Let's Get Honest! Blog: Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History

'A Different Kind of Attention Develops Sound Judgment' | 'Suppose I'm Right Here?…' (posted 3/23 & 3/5/2014). Over 680 posts, Public-Interest Investigative Blogging On These Matters Since 2009.

Hardly Breaking News, But Still True: “Black People and the Tavistock Institute” (2009 post)

leave a comment »


My ongoing concern, lately, is of certain groups promotion of the flawed concept that the family courts are merely “Flawed,” i.e., they are broken. In this manner, said groups have, in their quest (lust?) for power and publicity, hooked up (phrase choice intentional) with a powerful sector of the American psychological scene, i.e. the Cummings family and their various foundations, professional associations, and boards of ethics, etc. — in claiming loudly that Family Courts are Broken.

Broken? Just Flawed? All they need is a tweak by ETHICAL psychoanalysts, psychologists, psychopharamcologists, and psychotherapists whose financial backing comes, in greet part, from having successfully mainstreamed mental health treatment at the primary care level and wants it to stay that way? And from a leadership who personally invited a couple from the Tavistock Institute early on to come and help coach in certain endeavors, and whose other allegiances include a group known for endorsing clinical hypnosis (Milton H. Erickson Foundation) and claims to have trained half the professional psychologists in the state of California, where one of the major “OUR BROKEN COURTS” proponents (lately on the scene) comes from?

Broken, slightly flawed? — The hell they are. A history of the same groups shows direct connections to Tavistock. When at war (which this is), the first thing to go, generally speaking, is the truth about who’s who and what’s the agenda


Said groups have many distressed and traumatized/needy (as well as I’m sure indignant and offended, perplexed and — if they continue to use these groups’ analysis for their primary and sole narration of “What Happened?” in the courts — confused parents (particularly women), some of them homeless, others losing homes, professions, and parenting privileges, in essence, losing their power. Keeping in mind that there is a specific “Confusion Technique” which is known to help induce a trance state in victims who would otherwise resist the same, and is in use (allegedly) by cults and scam artists (i.e., for the purpose of stealing) and has been for decades. It’s not possible to literally cage up, traumatize, and cause altered states in the public at large, as it has been in certain awful situations involving children, or those incarcerated. therefore a little more subtle technique would be in order.

The Title in this post, I appreciate the talk because it’s straightforward and takes a stand — not a mealymouthed sell-out compromise position — on what this is actually about — it’s essentially racism, institutionalized. And the thing is — when the techniques of brutality and persuasion, deception and extortion, inducing any group to (if possible) hate and despise themselves, while lying about their own history, breaking up their families, and in general being an all over PROBLEM — are in place to be utilized against ONE group, they affect ALL groups. Particularly where it counts– in our ethics, and our will to fight, endure conflict, and keep at this until what’s arrived at represents truth. You cannot have justice without truth.

It takes money to control media and disseminate collective lies nationwide, and suppress individuals whose truth is spoken differently, or who simply want others to know more of it, so we can defend ourselves against insidious myths and lies. Hence the system of economic control of a nation, and media control, and PHYSICAL control — always go together.

This should be a good post, I hope it makes as much sense to my readers as it does to me.


If we think this is a relatively (compared to where?) free country, then consider the Aaron Swartz case (2011, “Open-Access Advocate is Arrested for Huge Download 7/19/2011, John Schwartz.”). Another 2011 Article, “Former Reddit Co-Owner arrested for Excessive JSTOR downloads” indicates he downloaded from PACER. (I cannot number how many times, in researching these “family court matters” I ran into roadblocks at the JSTOR level — you could read just one page. Now this very talented, controversial, and politically active young man, Aaron Swartz, at 26, and per his attorney “Capable of making extraordinary contributions to society,” young man, is dead, they say suicide, rather than face prosecution for in effect “signing too many books out of the library.”

Before you forget about him, and about anything but the mainstream spoon fed information about the Newtown, Connecticut elementary school shooting and divorce case around Adam Lanza, and his parents….. If our diet is MSM, then we will start exhibiting the appropriate symptoms of “ADHD,” for which medication can be prescribed… Short attention spans, resulting in no organization to resist the further sell-off of what’s left of America, or simply turning it into a locked-down continent with labeled specimens of humanity according to their designated profiles, like a zoo. (Only some zoos are probably better run and more humane).

I was looking up John Rawlings Reese (you should, too) and ran across this site. Before you start labeling me, let’s review:

The treatment of a race has parallels in the treatment of a gender, the female gender, and in short, to profiling as enabled by those in the business of profiling for purposes of ongoing slavery and periodic genocides. Plural. Part of slavery, obviously, is splitting up families and auctioning off the component members — and of course keeping women of fertile age to produce more of the same, plus control of educational systems, and ongoing indoctrination of one’s roles in life.

BLACK PEOPLE AND THE TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE” a post by “the nubian warrior” at “Assata Shakur,” as in:
(as in “Hands Off Assata Shakur,”)

This is a modest post, with few comments on a forum, it still grasps the scope of the problem with the opening passage:

Imagine that a stranger broke into your home, robbing it, leaving it in ruins and then kidnapped your children to work as servants within his home. This stranger, fearing an eventual retribution from these kidnapped children will find it necessary to implement systems for ensuring that these children remain loyal. The stranger may do so by routinely showing the children pictures of their ruined former home while falsely retelling the details of the event that he merely rescued them from the ruins and that their parents didn’t want them. This would cause the children to develop an undeserving sense loyalty and appreciation towards their kidnapper. The kidnapper may also find it necessary to implement a scheme to divide the children, to prevent them from unifying against him, by teaching them not to trust each other while simultaneously teaching them to treat only him. Such a system with an objective of controlling the exploited group has been implemented against Black people.

The above scenario is precisely what is being done to Black people. The common feelings of Black self hatred accompanied by an undeserving admiration towards whiteness among so many Black people is not merely indirect consequences of white cultural dominance upon the Black psyche, but rather instead the direct result of an insidious massive manipulation program. A sophisticated racial integration system that uses methods of propaganda and public manipulations practices, deployed very much like a massive marketing campaign. It divides to conquer and misinformed to exploit and suppress. Its propaganda and manipulations practices are being deployed in all sectors – government, media, health and welfare, entertainment, and education, etc- nationally and internationally.

Many researchers have concluded that this insidious compulsory racial integration propaganda manipulations program was originally orchestrated by London ‘s Tavistock Institute of Human relations. Although it had existed for decades earlier, the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations was formally established as an independent not-for-profit charity organization in September 1947.

