Posts Tagged ‘Stephen J. Ceci (Cornell)’
‘Human Ecology’ (Colleges of), Psychology, and Cornell. Why The History of the American University System Still Matters.
Post title with shortlink, started Feb. 17, 2018, published March 4:
‘Human Ecology’ (Colleges of), Psychology, and Cornell. Why The History of the American University System Still Matters. (shortlink ending “-8F5”) Post is short (about 6,100 words — can you believe it?!)
Subtitle: Some Historic Problems Design Flaws — or Inherent Design Genius, depending on one’s perspective — with The American University System.
Here, I discuss where “Colleges of Human Ecology and the intent to “develop” human beings from the start,” based on theories from high-profile psychologists such as the late Urie Bronfenbrenner (whom Cornell University’s center named in his honor credits for having founded, or inspired the massive “Head Start” programming itself), funded through their faculty positions meets “the imported university models” meets the “current US size and tax system” (university financing).
Tags: I added labels (“tags”) for topics in this post, and included this one — though it’s not discussed below — because the post discussing it is related: “FAF Financial Accounting Foundation (estab. by AICPA ca.1971 Norwalk CT set up GASB+FASB who set the guidelines=acctg rules)(see also “CAFRs”)
Regardless of one’s perspective, the American universities both private and public still have a basic design. That design for each has been historically based on a certain model espoused by their founders, reflecting their values and what kind of economic infrastructure those founders wanted for the country.
MORRILL LAND-GRANT ACTS
(Reference added March 5, 2018): Why the Morrill Act Still Matters, July 16, 2012 by Christopher P. Loss in The Chronicle of Higher Education. Added here because it’s a short narrative and for the 19 comments below arguing pro/con the whole situation. The comments are generally well-written and interesting.
Basics: Please read (for review, or if it’s not review) Wikipedia on the Morrill Land-Grant Acts. These involved federal lands to establish state college right about the time of the Civil War (!) and after the Confederate states had seceded (although they later got theirs, too). On that article, Cornell’s situation is in paragraphs 7 and 10. Paras. 6, 7 and 10 quoted here. Relates to Cornell and MIT.
Under the act, each eligible state received a total of 30,000 acres (120 km2) of federal land, either within or contiguous to its boundaries, for each member of congress the state had as of the census of 1860. This land, or the proceeds from its sale, was to be used toward establishing and funding the educational institutions described above. Under provision six of the Act, “No State while in a condition of rebellion or insurrection against the government of the United States shall be entitled to the benefit of this act,” in reference to the recent secession of several Southern states and the contemporaneously raging American Civil War.
After the war, however, the 1862 Act was extended to the former Confederate states; it was eventually extended to every state and territory, including those created after 1862. If the federal land within a state was insufficient to meet that state’s land grant, the state was issued “scrip” which authorized the state to select federal lands in other states to fund its institution.[7] For example, New York carefully selected valuable timber land in Wisconsin to fund Cornell University.[8]p. 9 The resulting management of this scrip by the university yielded one third of the total grant revenues generated by all the states, even though New York received only one-tenth of the 1862 land grant.[8]p. 10 Overall, the 1862 Morrill Act allocated 17,400,000 acres (70,000 km2) of land, which when sold yielded a collective endowment of $7.55 million.[8]p. 8
…With a few exceptions (including Cornell University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology), nearly all of the land-grant colleges are public. (Cornell University, while private, administers several state-supported contract colleges that fulfill its public land-grant mission to the state of New York.)
To maintain their status as land-grant colleges, a number of programs are required to be maintained by the college. These include programs in agriculture and engineering, as well as a Reserve Officers’ Training Corps program
This situation, as Wikipedia tells it, also supplanted a more egalitarian (among the states) and earlier “Turner Act,” giving preference for the then more populous eastern states. Overall, the federal lands represent land grabs from Native Americans originally, anyhow, so a case could be made that the entire situation is based on theft and land-grabs. Anyhow….
Read the rest of this entry »
SHARE THIS POST on...
Communities In Schools Model (When You Hear This Rhetoric, Go Find Those Tax Returns!) From Oct. 17, 2016: Feb 2018 Intro on Continuing Relevance of Awareness of CIS and Related Models [Publ. Feb. 23, 2018].
Communities In Schools Model (When You Hear this Rhetoric, Go find those Tax Returns!) From Oct. 17, 2016 (short-link ends “-8Fb”; moved here 2/17/2018. Hate to waste all that earlier work by not publishing it!)
Extended Version of Title, same link: Communities In Schools Model (When You Hear this Rhetoric, Go find those Tax Returns!) From Oct. 17, 2016: Feb 2018 Intro on Continuing Relevance of Awareness of CIS and related models. Currently about 11,400 words.
The term “Communities in Schools” represents a national nonprofit and its similarly-named affiliates, although these are NOT considered “related organizations” at the tax level. To its credit its recent tax returns or financial statements are posted at its main website under the link “Financial Information.” I posted tax returns for the national organization and at least a few affiliates at the bottom of this post. I was interested that the national organization increased its “Total Assets” by $5M over just two years, to $56M, for the year ending 2015, and that (on a more recent website check) its mostly-male board of directors did have six women, including the former First Lady of Texas, and other powerhouses. (Shown with the bio blurbs below the “affiliates” map image.)
Here’s a recent Map from their “affiliates” page of “Where we are” for a general concept. Note: having an entire US State colored in doesn’t necessarily reflect how much of a presence (or what size operations, how many schools they’re involved with — or in fact, much other than a location) throughout that entire state. And there are some “multi-state” affiliates listed.
Interactive map. For a list, see Affiliates page. Interesting what sections of the country it is NOT in… Map is interactive on the website, not this image.
Image #1 of 3, CIS Bd of Directors (incl. 2 of 3 “National leadership” — Wynn & Milliken but not Erquiaga also) alpha by last name, as thumbnail photo directory. Wynn & Erquiaga both functional or previously IN public education in NEVADA. But this National entity is legally domiciled in Georgia (which I note has many affiliates) with a Virginia (i.e., closer to W.D.C.) address.
Image #2 of 3, CIS Bd of Directors (incl. 2 of 3 “National leadership” — Wynn & Milliken but not Erquiaga also) alpha by last name, as thumbnail photo directory.
Image #3 of 3, CIS Bd of Directors (incl. 2 of 3 “National leadership” — Wynn & Milliken but not Erquiaga also) alpha by last name, as thumbnail photo directory.
Communities In Schools, Inc. (national) board of directors each has a bio blurb. Out of 24 total (incl. former Educ. Secretary under Pres. Obama, Arne Duncan; above three images), here are the six women so privileged in slideshow format (some bios may take two — Chairman Elaine Wynn’s takes three — images):
Interesting while the FY2016 and FY2017 audited financial statements are posted, no tax return past FY2015 (Fiscal year ending Sept. 30, meaning, now (Feb. 2018) that’s considerably “odd.” Also, the latest tax return says financials are “available upon request” when they are made available (except tax return for 2016, so far) on the website. Also while the tax return specifies only “children in schools” it’s clear from the website that, children in poverty, esp. children of color, is the “issue” and this nonprofit’s main focus.
Also, unspoken but fairly obvious, “Schools” is a subset of all legal schools within the country, and seems to mean PUBLIC schools; where poor kids are mostly warehoused…except those that have somehow broken out and gotten scholarships to better educational situations… (Keeping in mind that charter schools are still public, not private).
I’d like to raise certain financial issues up front here (for example, how the most recent available (FY2015) tax return shows “Gross receipts” $40M+ but Revenues less than half that, which were overspent, too. Why such a difference was found on “Statement of Revenues” which showed $25M of securities sold for $26M+ — i.e. at a loss. … Then there’s the matter, showing in Form 990 Part XI (Reconciliation of $$ differences between tax returns and audited financial statements) a $56M “Donated Services” reported as shown on the FS but NOT on the tax returns (for an organization reporting total assets of $56M at year end on the tax return. Turns out that $56M “Donated services” were in media, and from one of its major subcontractors, Causeway Agency. Having received the $56M, they simply expensed out the exact same amount (an accounting tactic?) on the FS).
I have decided against putting together the exhibits up top. See their “Financials” page for the links. This is fascinating, but for later. Except the following image gallery(!)
