Let's Get Honest! Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History

Identify the Entities, Find the Funding, Talk Sense!

Archive for December 16th, 2012

How It’s Done: Government by Private Nonprofit / ForProfit Alliances:

leave a comment »

PUBLISHED 12/16/12, after the Elementary School shooting in Connecticut, but assembled earlier, ca. 12/12/2011.

(This post is in two major sections, ca. 15,000 words, because I prefaced, in light of  the Connecticut elementary school shootings, a reminder of just who is this government we are dealing with (including some alternate information about the World Trade Center 2011).

The second half, dealing with the title topic, deals with a nonprofit coalition EVERY divorcing mother (or those in custody fights) should know about, but doesn’t — for the same reasons (pretty much) those in government simply “forget” to remind us all that there are things called CAFRs, and that’s called profit.

I thought the PTSD factor around the shooting was less than it was, and am not going to put more work into this post.  I am also angry that anyone should be expected to ship off their children to these schools any more, even though shootings have already happened, and a classroom of children is per se “bait” for either a “lone gunman” with a mental health problem, or a setup for a national media incident staged around a desired outcome, more civil rights violations for everyone.  I also warn us up front that when one is already somewhat disabled by grief, astonishment, trauma, and the internal “why” — that is NOT a good time to think clearly and consistently about maintaining personal boundaries, and paying attention to what else is going on politically and governmentally at this time.

I know this also as a DV survivor — right after the incident, there is a time period when your system tends to shut down.   And many of those incidents are NOT “outbursts of passion”  — they are planned in a cold and calculating manner.

If you rule out the possibility that this Newtown, CT, incident wasn’t either (including the possibility that there wasn’t more than one shooter, the possibility that it was not indeed young Adam who shot his own mother at the home — has anyone produced a witness?  Has the press yet seen any forensic reports or sought them? — then you are simply incapable of reason.  You do NOT know our own government yet, either what it does overseas, what it does at home (including in secret) or in short, what it’s actually about.

As such YOU (as a member of the general public) are part of a serious problem, called, an attitude — a stance that says:  “I’m here and ready to be manipulated to believe virtually anything that most of the rest of the public believes (my social status is more important that truth).  I hereby lay aside all desire to factfind any further, compare this incidents to others in any other than the standard fashion, and grant my faculties of reason to mainstream media.

Feed me something more, and as I don’t know how to find and assess truth (versus falsehood) for myself, I leave it to the experts.  As experts don’t agree with each other, I leave it to the most prominent experts!“)

When, a better approach would be to, in general, know who is funding the experts, and how.  I have this blog and “Cold Hard Facts” and plenty of links to others to figure that out.

Aurora, Colorado theater shooting was only last July.  Here’s some of what surfaced in the Denver Examiner in September, 2012 (although we were focused on elections about that time, right?  Distract, Distract, Distract — this was important information.  Where was the mainstream coverage outside Denver?)


A seemingly completely drugged individual alleged to be James Holmes, yet appearing to be someone totally different, is seen barely able to stay awake next to a very quiet defense attorney in a court and case that has been suspect from the very beginning.

Aurora theater shooting court documents blows inside job conspiracy wide open

(examiner.com, 9.7.12, Jeffrey Phelps):



When the incident is national — watch out.  There is never an absence of an agenda.

Preface re: the Connecticut Situation:

This is a major media and national tragedy incident — timed towards the end of the year when people have already been worked over (i.e., “working the crowd”) regarding fiscal cliffs, to prepare us for higher taxes, prices, and lower services — or else.  If you don’t understand the term “working the crowd” the reference is from performance situations, like stand-up comics, musicians, or as it were certain styles of Protestant or nondenominational evangelistic Christianity.  A result is desired (participation, tithing, applause) hence the audience must be primed.

I will talk in more detail about the Connecticut situation, but am publishing this post now because there is a “mental/behavioral” health situation, a family court (obviously — divorce) system, a violence situation (a young man Adam Lanza allegedly (I wasn’t there) murdered his mother, his mother’s principal, and his mother’s school’s psychologist, plus little kids in two classrooms).

It’s obvious that spin will focus on the young man, his mothers’ ownership of guns, his oddball loner characteristics, his potential mental illness problems, and of course their recent divorce.

Which plays into the hands of practically every special-interest factor in the family court system:  Mental/behavioral health, Responsible Fatherhood (here was a divorced mother whose son murdered her and others — see?  Bad single mothers!) and I’ll bet will NOT be framed as a “violence against women” issue although violence against women, and children, is routine in the world, and this might be in part about that….

(YOU WANT AN EYE-OPENER?  READ THAT LAST LINK…)(in fact here it is, a “one-minute read.”  This was an adult woman in another country being killed on the way to work.  everyone knew she was at risk, no one offered such women (government workers) protection; her predecessor had been killed by a car bomb last July (despite pleas from her son for protection for that mother….) and yet this woman had the guts and courage to go to work in a hostile to woman workers country….)  this is the whole article, a “one-minute read.”:

(from “theweek.co.uk” no author listed…)

Murder of a senior bureaucrat proves that women face spiralling violence in Afghanistan


THE MURDER today of the acting head of women’s affairs for the Afghan province of Laghman, just five months after her predecessor was killed in a bomb attack, is stark evidence of rising levels of violence toward women in the war-torn country, says  The Guardian.

No one has yet claimed responsibility, but the Taliban are the obvious culprits and the death of Nadia Sediqqi raises fears about the threat to Afghan women’s rights – and lives – once Nato troops leave the country.

Sediqqi was shot dead as she got into a rickshaw to go to work this morning in the provincial capital, Mehtar Lam. A spokesman for the governor of Laghman province said she travelled and worked without bodyguards – a common situation for female government workers.

Activists and some politicians blame waning interest in women’s rights on the part of the government for a wave of violence against women, says The Guardian.

President Hamid Karzai’s government denies the accusation. But while Afghan women have won back basic rights in education, voting and employment since the Taliban were ousted from power in 2001, there are fears that such freedoms could be traded away as Karzai seeks to broker peace with the group.

Sediqqi’s predecessor, Hanifa Safi, was killed in July by a car bomb that her family blamed on the Taliban. Safi’s son said that authorities had ignored repeated requests that his mother should be offered protection, the Guardian reports.

His claim reinforces concerns that the safety of female government workers is not taken seriously in a country where women who pursue careers often face opposition and can be ostracised – or worse – for mixing with male colleagues.

Why — in any country — should women be shot to death for the “crime” of going to work, or standing up for their gender?   Why in America should a mother be shot to death in her home, by her son (allegedly).  (Can’t put her son on the witness stand; he’s dead; so’s she.  Were there any other witnesses to the event whereby Mom was killed?).

Why, for that matter, should the institution of marriage be a place of death and abuse for women either?  Mine was.  As to going to work, my children were kidnapped on a work day.  Some women are killed while exchanging their children with their exes.   Some have been shot to death in beauty salon’s (or witnessed mayhem) because someone else’s ex was angry (and armed, I’m talking Scott DeKrai of Seal Beach, California — a divorce case with eight casualties).

I didn’t even know about Nadia Sediqqi — and wouldn’t have, had it not been for a blog by Anne Stevenson, who also writes on some of the HHS issues (link to right):  This is just a small segment of the blog; she has

Recommendation #1: Facilitate, Encourage The Meaningful Participation Of Women In Education, Business VenturesFresh in everyone’s mind is the fact that this week, senior Afghan government official Nadia Sediqqi, acting head of the women’s affairs department in Laghman province was shot dead on her way to work. Clearly, if Afghanistan wants to attract foreign business partners, Afghanistan’s government will need to do more to ensure all women are safe and capable of doing business within its borders.

Here’s the beginning of the blog, including the co-authorship of the director of foreign relations for “The Municipality of Kabul.” The whole article should be read:

This week, Mustafa Yasa, director of foreign relations for the Municipality of Kabul, has joined me in writing this column. We plan to share with readers our observations on how Afghanistan and the U.S. can work more efficiently and effectively to transform the country from a post-conflict society to an economically independent nation and formidable competitor in the world market.

“Afghanistan must stand on its own feet, and the only foundation that will support this emerging nation is the ground we stand on. Fortunately the ground under our feet is mineral rich,” Sadat Mansoor Naderi, chairman of the Afghan Gold and Minerals Company told participants last week at the Afghan-American Chamber of Commerce (AACC) 8th Annual U.S.-Afghanistan Business Matchmaking Conference (BMC) held in Washington, D.C.

Now you probably know why the US is so fascinated with Afghanistan also, among other reasons.  Mineral-rich ground. The scramble for Afghanistan….  Most politics is about commerce anyhow, particularly minerals, oil, you name it….

At the present time, Afghanistan remains a donor economy reliant on international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for financial support. While the mineral industry may be Afghanistan’s most promising asset, there are currently no long-term plans in place to facilitate the kind of stable and sustainable infrastructure needed to ensure Afghanistan’s future as an independent, sovereign economy.

In 2014, the U.S. plans to reduce the number of American troops in Afghanistan from 101,000 in June 2012 to 10,000 U.S. soldiers withdrawing by the end of this year.

Since 2001, the U.S. has invested $1.2 trillion tax dollars in the war in Afghanistan, over 17,644 U.S. soldiers stationed in Afghanistan been injured, and more than 2,000 U.S. Soldiers have been killed. Yet despite the high transaction costs of war, total withdrawal of U.S. troops seems highly unlikely where the Pentagon and the U.S. Geological Survey estimate that Afghanistan, and consequently our U.S. troops, may be sitting on as much as $1 trillion of unmined rare minerals, making it one of the richest mining areas on Earth.

RE: “Connecticut”

And assuming it was Adam Lanza (only), what better way for any young man (or older man) who has been put down or made to feel like an outcast, different, or inferior in society, than to “really” get even than to go kill some women and children, including Mom (or sometimes, it’s spouse, etc.) ….

