Child Support, Fatherhood Promotion: More DIALOGUE and TABLES of OCSE Grants to States (CFDAs 93601, 93563, 93564) from my 7/26/2011 Post (For example, in Alabama..)
. . .
Yep…I’m regrouping from an over-extended (vertically and horizontally, and probably subject-matter-wise) 2011 post….For more background on why and how I’m doing this now, in April, 2016, see the last installment (post) in April 2016, “Dialogue from 7/26/2011 post charting HHS/OCSE Grants to States (CFDAs 93563, 93564)” which, as that post explains, excerpts the most of the DIALOGUE from the earlier posts, and adds (marked by different colors) updates, leaving more of the charts to this one…..That post began:
2016 Update (I will use this background-color for this post to indicate):
RE: OCSE: Child Support Enforcement/Federal Grants to States: Let’s Look at the “TAGGS” HHS Charts (CFDAs 93.563 & 93.564) Originally published July 26, 2011, and at 25,000+ words
This blog excerpts most of the DIALOGUE from an older post, leaving the charts, breaking it into pieces so as to format the post with the real payload — the charts.
Also know that the above coloration (cream-colored background inside maroon-borders) basically represents 2016-added information, anything more than a paragraph. Naturally, in almost five years, some links will be broken, images not displayed, etc., which I will either correct, or at least mention.
I don’t expect this all to sink in with one reading or exposure to the information. I will be repeating the general concepts in following posts, “the Lord willing”…. meaning, as I can get to it. As sometimes happens when new or “cosmic” information or level of awareness starts to sink in, it grips my attention and I do have trouble getting a post out in one post… as opposed to one, long, linear, and systematic (covering each and every organization referenced) post
Tags on this blog — there are more tags than covered in this post; I took an EXTENDED 2016 update to a separate post and will duplicate the list of tags. This happened when I looked closer at a set of grants in Alabama hooking up with “Prevent Child Abuse America” and started, well, “taking names and posting tax returns.”
I discovered not just the defunct (but still advertising) nonprofit cited at the state level (“VOICES for Children in Alabama”), and the system of funding of multiple similar-but-not-identical “Children’s Trust” “Children First” and other things “Children” — and the pushing of more PreK education.
The Pre-K education pushing led to the authority for doing this, called “NIEER” which being “National Institute for Early Education Research: a Unit of Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey” and with this, direct connections to the UNC (University of North Carolina -Chapel Hill) based, and now 50 years old as of 2016, “Frank Porter Institute for Child Development.”
So far, that was “only” a New Jersey and North Carolina University weighing in on what should be done with public funding under CAPTA (to prevent child abuse), Tobacco Settlements (federal), and a state level board for preventing child abuse and neglect in ALABAMA.
But then a closer look at a letter posted on “NIEER (which, again, was used to validate the programming being run on Alabama’s poor, at-risk, abused, etc. children who were not showing up “Ready” for state-sponsored kindergarten) showed connections to NEW YORK University
School of Education(the oldest school of pedagogy in the US; it was “experimental education” then and is ‘holistic education” now under the new, improved (and referencing a 2001 $10M benefactor) “Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development”
http://Children.ALABAMA.Gov/first-class-pre-k-grants/ references the NIEER:
First Class Pre-K Grants
About the First Class Pre-K Process
The First Class Pre-K Program is Aabama’s state funded pre-K program for 4 year old children who are residents of the State of Alabama. The program is funded by the Education Trust Fund through the Alabama Department of Children’s Affairs Office of School Readiness. In order to receive funds for a First Class Pre-K Classroom, organizations must first complete an online application.
First Class Pre-K has been recognized by the National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER) as meeting 10 of 10 criteria for the highest quality Pre-K programs. Funding for First Class Pre-K is to (1) provide access for more children to attend high quality pre-K and (2) enhance quality of existing classrooms by providing funding and support to meet the high quality standards. All state funded classrooms receive coaching from specialized coaches to support classroom instruction and Developmentally Appropriate Practice (DAP). Additionally, DCA monitors to ensure grant compliance and a high level of accountability for the grant funds
Note: Children.Alabama.gov doesn’t provide a courtesy link to NIEER, mention that it’s based at Rutgers (and probably not a 501©3) or who decided that this NJ group should be evaluating programs for Alabama. Who, if anyone, is monitoring whether there might be some conflict-of-interest relationships between coaches & curriculum providers and the evaluators? Yet State funds TO Alabama fund the programming.
Let me show this with a link to the “NIEER” letter, the statement of whose publication the letter was based on, and an (amazing, actually**) few resumes, wealthy, PRIVATE foundations, and sponsored (by those foundations and of course federal agencies such as the US/DHHS and/or the US/DOE) university centers, not to mention a set of global connections which shed an entirely different light on why there is such ongoing interest in compiling social science data on “low-income” American families and why the pre-school school should be extended, and the pre-school year become year-round..
Apparently, there’s an intent to know what also works overseas in low-income families on other continents, and JUST HOW MUCH can we standardize, streamline, coordinate, and efficiently replicate “what works” overseas too. Also, how long can all the American public be persuaded that their taxes should not just be to save all the children HERE (which, FYI, isn’t happening) but also globally. And, apparently our “overseers” (Congress who appropriates, and federal agencies who distribute, particularly HHS) have already chosen their champion proselytizers with stellar academics (mostly in psychology, still !!) and PhD-published coming out the ears. In journals put out in corporation with universities alone, or (one example below) University (Princeton) + Famous Nonprofit (Brookings).
Regardless of what you may think about the programming, it’s time to look at the sponsoring foundations, the lingo, and why not, some of the people involved? HOW are they doing this, WHAT (in other terms than the profession/practitioner-specific jargon) is actually taking place here, and based on a closer look at that, WTF is the endgame?
Is there, or is there not, any genuine intention that the current generation of “low-income children” young, or youthful, actually stop being “low-income” and make it into another social class in ANY method other than a chosen few of them becoming mentored scholars (it comes up below) of the same scheme (or “schematic” if you wish) for another generation?
I wonder how the sponsored professors with named chairs at public/private-sponsored center (and their networked colleagues and philanthropists) would feel if forced to become subject matter of collected (and published) studies by low-income ADULTS (especially PARENTS) proposing that instead of redistributing OUR taxable wage revenues to these places, it’s time to flip the table sand redistribute some of the research grants, endowed professorships, and put a “chill” on how many tax-exempt entities any one family may start, sit on the board of, or otherwise control. (That statement may make more sense after you look at some of the numbers involved in these networks, and start counting just how many foundations are in on it….)
**it’s amazing how some people with their degrees and work experience (as psychologists) can end up so high on the “food chain” while others are stuck in the webs spun (if not spread, or strung) out across the nation fighting to simply retain a parent/child relationship surrounding the latest swings in social science policy and the public’s perception of what makes “low-income” people “low-income” and what — such as we saw in 1996 PRWORA — Congress should do about it, namely control reproductive activities of minorities, and other poor people, stigmatize single motherhood, and promote marriage through public media campaigns, provide extra legal help for fathers in the family courts (access visitation funding), and favor faith-based organizations who (all along) have not been too impressed with women, let alone single mothers, as a “species…. and continue diverting public funds (i.e., TANF surpluses) to any nonprofit who will “get with the program” and run the curricula on welfare populations, or — ideally– eventually ALL populations (except those who are calling the shots at the highest level fo academia and government, who obviously, somehow, don’t need them).
In other words, the power is going to certain segments and away from other segments. Merely working steadily at a job, complying with court orders, and particularly not “minding one’s own business” is not enough to survive.
Now that I’m done with that sarcastic moment, here’s the reference. Click to see context.
“Research Strongly Supports Investment in Early Childhood Education.”
WHOSE research?
On closer examination, it admits that this ECE Consensus letter posted at “NIEER” was largely based on ONE article published in 2013 by (a bunch of) people, with varied affiliations, sponsored by TWO other foundations: Society for Research in Child Development, and (NY’s) Foundation for Child Development.”
ORGANIZATION NAME | ST | YR | FORM | PP | TOTAL ASSETS | EIN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Society for Research in Child Development | MI | 2014 | 990 | 35 | $13,862,835.00 | 35-6005842 |
Society for Research in Child Development | MI | 2013 | 990 | 31 | $12,481,546.00 | 35-6005842 |
Society for Research in Child Development, Inc. | MI | 2012 | 990 | 32 | $11,134,832.00 | 35-6005842 |
INTERResting organization. For one, its legal domicile is Wisconsin, not Michigan. Its date of origin says 1933 (that alone is unique) and mission, to further the field of child development.
The setup seems centrally controlled — no subcontractors, and of their key (Part VIIA) employees, only one is paid at all or works FT, the Executive Director, Lonnie Shephard. That leaves only 16 other employees to split the following salaries (minus Exec Director’s salary) as listed on Line 9 of Page 1.
I’m setting this on a separate PAGE (not post) for inclusion in this one. This is probably an organization to keep on the radar. The website is http://www.SCRD.org. FYI, I found discrepancies and errors in the tax return.
The name of that 2013 publication is in maroon, bold font below, and two other posts (so far, in draft) have resulted from my looking at just how many other institutes, foundations, and “others” were citing to this ONE article….Clearly ,they are in communication with each other more than the public, most likely, is aware, or aware of the publications,either. There is a significant presence up in Portland, Oregon, pushing this general idea (“Friends of the Children/Portland” and “National” etc.).
(Perhaps I should publish the list so we all know who’s “in on it.”)
**This statement draws heavily upon a more detailed report on the scientific basis for preschool policy by: Yoshikawa, H., Weiland, C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Burchinal, M. R., Espinosa, L. M., Gormley, W. T., Ludwig, J., Magnuson, K., Phillips, D., & Zaslow, M. (2013). Investing in our future: The evidence base on preschool education. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Society for Research in Child Development and New York: Foundation for Child Development.
“Yoshikawa, H.,”** as lead author or co-author on this, comes up below in this post. FYI, he’s a secretary (i.e., officer) at one of the two foundations which published this work, the second one listed. I’ll show again below, in the context of a foundation he’s on.
**THAT link was to his two-dozen-plus page resume (as of July 2014 anyhow) posted at “Steinhardt,” including the employment, grants and education. Notably, this guy is SMART obviously, but his college education does start at Yale.
For every person that gets into and completes Yale, I’m sure there is a story (Including whether it’s born with a silver spoon, or average (middle-class) family, or scholarship, etc.) but I doubt between all the publishing, writing books, teaching, running conferences, mentoring other PhDs and planning how to run the world with Jeffrey Sachs and the UN Sustainable Development Globalization (…. see link/below for exact title) he has much time to talk about his own childhood and why he went to Yale for literature, then Juilliard for piano, then NYU for Psychology with an emphasis on applied and “social interventions.”
EDUCATION: BA, Yale, 1987, in literature (Magna cum laude); MM in Piano Performance, The Juilliard School (1989) — and then (for some reason) he goes into psychology at NYU: 1992 M.A., Psychology, New York University, 1998 Ph.D., New York University, Psychology (Clinical Psychology).
- Needless to say (?) that’s not a typical career path for either a psychologist, OR a musician. Here’s someone with top grades at Yale, then takes a few years and gets a piano masters — at one of THE top schools in the country, let alone in NY, for piano performance. Obviously he’s got talent in at least two fields, and credentials — but he does a career change and goes right into psychology (masters, then PhD) at NYU. WHY? Why did he do Juilliard if he didn’t want to have a concert or concert/teaching career?
As a pianist (though not Juilliard caliber, I was at least “Oberlin Conservatory” caliber) I know that often our brains work differently — really! — and have proclivities for certain other fields, such as math, sciences, medicine, and or some sort of telecommunications/systems analysis.
Seriously, music, in particular piano (two hands, 88 keys, harmony, frequently working in ensembles, and a huge variety of styles available over the short time (compared to other instruments) the piano has been around) plus reading music itself, involves using different parts of one’s brain, understanding a symbolic language, as well as (sound itself) acoustics, and something of how to express human, felt emotions in sound, and how others have done this… It also takes time to learn the technology, although many people do receive training as part of their childhood upbringing also.
Psychology and Education with an emphasis on “GLOBAL” and “VERY YOUNG CHILDREN” and “Government Sponsorship throughout” for Yoshikawa” per se wouldn’t seem to be the most obvious second, or third choice. Unless Juilliard (and the degree of accomplishment on piano) was just play-time and this was the plan all along…
Resume, “HONORS AND NATIONAL / INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY ROLES”
2014 – Senior Policy Advisor, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Human Services Policy.2013 – Co-Chair (with Madhav Chavan, co-founder of Pratham), Thematic Group on Early Childhood Development, Education and the Transition to Work, and Member, Leadership Council, United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network (UN SDSN). Research and technical network, under the auspices of the U.N. Secretary General and chaired by Jeffrey Sachs, advising on the development and implementation of the post-2015 global development goals…
2012-2015 – National Board on Education Sciences, Member (Presidential nomination confirmed by the Senate).
