Archive for December 4th, 2012
Proof that Governments are Essentially Commerce, with Guns
This is subject matter I’m currently working through, which is why it’s being posted in two of my blogs
When something grips one’s soul like this, answers (logical ones) are demanded. Also, in writing about how callous and cold the pure, economic, rationale is (in operation), I find the opposite part of my own self being stirred to empathize and seek to understand the situation, and what meaning does it attach now (personally).
Because there are many similarities of experience — though not quality. I am coming to the conclusion that the reason WHY it “feels” similar is that the same forces of colonization originating from England, Germany, and the Netherlands specifically (referring to three major forces in the gold and diamond industry have been focusing on) — are running governments in more than one continent.
In the green-background (extended) quote below here, a person involved in the Parliament of Namibia during its first years of independence (1990s) writes a chronology. He is a “Dr. Klaus Dierks.” He asks these questions (Year: 2003) in preface to a long, and detailed narrative, I think he has tried to make it an honest and thorough one (from what I can tell). This whole chronology appears to be available on-line also in both German and English (ISBNs and mailing address on the link):
Chronology of Namibian History
From Pre-Historical Times To Independent NamibiaKlaus Dierks
. . . (from the PREFACE):African society is little understood and under evaluated. Who are the Africans, where are they coming from? Which are the moving forces of Namibian history?
I would like to argue that the moving forces are not ethnic or racial in nature but social and economic. As implied above, one major shortcoming of Namibia’s historical records has to be borne in mind: the indigenes were considered to be nothing but objects of European intervention. They do not turn up as makers of history, and the impression is created that they lived “outside” the country’s history. The chronology before you makes an honest attempt to rectify this bias, but it has to be understood that this effort is merely an additional stepping stone in the cumulative effort to write up the very complex history of this young nation state.
Another major shortcoming of the records is that references to the role of Namibian women in the making of their country’s history, and in bringing about its liberation, are all too rare, and this topic is deserving of much additional research in the future. Women’s oppressed status in Namibian history is clearly manifested in the fact that they are not mentioned in most of the historical sources. Their work is not valued according to its scope, importance, or degree of skill.
“Handing over of the two Books to H.E., Dr. Sam Shafiishuna Nujoma, the President of the Republic Namibia, at State House, Windhoek, on 18.08.2003″ (It says he passed away on 3/5/2005)
See also Dierks’ page on “Reflections on Donor Aid” — very informative! Read his account of the liberation of Ecuador,(hover cursor, or click!) and how Great Britain was calling in the debt (it takes money to wage a war; that money for freedom from Spain was fronted by British bankers (and Great Britain) — early 1800s. Not resolved til 1937…. (Similar deal, in the US…. by the way …!!!!!)
{{in a piece of the chronology, I noted that part of this comes from missionary law early on.}}
While I cannot communicate, perhaps, in words only — or by assembling others’ writings — I am still trusting that, over time it will start to communicate that, if we want freedom (badly enough) and not to be witnesses AND participants (whether of technology, or of resources, i.e., dollars and labor, brains, and time) to the next round of outrageous genocides — which seems to be habit-forming — then we have to compile a good understanding of how to view things.
And, of WHO we are dealing with.
(See last post….)
This also one is a mouthful and an eyeful. However, I believe unless we get an in-depth view of where our own (meaning, the United States of America, and individual states’) origins were — ideological AND practical/tactical — we’re headed on the wrong side of the railroad tracks, so to speak (after building them).
Financial
Commerce
Legal
Social
Educational Institutions
Some off-the-beaten-track books and information I’ve picked up over the years (some of us are truly hunter-gatherers upstairs, not farmers) are coming to fruit now, and making more sense. Perhaps this is just age, perhaps it’s the times.
I also am personally having to re-work where I stand on Christianity in general, even given what I do know about the matters of what we now call ca. 200 or 300 AD when the Monotheism & State was pretty well sealed into a catechism.
Among things that came up (in the last few posts over yonder) were Africans writing about the history of apartheid, diamond or gold mines, Rhodes, De Beers, Oppenheimers, German (genocides) and colonialism — was my own reminder about the great library of Alexandria, Egypt — which had a series of fires and destructions, and may (or may not) have been mostly lost to history.
In fact I am beginning to think about things Alexander the Great had in common with this Cecil Rhodes: leaving no heirs, conquering fast and furious, and empire split up between his four generals at the time of his (premature) death. (Alexandria and the Hellenistic world, library, etc.)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
How current is all this now, how relevant? Oh, I don’t know — YOU judge! Here’s some more data:
Year 2000 (I also have this on “Long and Winding Rhodes#4”)
-
Diamond Con – Edward Jay Epstein
edwardjayepstein.com/archived/diamond.htmWALL STREET JOURNAL August 3, 2000 by Edward Jay Epstein …But the diamond cartel, while modifying its tactics, has not changed its basic strategy. … and human-rights communities, it has convinced theU.N. Security Council to impose …
The righthand column is the entire article. (As he has it posted, I’m assuming he wants the information out, with credits!) which sheds lights on the left-hand column, and I take it from there up to 2012…
|
||||
***Mr. Epstein is an American investigative journalist, and his book on the Diamond industry is as far back as 1982, and well-documented. Beyond that, there is prior documentation — a lot of it — on the history of these various groups. It’s just extremely hard truth to accept, and kind of shows a lot of press, politics (and governance) for what it basically is — greed, colonialism, and pre-meditated monopolies. Two sets of laws: Some for Us, Another for Them. This affects almost ALL business done in the United States.
Without tracing some of the ‘genealogy’ of ideas — and of the basic players — one just can’t grasp the reality. And while working (or unemployed) Americans are constantly being fed guilt about almost everything (including things we are actually guilty of), the fact is, we still at some level identify with our own government as “the good guys.”
Big mistake, I say.
The “good guy” is somewhere inside each of us, waiting to wake up, perhaps — or already in action. But of all the causes I can think which would be a PRIMARY cause — it would be to do something about the extreme centralization of wealth, power, and control of not just individual countries’ — but international — institutions designed to deceive, control, and extort the view (to varying degrees of cruelty depending on the various sector’s usefulness to the overall purpose, for now anyhow, basically, “the world.”
There is a paradigm for this in one of the books of the Bible, incidentally, and it is talking specifically about this same topic: merchandising, blood, human trafficking, etc. Of course, being the Bible, the culprit is called “Babylon, the great whore.” ( Babylon being one of the first world dominators familiar to these prophets?). No matter what gender (including both genders) are involved, the bad guy is often a woman, a “whore.” However, look:
It mentions Nations, Kings of the Earth, and Merchants. After much vivid and gory detail, it concludes (that chapter, at least), and listing what type of goods and merchandise was sold in this Great City…
Notice it mentions gold, precious stones, and pearls — in addition the merchants wailing that the source of their merchandise (or where it was being sold) was destroyed, suddenly and violently (it’s in the form of a prophetic curse, basically)
15The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing,16And saying, Alas, alas, that great city, that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls! 17For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off, 18And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city! 19And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas, that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate. 20Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.
21And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all. 22And the voice of harpers, and musicians, and of pipers, and trumpeters, [[WHo PAYS FOR THEM?]] shall be heard no more at all in thee; and no craftsman, of whatsoever craft he be, shall be found any more in thee; and the sound of a millstone shall be heard no more at all in thee; 23And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived.
24And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.
There are many references to shipmasters and trade routes. A lot of the colonialism of South Africa and Southwest Africa was basically to open and protect TRADE ROUTES (and migrate, settle, and sell more stuff), right? Dutch East India, British South Africa, German Southwest Africa, and various international ones also — then, and now.
While looking up the corporation “DKG” (D for “Deutsche,” i.e., German) — that was the Protectorate (supposedly) of the property this Bremen tobacco merchant and failed farmer (Luderitz) sold his stuff to, I ran across a very detailed narrative — a chronicle, really — of Namibia (German Southwest Africa then, Namibia now, complete with the “Forbidden Zone” now become a national park, etc.) which shows clearly, again and again, how things go:
NAMIBIA obtained independence in 1990. The person who wrote this chronology (well-indexed) was also a member of parliament and an engineer. I found it in looking up the DKG. You can see that before the actual sale and colonization began, missionaries and traders were involved, and began weakening and interfering with existing trading structures.
Then the bargaining begins (see last post, “Luderitz” inset), and you can see how the process works. It BEGINS with getting a treaty of some sort (public or private) and usually mining rights (the year 1885; year is in European style — day, month; not month,day). These were pastoral (and/or hunting and raiding) tribes, and here come the missionaries with guns (and some epidemics), and others trying to buy their land and mining rights. One tribe was supported against another, etc.
These histories parallel United States and World histories, both in and out of Wars, and in that there is significant evidence (in my opinion, observation) that the US is also being treated like a British colony. So if we want to see “how that goes,” this is a great example.
Also the centralization, regionalization following World War I still perpetuated colonial rule. The Germans got control at first, however, with WWI, and after, then control was (though under a mandate) more with the British. None of it was good for the original residents.… All this time, diamonds and gold were being mined, cut, sold, promoted, and the (diamond, etc.) cartel in existence pretty well running things.
The indexed format was helpful for me. Below this segment, we fast-forward to the year about 2000, but keep in mind — Namibia didn’t become “Namibia” until 1990. And I DNR when “NAMDEB” (Namibia + De Beers) came into being, whether 1994, or another time. By any other name, it’s the similar types of activities.
I will mark this segment with horizontal lines and different background color (rather than the “box” format some of my quotes have).
I am very thankful someone has taken time to put this together (although I live on another continent!) as I myself try to assemble a consistent and coherent understanding of my own country (and the world I have to continue navigating in, though now much more as a nomad than a farmer, being female, being a mother, having raised children, and experienced extreme alienation and sense of “displacement,” I have no extended family. Many women in my position are experiencing this in our own “homeland” (so to speak) — and to the extent we are (as women are so often alleged to be) “relational” and “social” beings, not to mention, we have instinct, emotion, empathy and compassion — for our own and for others —
How can I put this? — the clear sense (to me) is that this place has been violently ravaged, or raped, somehow. Maybe it always was, however, UNTIL I married, I never experienced this country, or life, as a place where I would be functioning as, literally — not figuratively only — half-fugitive, to this day.
It is more than personal — it’s social, and it’s a collective experience of misappropriation. I believe it’s possibly the continuation of what HEGEL called the “world-spirit.” It is violent, too.
I have never (ever) gone through anything like what the Herero or Namaqua did, or any of these populations. But I know there is something seriously wrong with my “tribe” – that’s in the nearby and in the wider sense (in case it’s not obvious, I’m Caucasian). Trying to connect one’s awareness (spiritually also) absent people I have a human community with (most are so wrapped up in this system that funds the destructions) — well, it’s just tough. Pretty much what we might call “abuse” — the listing of characteristics — is epitomized in “Colonizing.”
It’s really an attitude, and the attitude leads to practice, and the practices enable institutions. Please listen to this account not of ALL of the southern part of Africa, just Namibia (See map!) This is the country where a German Commissioner practiced and refined “concentration camp” and genocide, afterwards coverup of the material, and much more…
This was written in January 2003 by a Dr. Klaus Dierks (acknowledgements at the bottom of this page)
“The early history of Namibia cannot be distinguished from the period of the early European explorers, adventurers, traders and missionaries who opened this country up to the outside world in the 19th and early 20th centuries and who, in doing so, created the basis for Namibia’s colonial status which lasted all the way up to 1990.
An evaluation of the manifold records of the German colonial period from the 1890s to 1915, as well as some secondary literature, was carried out with a view to documenting the colonial character of Namibia’s history, whose grim consequences for Namibian indigenes were their being dispossessed of land and assets and deprived of human rights.
The mandatory rule of the Union of South Africa and later the Republic of South Africa in many respects perpetuated the objectives of the German colonial power. “
PREFACE
An updated and well-researched chronology of Namibian history is long overdue.
In particular, a chronological and properly indexed delineation of the pre-colonial and mandate periods following World War I, and of the period leading up to Namibia’s independence, has long been lacking. This chronology depicts “Namibia’s Road to Freedom“; the country’s striving for freedom and independence is the red thread woven through the rich tapestry of its history since long before the onset of formal colonialism in 1884.
The advent of colonialism in the last quarter of the 19th century serves as the starting point for this research, and the seemingly endless yarn of facts and figures that flowed from the colonial presence is followed to its logical conclusion – the birth of the Republic of Namibia on 21 March 1990.
Community awareness of ancient historical roots, associated with oral traditions about the origins and migrations of many Namibian communities play an important role in the revival of their cultures in post-independent Namibia and is reflected in this chronology.
The author, being an engineer by profession as well as a historian, has applied an “engineering approach” to this chronicle, which serves to advance its accuracy.
. . .This formal colonial period is divided into four sub-periods:
- the initial period of occupation from 1884 to 1889,
- the period from 1890 to 1903 which saw the initiation of active resistance against the German administration (nineteen uprisings by various Namibian communities against the Germans during this period, all in all there have been thirty uprisings against the German/South African colonial authorities between 1890 and 1959),
My point being, someone got a foothold in earlier; specifically Luderitz and Germany (DKG). they were resisting from quite near the beginning, but were overcome. Let’s understand why, because resistance is still required, to the same trends, only in different form perhaps…. and I don’t want to be part of a genocide, particularly… or enabling one, either!
- the period from 1904 to 1906 when the resistance culminated in central and southern Namibia, and
- finally the period from 1906 to World War I when the Germans consolidated their power.
The next section chronicles the period of South African rule in Namibia, and this period is divided into five sub-periods:
- the period of South African military rule from 1915 to 1918,
- the period from 1918 to 1945 when Namibia became a Mandate of the League of Nations,
- the period from 1946 to 1956 when the United Nations endeavoured to make Namibia a UN Trusteeship Area,
- the period from 1956 to 1974 when the struggle against South Africa commenced, and finally
- the period from 1975 to 1987 which saw a succession of South African interim administrations and the start of the attenuated process leading to independence.
The next section covers the period immediately preceding independence in 1990.
The Chronology is continued for the first ten years after independence until the year 2000. Due to the fact that the author as an elected Member of Parliament and Minister of the Government was directly involved in the founding years of the new emerging state, his projects use up a relatively wide room. They have not only to be regarded as part of Namibian history but also his personal memoirs.
The early history of Namibia cannot be distinguished from the period of the early European explorers, adventurers, traders and missionaries who opened this country up to the outside world in the 19th and early 20th centuries and who, in doing so, created the basis for Namibia’s colonial status which lasted all the way up to 1990.An evaluation of the manifold records of the German colonial period from the 1890s to 1915, as well as some secondary literature, was carried out with a view to documenting the colonial character of Namibia’s history, whose grim consequences for Namibian indigenes were their being dispossessed of land and assets and deprived of human rights.The mandatory rule of the Union of South Africa and later the Republic of South Africa in many respects perpetuated the objectives of the German colonial power
CLINTON’s Diamond Industry connections are CLEAR, (not that I’m a Bush fan, either) — see next box:
Here’s, unbelievably, a 2003 “CRS” (Congressional Research Service) report from the US Congress on this matter of “Conflict Diamonds.” (It seems to me that ALL such diamonds, at least from the discovery of diamonds in South Africa, and Southwest Africa, are “conflict” diamonds and signIficant bloodshed was involved. Not just “some” diamonds….)
|
||
One thing I learned from the history is that commerce, really, has no religion, no national borders, and always has an agenda. Those in charge are generally many steps ahead of any civil protest or unrest and equally able (see institutional controls), usually, to deflect, or even posture on one side or another of a war — or of a human rights violation.
|
||
And as the records (and several of my posts, including the one up top here, also show) — by 1889 he had a charter from Queen Victoria in England to form the BSAC — British South Africa Company — and was quickly on his way to mowing down the natives with machine-guns (the world’s first), courtesy an American-born inventor, Hiram Maxim. And when the word “mowing down” is used, the term is appropriate — the Africans (see Matabele, King Lobengula, etc.) resisted, and were well-trained, well-organized, and courageous. They just didn’t have this technology. Not to mention, there had been prior incursions, concessions, trickery and dismantling of their own social organizations, by missionaries and traders.
|
||
Regarding that last paragraph:
Many people simply do not know. Their lives are not focused on, or involved in politically correct, or humanist causes. They are struggling to survive, some under serious odds against survival. Moreover, we have been subjected to psychological barrage by the media to the point of information overload and sometimes confusion — not having real tools to sort through trash from truth. MOST OF US have been raised in the MIDDLE or LOW-income Educational System, in which the Middle are supposed to work in government (or professions) and follow policy set by the TOP (elites) to control themselves, and the larger, lower mass; write up policy matters for think-tanks, etc. The Middle are simultaneously taught to feel guilty for not being the low-income, while also responsible to help them (not knowing, for example, that reading CAFRs will show just how much w have been lied to, and having geared entire lives around pursuing conditional goals set for them by — the elite. Including buy diamonds for engagement rings and accept higher taxes and lower services. Believe that Republican vs. Democrat is a significant and THE major choices we have to make, and in general — stay distracted, and confused.
You’ve probably heard of “Silent Weapons for Silent Wars” and labeling it as some sort of paranoid conspiracy theory. I think we have to just continue paying attention to the evidence and see what patterns it fits into. For example, why wouldn’t indignant Americans “rise up en masse and boycott the purchasing of ALL diamond rings after they learn that they are blood diamonds?” Except that we’re being kind of herded and manipulated….
I’m bringing up the “SILENT WEAPONS FOR SILENT WARS” theme just now, because it seems they are still in operation, and I have just been reading about operations from pre-World War I, before the world’s first machine gun, genocide (know of, anyhow), concentration camps, income tax and Social Security Act in the US A (1935, right? Between the wars?), computers to measure people and transactions, and things like hydrogen bombs . . . . the same types of people were thinking several sociopathic steps ahead on how to pull these things off.
War is merely the act of destroying the creditor, and the politicians are the publicly hired hit men that justify the act to keep the responsibility and blood off the public conscience.
The silent weapon is a type of biological warfare. It attacks the vitality, options and mobility of the individuals of a society.
Apparently someone had something to say about the document source of this, only he was sitting in a federal prison around 2003 (see above CRS on the Kimberly Process, etc.)… Kinda reminds me of Ezra Pound around the time of another war….
|
Hartford Van Dyke, author of Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars (picture taken in federal prison in 2004) Click photo to read report |
the person (Hartford Van Dyke, above) goes on (I’m skipping references to “paranoia” magazine, which I have no interest in, and Wm. Cooper’s 1991 book claiming to have found the “SWFQW” material (he also wrote, I believe “Pale Horse, Pale Rider” in re: some of this stuff)… Let’s talk economics So this person writes from federal prison in 2004, anyhow):
SWFQW is not a “paranoid manifesto;” it is a politically biased technical instruction manual on how to justify, and how to selectively survive, human animal husbandry before the need for animal husbandry becomes unstably critical.
(Note: Historical Introduction – SWFQW, page five, states that a “system was necessary which could race ahead of society and predict when society would arrive for capitulation.”
…if there’s anything to be learned from Colonization (The Scramble for Africa) is that certain people’s minds were racing ahead to figure out how to extort the next population, after getting agreements of some sort with them to start with, or finding out who the local rivals/enemies were, and supporting the enemy. After that was used to weaken the target population (or, tribe) then the collaborators could or would be exterminated also.
“Also #74-1120 is an anagram of the date of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, 41-12-07. {{It is — move the 7 from “41-12-07 to the front of the string and it reads 74-1120. I don’t have the book in front of me so don’t know where “74-1120” showed up, though}}
The forerunner of SWFQW, complete with sources, equations, my signature, and my address, was published on or about 74-12-07. My book on the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was published at the end of August 1973.
Your analysis of Cooper’s capacity to understand economics and present economic arguments is an interesting piece of detective work. It is important to note that the references to the “patriot movement,” to “patriot leanings,” or to the “Illuminati” blueprint have absolutely no significance in reference to SWFQW as a scientific textbook of mathematical and economic warfare. Every past method of human conquest by mere physical warfare has been made obsolete by the Silent Weapons technology, except for the mechanics of implementing the use of the Silent Weapons technology.
So, guns and bloodshed are important to look at, obviously, but he’s saying look at the psychological, economic (“Silent”) warfare for how it saps energy and will to resist.
Once it becomes recognized that every problem, especially every mathematical problem, contains its own sufficient solution, it also becomes clear that “an error uncovered is two-thirds destroyed,” and the remaining one-third is destroyed by division of the house from within. Therefore, SWFQW states the problem and the solution, which gives it an “ambiguous” character. It is not a “hoax” any more than any other presentation of a scientific process could be deemed a hoax merely because it was not presented with the endorsement of its original discoverer. SWFQWhas many authors.War is “sociopathic” from the viewpoint of the prey. If the predator is victorious, then the war “is” and “beneficial” and “self-nobling” as the predator chooses to politically justify it
If certain people would get it through their heads about this regarding the family court system, it’d be a whole different history — with a lot better activists. They don’t understand who has been paid (federally) to defuse their attention, AND activism. This is part of “silent wars,” with real effects…. psychological manipulation by people posing as “helpers” “practitioners” and “Advocates.”
Classic colonialism….He continues writing, and is quoting the (sociopathic) viewpoint of people assembling the policy, the SWFQW manual:
ENERGY
“…a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such a people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent.”
The last paragraph of the book is an echo of this premise under the heading FACTOR VI – CATTLE (page 56 SWFQW)
“Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jellyfish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.”
“Useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.” That’s the three-level (tripartite) educational system: Professional/clerks, etc. class (skilled useful trades, including SOCIOLOGIST, PSYCHOLOGIST, EDUCATORS, get it????) “trainers of the same.”
Training is for dogs and circus animals. Learning is for people, except by consent, for example, when someone is seeking training to acquire a desired skill — gymnast, athlete, dancer, musician, etc.
FORCIble training is indoctrination and treating people like animals. Our society is basically run on this model, from the top down. It’s also where a lot of federal money is put, in setting up systems. “Technical assistance and training” centers are often, in certain fields, simply indoctrination centers.
It has been said that the fundamental principle of hypnosis is “in the battle between logic and imagination, imagination always wins.” Imagination is often closely connected with emotion.
SWFQW starts out as a very logical sociopathic work and ends as an emotional sociopathic work. But being about war, and especially an ongoing war, the subject matter never ceases to be sociopathic, and neither does our nation’s current system of foreign or domestic political behavior.
Important to remember, and I agree.
The book SWFQW is like a gold mining operation. With the gold at one end of the process, and the tailings (refuse or dross) at the other end of the process.
SWFQW is a collage, an overlay and paste-up of the works and words of many authors. I was the author only in the sense that I compiled and linked the gems of other writers. The book is not a hoax. Wassily W. Leontief proved the content of SWFQW by his article in the September 1980 issue of Scientific American, entitled “the world Economy in the Year 2000.” Leontief was the father of the Silent Weapons System, and was awarded the 1973 Nobel Prize in Economics long after his creation (1948) became recognized by the elite to be a weapon (1965).
Years passing do not change the invariant truths of science, not even of economic science.The elite were never fully named in SWFQW. It was not necessary to name them specifically. They are always among us, and they always will be among us.
SWFQW was a study in human nature; of motivation, psychological impulse and momentum, and force of habit; of control of social energy by influence, suggestion, and hypnosis; of the use of sociopathic processes to induce paranoid behavior; and so on. That is enough description of the theme and conceptual content of SWFQW. We now move on to a presentation of information sources.
Notice: “Sociopathic processes.” Can you think of any? (Don’t need to look far, do you!)
END OF QUOTE FROM THIS LETTER — BACK TO THE MATTER OF De BEERS and DIAMONDS, and protests, i.e., attempting to make this a “Jewish” issue when, I’ve got to point out — who drove the Jews, as a people, into the diamond and money-trading trades back when? (Chapter Eight of the E.J. Epstein book details; the Inquisition was involved. Other trades were closed to them also in medieval times; talking, about 16th century if I recall).
Here are some Londoners protesting the display of a certain diamond at the tower of London, given an Israeli human rights violation in 2009, the bombing of an extended Samouni family.
“Londoners Reject De Beers Forevermark Israeli Blood Diamond.” (Check out site for vivid photographs, including of the De Beers storefront in London).
“Boycott Israel News: Massacre Survivors Cry Out for Justice” (Tower of London Protests, site by “Inminds.com”) (see photos): “The Samouni Family are asking the Queen and the People of UK on their behalf to reject the Steinmetz Blood Diamond.”
During Operation Cast Lead in 2009, the Israeli Army’s Givati Brigade rounded up 100 members of the Samouni family, and ordered them into the house of Wa’el Samouni. The house was then bombed, and the ruined area cordoned off four four days during which time rescue services were prevented from coming, with ambulances being shot at. When rescue workers were finally allowed in, they found 29 bodies with traumatised children under the rubble with dead family members. They also found daubed on the walls in Hebrew racist graffiti, “the only good Arab is a dead Arab.”
Closure of the Investigation of Palestinian Family Killed by the Israeli Military (May, 2012 article; the bombing was in 2009)
Amid dust and death, the Samouni family’s story speaks for the terror of war: (graphic detail from survivors of this “Zeitoun incident,” dated January, 2009. 48 members of their family were killed in one day when Israel’s battle with Hamas suddenly centered on their home)
Why aren’t the same Londoners boycotting the colonization of the world from the center of their own City? Yes, this is horrific bombing and coverup — but is it unusual in the history of the same people?
Does lack of concern about violence going the other direction have anything to do with who is funding some of the Said Business School at Oxford these days?
Why not boycott the practice of training up American legislators and Presidents at Oxford? They do not exactly have the cleanest slate on the planet. Or quit trying to vaccinate and educate the planet from a small plot of land in the center of London, while extorting an entire continent from the Capitol of the United States of America, and then taking on more direction from another very small plot in the center of the City of Rome?
It sounds like a horrible thing to say– but I didn’t choose my country of birth either, however it wasn’t in one with at monarch and a state religion, or at least I think not.
Who was creating the first corporations of the world, which then raised capital and went forth to conquer other countries for use as a human resource — labor, building railways, digging in mines, etc.
And consuming things they didn’t even need.
Let's Get Honest! Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History 