On the other hand, I am still interested in the potential role any medication may have had on this one.  One thing I know for sure — I do not take anything published in the newspaper, or propounded by my own government at face value any more.  Neither should you past that September 11, 2011.

Ground Zero: September 11, 2001 – September 11, 2011

One of the most indelible memories in the collective psyche of Americans – and the world – comes from the images of the World Trade Center following the terrorist attacks on the United States, September 11, 2001. Yesterday, Americans and the world collectively remembered those who lost their lives in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania ten years after that unforgettable day. This post (edited by Leanne Burden) shows the transformation, of what became known as Ground Zero, over the last ten years. A memorial rises from the ashes of that day on September 11, 2011. — Paula Nelson (41 photos total)  (spectacular photos).
Now apart from the affective, how much “cognitive” was going on in the collective psyche of America — and the world — about the insurance liability policy taken out just a few days prior to the attack, because handling the asbestos problem would be too expensive; besides, how else could an Iraq invasion be justified, and other evidence contradicting the popular legend on HOW this happened?
The ability to deny the obvious is (double-think) part of the Orwellian future.  However a group called “Architects & Engineers” hadn’t given up, ten years later, in explaining the physical impossibility of the standard explanations…  HOW MANY PEOPLE DIED in the explosion, how many lives affected – – of the victims alone (including NYFD victims, i.e. rescuers).

 Among references to the contrary:

America’s “War on Terrorism

Author Name: Michel Chossudovsky
ISBN Number: 9780973714715
Year: 2005
Pages: 365 with complete index

waronterrorism.jpgIn this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky’s 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by “Islamic terrorists”.  Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration.

The expanded edition, which includes twelve new chapters focuses on the use of 9/11 as a pretext for the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, the militarisation of justice and law enforcement and the repeal of democracy

According to Chossudovsky, the  “war on terrorism” is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus.
The “war on terrorism” is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the “New World Order”, dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.

September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington’s agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

+++++++++The Dog and Pony Show for People with Short-Term Memories by Walter Burien – CAFR1.com
11/05/12 (ALSO posted below).

Good morning folks. Again it is the first day of the rest of our lives.

George Bush Sr. (REPUBLICAN) The ex-CIA director who became president. The stage was set for covert wars for the next 30-years and do you remember those interest rate jumps to 21% – 22% kicked off in the Reagan term? What a grand play. The population was screaming at the banks but alas the core reality was held back from the population that the government was the #1 investors with the banks from the profits made. The profit made was massive for government investments and the core deception principle of government investment manipulation was firmly rooted by omission. Then along comes Bill Clinton;

4. George Bush Jr. (Republican) – Large market manipulations in general are outside the scope for cognitive thinking and comprehension of the general population.

{{I wonder WHY!    ….}}

Come the end of 2001, the “planed” events of the new gang in power began to unfold.

The WTC complex was chosen as the “hook and bait” for what was to follow. Being a prior tenant of WTC1 back in 1979-80, I was very aware that the WTC Towers needed to be demolished. They were constructed using thousands of tons of asbestos foam fire insulation sprayed on the internal infrastructure (asbestos use banned after completion of the towers) and the flat surface design of the towers made them very susceptible to collapse in the event of a level 4 or 5 hurricane hitting the flat surfaces of the towers.

A demolition report in 1979 was commissioned by the then owners of the towers the Port Authority of NY and NJ and the cost for demolition the report showed would have been over seven-billion dollars with the report noted not accounting for the billions of dollars of collectively claimed damage suits filed from individuals saying they were exposed to the asbestos due to the demolition.

The Port Authority of NY and NJ took the alternative measure back in 1980 of installing a special air filtration system in the towers at a cost of over 120-million dollars that would filter out asbestos fibers as they deteriorated from the infrastructure coating. A ticking time-bomb was left standing.

George Bush “Sr.” as an ex-CIA director always wanted to takeover the Middle East oil countries for obvious reasons of wealth taken and control exerted. The opportunity now presented itself with George Bush Jr. at the helm. What was needed was the all-encompassing trigger to put his plan into motion. September 11th 2001 that trigger masterfully was pulled, played out, and put into motion.

The stage in all respects was carefully planned in advance and unfolded with the precision of a Swiss clock maker. Trillion dollar short stock index international market derivatives positions taken by the primary government institutional investment accounts months in advance; scripts provided to be read out by the syndicated media; and selected culprits to be blamed. Osama bin Laden’s name, an ex-CIA paid operative from Saudi Arabia during the Afghanistan / Russian war was mentioned as the fronted mastermind “20-minutes” into the event. The script read by the syndicated media out of the UK was a bit untimely when they reported WTC7 collapsed 10-minutes before it did. And then there was Larry Silverstein a dual American / Israeli citizen who took out the 99-year lease from the Port Authority of NY and NJ where for twenty years no one else would take a lease on that ticking time bomb. Larry Silverstein had the WTC complex insured with a double indemnity insurance policy for a terrorism attack just days before the towers went down. Some upper level Government officials say a coincidence, CAFR1 says in a Pig’s eye.


…..FAQs: (these are technical reasons, but the most rational reasons (supported by these) is in the row below…..

FAQ #4: Why weren’t the sounds that were heard during the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers on 9/11 as loud as the blasts heard in videos of known controlled demolitions?

Many sounds of explosions were in fact heard at the WTC on 9/11, and their continuous and rapid nature  would make individual explosions very difficult to hear. In addition, thermite incendiary materials, which were identified in the WTC dust, create less noise than conventional explosives. A more detailed answer is available here.

FAQ #5: What caused the isolated high-speed ejections of pulverized dust and debris from the Towers?

Video evidence shows that these ejections were composed of pulverized building materials, and they occurred at isolated, geometrically precise locations, in an engineered pattern which are attributable to explosives – not air pressure from above. In addition, the ejection speeds were too high to have been caused by the pressure of the collapsing structure above.  A more detailed answer is available here.

FAQ #6: Why does AE911Truth represent only a small percentage of architects and engineers?

Most architects and engineers have never been presented with the scientific evidence of controlled demolition. In addition, most of those who take the time to examine this evidence acknowledge that the official story can’t be true. As of the date of this publication, there are almost 1,700 architects and engineers who openly support the findings of AE911Truth vs. only a few dozen who have openly supported the NIST WTC reports. Even so, in the end, the evidence stands on its own, regardless of how many professionals are aware of it.  A more detailed answer is available here.

FAQ #7: Aren’t the red-gray chips identified in the WTC dust merely primer paint from the WTC steel structural elements?

Key ingredients of the primer paint are not present in the chemical composition of the red-gray chips – and vice versa. More importantly, scientific tests have revealed that the red-gray chips ignite at 430º C, creating molten iron as a reaction product – characteristics that confirm they are thermitic material and not primer paint. A more detailed answer is available here.

FAQ #8: What is nanothermite? Could it have been used to demolish the WTC towers?

Thermite is a mixture of a metal and the oxide of another metal that produces temperatures well in excess of 4000° F when ignited, certainly high enough to allow cuts through the structural steel of the Twin Towers. Nanothermite is a nano-engineered variant of thermite that can be formulated to be explosive, intensifying its destructive power. Residues of thermite and nanothermite were discovered in the WTC dust, which indicates they were used to destroy the WTC skyscrapers. A more detailed answer is available here.

FAQ #9: Were the Twin Towers designed to withstand the impact of the airplanes?

Yes. Airplane impact tests that were conducted during the design of the Twin Towers showed that the skyscrapers would withstand the impact of a Boeing 707, which has more energy upon impact than the 767 aircraft that crashed into the Twin Towers on 9/11. In the following years, lead WTC structural engineer John Skilling, WTC structural engineer Leslie Robertson and WTC construction manager Frank Demartini made statements that underscore that analysis. A more detailed answer is available here.

(Now you know about the site).
Perhaps it’s because people don’t know what to do with an acceptance or acknowledgment of this information, assuming it’s true — the ramifications would eradicate life as possible, as opposed to life as becoming impossible (the “boiling frog” encroachment // door-shutting of the Department of Homeland Security measures taken since……)….  But I would think it’s wise to keep in mind that multiple purposes were served by the WTC destruction, one of which was cost-savings (profit?) to the individual (or company) who took out the liability insurance “just in time” for the demolitions…


Most violence is about the right to steal something from someone, or the right to exploit a certain population — or retaliation from the same.  Stealing and Lying should be recognized for the forms of violence they actually arethere is no reason to steal or lie, with an exception noted, perhaps to eat, or perhaps to stay alive.

But to eat, or to stay alive, is definitely no excuse for the volume of stealing, lying (pretenses) and violence (killing, whether with high-powered weaponry or pharmaceuticals) done by what is commonly called “government” (and should be more properly understood as corporations that make the rules and exist to raise money, in part by selling debt, and enforce collections with — well, force!).  And let us keep this in mind while in shock and mourning over the children — and adults — killed.

Regarding the Elementary School Shootings:

Let us also be wary about how honest is the reporting, how truthfully was the account of it put together, and make mental notes of who, outside of the responding police, was actually a competent eyewitness of these things, particularly as most of the closest witnesses are dead including the person who opened the door.  Let us keep in mind the effect of sudden shock and trauma and potential fear upon any surviving witnesses IF it did not play out as it is being reported in the media, and let us not forget that there are going to be overlaps between who owns media, and who runs government — they are related.

This post (as drafted) begins dealing with a certain coalition of nonprofits formed to obtain grants and funding from the HHS (primarily) to promote responsible fatherhood.  One of the sponsors of that organization is a prominent fathers’ rights attorney from Chicago, and the other corporation, appears to have been a corporation rounded by one woman with the initials CJH, and this organization was itself set up to help get grants, especially focusing on giving grants to promote marriage, and grants to religious style organizations.