2011 Member, Board of Directors, Foundation for Child Development (2014 – present: Secretary of the Board and Chair of the Governance Committee).2010 – Member, Advisory Committee on Head Start Research and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
2010 – Advisory Committee on Early Childhood Development, Inter-American Development Bank.
2010 – Chair, Committee on the Science of Family Research: A Workshop, National Academy of Sciences/ National Research Council and Institute of Medicine.2010 – Best Edited Book, Society for Research on Adolescence, for Shinn and Yoshikawa (2008), Toward Positive Youth Development: Transforming Schools and Community Programs.
And, to reference a grant or two, look at the size of awards. All these began only in 2013 or 2014, but some are ongoing as we can see by the years. Notice the last one, while small, shows the involvement of “Society for Research in Child Development.”
2014 – 2017 Co-PI (PI Christina Weiland), Sustaining the Boost: Long-Term Effects of the Boston Public Prekindergarten Program. U.S. Department of Education, Institute on Educational Sciences. $1,419,000.
2013 – Co-PI (PI Pia R. Britto), Analysis of the Early Childhood Development Policy in Colombia. Bogota: Office of the President of Colombia. $124,000.
2013-2018 – Co-PI (PI Lindsay Chase-Lansdale), Expanding the Cycle of Opportunity: Simultaneously Educating Parents and Children in Head Start. U.S. DHHS Administration for Children and Families, $2,500,000.
2013-2016 – PI (Co-PI’s Greg Duncan, Katherine Magnuson, Holly Schindler). Effects of Early Childhood Programs on Children: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. National Institutes of Health, NICHD R01, $1,700,000.2013 – Co-PI (PI Martha Zaslow, Society for Research in Child Development). Policy Brief on Prekindergarten Policy and Child Development. Foundation for Child Development grant to the Society for Research in Child Development to produce policy brief on the evidence base on preschool education to inform federal preschool proposals. Coordinator and lead author for research team (including Christina Weiland (primary co-author), Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Margaret Burchinal, Linda Espinosa, William Gormley, Jens Ludwig, Katherine Magnuson, Deborah Phillips, and Martha Zaslow). $30,000
Another closer look at who was signing the NIEER (“Rutgers”) “ECE Consensus Letter” (that all people everywhere — but particularly all low-income communities — need MORE and BETTER and LONGER-DAY, LONGER-YEAR (“quality” of course) Pre-K) revealed the name Jeanne Brooks-Gunn which I recognize simply because I’ve read so much (or, perhaps “too much”) on marriage/fatherhood grants, and nonprofits propagating this quasi-religion, mythic interpretation of the causes of (basically, all) society’s ills, and doing it in academic, detached, “scientific” (social science and psychology, that is) terms so as to sound neutral, official and more credible.
Dr. Brooks-Gunn (she does have a PhD from University of Pennsylvania, and a M.Ed. from Harvard) works out of Columbia University of New York.
THAT gets real interesting as it ties in by association (and at times, co-publication, and collaboration on other projects) the “FRAGILE FAMILIES” theme (another word for fatherhood studies) — in association with Irwin Garfinkel, another well-credentialed and well-known, influential professor there. Professor Garfinkel’s “better half” (wife) Sara McLanahan actually works out of Princeton, NJ (NY/NJ, guess there is some commuting involved…) and on the “Future of Children” publication jointly sponsored by Princeton University (Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs) and Brookings Institution).
At all points, these topics, university centers, and some of the professionals they sponsor, publish, or promote — as well as the wording for the same — will be intersecting (a close match) with 1996 PRWORA interests and influential personnel. It is in fact SO CLOSE that another look at what was the ultimate purpose behind PRWORA to start with, might be in order.
At present, my take on it is a consistent “privatization of government / power grab” lest the civil rights (for minorities AND women) movements finish their work, and we move to a form of government based on individual, unalienable HUMAN rights, and as citizens and not, at any point in time, finding ourselves on the wrong side of whatever is the current social policy interest group…
Specifically, as to both Brookings, the Future of Children, and UNC (“Frank Porter Institute of Child Development”) we are looking closely at Ron Haskins, who manages to keep his foot in many parlors in these matters, as well as continuing to promote fatherhood on other less well-known 501©3s. That these fatherhood-pushing 501©3s (and centers) often involve high-ranking, PhD’d and published women should no longer be surprising.
http://www.brookings.edu/experts/haskinsr
A former White House and congressional advisor on welfare issues, Ron Haskins co-directs the Brookings Center on Children and Families and Budgeting for National Priorities Project. An expert on preschool, foster care, and poverty—he was instrumental in the 1996 overhaul of national welfare policy. He is also a contributor to the Evidence Speaks paper project.
(from “View Full Bio” link at the above link):
Prior to joining Brookings and Casey, he spent 14 years on the staff of the House Ways and Means Human Resources Subcommittee, first as welfare counsel to the Republican staff, then as the subcommittee’s staff director. From 1981-1985, he was a senior researcher at the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. He also taught and lectured on history and education at UNC, Charlotte and developmental psychology at Duke University.
Haskins was the editor of the 1996, 1998, and 2000 editions of the Green Book, a 1600-page compendium of the nation’s social programs published by the House Ways and Means Committee that analyzes domestic policy issues including health care, poverty, and unemployment. Haskins is a senior editor of The Future of Children, a journal on policy issues that affect children and families. He has also co-edited several books, including Welfare Reform and Beyond: The Future of the Safety Net (2002), The New World of Welfare (2001) and Policies for America’s Public Schools: Teachers, Equity, and Indicators (Ablex, 1988), and is a contributor to numerous edited books and scholarly journals on children’s development and social policy issues …
His areas of expertise include welfare reform, child care, child support, marriage, child protection, and budget and deficit issues. In 1997, Haskins was selected by the National Journal as one of the 100 most influential people in the federal government. He received a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement (2000); the President’s Award for Outstanding Contributions to the Field of Human Services from the American Public Human Services Association (2005); and the Lion Award from the Grantmakers for Children, Youth, and Families (2010).
He holds a Bachelor’s degree in History, a Master’s in Education, and a Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology, from UNC, Chapel Hill. Haskins, who was a noncommissioned officer in the United States Marine Corps from 1963 to 1966, lives with his wife in Rockville, Maryland and is the father of four grown children.
(I just noticed it doesn’t say “he lives with his wife … and THEY HAVE four grown children.” I wonder if she is the mother, or it was a second marriage or not. Either way, you can see after his bachelors degree, he went “EDUCATION / DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY” and never attended anywhere (for those three degree) OUTSIDE North Carolina, or other than that University. It also doesn’t reference his participation on the nonprofit “National Fatherhood Initiative” (if my memory is right on that) OR on MDRC (which runs social science evaluations on the country in a public/private partnership of major proportions; I think Isabel Sawhill is also on that board). Or, his participation on National Fatherhood Leaders Group (etc.).
(Update on the NFLG — promoting “Watch Parties” for a “Dad Camp” film; this website lists the participating organizations — but tells nothing about them as nonprofits, or centers at a university. or about NFLG itself as a nonprofit. Given the fiscal behavior of some of them, including NFLG itself, that’s no accident!). This appears to be run out of Canada (see site, and notice the phrase “leading fatherhood organizations in the U.S.”
http://www.brandnewz.com/?p=6561
The National Fatherhood Leaders Group (NFLG), a consortium of the leading fatherhood organizations in the U.S., is teaming up with VH1 on the premiere of the television network’s upcoming original series “Dad Camp,” which focuses on encouraging responsible fatherhood, featuring licensed psychologist Dr. Jeff Gardere.
The partners’ goal is to generate awareness and discussion around the importance of fathers in children’s lives. The cornerstone of the collaboration is the promotion of national “Watch Parties” for the series premiere on Monday, May 31 at 10:30 PM ET/PT on VH1. Participating fatherhood groups are now mobilizing their constituents and asking them to create and promote local viewing events tied to the premiere to spark discussion around the country about responsible fatherhood and the challenges that young men face today.
The National Fatherhood Leaders Group members include:
— Center for Urban Families
— Celebrate Dads
— National Center for Fathering
— National Center on Fathers and Families
— National Fatherhood Initiative
— National Partnership for Community Leadership
— Center for Research on Fathers, Children and Family Well-Being
— Brookings Institute {=incl. Center for Children & Families
— National Latino Fatherhood and Family Institute
— Fathers Incorporated
In the series “Dad Camp,” licensed psychologist and no-nonsense therapist Dr. Jeff Gardere works with six fathers-to-be, along with their pregnant girlfriends, to help prepare the young men for fatherhood
All very nice. Here’s the IRS Revocation as of May 2010, posted Nov. 2012, meanwhile, NFLG got themselves re-instated in June 2012. Similar (only more lenient) behavior for another fatherhood group based in Arizona, TBS (to be shown) separately. That time, the IRS waited SIX years to publish that the organization’s EIN# (not the one it was publishing on its websites WHILE STATUS “Exempt-REVOKED for FAILURE TO FILE 3 YEARS IN A ROW” and knowingly soliciting contributions under a DIFFERENT one anyhow….) . Inbetween the revocation and the IRS telling the public it was revoked, the organization formerly “dba” a differently named group, that group changed its name to the former “dba.” Just in case there were some forensic “show me your tax return!” bloodhounds on the scent… To this date I’ve not yet found that organizations’ tax return (under either EIN# or either name). It now admits at least to having waited TEN YEARS to incorporate the first time around, about 2004….
From a basic search for “National Fatherhood Leaders Group” the IRS site was the second search result. Apparently, not too many people actually looking. URL for this search result on IRS.gov – “Exempt Organization Select Check” To get Revoked one has to NOT FILE (“Fail to File”) for three years in a row which apparently, they did, I gather probably 2007, 2008 & 2009 (or, earlier) in order to get revoked on May 15, 2010.
Revocation Date (effective date on which organization’s tax exemption was automatically revoked):
15-May-2010Employer Identification Number (EIN):
45-4542131Legal Name:
NATIONAL FATHERHOOD LEADERS GROUPDoing Business As: Mailing Address:
2728 SHERMAN AVE NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20001-3920
United StatesExemption Type:
00Revocation Posting Date (date on which IRS posted notice of automatic revocation on IRS.gov):
12-Nov-2012Exemption Reinstatement Date (effective date of tax exemption, determined by the IRS
after the organization’s exemption was automatically revoked and the organization applied for reinstatement of exemption.):
15-Jun-2012
They are now listed as legal (for tax-deductible contributions) again:
1-1 of 1 results | Results Per Page | « Prev | 1-1 | Next » |
EIN ![]() |
Legal Name (Doing Business As) ![]() |
City ![]() |
State ![]() |
Country ![]() |
Deductibility Status ![]() |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
45-4542131 | National Fatherhood Leaders Group Inc. | Washington | DC | United States | PC |
I plugged this number, on the same basic IRS site, to see if they’d ever filed a Form 990-N (indicating revenues under $50,000 (click to see. as well as a different street address) — and that the Form 990s would not be shown on the usual databases which pull images of them off from the IRS source). So, they got reinstated in June, 2012 (see above) and filed Post-card returns for 2012 and 2013, this next little chart says. After that, they “graduated” to filing a Form 990-EZ:
45-4542131 | NATIONAL FATHERHOOD LEADERS GROUP | WASHINGTON | DC | 20001 | United States | 2012 |
45-4542131 | NATIONAL FATHERHOOD LEADERS GROUP INC | WASHINGTON | DC | 20001 | United States | 2013 |
I found ONE tax return by EIN# under this name, only a Form 990EZ.
Your query: ( Organization Name: , State: , Zip: , EIN: 454542131 , Fiscal Year: )
1 documents matched. 1 documents displayed. Click on the column headers to sort.