Headquartered in London, the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations is a leading organization in the use of new and experimental behavioral science programs. It is an independent organization that conducts research in the social and behavioral sciences, applied in the field of health, education and community development. Its research orientation places it between, but not in, the worlds of academia and consultancy; and its range of disciplines include anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political science, psychoanalysis, psychology and sociology.


Some of us don’t have to imagine the “kidnapped” scenario; it has already happened….

How much more of this is it really necessary to hear before we “get” what is happening? I first started putting it together experientially — and the first object of study was an abusive husband and others response to awareness of the abuse: tactics, intent, rhetoric, intentional censorship of my previous life (and work), degradation, humiliation (ritualistic in many ways), lectures. I should’ve been asking, where’d he learn to do that?

Here’s some more from the same link:

Another of noted contributor was Sir John Rawlings-Reese. A commander of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare that conducted research studying the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I to establish the “breaking point” of men under stress.( side note: Henry Kissinger, was student of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF)

A wide and indebt body of research by a collection of many renowned researchers has enabled the Tavistock Institute to develop pioneering breakthroughs in the field of mass manipulation and brain-washing techniques. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology.

A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II.

To repeat that last point — the purpose for learning these behavioral techniques, was for BrainWashing a population to engage in war. Specifically here, World War II. We should know by now that World War II was played on both sides from the United States, certain individuals of influence (a good rundown on it @ “The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush” although that’s certainly not the only one around. ). Excerpt from Chapter 2, “The Hitler Project,”

By Oct. 26, 1942, U.S. troops were under way for North Africa. On Oct. 28, the government issued orders seizing two Nazi front organizations run by the Bush-Harriman bank: the Holland-American Trading Corporation and the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation.@s2

U.S. forces landed under fire near Algiers on Nov. 8, 1942; heavy combat raged throughout November. Nazi interests in the Silesian-American Corporation, long managed by Prescott Bush and his father-in-law George Herbert Walker, were seized under the Trading with the Enemy Act on Nov. 17, 1942. In this action, the government announced that it was seizing only the Nazi interests, leaving the Nazis’ U.S. partners to carry on the business.@s3

These and other actions taken by the U.S. government in wartime were, tragically, too little and too late. President Bush’s family had already played a central role in financing and arming Adolf Hitler for his takeover of Germany; in financing and managing the buildup of Nazi war industries for the conquest of Europe and war against the U.S.A.; and in the development of Nazi genocide theories and racial propaganda, with their well-known results.

The facts presented here must be known, and their implications reflected upon, for a proper understanding of President George Herbert Walker Bush and of the danger to mankind that he represents. The President’s family fortune was largely a result of the Hitler project. The powerful Anglo-American family associations, which later boosted him into the Central Intelligence Agency and up to the White House, were his father’s partners in the Hitler project.

President Franklin Roosevelt’s Alien Property Custodian, Leo T. Crowley, signed Vesting Order Number 248 seizing the property of Prescott Bush under the Trading with the Enemy Act. The order, published in obscure government record books and kept out of the news,@s4 explained nothing about the Nazis involved; only that the Union Banking Corporation was run for the “ Thyssen family ” of “ Germany and/or Hungary ”–“ nationals … of a designated enemy country. ”

By deciding that Prescott Bush and the other directors of the Union Banking Corp. were legally front men for the Nazis, the government avoided the more important historical issue: In what way were Hitler’s Nazis themselves hired, armed and instructed by the New York and London clique of which Prescott Bush was an executive manager? Let us examine the Harriman-Bush Hitler project from the 1920s until it was partially broken up, to seek an answer for that question.

[you have the link…]

It’s not in ANY population’s best interests to have outfits like this around, or such people in control (or serving those in control). Tolerating this, like tolerating abuse, condones it and enshrines it, and any patronizing or condescending efforts to help (while psychologically belittling, and covering up the history of outrages) is also a form of abuse. For example, “empowering” or “enabling” is ridiculous — who stole, and who disabled to start with? If so, then why would the same sectors of society be fitted to “empower” or “enable”? Yet this is the language found throughout the grants system of “community development” etc. Why allow groups of people and institutions (such as HUD) who dismantled communities to be in charge of re-developing them?

Yet more, framing this conversation according to the title:

The present despairing global condition of the Black world is neither a Black curse, baffling phenomenon nor the result of some innate deficient capacity [emphasis mine] for unity or intellectual ability among Black people , but rather instead the direct result of this covert compulsory racial integration program.

This program is designed to break down the Black individual’s sense of personal knowledge in Black identity, Black racial heritage, allegiance and unity. It encourages the minds of the Black masses to admire and love whites while blaming and hating themselves for their current despairing conditions historically created and presently continued by the white elites.

Implementing such a diabolic manipulative program against the Black population is deemed necessary, by the perceptions of the white elites, because not only have they brutally exploit(ed) the Black world during the era of slavery, but also because their exploitations are being continued through ongoing unfair trade practices, U.S. government’s economic hit men and espionage specialist that continues, like vampires ,to ravish Africa while portraying the image to the world that it is merely Africans that are unable to govern themselves.

A nearby post, also May 2009, talks about “The psychosocial treatment of black people” and also “nails” the situation precisely. I don’t need 25 footnotes to understand the truth here; although it certainly reminds me of a two 1970 publications whwith explain #1, media, and #2 the use of psychology to reframe abuse and oppression: Jerry Mander’s “Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television” and (re: gender), Phyllis Chesler’s first book, I think it was, “Women [and] Madness.” Jerry Mander pointed out that the early civil rights movement, which dealt with conflict and confrontation, coincided with just about when the “wiring” of most? of America (referring to TV, obviously, not internet — but both deal with moving images, sound, and are people/drama etc. focused). Mother Earth News published a serialized version of his 1977 book; I have linked to its conclusion. He comments:

Along with the venality of its controllers, the technology of television predetermines the boundaries of its content. Some information can be conveyed completely, some partially, some not at all. The most effective telecommunications are the gross, simplified linear messages and programs which conveniently fit the purposes of the medium’s commercial controllers. Television’s highest potential is advertising. This cannot be changed. The bias is inherent in the technology.  
. . .
At the time of the early civil rights demonstrations, led at first by anonymous and brave black people, within incredibly hostile environments, and then by Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, Stokely Carmichael and others, television had only recently come into its own. The wiring-in of everyone was nearing completion. As a result, what happened in obscure Southern towns was visited upon millions of living rooms. People could see redneck sheriffs beating people. Everyone had to face the hard reality of racism. Its appearance on television ignited the movement beyond the South. A new national attitude developed. The obvious rightness of the struggle could not be avoided.<
. . .


The luckiest, or if it was conscious and deliberate, the smartest aspect of the civil rights movement was that it was confrontational. From the time of the early sit-ins, it expressed conflict.

{{funny, the courts are running classes to teach parents to avoid “high-conflict” divorces… I hope the next segment inspires you to read the whole chapter — and the whole book, remembering it was 1980s… His commentary fits with Nubian Warrior blogger’s, I think:}}

The civil rights struggle was about power and rights. And now we find black children in schools with white children, black people living in white neighborhoods, black people in high public office, black people on boards of big corporations. There are even black people reporting television news.

But there is something odd in the quality of this success. I’m sure it has not escaped you that the black television news commentators and the Asian ones, as well as the women, are inseparable in tone of voice, phrasing, attitudes, style of clothes, overall behavior patterns and apparent political perspective from the hundreds of white men who preceded them in those roles. The color and sex are more varied now, but the message is the same. Is it nit-picking to point this out? I don’t think so.

The average black person, three or four generations removed from Africa, raised in a transplanted culture in the Deep South, kept isolated until very recently from the dominant white culture and its forms, is likely to have retained something of a way of feeling and being different from the Judeo-Christian European.
{{“the average black person”??}}

But this average black person — the one who retains a rich cultural perspective that is not yet fully Americanized — is not the one who is chosen for the network television show or the corporate vice-presidency. He or she would not be chosen because, in so many ways, this person would be ill-suited for the objective, mental, aggressive, unfeeling styles that are rewarded in corporate life. Instead, the corporations pick the rare black person (or Chicano or woman or Indian) who is more like the white males who already occupy the center stage.

What is true for television commentators and corporation executives is also true for government officials. As the personnel within the institutions change, the institutions maintain their inflexible form. The balance of power among races and sexes begins to alter, but the power arrangements themselves — some people on top, other people on the bottom, other people totally excluded — are not threatened. As more diverse people occupy the central control systems, the systems do not become more diverse. The people lose their diversity and start to be transformed by the systems. The systems remain the same. The perceptual patterns that have been excluded remain excluded. If alternatives to the life-style of the systems exist, they are not represented.

None of this is to argue that black people, Indians, women, or any other group which has been denied access should not seek the successes they are presently beginning to achieve in the objective world of money and power. In their shoes I would certainly do the same. It is only to remark that the subtle pressures of technological and corporate form create an archetypal Faustian bargain. In winning rights or money or power, the diverse elements in American culture lose their unique identity, their cultural roots. They become what they oppose.

{{maybe in 1980 they were subtle; I don’t feel they are now, particularly as I look at the various advocacy “industries,” and their corporate backing/financing as basically media campaigns.}}

And so the real power is revealed as existing in the institutions and the technology itself.
(“MOTHER EARTH NEWS has serialized it in its entirety. This is the last installment in the series, and is reprinted with permission of the author and William Morrow and Company.” This post reads May/June 1980, authorship Jerry Mander.)


This discussion/review of Phyllis Chesler by Alison Leavitt, at “National Women’s Health Network” expresses a similar theme: Unless the institutions themselves are changed, which they have not yet been, how can the knowledge and experience be passed on to the next generations?:

Chesler’s activist career began in a time when new women’s organizations were founded daily. The feeling was that everything was “impossible and possible. We had a sense of collective destiny and invulnerability that now seems naive.” Being both an intern at a psychiatric ward and a psychoanalytical institute made Chesler realize that harmful attitudes towards women were ingrained in the practice and teaching of mental health. Phyllis Chesler saw first hand the disastrous consequences for women patients, which lead her to write her now classic book, Women and Madness.

The thesis of Women and Madness is that because the mental health system is patriarchal, women are often falsely labeled as being “mad” if they do not conform to stereotypical feminine roles. Chesler traces this mistreatment, which includes physical as well as mental abuse, back to the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Powerfully, Chesler discusses the history of putting women in mental institutions, the widespread use of addictive sedatives to control women, and the definition of “lesbianism” as mental illness. Her book articulated the mental “illness” experiences of women and, in drawing attention to the power hierarchies in the practice of the psychiatry, began to make change.

At the end of the 1970s, once the energy and the feelings of being invisible disappeared, there were new perspectives in place. This original group of feminists dispersed, and women went on their own to try and make a difference. Phyllis Chesler has indeed made her personal mark.

Women and Madness, published in October 1972, was “embraced immediately by other feminists and women in general.” It has sold over two million copies, has been cited thousands of times in academic journals and popular media, and has been translated into many European languages. “I immersed myself in the psychoanalytic literature, located biographies and autobiographies of women; devoured mythology and anthropology . . . I began analyzing the “mental illness” statistics and relevant psychological and psychiatric mental health studies. I also began interviewing the experts: women patients.

The book came from this extraordinary experience of feminism in America at that moment, my involvement in it, how it inspired me . . . Because I wrote it and got it published at that particular moment in history, it had this electrifying connection with other women. I don’t think this book would have had the influence it had without a feminist political movement being in the world.”

Chesler, when asked if the situation has changed since the publication of Women and Madness, stated that feminist work has “altered the theories and practices in psychology and psychiatry by about 30%-a wild guess,” and that roughly 15% actually put it into practice.

The majority of education is not taught by “feminists,” but instead using very traditional methods that still pathologize women. She contends that women’s studies programs unfortunately have gravitated toward non-radicals and non-activists. “After nearly thirty years of struggle, most radical feminists still have no institutional power. What we know dies with us. Without institutional power, we can’t pass our knowledge on to the next generations. My greatest sorrow is that I have, so far, been prevented from continuously teaching the next generations in a hands-on way; and that my work, like so much radical feminist work has, over and over again, been ‘disappeared’ in my own lifetime.


Returning to the conversation about this 2009 post:

The psychosocial treatment of black people“….


With the qualification/reservation that I do not endorse violence, i.e., creating mayhem, property destruction, bloodshed, etc., I do endorse the ‘radical’ intensity of the next two paragraphs as the only logical response to radical brutality of this psychococial conditioning mechanism.

I particularly endorse it after what I experienced and on particularly having seen how centralized and privatized control of wealth is typically also funneled into control of the media, a.k.a. “clearinghouses” — as well as parallel and unequal systems of education, from preschool through Ph.D., as in apartheid “Rhodesia,” so in Rhodes-scholars indoctrinated America. In short, I was raised to be a good, smart kid and work in ethical, community-serving professions, and enjoyed doing so. I was one of those “professionals” whose work supports the system, and helps heal some of the wounds it inflicts, without stopping the infliction of those wounds.

But when I myself was ineed of internal resources to stop personal violence, I found out I didn’t have the ability to fight back (being pregnant with a little one) although I think I was pretty damn good at surviving while seeking and NOT finding help, intervention or protection in all the usual places — but as soon as I got into a free, self-supporting and independent space where it was “OK” to express some anger (verbally, that’s all, and not to my kids or at my kids) — this was immediately subjected by my family of origin (who’d witnessed the extent of abuse) to indignant silence and reframing as a character or “innate” issue. By, unsurprisingly, a resident male from an elite college who had somehow entangled himself with my family line, which had more (surviving) women than men, and felt it his position to speak.

While it took “less than yesterday” to see where it was coming from (i.e., antagonism and immediate identification with my ex-batterer — I’m not spelling out all the details here, but there were frequent meetings, etc.) this entire cycle was then repeated and has been (since). It took yet longer to realize this was in essence, the “Hegelian dialectic,” although not long at all to realize I was dealing with what I can only call “amoral” people. If anyone wonders why people like me “get” the concept; we have experienced power dynamics in the extreme in miniature, local circles and venues; it’s not that hard to understand the larger scope, particularly when facing evidence. (Moreover there is no question that the policies are set by nationally and internationally organized nonprofits with backing from private money, i.e., see UBaltimore School of Law “Center for Families and Children in the Courts” and read about who’s all into developing “Unified Family Courts,” etc. Investigate some major nonprofits focusing on family and children issues, and find out who’s backing them (which foundations — MacArthur, Ford, Annie E. Casey, Rockefeller, William T. Grant, the Louisville Foundation (religious, kentucky), etc. — Coors, Anheuser-Busch, Koch Brothers, Scaife Family Foundation (NFI) — they have corporate backing, get it?

I had not realized how misogyny was woven into the fabric of our society, right alongside and as part of racism. Basically I see it as the need to label people as “Us” or “Them” and from that platform, one of the two has to be the dominator. I think this is the offspring of the slavery, and that the history of this country parallels the history of the scramble for AFrica, not to mention has some of the same perps or their descendants still calling the shots.

Anyhow, some more paragraphs; not all contiguous:

Once we Black people have absorbed and understood the fact of the white controlled media, it is our inescapable responsibility to do whatever is necessary to break that control. We must shrink from nothing in combating this evil power that has fastened its deadly grip on our people and is injecting its lethal poison into our people’s minds and souls. If our race fails to destroy it, it certainly will destroy our race.

THERE IS NO GREATER POWER in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America . No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America ‘s mass media of news and entertainment.

. . .
The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people that might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters. It is a view of the world designed by the media masters to suit their own ends—and the pressure to conform to that view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it, vote in accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it. . . .

The totally white controlled media have taken the lead in persuading a whole generation that Black people are the most physically abusive, the most users of drugs, the laziest, the worst parents, the worst children, the lesser intelligent, and have contributed nothing at all to the benefit of society. These assessments of Black people are totally unequivocally fraudulent.

This media psychosocial program revises the past to conveniently make whites appear less inhumane through out America’s brutal racist history; and despite a brutal history to the contrary– fraudulently depicts whites as being the standard of ethics and morale values while portraying Blacks as being all that’s wrong with America. This psycho social campaign also facilitates a national consensual environment of where in which Blacks cries for equality are lesser heard and their mistreatment appears more justified. . . .

And although this media psychosocial program is less blatant than those earlier racist systems used in the past against Blacks, its affects are very real and detrimentally. In fact this method is by far the most proficient system ever deployed against America ’s black population.

[[This post shows over 1400 views — but only one comment and it’s not even related..What a shame!}}


People who do not understand the basics of our economy, trading, securities (what’s a security) investments, banks in general, etc., and are pre-screened by race (and gender, then martial status) out of elite institutions generation after generation, generally are targeted for either direct manipulation, or appropriated to develop the institutes and technology for such manipulation. As then, so now. Judging by how Aaron Swartz (above) was treated, resulting in his suicide, rather than face federal prison (how’d he fare in federal prison — ever see a photo of the guy?) plus 13 felonies, i.e., MIT pushing for prosecution while JSTOR dropped it, “going rogue” [by breaking that public/elite barrier with his downloads] is definitely not appreciated

Don’t believe me? Go back to my posts on FedMine.com versus TAGGS.hhs.gov databases, and try again: WHY is there a fatherhood.gov? and a heavily subsidized “NHMRC.org,” and why would ICF (itself a multimillion-dollar corporation) get a multi-million $$ grant to maintain NHMRC?

ICF maintains the National Healthy Marriage Resource Center (NHMRC), a web-based clearinghouse that serves as the “first-stop shop” for marriage and relationship education information.

NHMRC provides 170 grantee organizations and the general public with access to a wide range of resources designed to build and support healthy marriages. ICF is responsible for updating and maintaining the NHMRC website; collecting, cataloging, and disseminating information through the website; employing an online library system for cataloging and displaying information on the website in an easily searchable manner; and providing information services through a toll-free phone, email, and computer-based inquiry response system that provides centralized tracking of all customer inquiries.

,BR />
ICF also provides conference outreach, program curricula, links to local programs, an online library, interactive facilitator and evaluation toolkits, tip sheets, topical collections, policy briefs, How-To guides, FAQs, and fact sheets. First launched in 2004 to support Healthy Marriage Education grantees funded by the Administration for Children and Families, the NHMRC also provides these grantees with training and technical assistance. The NHMRC is a major catalyst in advancing this nascent field.


The people who have been doing this for centuries and generations were GOOD at it, at organization, and at many other technologies, including the basic divide and conquer issues. The “Black People and the Tavistock Institute” material below (orange and brown-background insets) also mentions a 2005 “U.S. Conferences of Mayors.” (see yellow print).

Such conferences are nonprofit associations for centralized planning of America’s urban territories. Read closely Anne Stevenson’s Huffington Post blog on the 2012 Conference ago: “A Citizens Report From the U.S. Conference of Mayors” 1/29/2012 (see original for more links)

. . .Several mayors raised legitimate concerns that the Department of Justice is going to allow the banks to cut a deal that leaves municipalities holding the bill while the 1% and banks receive immunity and bail outs. If you watch the tapes of conference presentations on C-SPAN, you can feel the tension in the air as the mayors confronted speakers from the new consumer protection board. The general consensus was that “the foreclosure rate in my town has become unmanageable as banks become overly aggressive to collect on mortgage payments from struggling families who are unemployed. What can we do to help them stay afloat?” …

“Training the next generation: Many of the “partners” in the summer jobs program, such as Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, State Street Corporation, Wells Fargo, and Price Waterhouse Cooper are responsible for this nation’s economic crisis, they have not used TARP funds to repair the problems, and therefore, should be immediately removed from the list of sponsors receiving DOE grants to train our youth.” …

“Protect families with government transparency, accountability: Fire Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius for failing to address the public’s complaints of widespread fraud, extortion, and child trafficking within her administration. Just today it was announced that an FBI sting in Florida netted 40 alleged pedophiles, including teachers, coaches, and PGA golf pro Stephen Wesley Thomas. We cannot afford to continue to allow Sebelius to cut blank checks with no strings and send our disadvantaged children into unsafe programs Sebelius’s administration refuses to vet or properly oversee.

