Last April I wrote a post

Why Watching Conference Agenda is Crucial: Cummings Foundation, Behavioral Health Promotion, and “Our” “Broken” Family Court System.

and did some research on this topic, after hearing about a March 2012 conference in Arizona — a very interesting state from the family law perspective for several reasons (among them a major AFCC chapter, the origination of the Fathers and Families Coalition of America began there, a certain Republican legislator (Mark Anderson) was also a Unification Church (i.e. the late Rev. Sun Myung Moon) member, and a certain marriage-promotion organization with ties to the Godzich family, called “National Association of Marriage Enhancement,” the Godziches also have some connections to G.W. Bush, and a number of issues relative to this blog, and interesting in their own right.

I’m glad I did, because here comes some more of the same. File under, “I told you so!”:

Cummings Foundation Launches Congressional Initiative to Fix Broken Family Courts

Notice this link is from the NCSDV.org website…..This is an organization formed in 1998 with this statement:

Unlike many organizations, this one appears to have been started by a survivor, a mother who was temporarily on welfare, and got her undergraduates degree in 1987 by working FT days and going to school nights (who, then, raised her son?) and then went on to star summa cum laude at Harvard University School of law. Unfortunately, from a perspective of mothers going through the system (including systems of training created by founders and creative visionaries in the field of domestic violence itself), the expertise and insistence that a “Coordinated Community Response” is the best response — and including some of the problem agencies among the Coordinated Community” — has made it impossible to confront, or even be heard,about the problems and conflicts of interest this actually causes us. Or even that it’s resulting in unnecessary and avoidable deaths because of the same issues!

While Coordinated Communities Consolidate Philosophies and Increase Credibility — the fact is, they also “Incorporate Conflicts of Interest while Centralizing Control” — and hence strengthen their initiatives, while silencing alternative, unfunded, and non-collaborationist lone-wolve, who just might be howling out the truth in the middle of the night.

After a quick look at the “who’s who” in this board of directors, I can already see fatherhood funding from HHS (at a conflict of interest, supposedly, with situations in which women literally need to leave, and stay separated from stalkers, batterers, abusers, and molesters, once this activity has been identified), AND involvement of the BWJP (Battered Women’s Justice Project) who has been co-conferencing and collaborating with behavior-health-monger, “Association of Family and Conciliation Courts.”

However, as NCSDV is not the focus of the post, I’ll let it go for now. Except it is interesting that one of the board members has been active in Arizona also, it seems. Except to note that as they are into “collaboration,” they opted to advertise the Our Broken Family Courts Initiative, lending it credibility it does not, in my opinion, deserve.

In the bottom line, a corporation is a corporation is a corporation. And they take funding, often, from state and federal governments — which are themselves (and I can prove this) corporations. Our Government is a form of Corporation, and sooner or later this will (I hope) sink in, as well as the fact that what corporations do is seek profits.

That is THE simplest explanation of “OUR FAMILY COURTS” (they, too, seek profits) and why as such — they are successfully not only bringing profits in (untraceable ones, too), they have basically supported a PLETHORA of PROFESSIONS. So it’s in the best interest of people IN those professions, or seeking to make a place for themselves in the similar professions and networks to call those courts “OUR” family courts. When the word “OUR” is used, who is being referred to?

Similarly, the trillion dollar debt of the United States of America, when lecturing Americans about tightening their belts, expecting services, and be thankful we didn’t go over the fiscal cliff yet (but pay more taxes so we don’t), this debt is called “OUR” debt as well. I have definitely posted on this within the lsat few months, showing that neither the USGAO nor the OMB combined could issue an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of THE United States of America — but they were definitely sure about the public debt. (check archives….I put links, tables, and quotes…)

We, the citizens, are security and to be held liable for it, while others make off (and expatriate, apparently, some of them) with the assets. work through this website for a better understanding (it’s not an overnight quick-fix, but eventually, I believe this will sink in…) (Feb. 2012 post, The US is in Debt to Itself, plus commentary)

PROOF THAT Corporations are Funded by Taxpayers (a Layperson’s explanation how; I got it, I’m sure others could…)

PROOF that the United States (not to mention plenty of other units of government across the land (and in Alaska and Hawaii), over 200,000 of them, are basically corporations — this takes some reading, but is NOT that hard to comprehend if you do:

(You really should take a scroll through this individual blogger’s summary of “The Carlyle Group (private equity), CALPERS holdings in it, its holding in subsidiaries around the globe, and the Bush Connection (i.e., Bush Senior was on its board while Bush Junior was President). He then poses this possibility — given that the government itself is investing worldwide in corporations — with the taxpayers having previously simply handed over the means to do this to our own government (decade after decade):

These direct stock investments, as I’ve covered in depth before, represent a massive controlling stake in the corporate world, both national and international. And equally as relevant to the corporate takeover of the world, we can see that these “alternative” investments and corporate bonds literally give taxpayer money to the private industries that the government is a major or controlling stock owner of.

In other words, the taxpayers are unwittingly contributing to everything they complain about in the corporate world – to everything that is slowly killing their health and their spirit. Food, chemical, pharmaceutical, medical, banking, insurance, real estate, foreign currency, private equity funds, and everything else under the sun.

–=–

What Could Happen?

–=–

To put this into perspective, a horrific thought just occurred to me…

As of this moment, in July of 2012, these pension systems are owned and operated by local, state, federal government municipal corporations, and administered by their corporate boards for what they claim to be “on behalf of the employees” that contribute to them under federal and state pension laws. And like any private pension system out there, these corporations are at risk of bankruptcy, government raids, credit risks, or other purposeful mismanagement’s that might befall the public, government owned and controlled pension system.

So what would happen to all of these direct ownership stock investments in a worse case scenario – if the government decided to raid and kill the pension system all together?

What would happen to those stocks, and what would become of the debt that these private corporations owe the government (the people) if all of a sudden the whole thing came crashing down?

The answer to these questions, in this authors perspective, would be the final nail in the 4-decade long efforts to completely privatize our government. It would mean that those stock certificates that are held by each of these pension funds would either be transferred into private hands, or they would be sold off for pennies on the dollar in a false-flag depression scenario to the worst of either these private corporations or to some other individual or country. In short, it would mean the largest transfer of wealth out of the public’s hands in recorded history, including real estate, foreign currencies, stocks and bonds, precious metals, and the many other assets within.

But that’s not all folks… for all of those corporate bonds would also change hands, being transferred or sold off – possibly to the very private banking institutions that were the beneficiaries of those corporate bond and securities-type loans in the first place. In other words, the debts would never come back to the pensioners/taxpayers that loaned it in the first place (the public), but instead would be paid back by the corporations to the corporations themselves, ultimately equating to a grand theft of massive proportions via the loss to the taxpayers as the corporations pay themselves back for the debt against themselves as owners of their own debt… a paradox, and yet quite reasonable to these organized criminals.

This would be no different than the Public Private Partnerships (PPP) happening all over the country now, where parking garages, toll-roads, bridges, and other public infrastructure has been sold or “privatized” into the hands of banks and other private corporations – who now operate and collect the tolls and taxes for the infrastructure that was built by our forefathers and our children.

One could go crazy thinking about this…

For it would not take much at all to accomplish this feat. For federal pensions, as part of the Executive branch, a simple executive order might be signed by the president directing the liquidation of the pension system to pay for the “national debt”. On the State and local levels, simple bankruptcy proceedings would do the job, and the people and pensioners would be left out in the cold. After all, the taxpayer portion of the pension system is government property.

This extremely viable possibility could easily be implemented as the solution to the reaction to the problem of the lie that is continuously perpetrated on the American public – that the pension system is on a whole entirely underfunded. In two years of looking, I’ve yet to see a pension fund that meets this criteria, per the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. This lie stems from the actuarial projections (educated and purposefully misleading guess) on the future potential of pension funds. It has nothing to do with reality, and this is easily verified in the CAFR.

Sobering thoughts. However, again, this is one individual who has, somehow, made the time and had the will to look at the CAFR angle, and consider (or learn) the vocabulary of money, debt, securities, investment, investment return, and acknowledged who holds the most of it — at this point in time, it would still appear to be the United States of America.

On the other hand, the United States of America is itself a Corporation headquartered in Washington, D.C. TO understand that, one has to look at the history of incorporation for this district. A good set of links is on the same blog (realitybloger.wordpress.com), but just now I can’t put my finger on which post.)

Actually, processing some of the basic information at this site, and at CAFR1.com site (i.e., Burien stuff) will cut through a lot of the sludge about whose courts these are, how broken are they, and should we pay more experts to conference about fixing them, and take precious life energies (OURS) to even consider the topic? My simple answer is:

No.

But being (who I am), I tend to over-explain for those simply unable to believe something if it’s not collaboratively networked, holistically described, and certified by a DV or other counselor and professional. In other words, if I don’t join the cult of the experts, my information is suspect. This is great reasoning, if you don’t want to start analyzing information yourself, and are happy with the results exports have, so far, delivered to the public. (Are you?)….For example, I am making a stew, and I dumped in too much salt. Should I toss the stew, or add more substance, or water, to compensate for the fact that someone was stupid and dumped in too much salt? Gee, I don’t know — let me consult my networks….

I also learned while doing this post that Phoenix is moreover home to the Milton H. Erickson Foundation, Inc., with its emphasis on Hypnosis and Psychotherapy. A 2002 Newsletter from this foundation, highlights attendees of a “2001 Congress on Eriksonian Hypnosis and Psychotherapy states that for the past 20 years the foundation had petitioned the City of Phoenix to put up a commemorative bench, which brings us to the point both psychotherapy and psychology tend to have cult leaders and followers, in short, many characteristics of Religions.

I thought this could be a shorter post, as I’d already written the preliminary material last April, simply warning people (as ever) about certain so-called family court reform advocacy groups who have unique, to say the least, collaborations among the field of psychologists and psychiatrists, who are directly profiting from the increase and expansion of family court chaos to start with. There are definite appearances of some slave/master (controller/handler) relationships among certain groups, and I consider it VERY serious issue, given that the target clientele are already women, typically, who have undergone some serious terror and/or trauma in their lives already, and have been subjected to intimidation techniques through the courts.

However as I had to mention, and posted for reference, the truths that a lot of this field developed as part of psychological warfare (i.e., mind control) surrounding engaging the United States in two World Wars, (etc.), I am questioning whether these traumatized and re-traumatized women (mothers) in particular — are themselves being controlled, in the worst sense, through those who have the tools, the desire, the incentive, and the ability to do so, and have master the art of double-speak, sound-byte, and illogic in the process.

So Consider this post something like where “Our Broken Family Courts” meets “Battered Mothers Custody Conference” meets “The Integration of Behavioral Healthcare into Primary Care” meets “Professional Issues for Pharmacotherapy” for psychologists (A 2004 APA publication) meets “High-Paying Jobs that Give the Most Time Off” (NB This Sep. 2011 Atlantic.com article doesn’t include income from business, royalties from curricula sold, or certifications for franchise distribution rights on those curricula, also marketable through the courts, etc., also known source of income for some of those in the highest-paying jobs, but is only talking about actual jobs with paychecks) in the US” (article, based on Bureau of Labor Statistics starts the list with Judges/Magistrates (most of who were attorneys first), and close after, Psychologists, and School Principals, School Psychologists and Counselors, Law School Professors, etc. — in other words, get started as a public servant, and take it from there.. including moonlighting)” . . . meets “The Anglo-American Alliance and Eugenics, not to mention the art of Psychological Warfare,” revisited. Especially if you read chapters 3 and 21 of that last reference.

I forgot to add, “meets Tavistock Institute of Human Relations .. .. meets “TANF” and welfare reform, 1996ff…”
(search results here, several of the posts are mine, for example, see “From Tavistock to TMAP;”)

These issues of war, education, propaganda, myth, and money meet the courts here, through the development, professionalization — and FUNDING — of the fields of psychology, psychiatry, psychopharmacology (and desire of psychologists to have an unending source of income, preferably from the federal funding of healthcare), and the ability to use the word “Forensic” in association with “Psychologist.”

Fasten your seat belts, it is not an easy ride — but it is a major, and legitimate part of the history of this country. moreover, if we want to change the course it’s one, I recommend rejecting stupid catch-phrases such as “Our Broken Courts” and boycotting those who sell these phrases, as those who are capable of doing so, knowing what they do, lack the moral integrity to be trusted with our kids, our stories, our time — or our money.

Moreover, I believe at some level, they already know this, which is why they are going after FEDERAL FINANCING, bypassing our legitimate input as equals at every stage of the game. Our stories are welcome (these are good for television, video, and other publicity measures) — but our cognizant, sentient, and smart, experienced analysis of the SAME SITUATIONS coming to different conclusions –are simply not welcome.

What are groups trying to help Battered Mothers who lost custody of their kids to Abusers, conferencing with Trauma Survivors (that trauma, among others) and people whose normal field of practice includes hypnosis? Take for example, the commonplace acceptance of hypnosis as part of therapy, and its a little too close for comfort association with things like Pavlov (Lenin), and sects, like Scientology, all of who were quite interested in the material?

Does anyone here know who Alliant University is, or its background? People should look into the history of some of the schools now sprinkling the landscape in these professions, and how they got started. Some of that was covered in my April 2012 post.

Hypnosis can be authoritarian, or induced unwittingly by the therapist, and as such, it is part of coercive control. The subject is then susceptible to suggestions given by the therapist. Ostensibly these should be ethical — to help people overcome shell-shock (original)y), addictions, such as smoking, etc. However as a powerful tool, when the will and consent are over-ridden, then we are in the realm of coercion adn OUT of the realm of free will. Talk about a powerful tool!

Some of the key individuals (mentioned in this posat) are active in the “Fix Our Broken Courts” initiative — and within the Ericksonian Hypnosis movement. I also noticed another AFCC type person (Constance Ahrons) advertising in a newsletter.

In my opinion, now, the year 2013, would NOT be the season to go into an unintentional trancelike state at the repeated and illogical mantra perpetuated by certain people that our courts are actually “broken” and that it takes more — but better aligned — psychotherapy, psychology, and public relations firms (or nonprofits run by public relations professionals), in other words more Experts to handle that matter.

The primary cognitive dissonance is between people utilizing these courts (and their clinging to the myth of who those courts are, what they are there for, and that this somehow resembles justice, and facts/evidence — versus perpetually disbursing therapy, the more the better…. Although this information has been public since approximately 1963, or at least since a certain organization’s website admitted that as of the 1970s (at latest) its clear purpose was to change the “old” language of criminal law into the “new” (supposedly improved) language of behavioral health — after all, we’re all in our (very, very, very profitable businesses that no one can, really track all the funding sources of) — to HELP people, right?

People brought into this situation expecting justice and instead receiving diagnosis and being assigned personnel to attempt to get inside their head, and train them to co-parent better (for example) are bound ot have a variety of reactions which will not help their further diagnoses by the same personnel one iota. They exist to dispense therapy and are saying so openly — though not to the general public who might be going through the courts. Part of this therapy includes discouraging independent thinking, creative thinking, and dissidence which (generally speaking) is going to result in conflict. THe NEW values are that CONFLICT is bad, and COOPERATION // CONCILLIATION is good. If you don’t agree with this (agree to reconcile your irreconcilable differences with, say, abuse or idiocy, or perjury, etc.) — then AUTOMATICALLY the Court has jurisdiction of your children. Until they are 18, maybe even later…

That setup (which I’ve explained on a variety of pages herein) has nothing to do with “Broken.” That’s simply the setup and intention of the courts, and always has been. It’s only “broken” if you believe that they are something they are not. Again, let us review what the courts are “there” for from what I might call an “old codger” site….

This post is very informative, has background information on individuals, nonprofit associations mentioned in the conference, the formation of schools of professional psychology (which Cummings had a significant influence in developing overall). It should also be kept in mind that our country participated in World War I and World War II (not to mention others), which provided plenty of subject matter, as well as a political need to test recruits coming in, help vets coming out, and in general an ability to persuade the public that we should support these wars. It was around this time that both psychology and the professionalization of the fields of education (i.e., the realm of educational psychology) developed. I learned in looking at this (overall) that Cummings, who at one point was head of mental health for Kaiser, had also brought over Michael Balint and his wife (sorry, DNR), from England — and from Tavistock. (search results here, several of the posts are mine, for example, see “From Tavistock to TMAP;” That blog appears to be an automatic search-generated one on child abuse reform; its posts are just links).

Overall, this information is part of the history of the United States and relevant to its educational systems and court systems, health care systems (can you spell Medicaid?). While disturbing, the benefit is that more things will make sense. However, things do not make sense if one refuses to think about them, hear them, and process for possible, logical, or illogical (rational or irrational). And these matters come smack up against the issue of good vs. evil, moral vs. immoral (and what those standards are), and whether people we have sought help from are in fact are (or, are not — you decide!) using that need for personal, profit, or even possibly worse, purposes — few of which have to do with the labeling. If one only looks at the labels then you are part of the problem in this country — as more than likely your money and your silence, and your need to retain a certain social status (or stability) is continuing to enable this.

So, I wrote this up last April, 2012, under this title:. Time to revisit this information.

Why Watching Conference Agenda is Crucial: Cummings Foundation, Behavioral Health Promotion, and “Our” “Broken” Family Court System.

(Please scan for general contents. — it’s not that hard reading, and gives detailed and overview information that sheds light on “where we’re at” today, when people victimized by the family court systems, in part because these systems have psychologized real danger, criminal activity and other life-altering situations, labeling them as a problem existing in the mind of the people (including children) reporting, and promoted a national rhetoric deflecting the focus off the crimes (or fact-finding to determine whether they occurred) and instead focusing on counseling how victims must get along with the perps, or others who have directly harmed their family members. I.e., assembling conferences of people who are trauma survivors — and then recommending that some of the leaders in promoting the professional field of psychology itself should be the new leaders of a reform movement, simply does not make sense. At least in my opinion.]

In this particular case, there is a direct connection between the people (organizations) sponsoring said conference and the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. This link talks about occult religions, Illuminati (and all that) but what I want us to see is the similar attitude — the leaders are going to create a better world (i.e., Utopia) — or so they say — when in actuality, it’s about centralized control, and enslavement. The degree of experimentation which has been done on how to create “dissociated” personalities through ongoing, and early childhood, trauma is relevant, and should not be ignored. That process creates a slave/master relationship, meaning slaves can be programmed to obey, possibly may be susceptible to hypnosis (triggers), and other mean, nasty things not in the public’s best interest. If speech about “Illumimati” is not an automatic turnoff (I hope it’s not, here), continue reading, and let’s get honest about some of these influences, regardless of how one interprets them.

Note: Some of this next source (just found in looking up Tavistock, again) page is disturbing material; it deals with intentional (and military/religious etc.) use of trauma to provoke programmable, dissociated MPD. However I find it relevant because many people seeking to reform the “Crises in the Courts” (including me!) have been repeatedly exposed to un-real trauma that most of society doesn’t want to admit exists, or at least in the forms it actually does exist. Later on it mentions, for example, Paul Bonacci (Franklin Coverup case) and how children were terrorized into submissions, then used as drug mules, or to help blackmail those in power for political purposes.

However it’s relevant in that — I have got to point this out — that organizations seeking a following in how to reform the courts are often authoritarian in leadership, monotonously repetitive in their theories, and prone to sound-bytes. They also show up at conferences of traumatized mothers, sometimes second-generation survivors of this. A major organization providing followers to some of the more authoritarian types is, from what I’ve heard, led by a survivor of ritual abuse herself as a young girl. In such situations, the ability to think independently, and stand up to authority (without coming under someone else’s authority) can be — and in this case, has been, I say — compromised.

Before bringing up a (disturbing) post on this, here’s a chatty interview of Dr. Cummings, which relates how he became involved as head psychologist of Kaiser Permanente (major health system) in the 1950s, shortly after they’d fired the previous Chief, you may recall the name Timothy O’Leary, who went on to popularize LSD. Also interesting is that somehow even by this time, it appears Dr. Cummings was on a first-name basis with the founder of Kaiser Permanent (Sidney Garfield), who then eventually called him up and said, take this position.

Recommended reading. When Dr. Cummings then mentions Michael Balint, it is as having founded the British Mental health system after World War II… and in the context (first paragraphs here) of realizing that if one was going to hang around with the psychoanalysts of the well-to-do, that limits scope of practice — how were more people going to be reached with the good news that mental health help was available to them also? The first category he mentions is “African Americans.” . . . It’s an interesting, and not that long, interview:

If I were you, I’d read it (entertaining enough reading as well), for example to see how Michael Balint and his wife were brought over, how they became consultants in D.C., and how the plan of intermittent psychological treatment over a lifetime was hatched…using his connections at all times to get an ear with Ted Kennedy (when he was head of Senate subcommittee on healthcare — or setting up the California School of Professional Psychology by playing up Ronald Reagan (then Governor) who at teh time had a beef with the Board of Regents (of the University of California system), (remember the 1960s, student unrest, etc? Maybe Timothy O’Leary played a part as well,….). According to this account, Cummings, though a connection, got an interview with the governor and presented himself as a solution to an (unrelated) problem, and got in exchange, accreditation for the school he wanted — at first simply allowing students to access the terrific UC library system using Cummings card, available to him as a Ph.D. (note: call that cheating??).. You can also see that this individual is (clearly!) a serial entrepreneur (probably a kind of genius at some level) who bores once a problem is solved, and goes out to solve another one.

(too bad a lot of future generations of potential serial entrepreneurs are themselves being traumatized and run through this system!). Also see, the clear narration that along with creating a school, one has to create the boards to certify its professionally. I think we should look at this part. They are simply nonprofit trade associations which agree on what are the standards of any profession, including professions they halped create:

@@@@
Again, history is a continuity of forces, and we have to face that psychology and “psychological warfare” are not necessarily separate. The history of the development of psychology, as much as it was influenced by either this one creative powerhouse (with encouragement and collaboration from a colleague? from London who helped found the mental health system of Great Britan after WWII, i.e., the Balints); there is absolutely a dark side to it also. Many of us already know this as parents being subjected to extreme cruelty, or forced our kids to be subjected to the same, and being lectured or moralized to as if we were some inferior part of the human race when we protest being forced to co-parent with people who have threaten to kill us, or have harmed our kids, and have previously injured etc. — in the name of some theoretical social science construct that marriage and fatherhood are better for the country, no matter what. ….

The other thing I am facing is that the resulting hordes of traumatized and virtually nomadic parents (resulting from the courts) can be, and I’ll have to say, are being, “controlled” by certain authoritarian groups setting up their own personal oligarchies within the same government, and following many of its practices. Primary to this is framing the issues, rejecting non-compliant feedback (i.e., the
primary goal is not pursuit of the truth) and demanding national (or statewide) solutions to the problem, expressed as they have framed it.

I am starting to no longer recognize this country, which for a few decades (like maybe four of them), I personally had no serious issues with. But now I do.

There are some “scholarly references” to this book which came up on a search of this topic. See introductory pages, “American Caligula” of the “Unauthorized Biography of George Bush (not GWBush),” just prior to USA elections of 1992. It begins by talking about the initiation of the Iraq war, mentions the family line (i.e., back to royalty), and connections to what was at the time the largest bank in the world, not to mention “psychotic episodes.” The first few paragraphs state the purpose of the book, mostly that if Americans allow GWBush a second term, they deserve what they get. p. 10 talks about the concept of oligarchy goes with obsession with race science, breeding, and essentially eugenics. See Chapters III (“Race Hygiene: Three Bush Family Alliances”/one has to look at the Nazi connection, “special courts were established for the sterilization of the German mentally, ill, blind, the deaf, and alcoholics,” training a generation of physicians AND psychiatrists in this practice) and VII (Skull and Bones, @ Yale). This is a full-length, on-line book by Tarply and Chaitkin. It also forces the readers to face where some of the profits funding our major institutions came from (i.e., opium, etc.). It is good (healthy) to be forced to understand who financed what, and a track record on some of the tools, including institutes, by which the inferior were sterilized, and/or euthanized…

Keeping in mind that the same set of royalties were expert breeders of race horses, dogs, etc. How far-fetched is it that a similar attitude would not apply to people? However, for example, 1969 Republican Task Force on Earth Resources and Population (Chairman George H.Bush) invites eugenicist William Shockley (also helped make possible the computer//information age we are in), and Arthur Jensen: Congressional Testimony
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/719579/posts?page=63

*****

Cummings Foundation Launches Congressional Initiative to Fix Broken Family Courts

This is an October 2012 Press Release (Contact Kathleen Russell) at the top, featuring primarily this foundation, of course the sound byte about “our broken family courts” and because it’s such a crisis, the foundation, here, has analyzed the problems, written up a report and (apparently they have the dough to do this) mailed a copy to every member of Congress, Every State’s Governor and Chief Justice, and thousands of law schools and forensic psychologists across the countries..

Just so we understand we are dealing with the true insightful experts here, who want a federal level solution (based on their analyses) and are going about getting it with this mailing. Which it says is not really available to the general public, except a few leftover copies in a Reno, NV office.

The report highlights their (The Cummings Foundation’s) analyses (plural?) of the U.S. Family Court’s systemic flaws as presented by esteemed lawyers, judges, psychologists, and other experts who participated at the Cummings Foundation’s “Our Broken Family Courts” Conference in Phoenix, Arizona last March.

How “nice” (and “modest”) of them to solicit input from parents not on the coattails of certain organizations who may have something to say, such as we already know that these courts are pushing therapeutic jurisprudence, parental alienation, parent coordination, fatherhood, equal parenting laws, marriage (using welfare funds), and providing a wonderful professional future (including retirement income and royalties) for the psychologists (forensic or not) working in the family court arena, and are — like the Nicholas Cummings, his foundation, and friends, have worked hard, and diligently, to make sure continues to happen with federal funding.

Sometimes I wonder if this is a “tell,” a trigger, or a mantra — which by being uttered, like a warm blanket, somehow comforts those that rally around it, although the mindless repetition is, itself idiotic. Are people being hypnotized into trusting anyone who promises a rescue?

People who have been subjected, through whatever source, by long-term attempts to break their will, disorient them, blame them, and steal from them (including stealing family members) — without having committed any crimes that would merit this — have to work, and get help, to overcome that programming. However this HELP should not be obtained from anyone, or any group, which has been employing the same techniques, or has the same incentives,practices, or uses the same tools used to inflict the damages — again, in my opinion.

Not only do we see sometimes our family members (often children) being put through this routine, but also at the same time ourselves, it is no small deal to get free. The concept of “family” does not compute with some of the evil that comes from some families. Meanwhile, overall, while the public remains in cognitive dissonance about the causes of this violence on the human psyche (as well as in our economy, in general) and still credits those in authority as being our “helpers” — become part of the problem.

When the source of what should be positive and sustaining (nourishing) for anyone becomes an innate and ongoing source of severe psychic pain, then one needs to go through either changing that situation (reconciliation, justice) or a process of detachment and reconstruction of a personal identity, one which is not in constant pain. This is the desired event for which circumstances of ongoing trauma are set up to start with.

I hope this posts helps at least SOME people understand who is involved in this at the family court level, and get down to business with some Economics 101 on our country, change your lifestyle, and become part of a sane solution.

NOTE: Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports are not optional — we need to know who has been responsible for laundering selling off our assets, and disempower them from doing it any further. This is not going to be a simple task, obviously.

Just remembering — things that began in slavery, genocide and perpetuating national myths — while continuing to develop ever more refined technology for dominating masses of people (i.e., back in the late 1800s it was a Maxim machine gun. Now techniques do include psychological warfare on the American public, inducing simultaneous mass trauma and confusion ( i.e., cf.the Newtown Connecticut shootings) and a state of constant confusion, disabling the collective will to resist.

If you want to know HOW this happens, talk to some of your neighbors. Undoubtedly some of them have been through, or are going through this whole situation we are blogging about; there’s a lot of it going around these days.

If it started with slavery, genocide, and racist mentality, it is not going to get much better over 100 years later, and has not.

Here are some more sources on the commonalities between this practice of hypnosis a.k.a. “therapy,” and coercive controling sects (Scientology) not to mention, Communism, etc. It is co. 2003 “Arnaldo Lerna,” and relates that Ron Hubbard probably just plaigiarized state of the art WWII psychotherapy, afterwards demonizing psychiatry, primarily so people wouldn’t figure out where he plagiarized his stuff from (see the site psychcrime.org): By quoting this, my post goes to about 15,000 words, so I hope it has been helpful!

Dianetics, Scientology and Communism – both Hubbard and Lenin used Pavlov’s research.

Ida Camburn gave me a copy of William Sargants’s book, first printed 50 years ago, Battle for the Mind. I cannot recommend it more highly…for students and researchers into the Scientology problem and those who have been affected in any way by Scientology or any of its many Frontgroups.

Sargant’s book appears to be based on a journal that he kept during his experience treating WWII victims of post traumatic stress disorder. His observations and conclusions are as valid now as they were then and even more now so due to the apparition called Dianetics and its twisted twin sister Scientology.

Everything that Hubbard rants about in Dianetics including what Hubbard foists off as his “discovery” of Dianetics is based on prior art without attribution, in fact, instead of properly attributing the basis of his scheme to the research of Nobel Prize winner Pavlov, which Lenin incorporated into what became known as Communism, he goes to great lengths to vilify Pavlov and the entire field of Psychiatry, just to make sure that those he has fooled never figured out the degree to which we had been scammed…..that they were in fact trapped by state of the art Psychiatric techniques used in the 1940’s and abandoned because they took too long and were not consistent.

William Sargant describes a technique used during and after WWII called Aberactive Therapy… which stands for Abnormal Reaction Therapy – reliving incidents of trauma in your mind….(real or imaged) with the aid of a drug, hypnosis or ether…and a person to listen.

Aberactive therapy is not something special, people engage in it after having a few drinks and then pouring their hearts out to you….Though, of course Hubbard sought to demonize drugs and alcohol and psychiatry because he wanted to “dead agent”, to “depopularize” all possible competition and most importantly, reduce any threat of exposure and broadbased understanding of how his scam worked.

Even the description that only if you create an emotional discharge in an incident ( for which Hubbard coins many new words, to hide the sources of his information , he calls them somatics in Dianetics and then calls incident of trauma “engrams” ) you wont get relief and William Sargant was describing techniques being used in 1942 in North Africa by military practitioners treating with shell shocked and battle fatigued soldiers, and those recovering from the nazi bombings of London.

Every topic that Hubbard rants about in Dianetics is covered in William Sargant’s book, shock treatment, insulin shock… lobotomies… hypnosis…. Pavlov…. even Hubbard’s 2% rule. Sargant describes how early clinicians treating the psychological casualties of war, thought that a small percentage of soldiers did not suffer from battle fatigue. However, after a few years experience, they amended their opinion, to state that all will eventually succumb to stress induced fatigue except that 2 percent who in fact were psychopaths… Hubbard uses this same 2% rule in Dianetics to state that 2% of society are what he calls “suppressive” people.

This treatment of human beings as mere substance to be manipulated (notice, above, the word {subject) is common to totalitarian regimes and comes from a real disregard for their inherent worth. Those who resist, there are ways for their will to be broken. Its’ time we acknowledged what the present has in common with the past. Here’s some of that past, with “Dialectic Materialism” under Lenin. Note: Pavlov’s techniques were very useful in this purpose. If they are also in use by psychotherapists today (including those who want more Rx privileges), then I think we should be alarmed, adn reconsider the mainstreaming of mental health in this manner!

From “Nightmare of Disbelief” (re: the Dialectic of Materialism / Lenin):

Like the other Communist leaders, Lenin often stressed that Darwin’s theory was the fundamental basis of dialectical materialist philosophy. . . .
Along with Lenin and Trotsky, other Bolsheviks, under the influence of Darwinism, believed that human beings were an animal species, nothing more than an agglomeration of matter. Because they saw no value in human life, millions of persons could easily be sacrificed for the sake of the revolution.

According to Richard Pipes’s The Unknown Lenin, “For humankind at large Lenin had nothing but scorn: the documents confirm Gorky’s assertion that individual human beings held for Lenin ‘almost no interest,’ and that he treated the working class much as a metalworker treated iron ore.” (Richard Pipes, The Unknown Lenin: From the Secret Archive, p.10)

{{again — compare the Bush Family’s treatment of humankind during the lsat century…}}

Very clearly, Lenin accepted this materialist-Darwinist philosophy that regards human beings as animals. After speaking privately with Ivan Petrovich Pavlov, the Russian scientist famous for his experiments on the conditioned reflexes of animals, Lenin tried applying Pavlov’s methods to Russian society.

Lenin’s rule was a bloody one right from the start. As a result of his orders, tens of thousands of people were shot without trial. In conclusion, between 1918 and 1922, hundreds of thousands of workers and peasants who rebelled against the Bolshevik regime were slaughtered.

Modern educational methods can be applied in therapy to streamline man’s brain and change his opinions so that his thinking conforms with certain ideological systems. Medicine and psychiatry may become more and more involved in political strategy as we have seen in the strategy of brainwashing, and for this reason psychologists and psychiatrists must become more aware of the nature of the scientific tools they use.

etc.

I’m tired. Please consider in particular the post of April 2012, and the times we are in. Thank you. (note: the entire post was typed in html mode, not the easiest way to go. Hope to fix this soon.