As became clear when I saw Susan Dreyfuss circulating (like many of her leadership level) (and like many judges) in and out of governmental position in a State (as in, one of the 50) executive branch (here, Wisconsin, then Washington) — specifically a state-level equivalent of “HHS” (or a subsidiary of the state-level HHS, i.e., something to do with families and children usually) — and leading nonprofit alliances to fix and heal the nation from all its mental health problems, because they love to protect children and unify families, (etc.) — AND in this case the same individual was sitting (alongside a Texas state attorney general and others) on another nationwide nonprofit called “AHA” (American Humane Association’s) “responsible fatherhood” initiative board of directors — well, it sure does seem that all roads do lead to “Rome” — a.k.a. — the federal funding stream, a whole lot of it spurting off the Social Security Act, or in other words, “welfare.”

This is shown below, and it is indeed a genius of branding to somehow equate “fatherhood” with “prevention of child abuse,” when in truth, it’s actually about simply the profits — not about the children.

In the last post (herein) I talked about what’s been done to children, elderly and disabled, specifically along the line of virtually using them as receptacles for “drug cocktails,” (atypical antipsychotics) to control them, although apparently other restraints were also involved.  These locked up and unable to resist populations were assaulted BOTH chemically AND sexually/physically, at public expense for the actual purpose of pharmaceutical profits.  Our own government is basically a drugs-and-arms dealer, whether inappropriate and excessive FDA style, or simply things like cocaine and heroin.

So where, exactly, in this mix do you think the media emphasis on behavioral health, mental health (and saying lone shooters were probably suffering from a mental health problem) and making sure the public is disarmed, while the government is not — but who is paying to arm our government?  I mean, c’mon !!!  Is there a picture emerging from all this?  Or cannot the dots be connected yet?

More below….

As I began looking into the “School Shooting” Friday 12/14/2012 in Connecticut — I remembered things Connecticut has become well-known for (other than, say, YALE) among mothers attempting to protect their kids, and people investigating family court matters.  These are so many they have to be placed on a different (but collateral) post, and I am talking about what kinds of horrors (not deaths, but specifically child abuse and molestation, accompanied by financial fraud) this state — along with others — covers up.

Let’s keep in mind that as real as the emotion is around the needless death of innocent elementary school children, let us NOT forget that overall our own government, historically, is not about protecting the innocent throughout the world.  Not hardly.  It’s about the profits.  Governments are specialized forms of corporations that then, once in place, form other corporations for the purposes of raising revenue — sometimes by incurring debt (meaning, creating debt for the public to pay off later) and doing this when it already has huge amounts of pooled wealth, and probably doesn’t need to cut services OR raise taxes.

Just stay mentally alert during the time of this horrific tragedy.  The public’s emotions are being ripped one way and another over this issue, and that is NOT a good state in which to make sound decisions.

Remember the basic statements of
Silent Weapons for Silent Wars.

War is merely the act of destroying the creditor, and the politicians are the publicly hired hit men that justify the act to keep the responsibility and blood off the public conscience.
The silent weapon is a type of biological warfare. It attacks the vitality, options and mobility of the individuals of a society.


I believe this shooting was avoidable, but was not avoided in part because of its having dramatic and widespread effect through the media.  I am not saying it was a specifically-timed conspiracy, but the conditions and the set-up are all there. These things are going to happen, and they are needless. Why they continue to happen is because the overall game plan is as above — the population needs to be at all times controlled, and exploited, not to mention disarmed. Sooner or later, people are doing to find out to what extent we have been lied to (looking at CAFRs is a good start! — if anything shows dishonesty, and collusion, they do!) When people — or should they ever catch on en masse (meaning, probably those who are not domesticated and tamed under various religious dogma — most religious dogma is basically going to say “submit, submit!” anyhow…) they are going to be angry. As I have continued to show and repeat — government is a revenue-raising corporation with guns, it sees people as a resource to be exploited, a lot of propaganda is necessary (including in the teaching of history), control of the school systems from young to higher (university level) and in general, many people will be kept ignorant of the genocides and concentration camps going on on the other side of the world — or under their noses, but in places and institutions we don’t have a real handle on.

As such — the government is going to want us disarmed, and or institutionalized as mentally ill, at which time we can also be drugged up.  These are ALWAYS on the table, and a clear agenda — see the Rhodes Scholarships and watch what those scholars have been doing in Africa with the Diamond cartel (including in the US) and pay attention to how it was done.  As with Africa, so it will be sooner or later with North America.

The public’s role in this is to be so A-D-D and numbed to insane policies and procedures, they will believe anything, and continue paying tribute (let’s call taxes what they are!).

The two purpose of empire remain: expansion (military exploits) and loot, plunder and murder.  This, in addition to appropriating populations for slave (whether for brute physical labor, or for talented technical labor) who then help build the civic monuments (NOTE:  THIS INCLUDES INSTITUTIONS, INCLUDING SCHOOLS, MUSEUMS, (RAILROADS, ETC.) ….  and develop technology to better control more people.   As part of this agenda, a serious propaganda machine (or national religion) certainly helps make it easier to control the natives.

Am I jaundiced, cold, calloused, and simply don’t care?

No – -on the contrary, I DO care.   I just happened to have received a recent and very effective history lesson regarding certain individuals involved in the colonization (Scramble for) Africa.  Of course I am not academic or professor level in this, but by reading those who are, and chronologies, it’s really not too awfully hard to piece it together.

Of course, the personal experience of having been treated this way both in marriage, and by my own family of origin — as a resource (i.e., a child-bearing one) to be exploited and domesticated, denigrated, lied about and looted from (note:  Many parents, including many mothers, now know this experience well in USA, Inc.) it did make sense.  Particularly vivid was the “Hegelian dialectic” model, which I can see was used on me in the court system (and is being used on the public in many related systems).

_ _ _ _ _ Therefore:

Words and image stir emotions, provoke PTSD extreme in parents — I’m sure — throughout the country, who send their little ones in faith off to schools, expecting them to come back alive.  Now they can’t be assured of that — can they, really?  Oh my God, what kind of new restrictions can we have, what FURTHER civil rights violations can be put on the entire country because anyone — (particularly sons living with single mothers after divorce?) — could become the next mass murderer.  Let’s lock up all the guns — lock up the schools — establish even MORE mental health screening (people forgot TMAP, PennMAP, Teen Screen and all that?) . . . . .

I will just about guarantee that something is amiss with the media portrayal of this shooting, although it’s obvious that the children and adults involved are dead, as well as the shooter.  Just a little reminder — many of us around the issues of CPS and the Courts really do not believe that the late Senator Nancy Schaefer and her husband were actually murder/suicide victim.  More like murder/murder, and probably because of what she was investigating at the time (including federal incentives to traffick children through the courts).  (Google Garland Favorito for a good series of articles).


But you simply cannot get beyond the basic truths that Walter Burien brought forth and continues to bring forth — like a few decades ago — when he first understood beautifully that what we call government is actually a criminal racket by any other name.

Is that subversive?  Well, I don’t know.

But I sure as hell don’t like walking into what I was led to believe is a court and find it utterly uninterested in the facts of the case it’s allegedly judging.  I don’t know anyone else who does, particularly when children are involved.  WHY IS IT, we may ask, these groups do not view the children that we biologically fathered or mothered — as “ours”?   Heck, some of us even nursed our own children that we gave birth to — and they’re still not ours; what does that make us?  Breeding stock for some institution — like wars?

And we are supposed to sit still while people with considerable wealth, obtained in the public employ (i.e., as judges, attorneys, GALS) show up and talk about situations they’ve privately, and separately from our input (as a class of persons, or individually) pre-determined is “good” for the kids?  And then becomes immune to any feedback that it ain’t good?

At what point is it going to become “just too late” to stand up to this type of widespread abuse of the public?  I said it in a post a long while before running across the CAFR material — because I saw it.  What the CAFR material clearly (also) shows is pre-meditated strategy to do this.  As he points out, services (when they actually happen) are the “bait and hook” to justify more taxation.

And from what I can tell (see some of this blog) ain’t nobody really minding the shop.  No wonder they wanted “welfare reform” block grants to the states — it was a financing setup:  Wealth Diversion to ALL KINDS of nonprofits, and Privatizing Welfare.


In fact, the HHS would even help finance a corporation to start itself up (“Compassion Capital Funding”) and if that corporation then, well, kind of drops off the face of the map (fails to stay incorporated), who’s to know if it continues to get funds?  Go see Baltimore’s CAFRs if you want a sample, or fatherhood.gov, and related posts.

Then they have conferences, literally, to hook up (I wonder if there are also hookers present) the local nonprofits with the HHS wheelers and dealers to set up the “change agents” for the various court systems.  I’m talking about the “Fathers and Families Coalition of America” (Not Glenn Sacks outfit, but Jeffrey Leving-sponsored outfit), with every emotion-laden appeal in the book.  Every time you visit the site, the graphics are more advanced and flashy.

  • James Rodríguez, MSW
  • CEO/President
  • Gary Wieser, J.D.,
  • Dr. Ramon Nieves
  • Chicago, IL
  • Patricia Wilson-Coker, MSW, JD
  • Denver, CO
  • Ed Gonzáléz-Santín, MSW
  • Tempe, AZ
  • Charlene Lewis-Meeks
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Carl Chadband
  • Dunbar, WV
  • Dr. Nathan O’Neal
  • Denver, CO
  • Jeffery M. Leving, Esq. LTD
  • Chicago, IL

      (This would be Leving’s Law Firm)

If you click through it leads to a shameless self-promotion of Mr. Leving and his books, and career, including endorsements by a Chicago Cardinal (of the Archdiocese of Chicago) and President Barack Obama (also an attorney, let’s not forget):


Fathers’ Rights Attorney Jeffery M. Leving 

Jeffery M. Leving has been named one of “America’s Best Lawyers” by Forbes Radio™ and selected by his peers as one of Illinois’ top attorneys. He is the acclaimed author of three groundbreaking books, Fathers’ Rights, Divorce Wars, and How to Be a Good Divorced Dad, a new book that received an endorsement from Francis Cardinal George of the Archdiocese of Chicago and praise from President Barack Obama.