{{my personal opinion is that any replacement would do the same thing, but at least people are beginning to point this out! the writer works researching grants, and comments. Note her closing paragraph: }}

“On the whole, I found the convention inspiring. On an average day, I am in my home office using government reports and databases to discover whether grants coming from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services actually reach the children they are intended to benefit in an efficient and effective manner. Quite often I do find fraud, corruption, and grant steering, even child trafficking, but my ultimate goal is to use the ideas from the convention to figure out a way to change the laws to improve these programs to protect the children affected and increase their opportunities in life…

In fact, as “Back Atya” I put up four comments (which show in reverse order) one of which actually references that 2005 US Conference of Mayors, which acknowledged that domestic violence causes homelessness. Here’s one of those comments, and notice its last statement too:

… since 1996, Title-IV block grants to states with well-known foundations (Ford, MacArthur, Annie E. Casey) fund Ph.Ds testing social policy (how to train the poor and uninformed at the expense of everyone). See http://www.mdrc.org/subarea_index_12.html.

KNOWing this, AFCC and friends throw their collective weight into transforming juvenile & family law fields into an outcome based, not rights-based, or facts-of-the-case based process–which obviously “highly conflicts” with what the public still expects and wants in their courtrooms, which THEY pay for.

Other policy test areas include prisons, child support system, incarcerated youth, foster care, head start, etc. We’ve become a nation of designer institutions; of policy makers & their professional hacks vs. the traumatized demonstrated upon (who are not told).

Fatherhood, marriage/abstinence promotion in an HHS funded grants system attract the extreme religious element and dishonest elements. The “MIA” funds & poor oversight are well-known; even the GAO knows that suspended corporate status doesn’t mean no more grants. Groups just skip the state, regroup, rename & reapply. Nonprofit trade associations form just to help members (often themselves existing HHS grantees) confer(tax-writeoff) & get more. And the middle-class working public naturally wonders why aren’t these social services ever fixing the problems? What’s wrong?! with those poor, those divorcing parents, the schools; why the familicides, why are we broke?

The dirty secret is that ongoing poverty & abuse** really are desirable and for too many, great career path.

**I meant (hope it was obvious) “perpetuating ongoing poverty and abuse.”

Well, why trouble our souls about this, or distress our productive and still-stable lives by paying attention to things we, the public, or I, the reader, cannot personally resist or change? (Really)?

Hell, I don’t know specifically but I do know that someone who was aware in the 1990s that my husband was assaulting me could’ve at least made an effort to do or say SOMETHING. But for reasons I still don’t totally understand, reporting the problem, asking for help, and showing up with obvious symptoms of the situation, didn’t result in any real help. Thus there is a cycle of battering and incidents (those describing the situation are telling the truth at least in that regard) and a “wheel” (or web, perhaps) of power and control (yes, the Duluth Model tells the truth on that one also. But, it’s what they’re DOING with that truth I object to, such as pushing the concept that CCR (Collective Community Response) is going to do the job, while Selective Communities (institutions) are excluded from Scrutiny, namely the family law itself as a perpetuator of abuse and control through using behavioral health language to address what are symptoms of criminal behavior — and simply reframe them as the victim’s (or BOTh parents’) personal issues…. That’s a specific field of practice inherited from the “need” to persuade entire nations (both the military force and the supportive civilians) that world wars are necessary. Not to mention, see Shark Island….

I mean, how engrained into the ENTIRE population is the acceptance of wife-beating, with kids looking on? Does this go along with the practice of slave-beating and ingeneral aristocratic treating of many parts of the population like dirt, or animals? Plus the need for too many sectors to keep up the myth that they are somehow now “civilized” and “enlightened” even though many of their men (and plenty of women too) are just as violent as others?

Just because it’s always been done that way, it’s still acceptable? AND — does any of this have to do with the fact that we have been nationally programmed, still, to accept slavery, and live the compartmentalized life because living an activist life is just too damn inconvenient, expensive, uncomfortable — or someone else’s juob? After all, we pay taxes, we pay at the office, we attend and contribute (some) to a charity (or religious organization), we do not ourselves abuse others, and we believe in human rights, political correctness, and are fine upstanding members of our communities (obviously that wasn’t addressed to people whose communities are dealing with large homicide and gang-related issues).

WELL — you either do nothing —meaning, you’re a participant, or you seek to do something effective — meaning you retain more personal integrity. Hey, “what would Jesus do?” (keeping in mind how that one ended). Are you willing to put your life in the line of social economic fire?

I DO know, since I have discovered (painstakingly, but eventually) enough about the economic investing platform to be convinced that it’s being used to oppress people worldwide, and in the USA just as much — if you are feeding “the Giant Squid” you ARE part of the social problems here. See Clint Richardson (a Walter Burien protege, and like him, with a gift also for explaining things)

(from “CAFR1.com” (scroll down some)

How many governments exist in the United States

?

(City; County; School District; Enterprise Authority; State University; Gov Pension; Self Insurannce; Investment Pool; Self-Debt Funding ) As of 2007 TOTAL “Local” Government entities plus Federal are standing at 184,000

2007 [[Actually 2012 now available]] GOVERNMENT CENSUS STATS PAGE FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS CLICK HERE

I understood before running across this first explanatory post below (dated 7/2012) that the For Profit/NOT for Profit system PER SE is creating the caste system. It took a lot of looking at nonprofit corporations (that didn’t maintain their registrations) and too much time to even understand this. This single post (may take more than one reading) also adds in the INVESTMENT platform: and how allowing this (a system designed before most of us were born and in the context of World Wars I and II, along with the degradation of our currency,e tc. — but it’s still here, we still have to deal with this, and changes since:

CAFR School: how Corporations are Funded by Taxpayers

How would you feel if you were heavily responsible for the funding of globalization; for building up Mexico and China’s sweatshops and promoting imports to America – and for the loss of jobs in America – simply because you are not paying attention – or don’t know – or don’t care – about what your “retirement nest-egg” is investing in, as long as you’re taken care of in the end?

What would you do

if you found out that your pension contributions went to fund the corporate stocks and bonds that are used to build the weapons, the chemical biological agents, and the depleted uranium armaments that are killing and retarding millions upon millions of men, women, and children around the globe, including in America?

What if you finally comprehended that the national and international banks, oil and pharmaceutical companies are all funded by your “contributions”, and that all of the taxpayer’s in America are also forced through taxation to contribute to your pension fund investment scheme (with no benefit to the taxpayers themselves), knowing that the U.S. occupations of the Arab nations like Afghanistan and Iraq are for the government’s and the corporation’s control of oil and opium, and that these beautiful countries and their infrastructures are decimated just so that corporations like Halliburton can rebuild those infrastructures via no-bid government contracts while being forced into debt by the very government you fund?

How would it feel to know that the entirety of the government-contracted corporations that make up the “Military-Industrial Complex” are all funded by our collective pension fund contributions?

What would you do?

Is your nest-egg; your pension retirement benefits… are they really more valuable than the millions and millions of lives lost around the world at the hands of the corporations that your collective monetary contributions support via these government investment pension pools?***

***I should point out also (C.A. Fitts material “The Myth of the Rule of Law,” Narco-Dollars, etc. — and not her material only) that allowing any operation to get that large also makes it too big to confront when it goes about the criminal activity, i.e., drug- and gun-running. For more of that, see the history of Standard Oil (Rockefeller) and Railroads/Steel etc. (Vertical monopolies), i.e., Carnegie & Rockefeller. Not to mention Rhodes/Oppenheimer etc. (i.e., the diamond cartel)… This mentally of leadership is always calculating how to get and do more (imperialist, growth-oriented). The concept is that some are above the law, and the “law” is basically to keep “the natives” in check — and the media is to perpetuate the myth that this is basically a lawful government, a reasonable stable and lawful society, and that the government are the good guys.

When in fact — and the facts Do point here — they simply are not. They are Corporations with Guns, making sure that we do not have guns, or legitimate access to the truth of given dramatic (staged?) scenarios used to justify more and more abusive control. See, again, Aaron Swartz (a situation I’m going to look further into, as he was involved in an Edward J. Safra institute for ethics at Harvard, and Safra family helped get Bill Browder (see “Magnistky” posts herein, or look it up) started in business.

{{I added the bold/color changes above for “What would you do?}}.

If you’re religious, do you remember a similar phrase from long ago, in some sacred scriptures? Acts 2:37 and context (“Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart and said one to another, Men and Brethren, what shall we do?”) and Acts 9 (Saul) (“Lord, who are you, and what do you want me to do?”))

My comparison is not that inappropriate. In both cases, people were confronted with the fact that their leaders, with their consent, had been engaged in murdering the innocent (Acts 2, of one; Acts 9, of many). In other chapter, Acts 7, another group of individuals was likewise interrogating (another innocent) and confronted with similar accusations of murder, of their own prophets, at which the unanimous, hippocampal, gut instinct was to stone the messenger, producing what’s recorded as the first recorded martyr of the followers of Jesus.

They were cut to the heart also, but responded differently. Bloodguiltiness is a hard burden to bear, but without acknowledging it and repentance to a change of behavior, it still remains, in my opinion, at least. No one can bear the entire burdens of the world, here — nor am I asking people to. However, anyone can personally decided to change SOMETHING in response to being informed, you are a participant. I had to face this, including that I benefitted during some of the years recorded below, from NOT having been part of this target population. However, as an attendee in US Public Education system, I was definitely targeted along with others into a heavily censored and values-indoctrinated system when (as any growing child) I surely could’ve been doing a lot better things with the daytime than sitting in a classroom and being socialized into tolerating gang-like behavior from my peers and favoritism among teachers…So could you, if you were in the same system — and regardless of in what sector. The public school systems are a caste-sorting operation and CANNOT or will not teach their own history honestly… And now, kids are getting trained into lockdownprocedures, and murdered (not just raped) in school classrooms. Yet parents are still sending their kids back hoping that everyone should support a collective wish to allow their biological (or adopted, step-parented, fostered) offspring to be entered into a virtual Russian Roulette system at public expense. AND that includes the pension funds, too!



BLACK PEOPLE AND THE TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE” a post by “the nubian warrior” at “Assata Shakur,” as in:

(as in “Hands Off Assata Shakur,”)
I had no idea about this case, or who Assata Shakur is or was. However, the summary of the Tavistock situation, and right nearby that blogpost, of

[[below this is a statement from the NCBL — National Coalition of Black Lawyers — about the million $$ bounty on this woman.]]

On May 2 1973, Black Panther activist Assata Olugbala Shakur (fsn) Joanne Deborah Chesimard, was pulled over by the New Jersey State Police, shot twice and then charged with murder of a police officer. Assata spent six and a half years in prison under brutal circumstances before escaping out of the maximum security wing of the Clinton Correctional Facility for Women in New Jersey in 1979 and moving to Cuba. 

Assata: In her own words

My name is Assata (“she who struggles”) Olugbala ( “for the people” ) Shakur (“the thankful one”), and I am a 20th century escaped slave. Because of  government persecution, I was left with no other choice than to flee from the political repression, racism and violence that dominate the US government’s policy towards people of color. I am an ex political prisoner, and I have been living in exile in Cuba since 1984. I have been a political activist most of my life, and although the U.S. government has done everything in its power to criminalize me, I am not a criminal, nor have I ever been one. In the 1960s, I participated in various struggles: the black liberation movement, the student rights movement, and the movement to end the war in Vietnam. I  joined the Black Panther Party. By 1969 the Black Panther Party had become the number one organization targeted by the FBI’s COINTELPRO program. because the Black Panther Party demanded the total liberation of black people, J. Edgar  Hoover called it “greatest threat to the internal security of the country” and  vowed to destroy it and its leaders and activists. 



National Conference of Black Lawyers
Demands: Hands off Assata Shakur

The announcement that a $1 million bounty has been placed on the head of exiled freedom fighter Assata Shakur sends a clear, unmistakable message that the U.S. government will stop at nothing to perpetuate the systemic denial of the most basic human rights of African people born and/or residing in the Americas. The National Conference of Black Lawyers (NCBL) demands that the U.S. government immediately withdraw the bounty offer, and permanently cease its pursuit of Assata Shakur as such is both illegal and unjustifiable under international human rights laws.

NCBL takes the ongoing attacks on Assata Shakur personally. NCBL lawyers served on Shakur’s legal team during her trial on charges that she killed a New Jersey State Trooper. When NCBL pioneer Lennox Hinds dared to tell the truth about the racist nature of the trial proceedings, bar officials brought disciplinary charges against him. The travesty of the prosecution and ongoing persecution of Shakur is demonstrated best by Shakur’s own account of the events in question. In 1998, she stated:

“…On May 2, 1973 I, along with Zayd Malik Shakur and Sundiata Acoli were stopped on the New Jersey Turnpike, supposedly for a ‘faulty tail light.’ Sundiata Acoli got out of the car to determine why we were stopped. Zayd and I remained in the car. State trooper Harper then came to the car, opened the door and began to question us. Because we were black, and riding in a car with Vermont license plates, he claimed he became ‘suspicious.’ He then drew his gun, pointed it at us, and told us to put our hands up in the air, in front of us, where he could see them. I complied and in a split second, there was a sound that came from outside the car, there was a sudden movement, and I was shot once with my arms held up in the air, and then once again from the back. Zayd Malik Shakur was later killed, trooper Werner Foerster was killed, and even though trooper Harper admitted that he shot and killed Zayd Malik Shakur, under the New Jersey felony murder law, I was charged with killing both Zayd Malik Shakur, who was my closest friend and comrade, and charged in the death of trooper Forester. Never in my life have I felt such grief…”

Notwithstanding the fact that defense lawyers presented objective medical and other evidence that substantiated Shakur’s account of the events in question, she was nevertheless convicted by an all-white jury. Her sentence was life imprisonment plus 33 years. She escaped from prison, and has lived in exile in Cuba since 1979. The attempts by New Jersey and Federal officials to capture her have been relentless since that time.

Open Letter to the Mayor of Trenton, NJ (undated; see term/s of Doug Palmer)

An Open Letter To The Mayor Of Trenton, NJ

Doug Palmer

Dear Mayor Palmer:

Let me introduce myself by saying that Assata Shakur is my sister, friend, and comrade in the struggle for human rights of all oppressed people. When three “Freedom Fighters” boldly took action in 1979 and entered the Clinton Correctional Facility and liberated Sister Assata from the chains and shackles of her jailers, I rejoiced. I was proud to be apart of a generation of young African Americans that were courageous and committed enough to go up against America and didn’t give a damn about odds.

Others, and I, along with my late sister/comrade Ann Evans placed a half–page ad in the New York weekly, “The Amsterdam News”, affirming our love and support for Sister Assata and the compatriots who risked their lives. We didn’t back down then, and we don’t back down now.

The Advertisement in the Amsterdam News read: “Run, Assata, Run, Stay Strong and Stay Free”, reflecting the slave song for those who had escaped.

Throughout the Black communities on the East Coast — Harlem, Bedford-Stuyvesant, and New Jersey the ad from the Amsterdam newspaper was cut out and taped to the windows in the homes of a generation of youth who were politically astute. The message was clear, and concise, plastered on lamp poles and any other available space stating, “ASSATA IS WELCOLME HERE.”

Now that you know who I am, and I certainly have a clue as to who you are. We can in the words of Brother/Minister Malcolm X, “talk shop.”

At the annual U.S. Conference of Mayors in Chicago, Illinois, June 10th, 2005 you stepped in on the international affairs committee discussion on the” normalization of relations with Cuba”, placing Assata Shakur on the agenda; opposing relations with “communist Cuba”, until Assata Shakur (Joanne Chesimard) is returned to the United States of America.

You have taken it upon yourself to provide leadership by becoming the premier “Black Elected Bounty Hunter”; assisting the Justice Department in breaking its’ own laws. Arrogantly and purposely ignoring the fact that Assata was granted political asylum by President Fidel Castro 28 years ago. Are you even aware that on any given calendar day the United States of America grants political asylum to those who defect from Cuba and other communist countries without interference?

The illegal war that is being carried out by America in Iraq has led to the captivity and imprisonment of hundreds of Iraqi citizens, swept up (stolen) from their home land; held in captivity in Guantanamo in the exact same manner and fashion that over seas Africans were stolen from the Mother land, held captive on plantations, first, in the southern states of democratic America. Your willingness to “hunt” Assata down in light of this country’s history of “kidnapping” is reminiscent of those “house niggas” during slavery that loved their masters more than they loved themselves, or freedom.

Assata Shakur is no different than Sister Harriet Tubman. She did not ask to come here. In fact, if memory serves me right, it was the USA government that said to the young dissenting youth of the 60’s who raised their voices in protest- “Love it (America) or leave it”. With a few good friends Assata left it. What else is a slave to do?

I am not here to argue Assata’s case. I am here to say that the many critical domestic problems facing the mayors of the USA, and especially Black mayors of urban cities, one would think the focus would be placed upon solving “some” of the more basic problems of the people you and others were elected to serve.

Assata Shakur is not your constituent’s problem. If Assata were returned from Cuba tomorrow (under your advocacy) it would not change the racist policies that rule the construction unions (among others) in Trenton, New Jersey, that keep people of color out. Nor would the “return” of Assata have an impact on your city and state high unemployment rate among Black adult males and poor youth of every color; or provide health care for the hundred of thousands of uninsured Jersey residentss. Nor would her “illegal slave captivity” solve Trenton’s youth gang problem in your city. You tell me what purpose would the “illegal kidnapping of Assata Shakur” benefit the people of your city. I do however suspect that it would benefit your political career.

A million dollar bounty split three ways between you, the USA government and a hired mercenary reminds me of the auction block:

“Bid ‘em in, bid ‘em in…

I don’t have to wonder about how much they paid the slave to sell the slave, I think I know.

Hands Off Assata,
Mae Jackson


Obviously, if you are paying attention, after I began looking at welfare reform and reading the unbelievably arrogant social science rhetoric about the problems with single mothers, welfare Moms (emphasis on of which color), and the systematic use of highly-placed black, pardon me, “spokesmodels” (no offense to their advanced degrees, sometimes Ph.D.’s which I know took diligence to acquire) — I’m referring to groups like those running “Women in Fatherhood Inc.” (a nonprofit), and many others in prominent places within HHS grants-getting or Ford, Rockefeller, etc. support institutions.

This is no reflection on individuals’ ability, only what their individual ability has been used to do — which is oppress particularly people of color, and moreover, mothers, particularly stigmatizing single mothers …

After I saw “The Rhodes Connection” this led inescapably back to the imperialist and racist Cecil John Rhodes in AFrica, and history of the Scramble for this continent. More specifically, for this continent’s wealth.

It led to the study of the Rhodes Scholarships, which sought talent from various countries and brought them to Oxford University for indoctrination. It forced me to look at the history of Namibia, of Shark Island which I first (year 2012) heard of from an art gallery: Gallery Ezakwantu on the Herero and Namaqua Genocides. Other than that, I would never have heard of this god-awful island which was used literally, as a demonstration model (and trained some of the people later involved) in: The slave-labor concentration camps (work them to death, then murder), and even after people were murdered, their body parts (like skulls) were utilized later, exported for studies and the further development of Eugenics as a practice. The sociopaths doing this were of British, German, and (the Netherlands/Dutch?) origins.

This also led directly to the training of people and utter fascination with the fields we are now afflicted and drenched with — carrying the same aristocratic, ego-inflated, and Subject/Object relationship, in which a target population is the “object’ of supposedly detached serious study, en masse of course. I’m talking about so-called “Forensic Psychology,” Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychoanalysis, and the variety of Pharmaceuticals (a.k.a. DRUGS) industries related to this, including doping up, dumbing down, and addicting large sectors of any population to things that destroy them, including the idea that more degrees = more “expert” when the root word of “expert” is the same as “experience.”

(Reader alert — long, expressive sentence ahead: subject and verb towards the end….)
In recent posts here, and while myself still trying to deal with grief, separation loss of my kids, ongoing issues with the same characters (personalities) that did this and their psychotic need to DOMINATE, AS IF somehow superior to me (i.e., having functioned as agents of terrorism, and inflicting emotional distress, almost scientifically where calculated to get the most damage, and insisting that in ALL communications, the primary theme is dominance (not reason, not truth, not logic, and nothing mutual whatsoever), I have also been talking about the DIRECT connection between the development of this forensic psychology (as financially mainstreamed through, for example, President Bush’e 2003 “New Freedom (sic) Commission on Mental Health,” but previously by creative and ingenious entrepreneurs such as Dr. Nicholas Cummings and his American Biodyne (practiced on the entire welfare and federal employee population of Hawaii, then finally turned public and sold off) — and a certain foundation which specializes in Hypnosis! (the Milton H. Erickson Foundation).

This also has been utilized by some seriously dangerous cults (Scientology) and others. Although these tend to identify as “New Age,” another cult (the Unification Church, i.e., Sun Myung Moon etc.) have also been associated with the allegedly Judaeo-Christian element, i.e. the concept of monotheism), and BOTH are funded centrally through the United States government’s various branches at the Executive Department level. At all points they are going to emphasize “therapy” and “treatment” over due process, justice, and a hands-off policy where crimes are not being committed.

While these groups love to study the genealogy of target populations (i.e., they’re racist), and individually obtain psychological profiles of parents, with a view to PREDICTING potential behavior (a lousy skill-set, obviously, as people are both murdering and being murdered around divorce and custody issues, including kids). Apparently once dead they are no longer part of the database, which then cleans up the “success” rate being put forth??

Personally:
When I insisted or sought boundaries, and separation, I rapidly found my immediate relationships with immediate family members (that’s spelled daughters and mother) sabotaged til destroyed, as well as profession, and eventually remains of associations with that destroyed profession. In ALL aspects this handling, which I experienced as an educated, law-abiding, ethical, and community-involved woman (and mother), can be identified nationwide in others of similar background and education, as well as of other socioeconomic groups.

I have absolutely had to look at how many sectors of a community, and of all my associations over a ten-year period were somehow “unable” to either speak up, bold enough to step in and confront, or smart enough to figure, if doing so would endanger them, to locate some law enforcement, criminal report, or agency that would stop a man from battering his own wife in front of growing children by inflicting some form of deterrent, such as incarceration with separation. Moreover, no one also figured out that in some marriages, the wives and children are being deprived of necessities as a part of domination, whether or not they are working. As economic identities, they literally disappear (happened to me). I asked for help regarding this while still married and cohabiting — I made calls “Is there any way to force my husband to provide food and clothes for us when he has the ability to do so?” and came up empty. We have to look at how this can happen, but the fact is, looking at how this happens is both uncomfortable, embarrassing, and would require a shift of worldview away from fantasy (about MANY interrelated issues) to reality –a nd most people would rather not make that shift. So instead, they just excommunicate, read between the lines, and blame the victims — or patronize them, as if it was somehow a traumatized and terrorized individual, with samll children, to figure out who to completely shift the power balance, without real help and instead dominate the dominator through force they don’t have access to — and if they did, and wielded it, history shows, being female, they’d be probably arrested and lose their kids to the man anyhow.

At some point in time one has to acknowledge our society has serious, and fatal flaws, in its organization and operations, particularly the concept that it’s possible to hand over power to people who want centralized control, and keep them somehow “beneficent” or benign. Yeah, sure!
_________

I still recommend looking at the Burien // Fitts // (etc.) analysis. In the bottom line it’s about money (greed arrogance, extortion), so extreme as to constitute, when you get right down to it (this part is my opinion), a religion. The kind justifying human sacrifice are routine, and the art of experimentation on humans as normative.

If there is something seriously genetically wrong with certain sectors of society, I would pinpoint them as to be coming from this area of the world, at least in the last few centuries: If this doesn’t pull up several (or one decent) map of Europe and the UK, go find one.. I am of descent from one of these “tribes,” and have been absolutely flummoxed both personally and historically how these things could be, except perhaps centuries of inbred monarchies, the incredible bloodshed surrounding the Inquisition, burings at the stake for (literacy, essentially, regarding the Bible) and eventually the determination that to colonize the planet and breed humans like dogs or horses (and use them in the same manner was a good idea. If you haven’t yet finished the “Unauthorized Biography of George Bush” (by Tarpley) yet, now would probably be a good time.

While of course chapter 3 is important, why not start with Chapter 1. Self-explanatory, if you read carefully, an Administration/CIA/FBI “who’s who” of the 1900s…

Written by Let's Get Honest

January 16, 2013 at 9:00 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

martinplaut

Journalist specialising in the Horn of Africa and Southern Africa

Let's Get Honest! Blog: Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History

'A Different Kind of Attention Develops Sound Judgment' | 'Suppose I'm Right Here?...' (posted 3/23 & 3/5/2014). Over 680 posts, Public-Interest Investigative Blogging On These Matters Since 2009.

Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

The American Spring Network

News. by the people, for the people. The #1 source for independent investigative journalism in the Show-Me State, serving Missouri since 2011.

Family Court Injustice

It Takes "Just Us" to Fight Family Court Injustice

The Espresso Stalinist

Wake Up to the Smell of Class Struggle ☭

Spiritual Side of Domestic Violence

Finally! The Truth About Domestic Violence and The Church

%d bloggers like this: