Archive for June 7th, 2014
Amazing and False Assumptions about the Family Courts…(“The Safe Child Act” vs. records on HOW and by WHOM Family Code was Established State by State and NOT that long ago) [Publ. June 7, 2014, Updated Feb. 2016, Format-only Oct. 2022 | Shortlink ends ‘-2to’].
Post Title Adjusted to add date-published, and, this time, the ending of the short-link, for easier reference:
I have a 2022 and a 2016 foreword, after that, the post isn’t that long... 2016 foreword (marked below) was appropriate because June, 2014, due to personal (litigation and family situations) pressures led to a year and a half pause in publishing posts. At the outset, of course, I didn’t know this would occur, but by Fall, 2015, I found myself driven out of long-term housing, into hotels, and having to deal with it and those who cut off the normal move from one lease into another.
Now, in 2022, this has happened again; I’m determined the transition time will be less (and I’m not AS destitute as I was then and have put about (at least — NOYB!) half the continent of the USA between myself and those who engineered the situation and prolonged it. I fled California (not having a better option) in 2018.
I wrote four posts in June, 2014. These weren’t “prescient” they were mostly “observant” meaning not, I observed the standard rules of how to protest problems in the family court. I observed what was going around me, made a note of who (which entities) were involved (as possible), and, with a combination of gut instinct, curiosity, and what seemed to me then (and now) asking some basic questions which I didn’t hear enough others asking, as the propaganda and policy-making surged forward without proving how (we’d) gotten to the places we were in the first place.
In other words, without accounting for cause-and-effect.
EIGHT YEARS later, I’m still having to keep a trickle of information alive that assumptions aren’t proof, and that there’s no moral or even legal obligation to “standard journalism” to tell the WHOLE truth, or its context, nor should we except that because an article is “investigative” it’s necessarily ethical in withholding known major segments of the larger truth which the public deserves and ought to main some serious connections to. As taxpayers and consumers of services. It’s heavier responsibility than most seem to realize, and can’t be borne alone by just a few people.
Read the rest of this entry »
Let's Get Honest! Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History 