(from 990finder.foundationcenter.org, just not tinted the same as others on this page):
ORGANIZATION NAME | STATE | YEAR | FORM | PAGES | TOTAL ASSETS | EIN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NATIONAL FATHERHOOD LEADERS GROUP INC | DC | 2014 | 990EZ | 14 | $1,864.00 | 45-4542131 |
Check out the leadership listed on this form, and that under “Website” it reads “N/A” which — as I recall in 2014 — was not exactly “Not Applicable” — they had one, a very boastful site, actually…
JEFFERY M JOHNSON PHD INTERIM CHAIR
RONALD B MINCY PHD
INTERIM VICE CHAIR & SECRETARYCAREY CASEY TREASURER
BEATRICE HASKINS BOOKKEEPER (paid $32K; books are in her care, at an address in Hanover, PA)…
Here’s “FRPN” (discussed on this post) describing “NFLG” (above) with zero reference to the fact that it (its leadership) JUST DOESN.T LIKE to file its tax returns….”No Problem” with this crowd…)
http://www.frpn.org/partner/national-fatherhood-leaders-group-nflg
National Fatherhood Leaders Group (NFLG)
The National Fatherhood Leaders Group (NFLG) is a coalition of individual fatherhood practitioners and community based organizations working to elevate and sustain the fatherhood field. The organization features a wide policy agenda including sufficient funding of fatherhood programs; child support policies; father involvement in school, Head Start and child welfare programs; greater collaboration with family strengthening, fatherhood and domestic violence programs; and the implementation of evidence-based practices in fatherhood programming. Jeffrey Johnson, NFLG interim chair and vice chair, serves on the FRPN steering committee.
It may be a “coalition.” The name also happens to belong to a corporation which got its tax-exempt status revoked in 2010, reinstated in 2012, and even filed a few post-card tax returns afterwards (claiming no more than $50,000 revenues) for two years in a row, and then filed one cheap-ass Form 990-EZ as I have posted here. This brings into question BY WHAT MEANS (and how many of them are legitimate/legal) this fatherhood field is actually being sustained, judging by its self-proclaimed leadership. Keep reading:
Try and visit that website “http://www.nflgonline.org”and as of today, April 26, 2016, you will get this message: “NOTICE: This domain name expired on 4/21/2016 and is pending renewal or deletion.”
Time to check
Checking that Internet Archive for “nflgonline.org” today (4.27.2016) I found:
Saved 34 times between December 26, 2008 and January 11, 2016.
The Wayback Machine is an initiative of the Internet Archive, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, building a digital library of Internet sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form.
Other projects include Open Library & archive-it.org.Your use of the Wayback Machine is subject to the Internet Archive’s Terms of Use.
I have viewed the web-pages before they went down (and probably posted on it – see “search” function on this blog). Ron Haskins was definitely mentioned as a board member, as were several others. The web pages talked about conferences, institutes (trainings) and about themselves as an organization. From the paragraphs of self-description, the tax filings, and the corporate filings, it became quickly clear that the one thing NOT being done while coaching and training others, was complying with local or federal business and tax codes, to the point that by the time they got a tax-exempt status, almost, the corporate status had been lost. (AS I recall).
For these topics, wait for other posts (or inquire yourself independently) now in draft:
The Wayback Machine is an initiative of the Internet Archive, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, building a digital library of Internet sites and other cultural artifacts in digital form.
Other projects include Open Library & archive-it.org.
Your use of the Wayback Machine is subject to the Internet Archive’s Terms of Use.
(Several) “Centers” at Columbia University (if logos are shown, the logo is the link).
and the “Fragile Families” “Responsible Fatherhood” (etc.) connections among them:
FRAGILE FAMILIES AND CHILD WELL-BEING STUDY
This large-scale longitudinal study addresses three areas of great interest to policy makers and community leaders – non-marital childbearing, welfare reform, and the role of fathers – and brings them together in an innovative, integrated framework. In collaboration with sociologists, economists, and demographersat the Columbia School of Social Work and Princeton University, the Center is following 5,000 families, from the birth of their children through the adolescent years, from cities with different welfare and child support policies and labor market strengths. The project is examining the relationships among family structure, child care, maternal employment, gene-by-environment interactions, parenting practices, and economic factors.
Funding Sources: NICHD; California HealthCare Foundation; Commonwealth Fund; Ford Foundation; Foundation for Child Development**; Fund for New Jersey; William T. Grant Foundation; William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Hogg Foundation for Mental Health [FYI, in Texas, at a University, but I forgot which one] ; Christian A. Johnson Endeavor Foundation; Leon Lowenstein Foundation; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; A.L. Mailman Family Foundation; Charles Stewart Mott Foundation; David and Lucile Packard Foundation; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation and Administration for Children and Families). [[That’s “HHS/ASPE and HHS/ACF” Operating Divisions]]
Gee, what funds (exactly how much?) pouring through ALL those foundations’ tax returns (and HHS grants) over the years — HOW long was this going on? — and figuring out where it went? Was donation earmarked once it hit Columbia University’s Teachers College so a layperson (common slob who can read, count, and think) might be able to look it up on, say the University’s or the College’s financial statements and fact-check the totals? Or the reasonability of the expenses?
Contact:Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Ph.D.
Principle* Investigators: Irwin Garfinkel, Columbia University; Sara McLanahan, Princeton UniversityCo-Principle* Investigator: Jeanne Brooks-Gunn
Project URL at Princeton: http://www.fragilefamilies.princeton.edu/about.asp
(*make that “principal.” Guess they weren’t studying spelling, just “well-being”)
**The Foundation for Child Development keeps coming up in this context, so I’m posting its tax returns here, and now it’s assets increased by over $6million in just two years. Where are these assets being invested or held, where is the revenue coming from and going towards?
ORGANIZATION NAME | ST | YR | FORM | PP | TOTAL ASSETS | EIN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Foundation for Child Development | NY | 2015 | 990PF | 41 | $106,108,324.00 | 13-1623901 |
Foundation for Child Development | NY | 2014 | 990PF | 31 | $104,965,894.00 | 13-1623901 |
Foundation for Child Development | NY | 2013 | 990PF | 26 | $99,997,180.00 | 13-1623901 |
Street address: 295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10017
Blogger Note: I did the review of tax returns and some of the board of directors BEFORE checking out the website. Here’s the portion of the “History” page which references their name-change and the Pre-K program. This is, it says, an organization with over a 100 year history. As Form 990-PFs don’t show “Date of Incorporation” I wouldn’t know without outside information, or their website:
http://fcd-us.org/about-us/history …
Compared with the nation’s largest philanthropies, FCD’s endowment is modest. Yet FCD has had an impact that exceeds its assets. It has nurtured groundbreaking work in diverse areas of child development – physical, cognitive, social, and emotional. It has been a leader in prevention, in two-generational strategies, and in advocacy for low-income children and their families.
FCD was incorporated as a voluntary agency in New York in 1899, and established as the Association for the Aid of Crippled Children (AACC) in 1908. Voluntary contributions from the public supported AACC until 1944, when substantial funds were received from the estate of Milo M. Belding to honor his wife, Annie K. Belding.
In recognition of its evolving program and of its status as a grantmaking organization, the Association changed its name in 1972 to the Foundation for Child Development. In 1999, FCD celebrated its centennial. Read more about our history in 100 Years of Commitment to Children: Change and Continuity and in Our Basic Dream.
Since 2003, FCD has promoted PreK-3rd, [LINK BROKEN; HERE’S A SUBSTITUTE FROM THE FOUNDATION WEBSITE] the seamless continuity of educational experience for children ages three to eight to provide the first initial essential foundation for lifelong learning. Visit Our Work to learn more.
FCD archives from 1909 – 2000 are located at the Rockefeller Archive Center. To view a description of the collection visit FCD at the Rockefeller Archive Center 1909 -1996 and 1997-2000.
“Briefly” as I like to do with tax returns when there’s other business at hand:
Revenues — no Contributions this year, but it did earn $1.4M from Dividends and Interests on Securities, and $5.4M from “Sale of assets other than inventory.” (total Income, including a small IRS refund!) – $6.9M.
Of this $6.9M, SOME when to “Charitable Activities“: $174,622. (“See Statement 12”) and $157,985 (“See Statement 13”) which combined was probably less than they paid their investment manager LLC (by memory, about $334K) and a project manager ($90K).
Statement 12:
ACTIVITY ONE
YOUNG SCHOLARS PROGRAM – SUPPORTS A GROWING NETWORK OF EARLY CAREER SCHOLARS TAKING ON RESEARCH PROJECTS THAT ARE POLICY- AND PRACTICE-RELEVANT ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING NEEDS OF THE NATIONS YOUNG CHILDREN GROWING UP UNDER CONDITIONS
OF POVERTY AND LOW-INCOME. FCD NOT ONLY PROVIDES GRANTS TO SUPPORT THEIR WORK, BUT ALSO CONVENES MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS THAT ENCOURAGE NETWORKING AND MENTORING IN ADDITION TO PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TO BUILD RESEARCH AND COMMUNICATIONS SKILLS. THE CURRENT NETWORK INCLUDES 47 YOUNG SCHOLARS.
Statement 13:
ACTIVITY TWO
POLICY & COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM – LEVERAGES AND AUGMENTS THE IMPACT OF THE FOUNDATION ‘S GRANTS , THROUGH A STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM THAT REACHES OUT TO THE FIELD OF EARLY EDUCATION RESEARCHERS , PRACTITIONERS AND POLICY MAKERS
AS WELL AS THE GENERAL PUBLIC THROUGH PUBLICATIONS, AN ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER AND SOCIAL MEDIA, AND CONVENINGS.
In fact, page 1 says of the $6.9M revenues (or income), $2.4M was on “Operating and Administrative Expenses” and $3.6M on “Distributions” (i.e., grants to others / “See Attachment B”). MOST of the rest ($101M) is being held in “other investments” (“See Statement 9”). From what I can tell of that statement (towards back of the tax return), this is split between:
- EQUITY MUTUAL FUNDS (SEE ATTACHMENT B) $33,771,587
- BOND MUTUAL FUNDS (SEE ATTACHMENT B) $8,903,117.
- HEDGE FUNDS (SEE ATTACHMENT B) – $58.9M
- PRIVATE EQUITY (SEE ATTACHMENT B) $2.0M
So whether or not readers may approve of my opinions on what groups like this are doing with their money, it’s a fair and reasonably accurate statement to say that this Privately Controlled TRUST exists as an investment platform for whatever the $101M is invested in, and as something of a byproduct, also engages in some donations (thereby avoiding corporate taxation and probably incurring some good will, maintaining certain relationships with donees) and some charitable activity,while providing income for the people that manage the assets and consultants.
Currently most money is invested in hedge funds as you can see above, and second most amount is invested in “Equity Mutual Funds.”
The Foundation for Child Development (<==latest 990-PF shown)Board of Directors includes one HIROKAZU YOSHIKAWA, who, as lead author of an article pushing for “Investment in early Education” combined with a stellar biography, international (UN, for sure) connections and globalization interests, not to mention position at the NYU “Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development” already has my attention and is featured as symbolic of the WIDER purposes behind “pre-school for all,” and by that, I mean wider than just in the USA…, although before this article (because I’m not IN those circles) I’d never heard of him….. I recognize some of the other names also from organizations I’ve looked at before, or in general (i.e., “Morgenthau” ) below, and followed up in Vivian L. Gadsden because I remember that name in a “Fatherhood” context — which in this situation, is very relevant.
Despite the Officers, all officers and directors except Jacqueline Jones (who works FT and is paid — the only paid officer) are volunteers and listed at 0.50 hours/ week:
PART VIII – LIST OF OFFICERS, DIRECTORS TRUSTEES AND FOUNDATION MANAGERS STATEMENT 11, FOUNDATION FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT, EIN# 13-162390
DAVID LAWRENCE JR. (Dir/ Chairman of the Board)
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017MARGARET BEALE SPENCER (Vice President)
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017HIROKAZU YOSHIKAWA (Secretary)
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017ELLEN BERLAND GIBBS (Treasurer)
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017JOHN L. FURTH (Assistant Treasurer)
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017ANDREW D. RACINE
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017EUGENE E. GARCIA
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017JILL BAKER
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017JOSEPH YOUNGBLOOD, II
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017MARGARITA ROSA
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017ROBERT P. MORGENTHAU
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017
Just for “kicks” here’s Robert P. Morgenthau in 2004 (starting another firm; grandpa was Secretary of the Treasury under FDR, father (Robert M. Morgenthau) was (very) famous district attorney — for New York County — for a very long term (1975-2009).
In 2013 (age 93) Robert M. was taking up the cause — ironically, for this post — of a man stuck on death row in Alabama. To get some help with a Friend of the Brief, he called up his buddies (fellow district attorneys) Gil Garcetti in Los Angeles and another in Milwaukee. (Gil’s son Eric is now Mayor of Los Angeles; Gil is known in my circles for as L.A. District Attorney, allegedly (per Marv Bryer – and then-attorney Richard Fine — sitting on collected child support and NOT DISTRIBUTING it. A lawsuit, “Silva v. Garcetti” got some of the distribution happening (around the time child support distribution was being moved to a state-wide level anyhow, i.e., to “SDU” in the post-welfare-reform years. (A reference to “undistributable child support” levels in Alabama (and outside it) is in this post, too)…
Silva v. Garcetti also played a role no doubt, in getting Richard Fine (a) an 18-month coercive confinement, that’s SOLITARY confinement in the Los Angeles County Men’s Jail, order by a Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge (David Yaffe), and (b) disbarred, pretty quickly.
Here’s the NYT Article 3/15/2013, “A case too important to pass up” (Very interesting article; here’s part of it:)

Robert M. Morgenthau is asking the United States Supreme Court to take on the case of a man held on death row in Alabama for 24 years. [Photo: Hiroko Masuike/The New York Times]
Mr. Morgenthau said. “You say to yourself, ‘Not only is this guy innocent as a matter of law, he’s innocent as a matter of fact.’ I decided I wasn’t just going to sign my name to a piece of paper.”
He contacted Gil Garcetti, who served 32 years in the Los Angeles district attorney’s office, and E. Michael McCann, who was the district attorney of Milwaukee for 38 years, and they agreed to join him in a friend-of-the-court brief.
The opening lines explained why their views were worth hearing: They wrote “from the unique perspective of having overseen and been ultimately responsible for more than 7,000,000 criminal prosecutions.”
Of those seven million, how many were his? “Three and a half,” Mr. Morgenthau said.
Million? He nodded. “We averaged about 100,000 a year for 35 years,” he said. [paras. combined]
Few people who talked politics with President Franklin D. Roosevelt, as Mr. Morgenthau did as a young man, or survived the sinking of a Navy destroyer in the Mediterranean and the torpedoing of another one during World War II, as he did while serving in the Navy, remain active in public affairs.
Now with the firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, Mr. Morgenthau spends little time these days on criminal cases. He is fighting for immigration reform
July 12, 2004 in “Pensions & Investments,” by Ricki Fulman, “Head North: Face-to-Face with Robert P. Morgenthau”
Two years ago, Robert P. Morgenthau and a team of six investment and sales professionals started NorthRoad Capital Management LLC. Mr. Morgenthau had spent 10 years at Lazard Asset Management, New York, starting in 1990 as a portfolio manager. When he left in 2000, he was managing director and global head of marketing and distribution. (His six partners at NorthRoad all had worked at Lazard as well.) He said he decided to leave because he was weary of traveling overseas every six weeks and also wanted to try life at either a very small or very large firm. (Lazard manages $70 billion.) After taking off 11 months to get to know his family again, he became president of private advisory services at Banc of America Capital Management, overseeing 250 portfolio managers responsible for $110 billion around the country. Within six months he realized he didn’t want to work at a very large firm after all. Instead, he decided to build a company from scratch. Bank of America Corp. provided some startup capital, and the remainder came from the seven partners. Mr. Morgenthau — whose grandfather Henry M. Morgenthau Jr. was secretary of the Treasury during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s presidency, and whose father, Robert M. Morgenthau, is the highly regarded New York County district attorney — graduated cum laude from Amherst College, with a bachelor of arts in English. His first job in finance was a posting trader on the over-the-counter trading desk at Shearson American Express, New York. He was planning to go on for an MBA, but instead enrolled in the company’s rotational training program in 1982 to learn the business and then moved into asset management as a portfolio manager at Shearson Asset Management. Recently Mr. Morgenthau talked with reporter Ricki Fulman about the challenges of starting a new firm, its goals and strategies.
[His Bio Blurb at the Foundation adds some more company names and affiliations). The URL has it labeled “chair” ….
“…Bob founded NorthRoad Capital Management, an international and global equity manager, which he sold to Madison Investment Advisors at the end of 2010.
Bob is currently a trustee of the Museum of Jewish Heritage; A Living Memorial to the Holocaust. He is a director of the Davis Funds, the Riverdale Sanitation Corporation and Bitterroot Enterprises. He is a past trustee of Riverdale Neighborhood House and a former Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Ethical Culture Fieldston School.
Bob received a BA in English from Amherst College in 1979.
Such a person can get a masters, or a PhD degree — but certainly doesn’t need one….
VIVIAN L. GADSDEN
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017
WALTER K. FRYE
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017WALTER GILES
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017JACQUELINE JONES (President & CEO, Pay $153K + $35K benefits)
295 MADISON AVENUE, 40TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10017
Huh. By posting these ALL at the organization’s NY Address, it conceals from stray eyes on the return (although presumably the organization website will “tell all” of the affiliations).
In this case I remember this name from recent investigations (my kind….) of yet another “Fatherhood” project — with close collaboration (involvement) of the Denver-based and AFCC-overlapping (personnel), “Center for Policy Research…. Jessica Pearson, Nancy Thoennes, etc.
CPR (who have made post titles in this blog) have a new, or second, website with a lighter, brighter, more “feminine”?? color and MUCH larger words, lighter font). at “centerFORpolicyRESEARCH.org. The other one was subdued, tan, brown, orange and black tones, and hadn’t been updated in years. Perhaps getting too much publicity on blogs (although very few of them) like mine?
(<==the Logo is the link.)
HHS announcement flyer (<==look at the URL) says the new website was to launch in April 2014, and with Foundation for Child Development board member Gadsden among the original few staff mentioned:
As it turns out Dr.[Ed.D.= doctorate level!] Gadsden is on at least two “Centers” named after fatherhood. The biography below which mentions the “National Center on Fathers and Families” (which website link at University of Pennsylvania that I was able to find, is no longer current, and I haven’t found the current one) AND, at A “Fathers Research and Practice Network (link to “Team Members”) at Temple University – and supported by HHS Grant #90PR0006 (with #90PR0001,02,03,04 & 05 (going to a single fatherhood organization in D.C.) all having occurred in or around 1995. THIS one, however, started ca. 2013, is a multi-million-dollar study which is still in progress. The “Steering Committee on this same site is a virtual “Who’s Who” (many, not all of them) of “Fatherhood Promotion” spokesmen from across the country.
I just discovered (1) a second website for Center Policy Research, and (2) the Steering Committee link at FRPN, which I was only recently re-visiting, as to its funding, personnel, and whether the grants for it were trackable or not. (Answer — not easily — go look at Temple University financial statements and find this “Network” — and good luck with that….). Next paragraphs in tiny green font are my first-response, taken-aback commentary. Sorry….
SOUND-OFF about ESTABLISHING “Fatherhood” as a Public/Private-supported PROFESSION (primarily within sociology, psychology, social science and demographics) run out of University Centers taking HHS public funds and involving leadership associated with 501©3s long known to be taking HHS fatherhood funding also. Basically, this is an extension of governmental control which continues putting the apparent EXCESS of United States revenues in places where the sun don’t shine — or if it does, substantial forensic accounting digging is required to see it. Have you read the last few tax returns of the National Fatherhood Initiative and seen how a subcontractor which ALSO takes SUBSTANTIAL HHS grants funding (or, one of its subsidiaries or other branches) is paid by them? (ICF, International). taggs.hhs.gov — check it out. Http://990finder.foundationcenter.org — check out the tax returns).
Make a mental (or written, or post-it, or text, or email) note of whether the professionals are citing their affiliation with a 501©3 which ALSO might be funded (separately) by HHS (including by HHS CFDA 93086 category grants which are handled under Title IV-A, i.e., “TANF” (“Welfare”) of the Social Security Act. In other words, themselves diversions from direct aid to the households where the minor children may be living…and as part of a social policy stigmatizing women, single mothers, “matriarchy” and NOT too far from a deep-seated, post 1960s FEAR by those in power (at that time, and no doubt since) of changing the basic color (racial) of America through over-breeding. If BOTH African-Americans AND Women (of any color) began demanding fair treatment across the board, “business of usual” would be G.O.N.E. And, this was starting to happen in the 1970s, no question. It had to be brought under control, and it couldn’t be brought under control with spokespersons of primarily white, male color (only, or mostly) in front of the pack.
Divide and conquer, and strategically moving over for people (men and women both) and women (including of various colors) to promote “fatherhood” as a social service necessity has “worked” to ensure that control over the population, by which I mean, the country, can be retained through continual economic AND social pressure on them.
[Feel free to argue this with me in comments, but I am speaking about what I have been reading — for years — and also experienced, “in your face” for more years. This is also what I deduced. It is opinion, but it is an informed one. I think the larger question is about economics, and some of these tax-exempt foundations NOT being exposed with their control tactic for (a) retaining PRIVATE control of MAJOR wealth and (b) ensuring regional, if not worldwide, availability of “just educated enough to work for our corporations” workers who will be too hungry, or too concerned about housing, to properly stage protests about violations of their legal rights. It’s also about DILUTING the EXERCISE of legal rights of USA citizens ,and a good deal more.)
{{The “Steering Committee” of Temple University-based “Fatherhood Research and Practice Network,” which seems to be an HHS initiative. }}
The FRPN steering committee consists of a carefully selected group of fatherhood evaluation researchers, practitioners and policymakers who are leaders in the field. These individuals are responsible for providing direction for the five-year national project, working closely with the FRPN project team to develop and execute various FRPN initiatives.
Christopher A. Brown**
Christopher A. Brown, President, National Fatherhood InitiativeEducation: B.A., University of North Texas, M.A., University of South Florida
** For some reason, the webmasters or designers went for BIG letters and tiny thumbnail photos. Maybe some of these people don’t really want facial recognition outside the network?
Carol Burton
Carol Burton, Executive Director, CenterforceEducation:B.S. and M.S.W., Grand Valley State UniversityAndrew Daire
Andrew Daire, Ph.D., Associate Dean for Research, College of Education, University of HoustonEducation:B.S., Stetson University, M.S., Stetson University, Ph.D., Florida State University
Randal D. Day
Randal D. Day, Ph.D., Associate Director of the School of Family Life, Professor, Department of Family Life, Brigham Young UniversityEducation:B.S. and M.S., Brigham Young University, M.S., University of Wisconsin Madison, Ph.D., Brigham Young UniversityJeffrey M. Johnson
Jeffrey M. Johnson, Ph.D., President and CEO, National Partnership for Community LeadershipEducation:B.A., M.A., Ph.D., University of MichiganWaldo E. Johnson
Waldo E. Johnson, Ph.D., Faculty Affiliate with the Center for the Study of Race, Politics and Culture, Professor, School of Social Service Administration, University of ChicagoEducation:B.A., Mercer University, M.S.W., University of Michigan, Ph.D., University of Chicago
Because I will be publishing another post on this soon (I hope), I won’t elaborate much more than the FCD-US (Foundation for Child Development – in the US, at least) website does, on Vivian L. Gadsden. While I don’t approve of the use of HHS dollars for the project referenced below (which dollars go to Temple University ,not the smaller organizations with personnel involved — which makes them harder to track), another impression I had was that if someone was going to run the project, she might be more appropriate than Jay Fagan. Other than, not being a man, that is. Certainly as well qualified:
Vivian L. Gadsden is the William T. Carter Professor of Child Development and Professor of Education at the University of Pennsylvania. Dr. Gadsden is also on the faculties of Africana Studies and of Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies; serves as director of the National Center on Fathers and Families; and served as associate director of the National Center on Adult Literacy. Dr. Gadsden’s research and scholarly interests focus on children and families across the life-course, from early childhood through the aging process, particularly children and families at the greatest risk for academic and social vulnerability by virtue of race, gender, ethnicity, poverty, and immigrant status. Her conceptual framework, family cultures, has been used widely to examine the interconnectedness among families’ political, cultural, and social histories and racialized identities; social practices; and literacy processes. Her current, collaborative projects include studies of Head Start children’s literacy learning and teacher communities (the EPIC study), family engagement, and parent involvement; young fathers in urban settings; health and educational disparities within low-income communities; children of incarcerated parents; and intergenerational learning within African-American and Latino families.
In addition to serving on the Board of the Foundation for Child Development, she has served or serves on foundation and Congressionally-mandated review committees, including the Foundation for Child Development’s Young Scholars Program, the Spencer Foundation where she was a Resident Fellow, and a panel of the National Academy of Sciences. She has held leadership roles in the American Educational Research Association (AERA) and the Society for Research in Child Development. Dr. Gadsden also serves on several journal editorial boards and is Co-Editor-in-Chief of Educational Researcher, published by AERA. She has published numerous journal articles, book chapters, texts, and reports, including booklength volumes on literacy and African American youth; re-entry of incarcerated parents in the lives of children, families, and communities; and risk, equity, and schooling as well as a forthcoming book volume on children of incarcerated parents. Dr. Gadsden is a Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
The NCOFF is “housed” in the Graduate School of Education at UPenn. It’s referenced in the following (web-based?) international network:
The Work and Family Researchers Network (formerly the Sloan Work and Family Research Network), is an international membership organization of interdisciplinary work and family researchers. The WFRN also welcomes the participation of policy makers and practitioners as it seeks to promote knowledge and understanding of work and family issues among the community of global stakeholders.
The WFRN facilitates virtual and face-to-face interaction among work and family researchers from a broad range of fields and engages the next generation of work and family scholars. As a global hub, we provide opportunities for information sharing and networking via our website, which includes the only open access work and family subject matter repository, the Work and Family Commons.
Your support will help to advance, promote, and preserve interdisciplinary work and family scholarship and move the field forward.
HISTORY (diff’t link):
The Work and Family Researchers Network (WFRN) carries on the legacy of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network, the premier online destination for work and family research from 1997-2010. In November 2010, Jerry A. Jacobs and Judi C. Casey received a final grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation that supported the creation of a new membership and virtual organization, WFRN. To acknowledge the community-driven nature of our website and the importance of members to the success of the organization, we changed the name from “Research” to “Researchers.”
Judi was WFRN’s Director through 2014 following her tenure as Director of the Sloan Network from 2005-2010. Jerry was WFRN’s Founding President and continues to serve as its Executive Officer. Katheen Christensen led the Workforce, Workplace and Working Families Program at the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and has served as an Ex-Officio member of WFRN’s Executive Committee since its inception.
Why did the Network change?
Funding from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation had allowed the Sloan Network to provide all its resources to users free of charge since it began operating in 1997. Although the former Sloan Network was highly valued by its users, the earned income potential from products and services was not enough to cover operating costs. The new and enhanced Work and Family Researchers Network continues the efforts of the original Network and the legacy established by the Sloan Foundation.
What is different?
One of the major changes from the Sloan Network to the WFRN is the transformation from a staff-driven enterprise to a member-driven one. Members will take leadership roles in running all facets of the organization, and in providing content of interest to the interdisciplinary work and family research community. WFRN also functions as a virtual hub between meetings, with the News Feed and the Work and Family Commons providing open access free of charge to researchers, practitioners, policy maker and the general public. The transformation from the Sloan Network to WFRN coincided with a move to the University of Pennsylvania instead of Boston College. The Executive Office of WFRN is now located at the Center for Human Resources at the Wharton School.
Interesting, if it was formerly at Boston College under the Alfred P. Sloan foundation. Boston College (vs. “University”) is Jesuit.
Where are the resources that were on the former Network website?
We have done our best to archive the most popular content from the Sloan Network on this new website of the Work and Family Researchers Network, and make it available to you. However, information has not been updated since the summer of 2011. In some cases, information is older than 2011. The Sloan Network closed in February 2012.
*We are very appreciative of the support of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for the Work and Family Researchers Network.
So, the virtual networking (especially for those who join and become members) is of course by definition international with a focus on subject matter. This is in complete coherence/compliance with the pushing of “FUNCTIONALISM” (“David Mitrany” London School of Economics, searchable terms) in “Outflanking National Sovereignty”… But the NCOFF is at the EDUCATION School at UPenn:
https://workfamily.sas.upenn.edu/archive/links/national-center-fathers-and-families-1
Housed in the Graduate School of Education at the University of Pennsylvania, The National Center on Fathers and Families (NCOFF) is “an interdisciplinary policy research center…dedicated to research and practice that expands the knowledge base on father involvement and family development, and that informs policy designed to improve the well-being of children.”
Here’s a “Child & Family WebGuide (review of sites) at TUFTS University, showing another way to connect. The NCOFF was ranked high (in this review dated 2012). The copyright date (bottom of site) goes to 2010 and I notice mentions the “Elliot Pearson Dept. of Child Development” at Tufts University.
Homepage Http://Www.ncoff.gse.upenn.edu [<==broken link]]
Organization University of Pennsylvania
Date of Review 1/11/2012 8:33:09 PM …The NCOFF brief summarizes their Fathers Care literature review with sections such as key findings and recommendations, a review of current literature, categories of fathers, and fathers on which little research is done. Material covered includes father involvement, fathers’ relationships with mothers, and single fathers. Site is geared toward educators and information provider.
Related documents
Consequences Of Fatherlessness
Posits that six social ills, including poverty, drug & alcohol abuse, crime, educational achievement to name a few, faced by America√جø¬Ωs children are related to fatherlessness.Father’s Involvement In Childrens’ Schools
Examines relationships between father involvement in the schools and how well their children are doing. Five types of involvement were examined, with a number of different findings regarding father involvement in schools.Father Presence Matters: A Review Of The Literature
This review explores father presence from various vantage points, incorporating literatures on father absence, single parenting, marital disruption/discord, divorce, and father care.Fathers Care: A Review Of The Literature
It is unusually hard to find a website labeled “National Center on Fathers and Families” however this faculty page a UPenn GSE shows the background of it, and Vivian Gadsden’s faculty page
Vivian L. Gadsden
William T. Carter Professor of Child Development and Education
Director, National Center on Fathers and Families
Associate Director, National Center on Adult LiteracyGraduate School of Education
University of Pennsylvania [tel# and email available at the link]
EDUCATION:
BA (Psychology and English) Fisk University, Nashville, Tennessee, 1978. EdD (Educational Psychology and Policy) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1988.
Dr. Gadsden began her career teaching developmental English, reading, and educational psychology at Oakland and Wayne State Universities in Michigan. From 1983 to 1985, she was a research analyst at Policy Studies Associates in Washington, D.C. In 1988, Dr. Gadsden joined Penn GSE’s Literacy Research Center, where she became associate director in 1989. A former Spencer Foundation/National Academy of Education postdoctoral fellow, Dr. Gadsden served as associate director in the National Center on Adult Literacy for six years. In 1994, she became the director of the newly founded National Center on Fathers and Families, an interdisciplinary policy research center focused on child and family well-being. She also served as Education Graduate Group Chair from 1996 to 2004. In 2006, she was named the William T. Carter Professor in Child Development and Education.
She is an active member of the American Educational Research Association, serving as vice president of Division G, Social Contexts of Education from 2003 to 2006; the Society for Research in Child Development, serving as co-executive officer of the Black Caucus and program co-chair for the 2009 biennial meeting; . . .
Policy Studies Associates (PSA) conducts research in education and youth development. Founded in 1982, PSA believes in the importance of using accurate information to guide decision making about education and youth development. …
PSA’s clients include federal, state, and local government agencies, foundations, and other organizations that aim to use high-quality data to make policy decisions. PSA’s evaluation and research studies have helped these organizations to:
(Prior studies — at least back to 1989 — are posted, I picked out only two):
March 2000 | Creating an Appetite for Change: Leaders’ Perspectives on Promoting K-16 Reform Through Community Collaboration |
March 2000 | Comprehensive Regional Assistance Centers Program: Final Report on the Evaluation |
Searching for (where I remembers PSA from….) it may have been “TASC.org.” “TASC” = The AfterSchool Corporation“– example:
“Evaluations Backgrounder” ” A Summary of Formal Evaluations of Afterschool programs’ Impact on Academics, Behavior, Safety and Family Life“by “The Afterschool Alliance” summarizes evaluations of afterschool programs in general, and then gives brief abstracts on several studies. What’s interesting is who started this and who makes up “The Afterschool Alliance,” which includes, in part, the TASC group that PSA did a five-year study on:
- Policy Studies Associates’ five-year evaluation of The After-School Corporation (TASC) afterschool programs found that regular school day attendance for pre-K to eighth grade levels increased for par ci- pants compared to non-par cipants—especially for students in grades 5-8—and a endance for seventh and eighth grade par cipants increased by 2.7 school days compared to non-par cipants. At the high school level, regular school day attendance for par cipants in the lowest a endance quartile increased by 4.4 days, compared to nonpar cipants who were also in the lowest attendance quartile. (2004)
The Afterschool Alliance (also based in Washington, D.C.) describes itself as:
The nation’s leading voice for afterschool programs.
The Afterschool Alliance is the only organization dedicated to raising awareness of the importance of afterschool programs and advocating for more afterschool investments to ensure that all children have access to affordable, quality afterschool programs.
Our goals
- To be an effective voice for afterschool in efforts to expand quality afterschool programs.
- To serve as an information source on afterschool programs and resources.
- To encourage the development of local, state and national afterschool constituencies and systems.
- To communicate the impact of afterschool programs on children, families and communities.
Our history
The Afterschool Alliance was established in 2000 by the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the U.S. Department of Education, J.C. Penney Company, Inc., the Open Society Institute/The After-School Corporation, the Entertainment Industry Foundation and the Creative Artists Agency Foundation.
It is absolutely fair on my part to say that ALL of this “Public/Private Partnership” using the USDOE as primary (only listed) FEDERAL AGENCY FUNDER, apart from the USDOE, were operating in the tax-exempt field, and mostly utterly well to do ones as well, except “J.C. Penney, Company. Read the above paragraph — all these want more (and more, and more) public funds to pay for programming which will be controlled by the after-school tax-exempt funders (and probably using the for-profit curricular, or “technical assistance and training” they provide.
Meanwhile, any and all parents, especially single mothers, should go find employment at some of the corporations behind some of these foundations, presumably. One thing is clear — a power divide is taking place which ASSUMES that the typical school day and class situation is good for all, good for the economy and good for the people. [Afterschool Alliance FUNDERS page — take a looK!]
The Afterschool Alliance grew from public awareness efforts undertaken by the Mott Foundation through an unprecedented, public-private partnership with the U.S. Department of Education to expand afterschool programs through the 21st Century Community Learning Centers afterschool program. The federal government provided grants to local communities for afterschool programs, while the Mott Foundation funded training, evaluation and public awareness activities. The Foundation and the Department’s efforts caught the attention of several outside entities with a shared interest in achieving afterschool for all. These groups came together in September 1999 to create the Afterschool Alliance.
Some of the above-referenced 990s:
ORGANIZATION NAME | ST | YR | FORM | PP | TOTAL ASSETS | EIN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Afterschool Alliance | DC | 2014 | 990 | 37 | $6,786,186.00 | 52-2275123 |
Afterschool Alliance | DC | 2013 | 990 | 33 | $7,213,727.00 | 52-2275123 |
Afterschool Alliance | DC | 2012 | 990 | 32 | $5,852,476.00 | 52-2275123 |
Took NO gov’t grants, but $2.5M “Contributions” almost their only source of revenue. They spent over $800K on these four independent contractors, over $500K on their key officers, and Revs – Less Expenses this year were NEGATIVE ½ million (“oh well!”) despite reducing grants paid out from $250K to only $50,000 from the prior year…:
- PR SOLUTIONS INC
1707 LSTREET NW STE 925 WASHINGTON, DC 20036 - FOWLER HOFFMAN LLC PO BOX 70206 RICHMOND, CA 94807
- SHUGOLL RESEARCH
7475 WISCONSIN AVENUE NW STE 200 BETHESDA,MD 20814 - WASHINGTON PARTNERS LLC
1101 VERMONT AVENUE NW STE 400 WASHINGTON, DC 20005
The $50K grants ($10K each) went to five entities (two of them “United Way” in the title) for this purpose:
GRANT TO DEVELOP AND PILOT DIGITAL BADGE SYSTEMS, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH LOCAL AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAMS AND PROVIDERS OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR AFTERSCHOOL PROFESSIONALS
As with the “Society for Research in Child Development” (tax returns shown above, but not this detail from the tax returns) I noticed an unusually high expense on Part IX Line 11g (“Other”) and so looked it up on Schedule O at the back, and found $595,891 consisted of:
POLICY CONSULTANTS PROGRAM SERVICE B(PENSES 124,476 MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL BKPENSES 0 FUNDRAISING BKPENSES 0 TOTAL BKPENSES 124,476RESEARCH CONSULTANTS PROGRAM SERVICE ECPENSES 189,550 MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL EXPENSES 0 FUNDRAISING EXPENSES 0 TOTAL EXPENSES 189 ,550PROGRAM CONTRACTORS PROGRAM SERVICE EXPENSES 279,339 MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL ECPENS
ES 2,526 FUNDRAISING EXPENSES 0 TOTAL EXPENSES 281,865
How about $2 to closing in on $3 Billion in Total Assets as a little financial weight to throw around?
ORGANIZATION NAME | ST | YR | FORM | PP | TOTAL ASSETS | EIN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charles Stewart Mott Foundation | MI | 2014 | 990PF | 13 | $2,798,215,005 | 38-1211227 |
Charles Stewart Mott Foundation | MI | 2013 | 990PF | 394 | $2,587,788,238 | 38-1211227 |
Charles Stewart Mott Foundation | MI | 2012 | 990PF | 407 | $2,304,865,937 | 38-1211227 |
OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE (with the following EIN#) is just one of several controlled entities (see list near the end of the tax return), including one 501©4 — several at the same street address. It is a real “thing to behold” — you have to actually scroll through to sense the scope of activity. I’m certainly not going to describe it here!
I will say for whoever is preparing the tax returns, unlike MANY I read, there are actually detailed descriptions of what the grants are going to, whether it’s to individuals (many people being sponsored in obtaining their PhDs at a variety of American Universities) or organizations. This next list is just some of the, it says, som eof the charitable activities (that’s not including $454Million of grants distributed — as opposed to about $202M contributions that year (2012 I looked at).
NETWORK SCHOLARSHIPS SUPPORT GRANT ACTIVITIES THAT EMPOWER STUDENTS/SCHOLARS TO IMPROVE ACADEMIC, SOCIAL & DEMOCRATIC ENVIRONMENTS IN HOME COUNTRIES, FUNDED 800 GRANTS IN 2012
2US PROGRAMS SUPPORTS EFFORTS TO ADVANCE EQUALITY, FAIRNESS, AND JUSTICE WITH A FOCUS ON THE MOST VULNERABLE AND MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES HAD OVER 400 GRANTS
3THE OPEN SOCIETY JUSTICE INITIATIVE USES LAWTO PROTECT & EMPOWER PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD HAD 55 PROJECTS, 13 PUBLICATIONS AND 60 GRANTS IN 2012
4PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAM SUPPORTS MARGINALIZED POPULATIONS ORGANIZED 31 WORKSHOPS/SEMINARS, ASSISTED 140 GRANTEES AROUND THE WORLD AND WORKED ON 25 PUBLICATIONS IN 2012
ORGANIZATION NAME | STATE | YEAR | FORM | PAGES | TOTAL ASSETS | EIN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Open Society Institute | NY | 2013 | 990PF | 200 | $1,590,570,302.00 | 13-7029285 |
Open Society Institute | NY | 2011 | 990PF | 124 | $1,007,665,737.00 | 13-7029285 |
Open Society Institute-Baltimore | NY | 2012 | 990PF | 219 | $685,871,435.00 | 13-7029285 |
/ NIEER at Rutgers University / Center for Child and Family Well-Being and “the Future of Children” at Princeton / Frank Porter Institute for Child Development at UNC-Chapel Hill (since 1966!), and I found a more recent “Buffet Institute for Early Childhood” (or similar title) at University of Nebraska (all four campuses, and some foundation wealth as well as high-profile professionals involved) (there, it’s Susie Buffet (donor) and Samuel J. Miesel, formerly of the (Chicago-based) Erikson Institute (a nonprofit institute of higher — meaning graduate level– education; it trains early childhood workers ,family social services workers, etc.) — that’s on other posts.
Buffet Early Childhood fund pushing “EduCare Schools” and stating it’s being evaluated Nationally by the Frank Porter Graham institute…: Notice the combo here: A private Fund named after a philanthropist, what I’ll bet is a PUBLIC or Public-funded (“Ounce of Prevention”) Fund in Illinois named after its purpose, a no-doubt trade-marked/proprietary “deliverable” (the “Educare” schools) and someone authoritative to evaluate it ((the Frank Porter Graham Institute in UNC):
- Particular the use of the word “Institute” carries some weight in common understanding (although it’s now in such common use for almost anything, it shouldn’t. This one DOES qualify, but many don’t really). An institute could also be AT a university or a nonprofit, or itself a nonprofit. Or, it could be a free-standing institution, I suppose, of higher education. )
The Buffett Early Childhood Fund and the Ounce of Prevention Fund in Illinois are working with partners in communities across America to create state-of-the-art Educare schools to better prepare young children for success in school. Each Educare provides high-quality early care and education to 140-200 infants, toddlers and preschoolers growing up in low-income families. With 21 Educare schools, the Educare Learning Network shapes a new way of doing business when it comes to delivering early care and education to our nation’s most at-risk children and families. Plus, each Educare serves as a catalyst for programmatic and policy change throughout its community and state. Our work is being evaluated nationally by the Frank Porter Graham Institute at the University of North Carolina.
Unless a person begins to look at some of the networked interests — and understand the business models involved (where the University Center — the “premier professional” (often in Psychology, Education, or Sociology) who direct the centers — the tax-exempt philanthropists who donate BIG to some of the centers — the entrepreneurs leaving Wall Street and its hedge funds and junk bonds (really!) moving into a more profitable area with an infrastructure already built for them, i.e., the public schools and welfare rolls, among other things (Educare, Acelero, Inc. in NY, etc.) and even the supported education-journalism entities, such as California’s EdSource or, I recently learned of a “Hechinger Report” at Teachers College at University of Columbia” )
EdSource is a nonprofit based in Oakland, California, but ONE look at its Board of Directors shows that almost all of them are, or were, working for government — typically school districts, with the exception of someone from Hewlett Packard, someone in Radio. This is from its Beliefs, etc. page:
Belief Statement
EdSource believes that access to a quality education is an important right of all children. We further believe that an informed, involved public is necessary to strengthen California’s schools for the benefit of the state’s children, its civic life and its economy.
Goals
EdSource works to engage Californians on key education challenges with the goal of enhancing learning success. It does so by providing timely, useful and accurate information to key education stakeholders and the larger public; advancing awareness of major education initiatives being implemented in California and nationally; and highlighting effective models and strategies intended to improve student outcomes, as well as identifying areas that are in need of repair or reform.
History
Over a period of more than three decades, EdSource has established its reputation as a highly respected source of education information, research and analysis. It has now emerged as the pre-eminent multi-media education platform for the state, which with over 6 million students is the largest and most diverse public education system in the nation.
Since its founding in 1977, EdSource has broadened its focus to include a broad range of education reforms, including early education and preschools, charter schools, school accountability, STEM education, teacher evaluation and obstacles students face in the math pipeline from pre-kindergarten to college. In 2012, it launched its journalism and communications arms, EdSource Today, which now comprises the largest education reporting staff of any newsroom in the state.
The expertise of EdSource’s staff of reporters, writers, and communication and outreach specialists is strengthened by a statewide Board of Directors made up of distinguished leaders from diverse education constituencies
(END of “INTRO TO THIS POST” section)
As my TOC page says, this blog is a learning curve. Dialogue here represents where I was as a researcher, and blogger (technical abilities in self-taught html, or lack thereof) at the time. You can probably hear the indignation at discovering some of this information the first time around….
MORE DIALOGUE and OCSE GRANTS TABLES from 7/26/2011 post
NOTE: these are GRANTS only — for contracts, plus grants, plus loans, plus (etc.) one would have to hop on over to another database, such as USASPENDING.gov. however (the thing is) with both of those, the amounts are provided from the agencies themselves; there might be a better way to actually see what went out (like the individual state grants received documents, etc.) There are also SPECIAL PROJECTS for Child Support — CFDA 93601..
CFDA Prog. No. |
OPDIV |
Popular Title |
Number of Awards |
Number of Award Actions |
CAN Award Amount “2010” |
93.601 |
ACF |
Child Support Enforcement Demonstrations and Special Projects |
118 |
257 |
$17,306,652 |
93.601 |
CDC |
Child Support Enforcement Demonstrations and Special Projects |
1 |
1 |
$601,234 |
Page Total |
119 |
258 |
$17,907,886 |
||
Report Total |
119 |
258 |
$17,907,886 |
NOW, what exactly are those projects? I decided to take a look (FY 2010) and recognize quite a few names – especially the first one here:
[[….. I then ran a similar chart on the Year 2011 for same CFDA#, 93653. Then another type of “Special Child Support Projects” — CFDA 93601]]
{I’ll provide a link selecting the same year, CFDA# 93601, and most of the column headings. I omitted “OpDiv” because they are all “OCSE” and “CFDA# because I’ve just indicated, selected on 93601. This is from “Advanced Search” function, and for year 2010 only. The report is being re-run 4/9/2016:
See this link. Currently sorted on “Action Issue Date.” There are 29 awards, only 2 pages, and the “Abstract” text shows under each award. Recipient Names and “Award” names are also clickable for more information. Most “abstract” descriptions say only “special improvement project” or “Special improvement project/Priority Area #_” but I see one says “Co-Parenting with Responsibility” (Tuscaloosa Family Resource Center, Inc., $100K this year, $50K in 2011 and again in 2012) and another, ”
Family Employment and Support Program. Helping noncustodial parents (NCPS) meet their child support and family responsibilities. |
with the Circuit Court for Baltimore County as recipient. Or, Using Florida’s Supervised Visitation Programs to Increase Economic Self Sufficiency (Recipient: Florida State University).
I’ll look up a few [RECIPIENT ORGANIZATIONS or GOVT ENTITIES] (that I know less about, for example, Karen Oehme in FL is a known position….): MICHAEL MAGNANI in NY (apparently relates to a Drug Court): Michael Magnani Director Division of Grants and Program Development New York State Unified Court System 25 Beaver Street, 11th Floor New York, NY 10004 Phone: 212-428-2109 Fax: 212-428-2129 Email: mmagnani@courts.state.ny.usFor example:
Tuscaloosa Family Resource Center, Inc.
EIN#63-12904, [That’s short two digits#, actually 63-1212904]
2016 Update:
Form 990s:
(Click on Org. name to see related tax return. The word “East” doesn’t show on IRS Form and is a factor of the database posting the returns…)
ORGANIZATION NAME | ST | YR | FORM | PP | TOTAL ASSETS | EIN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
East Tuscaloosa Family Resource Center | AL | 2014 | 990 | 27 | $811,529.00 | 63-1212904 |
East Tuscaloosa Family Resource Center | AL | 2013 | 990 | 29 | $744,787.00 | 63-1212904 |
East Tuscaloosa Family Resource Center | AL | 2012 | 990 | 24 | $864,041.00 | 63-1212904 |
I looked this one up at NCSSDATAWEB.org — revenues showing over $2 million. 990 nonprofit purpose:
“TO EMPOWER FAMILIES BY PROVIDING SUPPORT SERVICES THAT DEVELOP SKILLS AND RESOURCES TO IMPROVE THE FAMILY’S QUALITY OF LIFE, PREPARE THEIR CHILDREN FOR SUCCESS IN A COMPETITIVE SOCIETY, AND ALLOW EACH INDIVIDUAL TO REALIZE HIS OR HER POTENTIAL FOR SELF-SUFFICIENCY”
With this nonprofit purpose, I shoulda been a nonprofit as a mere parent — this is what parents generally do! They basically want to be some other family’s “family.” So at what point is this outsourced to nonprofit organizations instead, supported by federal grants?
‘Howsabout’ empowering parents by consistently refusing to violate their fundamental rights as individuals and help keep YOUR local neck of government honest and accountable for its use of OUR money (via IRS, or wage-garnishments in child support programs, or sales taxes, etc.) and your officials, accountable for its use of all program funds?
Their 2010 IRS filed Form 990 shows program income revenues ZERO; contributions and grants, $2,082,707 — considerably higher than last year (which was $1,917,454) of which $2.5K (roughly — and lower than last year’s which was over $6K) INVESTMENT income. There are 17 officers and directors… Part III, #4, they are required to report have a ‘Statement of Program Service Accomplishments” (with expenses and revenues — and this section is blank.! This is the section that justifies the tax-exempt purpose. Instead, they simply re-stated their purpose (not what they actually DID)… and claimed that doing (whatever) cost “$1,968, 563” “All Other Achievements Description” — (after a number of blank pages of the form — and this is a statement, not an “achievement”) reads: FORM 990, PAGE PART I,LINE 4D (the part I just noted was blank, but shouldn’t have been……)
“CHILDREN’S TRUST FUND OF ALABAMA AND DHHS GRANT AND FAMILY RESOURCE PROGRAM GRANT USED TO PAY SALARIES AND EXPENSES OF DHR CASE CONTRACTS FOR THE COUNTY AND CITY OF TUSCALOOSA AND TO PAY TFRC SALARIES AND EXPENSES RELATED TO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION PROGRAMS”
“Organization’s process to review Form 990″: ” NO REVIEW WAS OR WILL BE CONDUCTED” (that seems obvious. AFter all, it’s only $2 million, right?)“GOVERNING DOCUMENTS DISCLOSURE EXPLANATION FORM 990, PAGE 6, PART VI, LINE 19 NO DOCUMENTS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC” Here are a bunch of directors: “
- TONYA ADAMS-NELSON DIRECTOR
- CARLA BAILEY DIRECTOR
- AVANTI BAKER DIRECTOR
- ELIZABETH BEEMER DIRECTOR
- MARY BETH CAVERT DIRECTOR
- ROBERT WHALLI JR DIRECTOR
- HELENE HIBBARD DIRECTOR
- ALISON HUDNAIL DIRECTOR
- TOM LEDBETTER DIRECTOR
- AMANDA MULKEY DIRECTOR
- SANDRA RAY DIRECTOR
- MIKE RUSSELL DIRECTOR
- TAMMY YAGER DIRECTOR
- KIM THOMA BAILEY PRESIDENT
- DEBRA NELSON -GARDELL VICE-PRES
- STEVEN K CASE TREASURER
- LESLIE GUY SECRETARY
(Alabama has been dealing with tornado damages…) solicitation (same address) from a group dealing with youth homelessness:There’s a blog and this shows a history — of TOP spot Family Resource Center. It began (like many nonprofits) with someone formerly in government social service work, and a grant of $80,000 — not bad for a startup:
In 1999, a group of concerned community members came together to create the East Tuscaloosa Family Resource Center, Inc. The goal was to create a place where underserved members of the Tuscaloosa community could come to gain access to services that were already available in other parts of town. The board of directors hired as the agency’s first executive director Teresa Costanzo, a social worker with management experience as the director of the Hale County Department of Human Resources. The budget in that initial year was $80,000; there were three employees.
Teresa’s Vision:
Very soon, Teresa’s vision began to exceed the limits of east Tuscaloosa, so, in 2001, the board of directors decided to drop the “East” from the name, making it the Tuscaloosa Family Resource Center, Inc. The agency [TECHNICALLY, it’s a “nonprofit” not an agency] continued to grow, as did the array of services provided. Soon, the community began to think of the agency as a “one-stop-shop” for a wide array of family needs. In an effort to reflect this perception of the agency, the board decided to begin operations under the business name Tuscaloosa’s One Place, a Family Resource Center.
Through the years, many of our services have changed. We now offer many school-based programs, several career-development programs, an on-site adult education program, an English-as-a-second-language program, healthy relationship programs, a juvenile detention alternative initiative, a Hispanic outreach program, and home visitation programs, to name a few of our services. We press approximately 800 volunteers, from all walks of life, into service for our community every year, and that number is growing. Our budget for the most recent fiscal year was approximately $1.5 million; we now have approximately 25 full-time employees and 80 temporary or part-time employees. To say that we’ve changed would be an understatement.Through all these changes, though, the agency’s constant has been its executive director. Teresa continues to be at the forefront of everything TOP does. Her oversight has been and still is the key factor in the agency’s place in the community.
And she got $100K of “Child Support Special Resource & Demonstration” project funds. Recently. ALABAMA UNDISTRIBUTED CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIONS(posted in an Iowa Fathers’ group), 2005:
ALABAMA | $11,765,750 | $8,271,986 | 70.3% | $3,493,764 | 29.7% |
(Columns: NET, PENDING & % of NET (cols. 2&3) Unresolved & % of NET(last 2) Fatherhood Groups tend to be up on Where is the Money Going? — as here (but as we look below, TANF money IS being diverted to Fatherhood programs, at $30 to $50K a pop; and I have a 2011 list) In that link, I see the group complaining that money was given to the Administrative Office of the Courts, and not “promoting responsible fatherhood” (??the courts are where that promotion would be most likely to take effect!) MEANWHILE, this appears to be an outfit offering MARRIAGE CLASSES with a “Focus on the Family” (very strong) emphasis = NOT good. See:
Marriage Classes/Curriculum 1. Classes Offered by Tuscaloosa’s One Placee. ** www.etfrc.org, P.O. Box 40764, 870 Redmont Drive, Tuscaloosa, AL 35404 (205) 462- 1000 (Contact Wanda Martin, wmartin@etfrc.org Relationship/ Marriage Educator, Family Support Specialist; or D’Undray Peterson,
[[Link to the image has expired, but the URL is: http://www.stmarkmethodist.org/clientimages/45340/ publisher%20marriage%20resources%202011.pdf]]
www.etfrc.org They have the solicitation part of the website all nicely set up:
We also accept monetary donations to support our programs. Because we are a non-profit social service agency, all donations are tax deductible. Please mail or deliver monetary donations to our offices, conveniently located in Alberta City or click below. Become a fan on Facebook!!
There’s the “Home visitation” services under “Parenting” and here is the “Let’s Help Dad with His Custody Case” (reduced or free legal fees) segment. Dads who are not actually getting legal results from these grants should complain to their local legislator, because that’s the purpose (also, for each State to conduct social experimentation at the direction of the Secretary of HHS, as 45 CFR 303.109declares): Apart from trouble with using the word “assist” or “assisting” correctly, this segment appears to have been part of the “special demonstration” funded program, above? Tax-funded, so noncustodial MOTHERS can know that their tax dollars, if they are employed, are going to the good cause of a nonprofit organization taking advantage of its tax-exempt status to help connect the fathers with REDUCED-FEE OR FREE LEGAL SERVICES, no doubt to also help them with custody matters as well.
D.A.D.S. Program (Dads Are Dynamite)
The DADS program is designed to assist non-custodial fathers comply {{“in complying”}} with child support obligations. Participants in this program will receive job search assistance as well as learn skills to strengthen their relationship with their child and his or her primary caregiver. DADS participants receive individualized case management services, which includes assisting those fathers who are underemployed become {{“in becoming”}} gainfully employed.
One night per week, fathers will participate in a class/support session to discuss issues unique to non-custodial fathers. ** Legal services are also available to fathers at either a free or reduced fee. Fathers interested in voluntarily participating in this program should contact Tuscaloosa’s One Place to schedule an initial intake. Call David De Shazo at (205) 462-1000 to sign up.
**if these are unique to noncustodial fathers, they do not apply to noncustodial mothers. They are family court &/or child support matters.
HOPEFULLY no one providing such services has any inappropriate relationships with (a) any family court judges or (b) program disbursement authorities in any of the grants being used to assist the fathers, such as we found (1999) in the Karen Anderson, Amadaor County (CA) case, where her ex-husband’s attorney just so happened to also have authority over the A/V funds, and just-so happened to also be in business? with a little nonprofit outfit receiving those funds…..
$1,500 of Tuscaloosa’s 2011 proposed Community Developmt Block Grant going to this DADS program
However “DADs are DYNAMITE” got $50,000 — from TANF funds — in The CHildren’s Trust Fund in this (Alabama Dept of Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention )
THE LINK above IS LOADED WITH FATHERHOOD FUNDING (DESIGNATED “TANF” ON THE RIGHT COLUMN AS WELL) — PLS. BROWSE. Clearly the way to reduce childhood abuse and neglect is to dedicate public funds to fatherhood policies, including some that will provide legal help (reduce/low-fee) in their child support and most likely child custody/visitation cases — which the mothers do NOT have a source of legal help for, for the most part. How does that work out when the reason for separation (or not cohabiting) was abuse to start with?
Other groups that received from this fund (dated March, 2011) include:
Grantee / Program / Source / $$
- Baldwin County Fatherhood Initiative, Inc./ (same)- TANF funding – $50K [for-profit, inc. 2004]
- Alfred Saliba Family Services Center / Saliba Center Fatherhood – TANF funding – $40K
- Autauga County Family Support Center / “DADS” / TANF – $40K
- Family Guidance Center of Alabama / Fatherhood Program / TANF – $5oK
- Family Services Center of Coffee County / Coffee County Fatherhood Initiative / TANF – $35K [Non-profit, reg. 1998, but no reports since 1999 and where is the EIN#? Cotter R. Rainer, III, purpose “assist families in need of prevention” at 203 EAST LEE STREET
ENTERPRISE, AL (currently an attorney’s office, Tindol- M. Chad & Cotter- R. Rainer- III Attorney) ACTUALLY — here is a Youtube 41second blurbon this one (date?) — I think it’s being offered at the courthouse, a judge announced:
The judge says the program will help the non-custodial parent pay his child support and have a relationship with his child.
Coffee County District Court Judge Paul Sherling says the state court system has awarded grant money to the county for a fatherhood initiative. He says that when a person charged with nonpayment appears in court and says he can’t afford to pay, he’ll have an alternative.
The program will direct the parent to a 12-week seminar program designed to help him find ways to earn income and pay for his child. The fatherhood initiative will be offered through the Coffee County Family Services Center.
This “eprise” site is interesting — because along with this article, are several others involving, for example, child abuse, murder, and complaints that the courts are short of money: this site states who helped get this money.
County gets almost $45,000 for fatherhood program
- A new program designed to help fathers help their children has received a financial boost. District Judge Paul Sherling announced that Coffee County has been awarded nearly $45,000 from the state court system to fund a fatherhood initiative.
08/27/2010 6:00 AM
- An Enterprise man was sentenced to 90 years in prison on six charges involving sexual abuse of three minor children.District JudgePaul Sherling sentenced Jack Ellis Hockemeyer, 54, to serve 15 years in state prison on each charge, with the sentences to run concurrently, meaning he will serve a maximum of 15 years.Sherling imposed the sentence Tuesday afternoon following Hockemeyer’s guilty plea on one count of sexual abuse of child under age 12 and five counts of second-degree sodomy involving minors over age 12, but under age 16ENTERPRISE, Ala. — The 12th Circuit District Attorney Office’s recent child support roundup was its most successful to date, collecting more than $25,000 for Coffee County families. Assistant District AttorneyChris Kaminski said, as of Friday, the office has collected $25,573.69. Five more people remained in the Coffee County Jail on cash bonds, which will increase the total, he added. Kaminski said Friday’s total was “by far the best we’ve had.” From late March until April 8, the DA’s office allowed anyone behind on child support payments to catch up or arrange a plan without a penalty. Twelfth Circuit District AttorneyTom Anderson said about 80 percent of this year’s collections were obtained during that period.
Former Elba lawman {stepfather} charged with torture, willful abuse of child
(and let out on $5K bail after THIS:)
A 3-year-old child is now in the custody of the Coffee County Department of Human Resources after his stepfather was arrested and charged with torture/willful abuse of a child. {{WHERE WAS MOM!??!}} Coffee County Sheriff’s Office Chief DeputyRonnie Whitworth said the child’s grandfather reported the incident to law enforcement authorities. Jeffery Hayes Fuller, 28, of County Road 349, Elba, was arrested and charged with the Class C felony Dec. 22. Fuller is reportedly a former Elba policeofficer and a former firefighter. Whitworthsaid the baby was found badly bruised in the buttocks region with blood coming from the wounds. Fuller reportedly confessed to paddling the child with a hand-gripped paddle, then placing the child on a hot pad and then rubbing peroxide on the wounds. Fuller was released from the Coffee County Jail on a $5,000 bond and ordered by JudgePaul Sherling to have no contact with the child. Whitworth said the case remains under investigation. (SORRY about all those extra hyperlinks)…..
REPEAT THE MANTRA: Fatherhood training will reduce child abuse and prevent it…… Here’s a 30 yr old Army Sgt caught with 18 videos of child porn (same judge, which is how it came up) – he’s in jail. . . . . “The child pornography evidence against Hogan includes 18 videos and pictures of him sexually assaulting 2 out-of-state girls, ages 8 and 10. Authorities arrested Hogan Jan. 28 on charges of second-degree possession of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia and felony possession of a controlled substance.”
THIS “family services center” appears to be not just a regular nonprofit, but one of the many situations that appear to be a public/private project involving an actual building; it was dedicated in 1998, per this article (and also articles of incorporation):
Coffee County Family Services Center receives 2010-2011 Children’s Trust Fund grant funding
Check presented in the amount of $103,400
Linda HodgeThursday, Dec 02,2010
Elected officials, officials from the Alabama Department of Abuse and Neglect Prevention and the board of directors of the Coffee County Family Services Center all gathered Tuesday morning, Nov. 30, in Enterprise, Ala. for the announcement of the 2010-11 Children’s Trust Fund grant funding. Coffee County Family Services Center received $103,400 from the Children’s Trust Fund to be used for child abuse and neglect prevention programs. “I can not tell you how much we appreciate this money and their (Alabama Dept. of Abuse and Neglect Prevention) support of our programs,” said Judy Crowley, executive director of the Coffee County Family Services Center.
The Coffee County Family Services Center opened its doors in 1998, and Crowley said that also was the first year the local organization received grant funding from the Children’s Trust Fund for assessment referral, which remains a number one priority today as the programs most highly utilized area. In regards to the 2010-11 grant funding announced Tuesday morning, Crowley said the monies will be used also to assist with all child abuse and neglect prevention programs, as well as, the Building Blocks program and the new Fatherhood Initiative program.
This is a listed nonprofit (Here’s the 2009 “990 “filing from NCCSDATA.org — though mostly blank, it confirms that it gets about $265K grants/contributions per yr and Judith Crowley earns only around $40K. There is no description of services provided . . . . . it does have an EIN# (721374603 ) Heritage Training and Career Center, Inc / Faithful Fathers Fatherhood Program / TANF – $30K (THERE are 11 pages of this, and I don’t feel like going through all – -most pages have several, not just one or two, fatherhood programs on them) Any of these can be looked up (for example, the last one shows at the Alabama Secretary of State site as existing, yes, as of 2007 — and as a nonprofit, but I don’t see any filings yet. ”
Entity ID | Entity Name | City | Type | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
565 – 632 | Heritage Training and Career Center | MONTGOMERY, AL | Domestic Non-Profit Corporation | Exists |
This group (under a “Cynthia Brown”) when I looked up the street address, is a “New or Rejoined Nonprofit” member of the Montgomery chamber of commerce:
A “Billy W. Jarrett Construction Co., Inc.” at this address apparently got a contract (for a North Carolina Military project) …. There are also 5 entities, some LLC’s incorporated (or registered agent) by a “Cynthia Brown,”(without middle initial) not that this isn’t a common name…
**
EVERY/ANY one of these organizations (in whichever state) can be looked up as to: Incorporation (Secretary of State) and any related dbas (other names it does business as), if nonprofit, the NCCSDATAWEB.org or other site showing some of the 990 filings for these groups; their websites, their directors, and other LLCs they form. SOMETIMES these are front groups that exist ONLY to catch the fundings.
EVERY organization (for example) that is taking TANF funds in particular, can and should be looked up and checked up on(especially for any Alabama residents with access to internet) — again there is a LOT of fatherhood funding showing up here: http://www.ctf.alabama.gov/Grantees%202010-2011/2010%202011%20Grantees%20Funded%20as%20of%20March%2029%202011.pdf
AND, of course the “Healthy Marriage” part as well, right underneath help to enroll in Food Stamps. (If you are Title IV-A, your Child Support qualifies for Title IV-D, and as such a diversion into marriage promotion will of course help establish the steady payments of fathers).
(**text was original, borders and emphasis added).
(A LINK from the TUSCOLOOSA ONE-STOP group)
Alabama Community Healthy Marriage Initiative
AGAIN, here is the child support funding for “Regular” (not “research and special demonstration”) child support. In each State, County — your county — what does this translate to, and who is watching? Who is profiting — are the children subject to the child support order profiting, and is this consistently effective in reducing TANF expenditures?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CFDA 93.593, “CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT” Grants to States — selected Years 2010 & 2011
2016 Update:
[There IS no CFDA “93.593” category, I re-ran Years 2010 and 2011 of “93563” which appears to be what was meant. Realizing, I’d already showed 93653 (basic CSE grants for enforcement) above in this post, or its predecessor (2016 revisited) — and then sorted it on “Sum of Awards” with the LOWEST $$ displaying first. Of the 1362 awards totaling, $6.7 Billion or so, displayed over 55 pages of only 25 rows each (!!!), sorting by $$ shows pages — literally, over 400 — negative entries, in the millions of dollars, before we get to a single page showing a (small page total) positive.
The first page total in this sort (covering, as I said, BASIC CSE services over a two-year period) shows a NEGATIVE $439M page total (only 25 rows or awards involved). I’d like to know why this is occuring and its significance — is that by how much the federal vs. state cooperations are OVER-estimating need, or are the states hanging onto this excess (and letting it earn interest or investment dividends, which the state most likely keeps, at the state level), are we looking at electronic cleansing of the record to justify the huge expenditures in pursuing child support orders — or what? I don’t know (yet), but here is the link to see the rest. $$ amounts are far-right column; if they don’t display, I suggest use “View-Zoom” to minimize print size. TAGGS.hhs.gov doesn’t yet let users move the columns WE consider more critical, or of interest for a particular report run, to display further to the left. ALL reports that include $$ show the $$ on the right-most columns, or just about, position (order of fields as shown in the select menu at bottom of “Advanced Search.”). Meanwhile, there’s a lot of blank space on the left margin. “Go figure….”
- Data Fiscal Year: 2011, 2010
- CFDAs: 93563
- Report Total: $6,780,836,382
- Distinct Award Count: 1362
- http://Tinyurl.com/hamm46c
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Also for scope, the chart should show how which agency gets this varies from state to state. The “activity type” is at all times described as “SOCIAL SERVICES” and note that the grants type is either NEW, or Administrative Supplement/Discretionary — meaning, they asked for more… I left blank the column Private Investigator — because it’s agencies getting the monies. Keep in mind also that some states farm out the responsibilities to private contractors, some of whom I have been researching, and the large ones of which have been in several cases caught in major money-laundering or fraud. This is good to keep in mind when considering how quickly one state (South Carolina) is to contribute (further) to the racial inequality in the US prison system by jailing low-income black males for nonpayment of child support — and then going to the public and complaining that the child support system is unfair to low-income black males (although the literature saying this typically calls the males “fathers” and the mothers’ households, “female-headed households” as if they were domesticated breeding stock (which, viewed in certain lights, they are…. being treated as). FOR A SAMPLE of this chart
2016 Update (I will use this background-color for this post to indicate):
Re: next quoted paragraph (below this 2016 update box), I’m unsure if it was referring to the table just above it (I think so), or the one below it, which I will try to recreate, and leave as a link, after this next quote. I also see at the bottom of the post, the system generates apparently related posts, which appeared then as:
“Related”
Is OCSE Footloose in Tuscaloosa? (a.k.a., “When Nonprofits Exist JUST to attract Healthy Marriage/Fatherhood/Child Support Grants”)In “History of Family Court”
Let’s Eliminate OCSE — the Office of Child Support Enforcement — and why. In “Business Enterprise”
There is also a very interesting comment from “Robert Trap” on the original 7/26/2011 post, about his case in Alaska versus L.A. County Other than that, the comment were a few pingbacks (internal to this post) and one of my own comments expanding on the theme.
COMMENT from reader “Robert Trap”:
This is 500 names (at least, the search results were sorted to show 500 names at a time) of approximately 1,308 names. I’m not sure why several years displayed, i.e., why a 2009 date would show up. However, the point is to get an idea of where & how much money is hitting is inbound, at least the state level.
As this is PUBLIC money, anyone has a right to find out what is the local public payroll, how grants are being spent, who is allocating them to whom (Subgrants). Some of this can be looked up on-line and some can be formed in a FOIA letter, which by law, has to be responded to in a certain time frame. It may not be, but it is a legal right to request public information.
AT ANY POINT — it’s appropriate to ask what are these grants being used for
They are Smaller, but they are in positions of influence, including some courts. ALSO notice the ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENT / DISCRETIONARY BLOCK category seems the main category (sometimes being adjusted downward). If I looked only at “NEW” grants for (YRS — “All”, i.e., database goes back to 1995). Notice how active Center for Policy Research is — hardly surprising: Jessica Pearson was a co-founder of AFCC (Per Liz Richards[NAFCJ.net]) and this Denver-based organization is often working the Child Support Field. The for-profit arm is Policy Studies, Inc. — CPR is the smaller, leaner, nonprofit…This table has 224 rows; I will also upload it here, for easier viewing: ///
…….
[2016 additions/chart replacement(s) for that 7/26/2011 post]
I had to individually check all Fiscal Years up to 2011 (Year “1992” not available to check). This won’t be exactly identical to the one I ran halfway through 2011 as you cannot select only on an END date without supplying a beginning date. Also, it appears (I checked several pages) that these are all under CFDA 93601 — and so I omitted that column in the results.
http://TinyURL.com/gq92x53 = the table of results, with these totals! (about 11 pp, 25/page):
t M
|
At TAGGS.hhs.gov, I found you still cannot enter a DUNS# as a Search Criteria under “Advanced Search” so I couldn’t get “Center for Policy Research” grants to display by themselves — because there’s a similarly named organization, also in Denver. There is also no option for “exact phrase” or “contains” under recipient NAME search. So I cannot show you the several different spellings and wordings of the principal investigator names (Jessica Pearson, Jessica Phearson, Dr. Nancy Thoennes” (Both Pearson & Thoennes have PhDs and so could be called “Dr.”) etc. But here’s a total by the organization’s DUNS# — it seems small, however, they also get contracts and are very active in several fields related to the subject matter of this blog. See organization website (and/or other posts herein) for more information.
Export Options:
Recipient Name
|
DUNS
|
City
|
State
|
ZIP Code
|
County
|
Ctry |
Type
|
Class
|
Sum of Awards
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH | 14938
7185 |
DENVER | CO | 80218-1450 | DENVER | USA | Research Institu-tion, Founda-tion and Labor-atory | Non-Profit Private Non-Government Organizations | $449,600 |
…
Written by Let's Get Honest|She Looks It Up
April 26, 2016 at 2:46 pm
Posted in 1996 TANF PRWORA (cat. added 11/2011)
Tagged with "Kids Count" & Annie E. Casey Foundation - in Alabama, "Preventing [____] Abuse Before It Happens" = Run Curricula & Invade Privacy (Increase "Home Visitation" programming), "Research Strongly Suggests Investment In....", $16.4M= 20 yrs (1991-2011 minus "1992") of CFDA 93601 grants (Copy URL to see report: http://TinyURL.com/gq92x53), ADCANP ="Alabama Dept of Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention") & "Prevent Child Abuse America", Alabama Community Healthy Marriage Initiative, CFDA 93563 Child Support Enforcement (regular), CFDA 93564 Child Suppt Research Demo, CFDA 93601 Child Supp Spec Projects ("90FI" series), CFFPP, Children FIRST Trust Fund, Children's Trust Fund, CPCs-Children's Policy Councils (in Ala. at least, CRFCFW=Columbia University School of Social Work's "CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON FATHERS CHILDREN & FAMILY WELL-BEING" (Ronald D. Mincy PhD), First-Class Pre-K & NIEER.org, formerly Juvenile Justice Coordinating Councils) re-routing government programming and funding, Foundation on Child Development (FCD-US.org in NY), FRPN - Fathers Research and Practice Network (at Temple Univ in Philadelphia but see also CPR (Pearson - Thoennes) in Denver + HHS grant 90PR0006, Henry Morgenthau Jr (as Robt P. Morgenthau's Grandfather -- and Sec'y of US Treasury under FDR), HIROKAZU YOSHIKAWA (NYU Steinhardt School of Culture Education & Human Devpt - Foundation on Child Development - Harvard Grad - HHS sponsorships (Grants) - Global Connections & C.V....), How CDBG money goes to Fatherhood Initiatives, IL corp? "Healthy Families America" becomes "Prevent Child Abuse America" in 2001, Jacquelyn Boggess (Wisconsin's CFFPP), National Alliance of Children's Trust and Prevention Funds, National Institute for Early Education Research (a unit at NJ's Rutgers Univ) & its Columbia U connex (Jeanne Brooks-Gunn | Irwin Garfinkel | Fragile Families Projects, NCFF=National Center for Children and Families (at Columbia U Teacher's College -- see HHS grants), NCOFF - National Center on Fathers and Families (somewhere) at UPenn Graduate School of Education, NYU's "Steinhardt School of Culture Education and Human Development" and the NIEER, NYU's Steinhardt School of Cultur Educ & Human Devpt": "applied psychology- art- education- health- media- and music", Prevent Child Abuse ALABAMA Inc (EIN#63082332 - nada since 2003) aka "VOICES for Alabama's Children", Prevent Child Abuse America, redefining holistic education, Robert M. Morgenthau (NYCounty D.A. 1975-2009) as Robt P. Morgenthau's Father, Robert P. Morgenthau as FCD board member, Tuscaloosa Family Resource Center (EIN#631212904), Vivian L. Gadsden (FCD Board member - NCOFF Center at UPenn - FRPN Leadership at Temple - etc.), VOICES for Alabama's Children (fiscal filings "M-I-A"?), X $6'382'786 = 2010 & 2011 CFDA 93563 (ChildSuppEnforcemt straight) HHS grants (Copy URL http://Tinyurl.com/hamm46c to see report)
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
In 1999, I filed an alaska federal suit, Long V. LA. County, (4AK. Defendants), in part for Alaska, and LA. County, supported by documents falsely using fraudulent cssd, actions against me to defraud the federal child support enforcement grant program-by keeping the dead and other fraudulent cases on state list records to defraud the feds, from 1999, to 2012, I have discovered just how far into Criminality the governments will go to maintain this fraud, even prevailing in the federal courts does not end it, Alaska, actually effected the takings on the federal suit legal cost award to create a lien based on the same court ruled illegal original actions the award was in relief to, the judge suborns this, bullets I have discovered really are the only way to fix this, if some one else has another idea that will work let me know, as I will be in the media head line in Alaska, before long! Trapper. Xtrapper@hotmail.com.