Jeffery Leving received his Juris Doctor from the Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law in 1979. He is licensed to practice law in Illinois, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.

His professional associations include the American Bar Association, the Illinois State Bar Association, the Chicago Bar Association, the Lake County Bar Association, the DuPage County Bar Association, the McHenry County Bar Association, the Kane County Bar Association, the LaSalle County Bar Association, the Federal Trial Bar, and the Decalogue Society of Lawyers.

Is that enough private nonprofit trade associations, for starters?  Plus Presidential Privileges:

Jeffery M. Leving was chosen by the White House Office of Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships to provide expert input in the first Town Hall Meeting on Responsible Fatherhood and Healthy Families in Chicago and recently met with President Obama in Washington, D.C., to discuss critical issues facing the nation.

(Women don’t stand a chance in contested custody matters with this kind of firepower)  Just for the record, that “White House Office,” now Obama’s territory, was established by THE First (two) executive orders issued by George W. Bush, Jr. in 2001 on taking office.  Some say, in a stolen election.  Possibly he was just doing the right thing for people who helped him get into office (not necessarily the public).  So January, 2001, we got that Faith-Based Office set up by Executive Order (why bother running it past the plebians, meaning, the voters, or for that matter, even Congress?  A Bush President Spoke, and It Was So.  Before the year was out, however, about 3,000 people would perish in the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers, 9/11, changing American government even more than this executive order.).

I should probably mention that the ABA HQ is in Chicago, that (obviously) President Obama hails from there as Senator, and in general this city is known as a great place for politics (See “The Machine,” Blagojevich, Tony Rezko, etc.)

The disclosure of Blagojevich’s {discredited comments that Rezko contributed to Obama campaign, taped by the FBI} comments comes as the president is locked in a tight re-election campaign with Republican Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, who has sought to link Obama’s Chicago connections to the city’s culture of political corruption.

Obama’s ties to Rezko were a nagging issue in the 2008 campaign. Rezko and Obama were friends, and Rezko raised as much as $250,000 for Obama for the first three political offices he sought. Obama also acknowledged a lapse in judgment over his involvement with Rezko in private real estate transactions related to the purchase of Obama’s home in the Kenwood neighborhood in 2005.

That was just sarcastic side commentary.  However, this particular nonprofit organization is a problematic one, and seems to symbolize some of the issues.  Wish I’d known about these groups in time for my own custody issues…  

(click link to see CJH Educational Services logo properly arranged…..)

  • Its mission is to address the social and educational needs of citizens in North Carolina through the attainment of federal grant funds. CJH prepares and submits proposals on behalf of academic institutions and experienced nonprofit organizations seeking effective programs and initiatives to serve youth, adults, and/or students who reside in poverty or who have special needs.

Apparently, Healthy Marriage Education is more important than food, transportation, or child support being delivered to the families in which the children reside.  The PUBLIC supported the setup and the Demonstration Projects for this one group to the tune of about $6 million (per “TAGGS”) starting in 2002.    They are definitely “private” taking public funding, and apparently they are Father-friendly because I sure don’t see CJH services in any domestic violence or feminist organizations — just this conferencing group in Arizona (However, those other groups also have their federal funding as well, to keep the conflict going….)

I’m going to show these grants for a demonstration, again — hopefully readers will “get” how this works.  In “getting” FAF nonprofit, it’s also vital to understand how the flip side of the coin (DV etc.) groups, out of professional courtesy (don’t bite the hand that feeds you) make sure NOT to tell their distressed mothers (who provide email contacts and free publicity, show up at rallies and sometimes buy products, too) that FAF exists, or what for.    So, then who are the nice guys — either side? (No, not either side….).

The public continues to be the dupe, funding BOTH sides and wondering why the social problems of fatherlessness and/or child abuse and domestic violence (pick your criminal area:  drug abuse, illiteracy, etc.) “just don’t seem to go away.”  

Like I said, we’ve nearly ALL been raised to be duped in government matters, you name the topic, it probably applies.  

Here we go for CJH services.  This is hardly a “big player,” but it sure seems to come in handy – -and it’s sponsoring those hookup with HHS conferences, per the website (as is our Chicagoland Fathers’ Rights attorney Mr. Leving):

Your guess is as good as mine why this private nonprofit is listed under the federal (HHS) public access database as “welfare department.”  Notice her name shows up in three different styles.

Grantee Name Award Number CFDA Number Principal Investigator Sum of Actions
CJH Educational Grant Services, Inc. 90EJ0018 93647 CYNTHIA J. HARRIS $ 3,339,867
CJH Educational Grant Services, Inc. 90FE0059 93086 CYNTHIA HARRIS $ 550,000
CJH Educational Grant Services, Inc. 90FE0059 93086 CYNTHIA J HARRIS $ 1,100,000
CJH Educational Grant Services, Inc. 90FE0059 93086 CYNTHIA J HARRIS $ 1,100,000
Printer-friendly Version
Recipient: CJH Educational Grant Services, Inc.
Address: P.O. BOX 14264
RALEIGH, NC 27620-4264
Country Name: United States of America
County Name: WAKE
HHS Region: 4
Type: Welfare Department


Showing: 1 – 8 of 8 Award Actions

FY Award Number Award Title Budget Year of Support Award Code Agency Action Issue Date DUNS Number Amount This Action
2010 90FE0059  HEALTHY MARRIAGE DEMONSTRATION, PRIORITY AREA 8 5 00 ACF 09-24-2010 124630497 $ 550,000 
Fiscal Year 2010 Total: $ 550,000
FY Award Number Award Title Budget Year of Support Award Code Agency Action Issue Date DUNS Number Amount This Action
2009 90FE0059  HEALTHY MARRIAGE DEMONSTRATION, PRIORITY AREA 8 4 0 ACF 09-18-2009 124630497 $ 550,000 
Fiscal Year 2009 Total: $ 550,000
FY Award Number Award Title Budget Year of Support Award Code Agency Action Issue Date DUNS Number Amount This Action
2008 90FE0059  HEALTHY MARRIAGE DEMONSTRATION, PRIORITY AREA 8 3 0 ACF 09-14-2008 124630497 $ 550,000 
Fiscal Year 2008 Total: $ 550,000
FY Award Number Award Title Budget Year of Support Award Code Agency Action Issue Date DUNS Number Amount This Action
2007 90FE0059  HEALTHY MARRIAGE DEMONSTRATION, PRIORITY AREA 8 2 0 ACF 09-17-2007 124630497 $ 550,000 
Fiscal Year 2007 Total: $ 550,000
FY Award Number Award Title Budget Year of Support Award Code Agency Action Issue Date DUNS Number Amount This Action
2006 90FE0059  HEALTHY MARRIAGE DEMONSTRATION, PRIORITY AREA 8 1 0 ACF 09-25-2006 124630497 $ 550,000 
Fiscal Year 2006 Total: $ 550,000
FY Award Number Award Title Budget Year of Support Award Code Agency Action Issue Date DUNS Number Amount This Action
2004 90EJ0018  COMPASSION CAPITAL FUND DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM 3 0 ACF 09-07-2004 124630497 $ 1,116,440 
Fiscal Year 2004 Total: $ 1,116,440
FY Award Number Award Title Budget Year of Support Award Code Agency Action Issue Date DUNS Number Amount This Action
2003 90EJ0018  COMPASSION CAPITAL FUND DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM 2 0 ACF 09-09-2003 124630497 $ 716,440 
Fiscal Year 2003 Total: $ 716,440
FY Award Number Award Title Budget Year of Support Award Code Agency Action Issue Date DUNS Number Amount This Action
2002 90EJ0018  COMPASSION CAPITAL FUND DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM 1 0 ACF 09-15-2002 124630497 $ 1,506,987 
Fiscal Year 2002 Total: $ 1,506,987
Total of all award actions: $ 6,089,867

Ms. Harris’ blurb, from the site:

 She is a graduate of the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill with a B.A. in Psychology and the University of Virginia, Charlottesville with an M.A., in Counselor Education, Human Services.

A native of Greensboro, Cynthia is an active member of Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. and First Baptist Church in Raleigh.

Currently she serves as President of One Mission Tree, Inc. a non-profit, tax- exempt organization addressing the social and educational needs of underserved adults and youth.  (my link shows an EIN# 317746236, ruling date 8.2011 only with a revenue JUST UNDER the reporting level (I believe) of $25K.  Cute.  However state of NC shows earlier:).

Entity Name Type Status Formed Online Annual Reports
Legal NC Corporate Name One Mission Tree, Inc. NP Current-Active 12/11/2000 N/A

Name changes, and when:

Image Date Document Id Event Document
Download PDF 12/11/2000 203439069 Creation Filing INC – Articles of Incorporation
Download PDF 4/10/2002 220935019 Amendment CROA – Change of Address of Registered Office/Agent
Download PDF 9/19/2003 C200325800439 Name Change DNAM – Corporation Name Change (Domestic)
Download PDF 4/21/2011 C201110500040 Name Change DNAM – Corporation Name Change (Domestic)

(the address change was to a larger and more valuable home with 12 residents listed, African-American, male & female (can you believe the web lists Real Estate resident ethnicity !!!).

Previous names:

Corporation Names


“She has served as a Field Reader for the U.S. Department of Education, rating and scoring federal applications for competitive grants”

One of CJH’s  compassion-capital award sub-grantees ($20,500)it’s called “re-entry” award:  Clara D. Bain is a Substance Abuse Counselor.  It says 15 people live in the single-family 3BR 2Ba home at the address.

Unknown 09/12/2002
General Business 0645268
North Carolina (NC)
10 Years, 3 Months
600 Whitetail Lane
Clayton, NC 27520

(Low-cost temporary housing?)

Although as far as the state of NC is concerned, this organization didn’t exist until 2012, it somehow got a $20K subgrant from CJH Educational services for re-entry help, in 2004-2005.

Entity Name Type Status Formed Online Annual Reports
Legal NC Corporate Name Bain’s Community Counseling & Care Management Center NP Current-Active 9/12/2002 N/A

More Board of Directors of FAF.  You can see they come from a variety of states and include some “Revs.”

  • Richard Claytor
  • Boston, MA
  • Charley Taylor
  • Jacksonville, FL
  • Rev. Deborah Taylor
  • Milwaukee, WI
  • Kevin Poleyumptewa
  • Ahwatukee, AZ
  • Ted Dance
  • Scottsdale, AZ
  • Rev. Terry Weston
  • Plano, IL
  • Nellie Reina
  • Salt River Pima Maricopa Community
  • Rev. Bevann  Garnes
  • Scottsdale, AZ
  • Lynn Wieser, MS
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Dr. Sherry Ulmer
  • Coolidge, AZ
  • Dr. Gene C. Blue
  • Treasurer Phoenix, AZ
  • Domingo Rodríguez
  • Phoenix, AZ


I think you can see the issues it raises when a private organization sponsored in part by one well-known attorney and another group the HHS helped fund (with $6 million no less) whose sole purpose is helping people get grants, and then this organization’s primary purpose appears to be establishing a new field of practice FIRMLY, and getting grants to fund it.  So who wants the job of tracking where that money went — do YOU?  THE ENTIRE FAF GROUP ORIGINATED IN CONSOLIDATING STATEWIDE GRANTS RECIPIENTS (ARIZONA) Ca. 1994 TO START WITH ANYHOW, AS I RECALL.

What is the whole operation — some kind of bad joke?  When is it over?  Or if it’s a very long, bad dream, when do we get to wake up?

Look — here it is plain and simple.  I told us re: the family court nonprofits.  He’s talking re:  Financial Organizations that head up nonprofits.  I also showed a while back, after Carl Hermann (who now reports on CAFRs in California, at least) attempted to engage in a conversation with some public officials on how come they feel it proper to just “not mention” how much private assets are being held? And we got a nice example (as I looked up a District Attorney who failed to respond to his written questions, and found out that the same district attorney didn’t see fit to restrain some strange corporation-propagation behavior within the “City of Industry, California.”) . . .. Sooner or later this picture comes into focus well enough;


Once you see this — your worldview will be vastly expanded, and your relationship to it, radically changed.   For example, how about a person’s work life?

The United States of America1. What is Taxation?ANSWER: A revenue source.2. What is Investment Return?ANSWER: A revenue Source.3. What Enterprise operations do?ANSWER: Generate a revenue Source.
From 11/5/2012 “The Dog and Pony Show“Government and the private associations developed around government for the last century were driven by the lure of access to easy money of massive proportions.  The “front” of public service has always been the first-line “bait and hook” of presentation with the core reality being that of the massive control of the wealth involved. It would be rather refreshing to hear straight talk from those running for public office qualifying the core reality clearly and up-front don’t you think?

Note — I HIGHLY recommend a re-read of this short post, above — he talks about stolen election, world trade towers, two Bushes, invasions, etc.  And the year 2001 as a turning point in this country.  I also know the year 2001 as having created an office of faith-based initiatives by Executive Order.  It is now almost taken for granted that the World Trade Towers (9/11) was a foreign plot, and not a way of avoiding a billion-dollar reconstruction (asbestos removal) project, and had nothing to do with a double-indemnity liability policy taken out TWO DAYS before 9/11. Sure, you right.    Well how easily we are distracted, and get behind whatever war the administration wants next, right?  (Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.).

Apart from that, here’s a nice reminder from W.B. about what CAFRs represent.  These FAQs should be memorized:

Per understanding CAFRs [ Google CAFR ], people have been intentionally kept in the dark so long they forget the basics:1. A “Budget Report” is a selective funding of x accounts from x resources (set up to be primarily funded with taxation and it is for “the year”)2. An “Annual Financial Report” is the showing of “all” income: Investment; taxation; and Enterprise, plus the “accumulated wealth over decades. Budgets are for the year, an AFR is for it all since creation of the entity. There is a big difference between the two. A correct analogy would be: The budget to operate your house vs. your statement of net worth.The public has been played with the biggest shell game of selective presentation there is allowing for massive fortunes to be made by the inside players over the last several decades..Every investment fund large and small is a power base. Where that money is invested determines what country; company; real-estate venture, etc., is made or broken. Thus in line with that, never a mention of the 184,000 AFRs of the corresponding local governments..nor the many thousands of specialty investment funds they contain.I note gov pension funds facilitate the same. Paying employee benefits from the return on the funds is an after thought for the government players. The head communists back in the 30’s and 40’s said they could take over America without firming a shot. The undercurrents of that statement were that they could depend on the greed and opportunity of the players to accomplish that goal and it did. US Collective government since 2000 brings in more gross income than the entire gross income of the population of the United States. Taxation is rammed down the public’s throat (1/3rd of the gross income) and Investment / Enterprise income (2/3rd of the gross income) the “silence is golden” rule is strictly enforced with the full symbiotic cooperation of the syndicated media; controlled education; and both political parties as applies over the last century.
NOTE:Up until 1999 the CAFR showed the “gross” standing balances of income and investment fund balances. Then with onset of disclosure by CAFR1 and the public now looking for the first time http://GASB.org (a 100% private association) who oversees the accounting guidelines of the CAFR, changes were made starting with transmittal letter-31 (up to 90 now) changing the showing in the CAFR from that of gross balances to a showing of “net” balances. Many games are played there so it is very important now to look through the “notes to the financial section” to spot or be directed to many of the specialty advance liability actual fund balances.

Government was NOT supposed to operate at a profit.
 How did they get around this restriction?ANSWER: If for example a city had a 100-million dollar profit for the year from any of its operations, at a stroke of a pen they create a “liability fund” and poof, there goes the profit re-designated now as a liability.

It absolutely is not optional to get busy — this means YOU — and find out at least where you live (take it from state level on down, why not?) how many government entities of those 184,000 or so are actually functioning — DOWNLOAD (don’t just link to) as many of their CAFRs as you can get your paws on, and start looking up funds, and thinking about what you see. CAFRman.com gives a quick guide on how to; you can do this!

Please also consider this post, he is talking about government by “consult” with private organizations to (intentionally) bypass monopoly laws.



Government, how to bypass its own monopoly laws
by Walter Burien – CAFR1.com
04/18/12CLICK HERE
Government, how to bypass its own monopoly laws
by Walter Burien – CAFR1.com
The feds mandated (by strong suggestion) to local governments back in 1977 at the risk of those local governments loosing federal funding, to comply with preparing a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) or in the alternative if a small local government an Annual Financial Report or Statement (AFR).All local state governments that were not already doing so complied. Then the states passed statute regulations to all of the thousands of local governments in the state to comply also if not already doing so. Back in 1977, at least 50% of all locals were doing so already. (the program started in 1946)The monopoly takeover structure started in 1946 with the creation of http://GFOA.org(Government Financial Officers Association) who started the CAFR promotion project to local governments in the US and Canada, and now since the end of the 70’shttp://GASB.org (Government Accounting Standards Board) oversees the accounting policy and guidelines of the CAFR preparation. Both are 100% private associations with almost 100% government accountant / financial management membership.This gives both GFOA and GASB a clear monopoly by consult over massive equity (tens of trillions of dollars) without being called a government operation. if a government operation HAVING TO BE IN COMPLIANCE  with standing monopoly regulations that government bodies were subject to, they would have been shut down a long time ago as a clear monopoly.You see, being established as private associations directing government by organized and absolute consult, that got around the in place local government and federal monopoly laws effecting government bodies even though both Private Associations having almost 100% government membership.On the Federal level the counterpart federal “one looks after all” private association overseeing accounting and financial management over enterprise; private; and consult to the other associations was called http://FASB.org



Another one to seriously watch is Bush’s New Freedom Mental Health Commission, etc.   Again, a private nonprofit, “NAMI” is publicizing it.

This exhaustive report from President Bush’s

New Freedom Commission on Mental Health

emphasizes the need to transform our nation’s mental health system.

Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America

also provides recommendations for steps that can be taken at national, state and local levels to improve mental health services and supports for people of all ages with mental illnesses.

Will the report of this Commission result in the wholesale transformation called for by the Commissioners? Or, will it prove just to be another Washington report gathering dust on shelves?

I’m telling us, unless we can get a grip on “Government by Private Consult” it’s a full-time job keeping track of who’s up to what next.  I called this one on the “Broken Family Courts” Initiative and the Cummings Foundation last April.  Another “Crisis in the Courts” group (Center for Judicial Excellence) is now in the mix, and promoting the rhetoric.  You PROBABLY heard it first here:  The Family Courts are NOT broken, but doing exactly what they were designed to do!


Why Watching Conference Agenda is Crucial: Cummings Foundation, Behavioral Health Promotion &”Our” “Broken” Family Law System

Our Broken Family Court” isn’t. It ain’t “Ours” and it ain’t “Broken.” That phrase is a “tell.” I’ll tell you why


And last August (8/30/2012) I just took a sample of a single day of contracts from the Federal Government — the amount was $156 million — from the database FEDMINE.com (a good place to track them).  A sample of the top dozen or show revealed several (not just one) well-versed in promoting marriage and fatherhood, particularly “The Lewin Group.”  This is a Consulting Group — and they were consulted about Responsible Fatherhood, although later, apparently more into pharmaceutical stuff:

HHS — Contracts Awarded 8/30/2012 = $156 million. Just for today, August 30, 2012, that is.

197325277  –  LEWIN GROUP, INC., THE**(link is to someone from this group presenting at a 2007 AFCC conference.  Since 1970, they are Health and Human Services consultant; you can look it up). 630,811 4,396,810
127687093  –  CHILD TRENDS INC 1,011,927 1,686,523
072648579  –  ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C. {{see below}} 500,000 13,942,449

Would you like to see where this Archipelago of Mental Health Treatment Facilities (and privatizing government) is heading?  Check out some of the whistleblower lawsuits cropping up.  While this article doesn’t say “PENNMAPP” (Modeled on Texas’ — under Bush — “TMAPP”) Whistleblower, the person who below the whistle is mentioned in the article.

Read it carefully — and see where the atypical antipsychotics are being prescribed, and how.  Keep in mind that pharmaceutical companies are among the largest on the planet — and running a good deal of the United States (see ‘ALEC’).      The place and way to handle these things — I believe — is by getting a grasp on the economics of (abuse) — the economics of government.   This is a 2007 article.  Look at what’s it’s also costing the government to investigate and sue over these issues:

Makers of Zyprexa Risperdal and Seroquel Under Fire

March 9, 2007, 12:00:00AM. By
Washington, DC:Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, and AstraZeneca, are all named defendants in a new lawsuit filed by the state of Pennsylvania on February 26, 2007, to recover money paid through public health care programs to purchase Zyprexa, Risperdal, and Seroquel, and the costs of medical care for the people injured by these drugs.
You did catch that about “through public health care programs,” right?Pennsylvania is the 5th state to sue Lilly over its illegal marketing of Zyprexa. And according to SEC filings, Lilly was served with four Canadian lawsuits in 2005, with claims “similar to those in the litigation pending in the United States.”
So far, two states have sued Johnson & Johnson over Risperdal, but Pennsylvania is the first state to file a lawsuit against Seroquel-maker AstraZeneca.
The drugs belong to a class known as “atypical” antipsychotics, FDA approved only to treat adults with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, and yet they are some of the most widely prescribed drugs in the world.
In 2006, Zyprexa sales were $4.3 billion, Seroquel’s earned $3.4 billion, and Risperdal had sales of $4.1 billion, according to SEC filings.
A July 2006, report by Decision Resources, a leading advisory firm on healthcare issues, listed antipsychotics in 2005, as the fourth-highest-ranking class of drugs, and said two of the top ten drugs in worldwide sales were atypicals.
According to the lawsuit, the defendant drug makers concealed the risks of atypicals and exaggerated their benefits while persuading doctors to prescribe the drugs off-label for dementia, attention deficit disorders, and mood and behavior disorders.
When the FDA approves a drug it also approves the label, which lists the indications for which the drug can be prescribed, along with instructions for use and warnings about the risks associated with the drug. Once a drug is approved to treat one condition, doctors may prescribe it for others if they think it will be effective, but by law drug companies are not allowed to influence physicians to prescribe a drug for indications other than those listed on the label.
On March 1, 2007, four days after the Pennsylvania lawsuit was filed, two of the three drug companies became the target of another investigation, when Representative, Henry Waxman (D-Cal), the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, sent letters to Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca, requesting information related to the exact same charges alleged in lawsuits filed by individual states.
. . . According to the New York Times, some of these documents reveal that Lilly knew about Zyprexa’s link to high blood sugar and extreme weight gain that often leads to diabetes, and others show the details of off-label marketing scheme called “Viva Zyprexa.”
This next section of the same article is so RELEVANT I am going to post it here.  What is being done with federal HHS-based funds:  Medicaid, Medicare, promotion and incentives to put kids into foster care (needlessly, many times), or setting up “special court systems”  for “high-conflict” (another word for “dissident?”) divorces?  How many DV deaths were possibly related to someone being on such an atypical antipsychotic.   Can we see how it drive some parents rather nutty to have their children be inappropriately hauled off into the care of strangers?  If this is then used to justify cracking down on the general population — we are in for some very, very rough times (and, FYI, it already has been so used. )
(CONTINUED from Above):

The Pennsylvania case comes on the heels of lawsuits by two Pennsylvania whistleblowers, Allen Jones and Stefan Kruszewski, who say, drug companies are making a fortune from the off-label sale of drugs to patients whose care is funded by Medicaid and Medicare.At the heart of the off-label scheme, they say, are the preferred drug lists, or medication formularies, maintained in many states. Once drugs are added to the list, they must be prescribed as a first line of treatment for all patients in state run institutions and patients in the general population who are covered by public health care programs.In the summer of 2002, psychiatrist, Dr Kruszewski, was employed with the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, and charged with reviewing psychiatric care provided by state-funded agencies to identify waste, fraud, and abuse. He was also responsible for reviewing the deaths of individuals in state care who died under suspicious circumstances in facilities inside and outside of Pennsylvania.

Early in his investigation, Dr Kruszewski noticed that almost all of the patients under state care were on drug cocktails consisting of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants. The populations he found drugged most often, he said, were children in state care, the disabled, people in state prisons, and children in the juvenile justice system.

For instance, he says, Neurontin was only approved for controlling seizures, but “was being prescribed for anxiety, social phobia, PTSD, oppositional defiant behavior, and attention deficit disorder with no evidence to support these uses.”

When he informed his superiors about the high rate of off-label prescribing and warned about the risk of liability to the state of Pennsylvania if it continued, he was told, “it is none of your business.”

In June 2003, Dr Kruszewski inspected a facility in Oklahoma that housed children from Pennsylvania after an unexpected death of a child, and found children were being overmedicated and housed in deplorable living conditions, in addition to being sexually and physically abused by staff and kept in unnecessary restraints and seclusion.

In a report, Dr Kruszewski recommended removing the children from the facility, “in order to protect other innocent individuals from morbid and mortal consequences of severe over-medication, including chemical restraints; emotional, physical and sexual abuse; seclusion; and dirty and inadequate living conditions.”

A day later, Dr Kruszewski was accused of “trying to dig up dirt,” and was subsequently fired in July 2004, because he refused to keep quiet and accept that it was none of his business, he says.

A year later, Dr Kruszewski filed a whistleblower lawsuit alleging that patients under state care were being drugged for profit and prescribed as many as 5 psychiatric drugs at the same time, and that four children and one adult had died

From below, I have shown how the nonprofit/for-profit alliances can work:

Allen Jones (mentioned above) showed some real courage and tenacity in this one. notice that the drug involved was “Risperdal” and that there’d been a plan to administer a plan from Texas in Pennsylvania, in one fell swoop.  This is absolutely outrageous behavior, particularly by state officials (not all of them, obviously) and it is hurting people, and cheating others.   Poor people and people of color are being targeted, but it could be almost anyone.  They also mentioned nursing homes.

I hope this illustration explains how multi-country, multi-state nonprofit alliances acquire power (this does include assets, wealth, and influence) and then affect policy, or definitely try to.

This example arose when I found out about a retiring Washington State Judge (Bobbe Bridge) who formed a major nonprofit around the children and youth justice system.  For her to do this, someone favorable to the idea had to be running the state-level HHS (in other scenarios, it might require, for example, someone favorable on the state Supreme Court, or otherwise in the Governor’s Office, in order to bypass the legislature and the awareness of the residents what this really represents).

In that situation, the super-achiever Judge (with a family background in the jewelry trade), the Hon. Bobbe Bridge, and a super-achiever in-and-out of government, Susan Dreyfus (below) were involved in setting up a certain nonprofit within Washington State.

Judge Bobbe Bridge is also now involved with another group since 2006, “CITA”  Court Improvement Training Academy” also taking federal funding.  You can read about that by following its links:


About CITA


The Court Improvement Training Academy (CITA) was established at the University of Washington School of Law in 2006 by Professor Lisa Kelly.Funded by a contract with the Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts using federal Court Improvement Program training money, CITA began serving the legal community in Washington State in September 2007.

THE AOC’S (Administrative Office of the Courts) are major policy-setting places, and where many time grants come through.  They are also coming, at least in California, under serious scrutiny for their practices, making headlines for major projects overbilled, retaliation against whistleblowers, and changing-of-the-guard on heading it up.  The AOC in ANY state should be monitored for their policies, unless it’s OK to have justice-by-administrative-offices throughout the land.   Some of the AOC leadership in these courts are AFCC;  AFCC has a particular agenda regarding women, and regarding the handling of abuse (violence, child molestation, etc.) within family lines, which is why blogs like this, and/or people (mothers specifically) marching on Washington to plead for mercy!

As this is within a school of law, it doesn’t sound like a nonprofit (is it?  Maybe).  And it wasn’t founded by Justice Bobbe J. Bridge, ret. (below) who also had been working with Ms. Dreyfus on another project.   However the professor who DID found the ‘CITA” was in a professorship endowed by this same judge!  (click on the link):

Lisa Kelly

Photo of Lisa  Kelly

Director, Children and Youth Advocacy Clinic
Bobbe and Jon Bridge Endowed Professorship in Child Advocacy

Phone: (206) 685-1826
Email: lisak2@uw.edu

Curriculum Vitae |

You get what you pay for.  This professorship in Child Advocacy was obviously paid for (endowed). A look at the curriculum vitae here shows Professor Kelly has been teaching family law up here in NW united states (Washington)but hails from West Virginia and Arkansas, rather the other side of the country, and in some of these fields:

1996–2002West Virginia UniversityMorgantown, WV
Professor and Deputy Director of Clinical Program

Deputy director, general civil clinic with domestic violence, family law and public benefits focus
•Family Law
•Trial Advocacy
•Education Law
•Provided interdisciplinary training to law students for certification as GALs under a Court Improvement Project Grant

Interesting resume.  This theme comes up several times:

  • Conceiving Father’ Rights, International Society of Family Law, Brisbane, Australia, July 2000
  • Conceiving Nonmarital Fathers’ Rights, Family Law in the Year 2000
  • Domestic Violence and Child Welfare: Two Worlds Collide, Domestic Violence Summit, Seattle Washington, 2004.

The whole development of child welfare law — as a specialty — has a corporation background I probably blogged more over at Scranton Political Times (activeboard forum) under family law topics, and groups such as the “NACC,” which got a $600,000 HHS grant to develop certification in this area of law.  The NACC conferences alongside AFCC (etc.), however of interest is one of its primary advocates and leaderships actually has a British background; I DNR his name, but he now works for the Juvenile Law Society.

The area of “GALs” has historically been a major problem area for mothers of contested custody cases where abuse has been an issue, and was in mine also.  The practices of the NACC member (who presented alongside a parent coordinator and the then-presiding family law judge) from Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania, eventually ended in reports of financial fraud, overbilling, double-billing and an FBI raid on the offices (AFTER an individual got some of the receipts and posted them, as I understand the situation).   To narrate much more would be off-topic of this post, but the people and the nonprofit organizations DO interact, influence each other, network — and it DOES count to look up some of the “genealogy” of some of the major leadership within an area.

Right here, in Washington State, we have a powerful judge (bio below) from a wealthy family and an acknowledged philanthropist who has founded both a NONPROFIT (2006, mentioned in blue font below) and apparently endowed a PROfeSSORSHIP at Washington Law named after herself, the professor holding this position then (who pays the piper calls the tune) founded the “CITA” Court Improvement Training Academy, which is going to be taking federal funds to change the justice system according to what definitely looks like a model.

Here’s the indicator from professor Kelly’s vita, I believe, that Justice Bridge was on the same information stream — a workshop in London which I recall also was mentioned in the (Colorado-based?) “Juvenile Law Center.”

July 19, 2007, Once Upon a Legal Time: Developing the Skill of Storytelling in the Law, London, England,Telling Children’s Stories.

and next thing you know, here it is in Washington State, after a stopover in Arizona:

October 19, 2007, Celebrating the Decade Past, the Decade Ahead, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, Right Around the Corner: Emerging Rights Theories for Children in State Care

January 31, 2008, Bobbe & Jon Bridge Professorship Installation, Telling Children’s Stories: Legal Advocacy for Children and Youth.

And here is the Juvenile Law Society (founded in 2009) book on the same basic material, by Marvin Ventrell:

The program is based on a new book, Trial Advocacy for the Child Welfare Lawyer: Telling the Story of the Family, written by JLS Director Marvin Ventrell and published by the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA) and LexisNexis Publishing © 2011.

The book and the training are comprehensive treatments of the trial, from case analysis and opening statement through closing argument. A courtroom ethics and professionalism segment is included. The book and training represent a blending of the general art of trial practice with the particulars of child welfare / custody court practice.

Historically, child welfare lawyers have lacked adequate training and mentorship in trial practice, a privilege reserved for more traditional and better-resourced areas of litigation. Additionally, the less formal nature of child welfare and custody proceedings fostered a view that the traditional art of trial practice did not belong in child welfare court. Times have changed, child welfare law is now a legitimate legal specialty, and courts and clients demand well-trained child welfare litigators. JLS trial skills training meets that demand.

Mr. Ventrell’s background shows that prior to the NONPROFIT “JLS” (Juvenile Law Society) he was head of “NACC” (National Association of Counsel for Children), and in general the extent of his influence and prestige in this field. It is likely, and seems obvious, that Justice Bridge is favorable to the continued installation of children’s law offices (and trainings for them) in Washington, and probably elsewhere. For one, it also implies government-funded work for attorneys, keying off the HUGE dependency system in the USA (foster care, adoptions) and overlapping with custody fields. I hate to put it this bluntly, but for non-abusive parents fighting for custody with an abusive one, which are often the bread and butter of the courts, this is a motherlode — to set up shop for more GALs and Child Welfare offices throughout the land. They will NEVER lack for customers….


Marvin Ventrell founded the Juvenile Law Society in 2009 following 15 years as the chief executive officer of the National Association of Counsel for Children. In his 26-year legal career, Mr. Ventrell has been a litigation firm associate and partner, a public defender, an association director, a policy advocate, a teacher, and a trial skills instructor. He
is a recipient of the ABA Child Advocacy Award and the Kempe Award, and is a Fellow of the Colorado Bar Foundation. Mr. Ventrell co-directed the national program sponsored by the U.S. Dept. of HHS Children’s Bureau that established Child Welfare Law as a formal legal specialty and created the Child Welfare Attorney Certification Program. He co-edited the national treatise, Child Welfare Law and Practice, and compiled the national examination for child welfare law proficiency. He is also the author of numerous articles and book chapters including, The Evolution of the Dependency Component of the Juvenile Court. Mr. Ventrell is responsible for the creation of the National Children’s Law Office Project that supports the creation and maintenance of model children’s law offices through the project publication, Children’s Law Office Guidebook. Together with the National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA), Mr. Ventrell established the annual NITA Rocky Mountain Child Advocacy Training Institute, now in its 17th year. He serves as a faculty trial skills trainer for NITA’s National, Regional, and Specialty Programs.

Justice Bobbe J. Bridge, ret.

Return to Introduction.Justice Bobbe J. Bridge, ret., is the Founding President and Chief Executive Officer of the Center for Children & Youth Justice (CCYJ) which she founded in 2006.

She served on the Washington State Supreme Court from 1999 to 2007 before retiring to lead CCYJ fulltime in January 2008.

If you finish reading this, we have obviously a retiring judge, wealthy enough family to be philanthropists, founding a nonprofit one year before retiring to stay involved.  In short, not that probably the income (if any) from this group was needed, it was (as “San Diego Family Justice Center” probably was for retiring City Attorney, Casey Gwinn) what we might call, public employee retirement plan nonprofit projects.

The prior governmental connections are great for getting grants, or getting these things up and running which continue to influence the justice (etc.) systems.

She was a King County Superior Court judge from 1989 to 1999, served as Presiding Judge of the 51-member Superior Court for two years, and was the Chief Judge of King County Juvenile Court from 1994 to 1997. Before joining the bench, Justice Bridge was the first female partner at the Seattle law firm Garvey Schubert Barer.

Recognized statewide and nationally as a leading advocate for foster care reform, domestic violence victims, truancy prevention, juvenile justice reform, and a host of other issues, JusticeBridge also serves the community as a dedicated volunteer and philanthropist.

She has been a member of the boards of many nonprofit organizations, including YouthCare and the YWCA. In 1999, she helped establish and fund the Pacific Northwest’s first court-based child care center at the Regional Justice Center in Kent, offering a safe place for parents and guardians with business before the court to leave young children . . .

A look at that nonprofit’s tax returns showed clearly (clear as a bell) where it’s funding was coming from, by individual (wealthy) foundation — the type of foundation that runs demonstration projects on an entire state:  something which can be done from the top down, and is rarely a grassroots effort.

As I looked up Ms. Dreyfus’ very interesting background from Wisconsin, it became immediately clear that she was involved with the “DCFS” component in Wisconsin under Gov. Tommy Thompson, near the beginning of welfare reform.

She then went apparently into (or back into) the private field of behavioral health (as below) and from there, to head up a multi-million$$ HHS budget in Washington.   Her real allegiance wasn’t to the people of Washington, I’d have to surmise, but to the program material.  Ms. Dreyfus also is currently on an advisory board run by? the American Humane Association on “NQI-NRF” or something like that — the “fatherhood” component of the United States Department of HHS’ child welfare administration.

In fact, here is that biography; you can see the components plain and clear.  Below that, I have simply chosen to use the Alliance of Children and Families as an example of privatization of government services, and alliances which set policies among themselves and with their own related interest organizations.  When this comes to the matter of something so broad-based (and poorly defined) as ‘BEHAVIORAL HEALTH” –all of us need to wake up and pay better attention.

This is a teaching post along those lines.  Please communicate if it’s been helpful information!

HomeSusan Dreyfus Background

On Jan. 2, 2012, Susan Dreyfus willassume leadership of Families International as president and CEO. In addition, she will be president and CEO of the Alliance for Children and Families, CEO of Ways to Work, CEO of United Neighborhood Centers of America, and will serve on the FEI Behavioral Health Board of Directors.

Currently, she is secretary for the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services. She was appointed by Governor Chris Gregoire and unanimously approved by the state senate in May 2009.

Since that time, Dreyfus led the largest Washington state agency, with an $11 billion budget and more than 16,000 employees. The department is responsible for programs and systems including child welfare, juvenile justice, aging and disability services, substance abuse and mental health, vocational rehabilitation, deaf and hard of hearing, and economic services. The department directly administers programs and institutions and works closely with the nonprofit and for-profit sectors throughout the state of Washington.

Yes it does, and that’s what I’m talking about:  This Department is the largest state agency (HHS is the largest federal, I believe, or among the largest) and handles programs relating to — basically, PEOPLE from child through aged.  Is there another sector of humanity it does NOT have influence over?  People just don’t see how much of government is indeed stuffed with “HHS” or “DSHS” programs, and what they do.

She is a member of numerous task forces and other working groups, such as the governor’s health cabinet on health care reform, governors subcabinet on WorkFirst, and the Legislative Task Force on WorkFirst. Dreyfus also engaged staff and external partners, stakeholders, and tribes to develop the strategic framework for the future for the department.

People get into position of power and influence in the EXECUTIVE branch of state governments, either the governor’s office (she as an appointee, though obviously approved by the legislature), often at the top of HHS, and from the top DOWN, “reform” government.  Often such people have prior background experience in government reform, and that is their agenda; increase profits, reduce expenses, streamline services, centralize policymaking, and call in the private nonprofit/forprofit pinch hitters.   Groups that don’t play according to the game plan will find themselves out in the cold.

Another person who did this in Oklahoma, ca. 1999ff, which I profiled (and who carries a religious banner, as Ms. Dreyfuss carries the behavioral health banner) — was Jerry Regier.  However, it’s the structure of government and the “asleep at the switch” population which tolerates this to start with.

Before joining the State of Washington, Dreyfus was executive vice president for strategy at Rogers Behavioral Health Systems, Inc. She was responsible for developing, implementing, and providing for a dynamic and ongoing strategic planning and positioning process for the system and its key corporations. She also facilitated the evaluation, implementation, and integration of new business opportunities for the system.

In January 2003, Dreyfus was appointed senior vice president and chief operating officer of the Alliance for Children and Families. She provided vision, leadership and management to develop and successfully implement the strategic plan and ensure the day to day operations of the organizations and its staff. In addition to member recruitment and retention activities, she worked to increase the national presence of the Alliance with states, national operations, federal officials, and Congress.

If Ms. Dreyfus’ interest had been religious sphere, and not behavioral health, she’d probably be an evangelist and working through government as well for privileges and influence.  That said, the religious sphere is not so power-friendly when it comes to women running things.

Notice:  While at Alliance, as part of her job, she sought to increase it’s “national presence” with — in short state level, nationwide, federal officials, and lawmakers, a.k.a. “Congress.”  Do we believe that back in government these alliances and allegiances were forgotten, or were they part of why she was appointed to start with?  Where really is the loyalty — to the behavioral health system, or the law and due process, etc., of government with significant input by the people who live IN the states affected?

In addition to her duties with the Alliance, Dreyfus was named senior vice president and COO of the Alliance’s parent organization, Families International. She partnered with and supported all the affiliated organizations of Families International on initiatives, leveraging opportunities and day-to-day administration.

Many nonprofits — “AFCC” (Association of Family and Conciliation Courts) running American, or USA (or individual state) institutions and programs (i.e., government, people who are public employees) — are international and do not have primary allegiance to the governmental structure of this particular country, the USA.  Which is probably why it’s becoming more and more “collectivist’ and individual rights, due process (etc.) have hitched-a-ride, if they exist somewhere, elsewhere.  That at least is how I understand and experience my own country now, although I most definitely did not understand it so before being hauled improperly (and on a frivolous lawsuit), through case consolidation (ex parte) into the family court (conciliation court) system in a northern California urban and supposedly progressive area.

This next paragraph counts — a lot:

Prior to joining the Alliance and Families International, Dreyfus was administrator of Wisconsin’s Division of Children and Family Services for more than six years. Appointed by Gov. Tommy Thompson, she helped design the Division of Children and Family Services, which was created in 1996 to provide a major focus on issues and policies affecting children, families, and communities. The agency responsibilities included child welfare, regulation and licensing of child caring facilities, youth development, and a broad range of community programs.

Dreyfus currently and previously has served on numerous boards and committees. Currently, she is on the board of Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago, and is vice president of the board of the American Public Human Services Association

Anyone here ever even HEARD of the “APHSA” before? I hadn’t, and looked it up (naturally). You can too.

HOW IS IT that a single person (looks like someone you might meet at the local PTA) can have such extreme influence in so many places, while people affected by these programs, some of them, have their kids ripped out of their care, are driven homeless or close to it while trying prevent or remedy that, and are basically brought into permanent trauma, for the rest of their lives, over the issue — let alone what happens to the children?

Why is our country obsessed with programs of this nature and re-arranging families to transplant kids based on accusations, and yet when there has been identified abuse of some sort, switch them back INTO the home where the abuse was?

And why are there so many individuals like this one, in positions of such power and influence? Was Ms. Dreyfus groomed for this career, is she unnaturally smart and talented, did it relate to marriage (I seem to recall marriage to a Wisconsin judge) — WHY would people even accept jobs like this? Do they really believe all the poor, mentally ill, and distressed people need superior organizational oversight and bunches of them to be placed in group homes? What’s causing all the behavioral illnesses around this place?

Assuming this bio is accurate (it seems to be), Ms. Dreyfus got some work done for people who wanted government rearranged according to a certain plan. I definitely do not accept it came from just one person’s unique concepts — because this concept is similar to what’s going on in other circles.

Anyhow, below here is an example this “Alliance for Children and Families” whose acronym “ACF” just happens at match a major program div. within the federal HHS:


Some of the larger ones around (these days) seem to be in the behavioral health or mental health fields, longtime a great province of government control.  Here’s one:


Our MISSION is to fuse intellectual capital with superior membership services in order to strengthen the capacities of North America’s nonprofit child- and family-serving organizations to serve and to advocate for children, families, and communities so that together we may pursue a VISION of a healthy society and strong communities for all children, adults, and families.

Regardless of the front pages, mottos, etc., remember, nonprofits are not there not to profit.  They are for a purpose, and have an agenda, and are corporations.  Corporations have income (from various categories), expenses, distributions, writeoffs, a net cash flow for that year, and assets.  It gets pretty interesting, because one thing nonprofits are very good at, some of them, is consolidating assets (or cash) and having investment income.  Or, “Program Service Income,” plus at times, government income.  Naturally, they want to set government policy too….

If you read some of the tax returns, it shows the activities, including salaries of officers (many work 0.5 hrs week, a few are earning, though from two or three columns of compensation, totalling over $1,000,000 — that’s board compensation, collective.  The organization below is also giving grants to other nonprofits, (members?) ca. $9K or $18k, and then another schedule shows transactions with related organizations — large (in this case) very large (several hundred thousand) of transactions.  SO under this one nonprofit, a lot of money moves around between organizations and people, and is labeled, valued and assessed, etc.

Alliance for Children and Families, Inc. WI 2006 990 64 $4,204,062 39-1709925
Alliance for Children and Families, Inc. WI 2007 990 37 $6,072,497 39-1709925
Alliance for Children and Families, Inc. WI 2008 990 42 $6,031,718 39-1709925
Alliance for Children and Families, Inc. WI 2009 990 40 $5,244,040 39-1709925
Alliance for Children and Families, Inc. WI 2010 990 45 $5,163,415 39-1709925

Usually close to a nonprofit is the related “For-Profit” so remember to look for them (AND THEIR CUTE LOGOS/ACRONYMS) when you land a big one, which it seems ACF, above, is (FROM THEIR “ABOUT” PAGE)

The Alliance also bolsters its impact through Families International, an impact-generating vehicle created by the Alliance to strengthen its efforts to realize the shared vision of a healthy society and strong communities for all children and families.

impact-generating vehicle“??  Like these?

Families International leverages the unique strengths of its affiliates—the Alliance, United Neighborhood Centers of AmericaWays to Work, andFEI Behavioral Health—by promoting collaboration, synergy, and growth, creativity, and innovation.

Actually, in this situation, the “IMPACT-GENERATING VEHICLE” ( Families International) is a Milwaukee-based holding company for two nonprofits and one for-profit.  So the NONProfit “ACF” (see logo above) then incorporated the umbrella parent company “FI” under which was sheltered some more.  It took me a while to get the process, but after I saw it happening often enough, I began to catch on.  It’s kind of like the beginning of the book of Numbers — or, say Matthew, only  maybe a little less linear, and definitely not limited by the human reproductive cycle — these are simply corporate entities:

Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren; 3And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram; 4And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon; 5And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse; 6And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias; 7And Solomon begat Roboam;** and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa; 8And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias; 9And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias; 10And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias; 11And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon:

(**it appears that Solomon, and most of these, begat a good deal more than one!!)

The Alliance for Children and Families is the sole incorporator of Families International (FI), a nonprofit holding company based in Milwaukee.

 SO, although “ACF” may now be an “affiliate” of FI, it sounds like ACF “begat” FI, and then whoever incorporated the other little grandbabies, or cousins, pulled them in under that family “holding company” or “impact vehicle leveraging the strength of its affiliates” if you will.

FI serves as the parent organization for three nonprofit organizations—the Alliance for Children and FamiliesUnited Neighborhood Centers of America (UNCA), and Ways to Work—and one for-profit company, FEI Behavioral Health.

Visually, by logo, something like this: “NP”=nonprofit, “P” = Profit

NP Home begat…  under which 2 more NPs, and the incorporating NP +  & 1P, I have their logos now below; each serves a different function in the “family” tree:

Home  (this incorporated the Parent CompanyFI, then took its place as an “Affiliate” under it.

The Alliance shares office space in its Milwaukee headquarters withFamilies International (FI) and the three other FI companies. The office also houses the American Association of Children’s Residential Centers, which is managed under a partnership agreement with the Alliance.  

The kicker is the bottom one, “FEI,” “one of the largest behavioral health companies in the United States

Where this gets interesting, typically, is when you look at the flesh and blood (and their corporate affiliations) on “board” these companies.  I have looked at hundreds (probably thousands) of these over years, and the string of allegiances is, literally a web.

And, I have to be honest — they generally have anchor hooks into government, one way or another — if not right while the person is on a board, they will rotate in and out of government (HHS, DOJ, DOE, DOL — but typically the first two, in these family-related fields) inbetween serving as nonprofits on corporations and preaching to everyone else that the way out of poverty is NOT to “do what we do” but “do what we want you-all to do,” which is focus on having a single-source of income from one of our corporations, keep contributing taxes to fund the centralized wealth from which OUR corporations provide services….. and will over time, morph, and change to make sure that the market for this type of services never runs dry.

From ACF above, (interesting, eh, how the acronym “ACF” matches the Federal “HHS/ACF” department, is it not?)

This timeline from what in 2005 was “the Family Conservancy


In the early days of our founding as The Provident Association in 1880, we helped families overcome joblessness, floods and epidemics.

Over the decades, we responded to the impact of wars, poverty and societal changes to support families and children in pursuit of stability and happy lives.

View a timeline with details of our 130-year history.

(Please read the timeline, fine print, and notice the morphing of the original purpose towards parent education and creating bright futures with healthy families, etc.)

Written by Let's Get Honest|She Looks It Up

December 16, 2012 at 7:15 pm

%d bloggers like this: