged to help collect child support, failed to do so locally.}}

Annual Funding

• $10 million in federal funds is divided among the states annually based on a funding formula contained in the statute.

That’s since 1996, folks. Have I got your attention yet, and is it THAT much harder to remember “A/V” in connection with “DV” for “domestic violence,”which is what these grants help cover up in the custody venue?

Maybe $10M/year (for 14 years, so far) is peanuts, in the larger picture — but what is it doing to the court process? Or reduce the familywipeouts after domestic disputes, etc.?  Besides which, recruiting Dads and failing to tell moms one is doing this just ain’t honest.  Besides which, grant usages isn’t tracked fully, and there has been evidence of custody-switching scams (i.e., steering cases to certain court personneL) in many cases.  This is a PUBLIC issue, along with the huge superstructure of DV cancelling out FR grants  because it appears they are maybe splitting the proceeds, and keeping parents in the dark, except some of us who got mad enough to pursue answers (and we don’t show up in public and shoot bullets).

Who administers this?

Federal Administration

The Office of Child Support Enforcement — part of the Administration for Children and Families at the Department of Health and Human Services — has responsibility for administering the Access and Visitation Grant Program.

OK, so there you are.  The FEDERALIZING of what otherwise would be state-level, county-level, and district-level legal procedures played out in front of judges who have sworn to uphold the state, at least, constitution, or so one might hope.

.  Liz Richards of VA (D.C. area) has been collecting evidence on this since around 1993, and it’s critical to how the system works.  Needless to say, she is not invited to present at any of the above conferences.   Just because a site doesn’t have a link to YouTube of Blog Talk Radio, or Facebook, twitter, etc. — think it doesn’t have relevant information?  This is mostly WORDS (remember those?)

And some women who attempted to present some of this material at the end of BMCC were filibustered out of it, which at least left a witness, I hope, to the audience of the gamesmanship.  A mother who’d flown in from Australia was talking about on-line safety, and was not allowed to finish even her short, well-organized powerpoint, including about on-line safety for women.  She got about 7 minutes.  The previous presenter, a man, whose name was on some of the books were on the table outside, was an hour over schedule, and no one interrupted.

Meanwhile, and possibly at public expense? Mr Hayes, of Texas, is going to fly North to Minnesota to promote the same stuff, I’m sure…He’s all about fathers, and someone who is favorable to fathers is of course needed to really “tow the line” in collecting past-due child support, to help custodial mothers who need it to help raise their children in safety, and with food, and not begging for it, or working a third shift.

Here’s more from the RandiJames.com commentary on this, from the TEXAS perspective  (don’t forget to check out some charts she posts up there, too, with $$ figures on them).

Another great part about our work in the Family Initiatives Section is the way we use research to develop theoretical models for project development, and then take that theoretical model and design the intervention, track and evaluate implementation of the intervention, and then use what we learn to inform the next generation of programs and policy.

And so we conclude with how the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Administration of Children and Families (ACF) fuels their own research and sets propaganda in action through the creation of public policy.

That’s exactly what they are bragging about.  Too bad more MOms aren’t trained to look up this stuff.

SO, TO SUMMARIZE REGARDING THE 1, 2, 3 conferences:

Someone has to wave a red flag around to make sure the bull keeps charging the flag, and is not distracted and actually reaches a matador or an on-looker in the crowd.  That red flag in this case has any number of psychological terminologies, or pet phrases on it, to distract, as we say, the bulls, and appease the crowds, who come in for the spectacle.  If you’re living in the US and paying taxes, you are part of the spectators.

Battered Mothers’ Custody Conference badgers Mothers to Buy Books and Join! Organizations promoting these books.

[The domain name (randijames.com) has since gone up for sale.  The individual is among some women I blogged alongside, for a while — until not long after this BMCC conference, which I had attended (finally) for the principal purpose of at least meeting some of them.  By this time I’d already figured out that the conference purpose was to sell books and services for friends and colleagues, and avoidance on reporting the fatherhood and access/visitation grants as a considerable influence on the entire field (not to mention also obscuring or discouraging conversations around the existence of the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, and all that represented…. //LGH 2017 update]]

Maybe not badgered, just relentlessly marketed to.  …  The name of the conference should be adjusted to reflect “Good Cop/Bad Cop Press Releases.”  The Good cops had control of the microphone, pointed to the bad judges, custody decisions, evaluators, etc.  (from whom they derive their livelihood) as the Bad Cops, cough up your stories (women were, literally, asked to send theirs in to help Mr. Bancroft with the next literary masterpiece based on something that had inspired him), and dollars (what’s left of them) and (if I may switch from gangster movies to The Wizard of Oz) “pay no attention to that man — and the word applies, overall — behind the curtain.”

Another mother who attended the first conference, commenting obliquely upon it, I’m sure, and a book being sold for $100 to mothers, which it is declared will fix our broken dreams, and change the scope of family law practice, because it “explains” why judges “don’t understand” domestic violence.  And $ 100 was a discount.

VENI, VIDI, Vomiti.   (It was shameless; I was there…)

I would write a more stringent post, but am overburdened, like many of us, and sickened at the whole scene, particularly the marketing of other Moms’ stories.  Reminds me of The Amazing Cells of Henrietta Lack.  I think Moms are starting to catch out that their ongoing troubles (caused by court professionals in many cases) are a new target market — because Fatherhood and Domestic Violence niches are [already] taken.

How gullible do these people with Esq.,Ph.D., and M.S.W behind their names think we are? ???

I recommend, NEXT year, attend the conference that’s NOT in your designated area of concern, and find out what’s being said.

The Minnestoa Fatherhood site has a new phraseology you should learn: “Women in the Fatherhood Movement.”  This is abbreviated WIFI, which I think is catchy and current — don’t you?

They, too, got a grant from HHS to blog about how great everyone is, and the real way to stop DV is to get families re-united (with Dads in there).  The word ‘mother” rarely appears in the handout, even though some of these specially-selected women of color and highly-placed (in the fatherhood movement) are indeed Mothers (at least one, I read), their lives and lifestyles have LITTLE in common with the hellish things happening, across the board to women in the court systems.   And in high-profile cases many times involving very wealthy, white males — such as I blogged on in Nassau County, NY, recently.  These women are Executive Directors, leaders, professionals, and one is even married to a pioneer in the fatherhood movement.

And YOUR tax dollars (or, at least a single HHS contract identified so far), like Bush paying Maggie Gallagher $20K to push his marriage movement long ago– are helping pay for the glitz.  I hope I caught THIS one out the gate — the organization (nonprofit) is so new, dating to 2008, it hasn’t even got its data up on Guidestar.org yet.

http://womeninfatherhood.org/main/

[[2017 Update on missing domain, “WomenInFatherhood.org” — this is a story unto itself, both its brief “flash-in-the-pan” existence (but long enough to use the organization name to advertise its White House Connections), after which it stopped filing, apparently, in 2012, and was finally IRS-revoked, says the IRS (for not filing 3 years in a row), which they published in August 2016, and is not showing (although read the fine print: to know for sure, call the IRS 800#) as reinstated.  Meanwhile, both OpenSocietyFoundations and other sites like BlackMaleAchievement, reference it.  Believe me — if WIFI.org wanted to stay incorporated and maintain its website, it would have, especially with backers like that!  But to narrate it in screen-prints or exposes during this 2017 update — ain’t gonna happen.   “CBMA” which Open Society Foundation referenced, is “waiting to get its 501©3, but til then working through Silicon Community Foundation as its “fiscal agent” — i.e., funding will be buried.

This giant foundation, whose returns I viewed briefly (2006 and 2007 only), long enough to see how poorly the Grants Sections were organized for anyone wishing to follow them, making another note about Donor Advised Funds and Community Foundations, I in the process noted, had paid its first President, “Emmett D. Carson” a $500K loan (at 4% + some, over ten years) in addition to a salary (not including benefits) of over ½ million a year.  Maybe here’s why — and note that I’m posting what is a 10-year anniversary for this particular tax-exempt.  See also next two images showing the assets combined and prior EIN#s of its predecessor foundations. Notice he came from the Minneapolis Foundation (12 Yrs) and before that Ford Foundation (also a proud (sic) sponsor of responsible fatherhood initiatives):

svcf-ein205205488-form-990-2006-showing-prior-foundation-assets-over-%c2%bd-m-each-transferred-and-their-eins-statemts23-2017-02-19-at-357pm <> svcf-website-emmettdcarsonphd-pres-annotated-10th-anniversary-nations-largest-community-fndtn-viewed-2017feb19-at-630pm

Silicon Valley Community Foundation is a merger operation (as of 2006) and at this point has a half-billion assets, and most of its grant-making is “Donor-Advised” apparently… More later!//LGH Feb 20, 2017, “President’s Day” (almost!).

Meanwhile the “GoDaddyWebsite” above (domain) for womeninfatherhood.org  is for sale, and another site tracking the IP address says, “Japan.”]]

(Here are “JUST A FEW” screenprints and related pdfs, added 2017 obviously). I’m starting with the IRS filings (and proof when their status was revoked) will provide filenames as pdfs (to see images full-sized), the show other “entities” (Soros Open Society Foundations, and one of their projects (?) which featured WomenIn Fatherhood.org (at some point after 2006) and admits using a mega-merger foundation in California for its fiscal agent “while waiting for 501©3 status” although it’s flush with membership and showing at least 9 major funding partners.  I also am including (before that) evidence that the WomenInFatherhood.org website is available as a domain name (i.e., no re-direct was provided), and that, based on the timing of the IRS exemption, apparently no sooner did a representative get positive PR through Obama White House “Champions of Change’ (for responsible fatherhood) in June 2012, than, apparently, it simply quit filing tax returns.

Or (who knows?  I can dream, can’t I?) someone informed them of this 2011 post complaining about the situation!)

I also show that in 2009 the tax return declared less than $25K revenues (because a Form 990-N was filed) and I personally, at this point, can’t see a year 2008 or earlier tax return (regular or ‘Form 990EZ”) — which doesn’t mean one couldn’t be hunted down.

But clearly this organization (WIFI, not SVCF!) is a “flash-in-the-pan” intentionally, not accidentally.  The name was helpful for citing when on public platform somewhere promoting “the cause.”  And with Annie E. Casey and Soros and a White House Administration (Democrat) behind one, who needs to stay legit?

To save time, all links may show up in one place, and the images as, probably a left-hand stream of images. I’m sure my smart readers can sort it out this time.

IRS site showing status “Revoked” as of 5/2016. To get to this state requires 3 years in a row of not filing. “Do the math” when they stopped. And this is “RESPONSIBLE” fatherhood (women for) being promoted? Sure….

exempt-org-select-check-irs-website-showing-wifi-ein23-1370153-was-revoked-may-2016-publ-aug-2016-not-shown-reinstated-2017feb19-at-331pm<> wifi-ein26-1370153-form990finder-shows-didnt-file-after-2012-was-revoked-aug2016-2017-02-19-at-330pm<> wifi-ein261370153-eos-selectcheck-showing-yr-2009-only-they-filed-a-form-990n-declared-less-than-25k-revenuesviewed-2017-02-19335pm<>

~~~ipglider-showing-womeninfatherhoodorg-provider-is-123server-inc-location-japan-ip-210-188-214-32-screen-shot-2017-02-19pm <> womeninfatherhoodorg-domain-available-blackmale-achievmtorg-promoting-though2017-02-19319pm <>

pressrelease-fr-women-in-fatherhood-inc-featuring-june2012-champions-of-change-and-wh-ofbnps-from-myemailconstantcontactcom-seeing-as-wifi-quit-filing-in-2013<> wifi-shown-as-open-soc-fndtns-2010-grantee-225k-acknwledges-they-advised-wh-ofbni-sic-2017-02-19-310pm

AND (last) some more as I attempted to find out who was the entity (turns out to be a non-entity?) promoting WIFI, while using a major foundation for its fiscal agent.  AGAIN: Forget the “cause” most activity is just about setting up the financial investments and cash-flow.  The talk of “cause” simply generates revenue and public approval!

cbma-funding-partners-of-its-%22institute-for-black-male-achievemt-created-in-late-2012-with-4m-screenshot-2017-02-19-at-32537-pm <>  cbma-as-a-natl-membership-netwk-of-over-2500-orgs4720-leaders-acc-to-another-pg-on-site-was-still-waiting-on-its-5013-status-viewed-2017-feb-19-at-323pm

 

 

 

Now that I’ve posted several images under this section, if you can visualize the 2011 post in its simpler form, that would be closer to the reality.  I just at the time hadn’t figured in the “abandoned domain name, status-revoked entity” so much as how ridiculous was the concept of “Women in Fatherhood” in the first place. 

I am still a Californian, and it was good to learn about the Silicon Valley Community Foundation as another major player in my (regionally speaking) “home turf.”  I don’t have it in me to go chase down who is and isn’t a real 501©3 yet in the above mix.

Outside this background tint (not including the images I just added below left) resumes the Year 2011 dialogue..

Feedback via submitting a comment welcome any time.  Thanks.//LGH.

 

 

In December 2005, the Annie E. Casey Foundation convened a meeting of men and women working in responsible fatherhood to assess the influence women were having in the field. After extensive consultations with experts in the field, the group found a high level of need for a collective effort of women*** to provide a unique and necessary voice for:

• Effective advocacy and support of Responsible Fatherhood in program and policy;
• Fatherhood awareness, education, legislation, & policy initiatives, which benefit from the input of mothers and other women;
• Effective programs designed to involve fathers–the perspective of mothers and their advocates is essential to their success.

This led to the formation of Women In Fatherhood—A diverse* group of women dedicated to advancing the responsible fatherhood field through public awareness and education, policy advocacy, research, and collaboration.

* there is a token white woman, or three? but look at the bios and I don’t see one family court scapegoat noncustodial mother.  I don’t see one person who has identified experiencinug domestic violence, or dealing with child molestation in the family, or a broke person, or a mother whose wages are being garnished to pay her ex-abuers (for example, see “rightsformothers.com” blog, which represents that voice).  There is one who identified as having experienced divorce (at what level, not shown).  Are there atheists on the group?  Jews? Are there feminists?

Well, then how diverse is it?  The photo is refreshingly different, but photos are photos, and show faces, and smiles.  Look at the backgrounds.

“collective” — they chose and assembled certain kinds of experts, and excluded others.  Hence “collective.”  Kind of like national Fatherhood Initiative started with “a few prominent thinkers,” and the website actually did say that, last I checked.  A FEW prominent “thinkers.”

Well, what about some obscure, underground” thinkers? for a change?

** No doubt because the heavy-handed male dominance of the father’s rights groups, plus some blogger dads like Glenn Sacks who took their free (Stay-at home?) time to go after, say young adult survivors of domestic violence and fleeing to escape it, such as Jennifer Collins.  Or others.  They needed some articulate, poised, and not about to cause a ruckus in the movement FEMALES to front the MALE agenda, which the fatherhood movement is.  In other words, they correctly realized, the image was tarnished and needed a facelift.

Annie E. Casey foundation convened.  Well, two (that I noticed) of hte Boards of Directors — and that’s a well-rounded one, plenty on the Board — had connections already with Annie E. Casey, who funds lots  of fatherhood stuff.  I’m really puzzled why the need more.  Look yourself, although I don’t have the timing of it yet

• Email
• Print

“Responsible Fatherhood”: What Do Women Have to Do with It?

October 12, 2010 | by Stacey Bouchet and Julia Hayman Hamilton

There are many national and local efforts focused around the issue of fatherhood in the United States. They are necessary and encouraging, but we are convinced that women’s voices are also essential to their success and sustainability. That’s why our organization, Women In Fatherhood, Inc. (WIFI), recently joined with the Open Society Campaign for Black Male Achievement in its work to strengthen low-income families and communities through the support of positive father involvement.

We are launching a media campaign, “In the Words of Women,” to raise awareness about the importance of fathers.

What — FATHERHOOD.gov, Fatherhood.HHS.gov, Fathers.com, and Fatherhood Commissions around the country, National Fatherhood initiative, state-level “fatherhood initiatives” and all the CFDA 93086 on “Healthy Marriage and Responsible Fatherhood”  millions — and it indeed Was then, Is Now, and I gather “Ever Shall Be” million$$ — to promote these things — again with PUBLIC $$ and faith-based collaboratives at times — isn’t that enough?

It takes more than absence of  Y chromosome to qualify to be a VOICE of a WOMAN that needs to be heard nationwide .  This is more paid-for static paid for by the majority white male, still, Congress.  And I never used to talk like this before.  I’ll try to post the brochure which states this clearly — but my laptop battery is about to die.

Here’s just one of this august board of directors (probably great women in their own rights — but they are on a cause that is hurting others, so I feel very free to speak out about the farce.  First white dudes (Wade Horn et al), go after inner-city  urban churches (i.e., the black vote) to make like fatherhood agenda is NOT racist.  That under the belt, they then go get some women (including, in case below, a wife of a fatherhood pioneer) and front them to say “we speak for women.”

Frances Ballard

Frances Ballard is the Executive Director for the National Responsible Fatherhood Clearinghouse (NRFC). In her role she is responsible for the strategic direction and leadership for activities regarding the NRFC, including the coordination of the media campaign, clearinghouse and Web site, Training and Technical Assistance (T & TA) to responsible fatherhood demonstration sites, and building relationships and partnerships for NRFC. She has over 20 years experience working with fathers, families and healthcare. Her previous positions include 12 years serving as the Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for The Institute for Responsible Fatherhood and Family Revitalization; Consultant to The Annie E. Casey Foundation’s Making Connections Program; ***

Director of Corporate Development and Clinical Manager-Ambulatory Care, Grace Hospital; and Nurse Consultant/Program Developer, The Institute For Responsible Fatherhood and Family Development. She holds a Masters of Science Degree in Nursing Administration, a B.A. in Social Work, an A.S. in Nursing, and numerous executive management certifications.She is married to Dr. Charles A. Ballard, “pioneer” of the Fatherhood Movement and the mother of their three children, Jonathan, Lydia and Christopher.

At the bottom is a link to her husband, and his “faith.”  Makes me wonder about the separation of church and state, and where it went…***

** kind of reminds me of Wade Horn and the HHS Connection.  Maybe that’s the “CONNECTIONS” they are really dealing with ..

Well, has your local church (wear the shoe if it fits) stopped seeking tithes and offerings yet? Has hell (fatherlessness, I guess) froze over yet.  Is the Vatican scaling back?  Then the answer, evidently, is NO.

Again, I repeat:  “How gullible

do they think we (mothers) are?”

Look — if readers can put up with  my (lack of proper) formatting and failing to spellcheck on this post, the URLs on it are great lead-ins to what the courts are about.  I have the links, it’s up to you to THINK, and continue to see if the puzzle pieces are starting to assemble into the larger picture.  More later, I hope, and this is my contribution to the Major Holiday that today represents. What depths we have sunk to on high, sacrificing civil rights and  consitutional rights for someone (else’s, not Martin luther King, Jr.’s) “I HAVE A DREAM” about Fathers & Families (no “mothers”) and a totally organized, uniform controlled workforce run by foundations, and executed through the family law and etc. court systems, all a seamless, no-conflict whole, run from the top.  Sounds like what some World Wars were fought over, last century, only we’re on the wrong side, on this one — in trying Designer Family USA.

I’ll try & include the ilnk to the brochure stating, clearly, that the HHS paid to have certain dialogues put forth, and that NCADV was a recommended conference to attend in the Fatherhood matters.  Also telling in that brochure is that (unlike the Bible, which seems to be so foundational to many of these agenda) the phrasing was fathers & families, or Fathers & children, community, etc.  The word ‘mother”?  I don’t think it was even on the two -page glitz blitz promo page.

It’s in the Ten Commandments.  But, these family folk can’t seem to consistently choke out the word in their rhetoric.

Remember — Please THINK about the LINK — and the word “Please” has a “PLEA” in it — from me, at the start of 2011, and over four years since my profession was destroyed by the presence of these programs in and around the courtrooms.