Let's Get Honest! Blog: Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History

'A Different Kind of Attention Develops Sound Judgment' | 'Suppose I'm Right Here?…' (posted 3/23 & 3/5/2014). Over 680 posts, Public-Interest Investigative Blogging On These Matters Since 2009.

About Dog and Pony Shows, and another Beast….(post-election perspective)

leave a comment »


(this actually, it says, is from a Renaissance festival in Louisiana).

Some people may now not know the term “Dog and Pony Show” referenced in my Election Day posts.  I think the above communicate the message — taken from image search on “dog and pony show” where the original links for these may be found.

While these are easily identified in re: the word “SHOW,” or “Entertainment” or “novelty” etc., perhaps this type of material may NOT be:

(incomplete Election Map — Florida not in (again.  Fancy that!  Remember 2000?))

NY TIMES ELECTION RESUTS MAP (SHOWING RED & BLUE STATES) 2012

QUITE DIFFERENT WHEN ONE LOOKS AT THE COUNTIES (MORE RED THAN NOT)

Please look at the “States” map and then opt on the “Counties” map.  See what a mosaic of counties is across the country?

Be aware that every single one of them (the counties) is a governmental entity which has an associated “CAFR” and it’s my intent to locate and post them all (unless I can get some help with that!).  And that’s just the start.

Anyhow, thanks to modern technology, the Christian Science Monitor already has the racial breakdown of the election, informing us what should be obvious by now — when it comes to popular vote, the era of “white male supremacy” is probably over.  Which probably (in great part) is what the marriage/fatherhood promotion is all about anyhow — because it immediately (welfare reform, I mean) targeted the base prejudices of the human nature — welfare queens, etc., low-income people (what is a “low-income” person???  Is that a genetic descriptor???    Or did the offspring of eugenics have something to do with who had more income than others, based on racism?

This is entirely a different matter than who, REALLY, is the United States of America?  Because I’ve been spending the last few days looking at more utter chaos, fraud, dishonesty and stupidity in the handling of money around certain federal programs that I’m beginning to believe we’ve had stupidity programmed into the entire country.  It’s definitely in the school systems, and in the public-consumption version of who is government, and for all I know, it may be in the water, too!

Election results 2012: Who won it for Obama? (+video)

Exit polls find that a key to Obama’s victory was winning 93 percent of African-Americans, 71 percent of Hispanics, and 73 percent of Asians. Mitt Romney took most of the white vote, which is 72 percent of the electorate. But it wasn’t enough.

By , Staff Writer / November 7, 2012


President Obama was reelected Tuesday night in large part because of strong support from women and minorities. The lesson of his victory for both parties, but particularly Republicans, may be this: The primacy of white male voters has passed. In the modern era, it takes a diverse coalition to win the White House.

Look at the basic breakdown of Mr. Obama’s victory, according to exit polls (which may yet be revised). He won 93 percent of African-Americans, 71 percent of Hispanics, and 73 percent of Asians. He took 55 percent of the overall female vote, down only one percentage point from his comparable 2008 showing.

Mitt Romney, meanwhile, won about 59 percent of the white vote. That’s the best a GOP nominee has done among whites since 1988, and not too long ago such a performance might have guaranteed a winning margin of 270 electoral votes. After all, whites still make up 72 percent ofUS voters. …

Mr. Romney would have needed the support of even more whites to win – and Obama did well (or well enough) among white women, particularly single and young white women.

Romney won white men by 25 points. It wasn’t enough.”

Women, in this election, didn’t have a real good choice.  I do know some who voted for Romney, but I wouldn’t characterize this as too smart.  Notice it’s single and young ones.

Others, like me (I’m single and not young, and also a mother, obviously from this blog) know more by now about Social Security, Welfare Form (and diversions into marriage/fatherhood) and Clearinghouses paid for with tax monies.  Of course, I learned the hard way that parents are only temporary custodians of children, until the state sees it differently.  This may be why politicians keep speaking about “OUR” children.  It turns out to be, literally (and legally) true as a corollary of citizenship.

While we may not be guilty or cognizant — up front — of the “sins of our fathers” (I should say, mothers and fathers) in giving us birth certificates and, for the most part, sending us off to compulsory education in state schools, while going off to work in a corporation and get paid in what’s not really, bona fide money, such that the KIDS primary relationship is with a procession of teachers (some who teach them, some who molest them, some who at least make competent babysitters) and the PARENTS relationship is so frazzled — but, I’d have to say, with their corporate masters (or institutional, if incarcerated) — and trying to get the day-time babysitters (called schools) to do a decent job — all of this is a interlocking directorate of HOW WE SPEND OUR DAYS.

What I’m blathering on about here is the birth certificates, marriage certificates, drivers’ licenses, and all that stuff that did not USE to be routine.  I am old enough to remember when kids were not issued social security numbers (not claiming to have been alive then, but — read between the lines).
I tried (again) to explain the “Baltimore” situation, recently, but ran across the faith-based thing, and how Ohio’s Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (the first round) was simply steering HHS grants to cronies, after which the person stepped down in 2007 (as apparently did the person involved in the Baltimore Mayor’s Office of Children Youth and Families (a.k.a. “Baltimore Rising, Inc.” which called itself a nonprofit, apparently filed a tax return twice, but which — I simply don’t see, at least in Maryland.  This also parallels behaviors of other groups in New York State, and in California — they get the grants, and they don’t comply with the state laws of charities or corporations, AND THEY KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT!

And quite honestly, it’s rather discouraging.  If someone has regurgitated the Kool-Aid as not sustaining life (and tastes bad) it’s very hard to drink it again.  I have done this, and am having one HECK of a time justifying why to hang around and feed any part of the system anything.

 

I said it instinctively even, once in a courtroom — when a civil servant (the kind wearing a  black robe) in my presence — virtually validated (rewarded) what the law calls a felony (child-stealing/kidnapping) and, this having been a hearing on what to do about that (proportionate to my income) child support arrears — and having been asked by me, with reference to the domestic violence factor here (not too bright, in hindsight, it pissed off the individual behind the bench) — to at LEAST require, say a portion of it upfront here so I don’t lose my housing — the person instead removed all “intercepts” (without telling me — I was not informed), and basically retroactively wiped it out back to the time the man took our kids, which was about a year prior.

This basically forced me, like many mothers, back to begging when, absent this system, we’d be on our own initiative and instead, working.   The system CANNOT stand independence — in spirit, in reality, in thought, and in self-sustaining work.  Once challenged, it will fight back and viciously so.

So, at that time, I’d muttered to myself on the way out (which was not appreciated), “I’m going to find a better country to live in.”  I had done this country no wrong.  It had done my entire family line a horrible wrong by, I thought, withholding justice and making a mockery of its own courts and laws.

That was before I knew any of this, it was pre-blog 2009.  Gradually I came to understand the truth — as citizens of the United States of America and of an individual “State” — we do not, literally have rights.  We have debts.  It’s part of the contract.

There are no rewards for not facing facts:

Here are some excerpts from a blog I keep coming back to — it makes you think and shows the documentation, but still in “lay terms” that, while it may take more than one reading, hits home.

Seeing as we had a Mormon man just NOT become the next POTUS, although it’s just an example, perhaps this example of what lies ahead for Citizens, and in the matters economic, may become clear.  Generally, what any group of (entitities, people, etc.) HAVE been doing is a pretty good indicator of what they are going to continue to do.

It also helps when they have written out “master plans” and “Capital Improvement Projects” that may involve, for example, where you are living — not just taking your kids away and trafficking them for the good of the public (allegedly).  Here’s this guy Clint Richardson, “Realitybloger” (spelling isn’t the longsuit.  Reason, I believe, is:

The Master Plan: Agenda 21 in Action (posted 4/2012):

In essence, the rights of the people to have private property must be eroded or stripped, making all ownership of any property a part of the “community”. Only then can the global Agenda 21 Sustainable Development take a root where once there was individual rights and property. And only by making private property into public (community) property, can the State and local governments justify the legal theft of that property in the name of the people.

The “Master Plan”, as stated above, is one of the most useful tools in this takeover and subversion of private property rights for individuals.

What is the Master Plan?

Each municipality (city), county, and State government generally have something called the Master Plan on file at their offices or city halls; a literal drafted blueprint for thefuture construction of roads, bridges, schools, and other “public” and “private” infrastructure for which the government has planned to build.

The only problem is… the Master Plan and its creators don’t care if your land, home, or business is located where this future construction is planned to be built. And through the use of the abusive powers of eminent domain with the BAR’s “due process” establishing “just compensation”, the governments of the States, counties, and municipal corporations (cities) grant themselves complete autonomy and overpowering authority to take the property of anyone that stands in the way of completing the Master Plan – all in the name of “community development”.

Like anthills or moles holes, the property of Americans everywhere is being pre-meditatively squashed for the crime of having their foundations within the future expansion of the Master Plan.

Now, it is very important to understand where this idea stems from, and that it is fully supported from the highest levels in government; up through to the federal government and the United Nations. In fact, this practice of legally stealing land and property from the people is actually one of the standards and practices recommended by the Government Financial Officers Association (GFOA) – a very powerful organization.

Time and Time and Time again we have been warned about the power of foundations to alter the face of government and eradicate representative government.  I have begun to understand this by research and come to agree with the conclusion.

The thing about foundations is that they are CORPORATE “beings” doing commerce (for purposes of this discussion) in the USA but not paying taxes like individuals must — the system is skewed towards the large and organized.  For example, everyone’s heard of, probably, the Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie, etc. Foundations — but there are more than you can imagine

The other aspect is the influence of nonprofits (not necessarily “foundations” which is a specific type of nonprofit) trade associations.  They too have a tax-exempt character and can acquire assets, too.  Such is the AFCC, the Bar Association, the APA, all of them.

It seems to me that for virtually almost any public employee category of work, major ones that is, there is at least one national and several regional (or state) “Associations” of that profession.  Example, CSEA (Child Support Enforcement), etc.  Judges, you name it.

So, this blogger is talking about an association of Government Finance Officers:

When we go to the GFOA website, we find that this non-governmental organization (NGO) is a private association for which many local, state, and federal financial officers hold membership within. And we also find that this organization is heavily steeped in United Nations and Agenda 21 planning principles.

This particular link brings us to the recommendation by the GFAO to local and state governments on how to use their Master Plans as a standard and practice (best practice) for stealing the peoples private property for future economic development:

Source:http://www.gfoa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1600

Begin Excerpt from the GFOA:

BEST PRACTICE

The Role of Master Plans in Capital Improvement Planning (2008) (CEDCP)

Background.

Many governments establish long-range strategies focused on community development and sustainability through the use of Master Plans.1As blueprints for the future, these plans identify economic, land use, and infrastructure development and/or redevelopment, which may includetransportation, housing, and public facilities. Master Plans, most frequently coordinated by the local government’s planning department with broad community participation, identify jurisdictional needs ten to twenty-five years into the future. Regular updates to these plans are imperative to ascertain development or infrastructure needs as local conditions change.

Master Plans are the foundation for:

  • the development of physical plans for sub-areas of the jurisdiction;
  • the study of subdivision regulations, zoning standards and maps;
  • the location and design of thoroughfares and other major transportation facilities;
  • the identification of areas in need of utility development or extensions;
  • the acquisition and development of community facility sites;
  • the acquisition and protection of open space (private lands);
  • the identification of economic development areas;
  • the incorporation of environmental conservation (Agenda 21 Sustainable development);
  • the evaluation of short-range plans (zoning requests, subdivision review, site plan analysis) and day-today decisions with regard to long-range jurisdictional benefit; and
  • the alignment of local jurisdictional plans with regional plans (i.e. organized crime).

In addition to a long-range Master Plan, governments utilize Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) to identify present and future needs requiring capital infrastructure. Such plans operate for a shorter duration, often three-to-five years, and list the projects and capital programs planned for the community with corresponding revenues and financing sources.

This information is important to understand, as when sometimes secret no-bid contracts are given to private corporations after the land and property of the people is taken or force-bought through intimidation by the governments and local city councils and mayors, we find that these corporations are often friends or family of the councilmen and mayors enforcing the eminent domain. They often take more land than they need for their master plan, and then sell off that land to developers and businesses.

And of course one of the jobs of the Sheriff of the county is to enforce state liens and sales of the peoples property, whether its a “bank-owned” foreclosure or eminent domain property. So organized crime in Salt Lake County, as you can see, is often a family affair. And it is much easier when the Sheriff’s Department has been “federalized” into a state “incorporated” district.

. . .

He then goes into an explanation of a certain “Winder” family, who has been in the area and kind of running things since 1878, and lists members,including surviving and ancestral in the area, and their various posts.  We’re talking, Utah….  which gets down, then, to the sheriff:

Jim Winder* (son of Judge Dave) — Salt Lake County sheriff (2007-present)

Somehow a sheriff being the son of a judge is less than re-assuring.  But what else is new, eh?  In my (very blue state and region) we have all kinds of judges and DA’s related to each other, and their kids work in each other’s offices.  They have to keep the nepotism straight by charts sometimes…. Inbetween prosecuting law enforcement for things like setting up stings and running a brothel.

Jim Winder is now the county Sheriff. If you aren’t familiar with my toils with this completely corrupt Sheriff, know that he succeeded after his election in dissolving the entire Sheriff’s Department, and implemented a new corporate structure called the Unified Police Department (UPD), which made the former Sheriff’s deputies into county municipal police. Winder accepted this corporate structure as the elected Sheriff, and gave up his authority and autonomy as Sheriff (America’s last hope) by agreeing to be CEO of this UPD under the authority of the county council and the mayor of the county.

FYI, this is pretty parallel to what JUDGES around the country are doing once in position, particularly if they are AFCC.  They get the job then get a bright idea (usually from one or more of their trade associations) and decide the public needs more “services” (usually therapy, or to have some child removed and, possibly, sent into foster care, or switched to the other parent, let the games begin…)  UNIFIED FAMILY COURTS (regionalism, etc.).

People who don’t want to face up to this (collective reorganization of governmental units for the purpose of raising capital) are going to lose it.  get on the web and read the tax returns of nonprofits and the websites of the foundations, etc.  It’s CLEAR as a bell.

Back to Draper area, Salt Lake County:

Mike Winder was on the city council of what is known in Salt Lake County to be the most corrupt of the incorporated municipalities in the county, especially the courts.

(He then goes on to detail, step by step how they got ahold of land from a particular, not-in-the-ruling-clan’s-family-line farm (it was of Irish background, had been there forever, but no matter) through eminent domain).  The point being, it was planned strategically, then acted on.

Here’s some more classic stuff, same blog — it’s generally speaking good reading.  If you have a religious bent, this one is calling the Social Security system “The Mark of the Beast” (NB same person compared religion  politics, I don’t think he’s coming from the “fundie” perspective, but using this for comparison.  Maybe — I don’t know).  You have to read more, it’s dealing with jurisdiction and citizenship.

I just was struggling with post after post on explaining the exact same thing — how the NRFC, a “clearinghouse” was authorized from the same Social Security Acts (SSA) called welfare.  In other words, we did this to ourselves….  This is where we get the marriage/fatherhood funding (child support enforcement, block grants to states, etc.) from.  But the Social Security itself is a “trust” fund.  It has “trustees” and the trustees have the power.  Who the owner is, not a topic for a short talk.

So the Social Security ACT is about what to do to keep track of the contents of that trust fund, right?  As huge as it be…

And to understand that, we also have to understand some of the various US Bankruptcies (about one every 70 years, apparently)… and what happens when something goes into “bankrupcty” — a reorganization, right?

Well, when a country does it, their currency is also restructured, like after the war.

For a clue, the last two apparently were in 1931 and 2001.  Hopefully those dates speak loudly (as in 9/11/2001…. Reorganization of country for Homeland Security purposes, etc.  See that Dog and Pony post as well).

OK, that’s all the intro. Here’s a segment from: “SOCIAL SECURITY  – THE INTERNATIONAL MARK OF THE BEAST” which, again, is simply a wordpress blog post… (April 24, 2012)

One of the greatest misconceptions of biblical prophesy is that the thing referenced in the Bible as the “Antichrist”, and in so many other fictional tales of said Antichrist, will some day be incarnated as a single living entity – a beast in the guise of a human – that will fool the people of Earth into loving and following that beast into a virtual hell and enslavement on Earth.

But I am here to provide you with an alternative and more realistic view. I am here to say that the biblical “Antichrist” is already upon us. It is not a single person; but a government run by and consented to by the people. It is not a living, breathing human or demon, but is instead all humans via their consent to it.

I am coming to the same conclusion, as this entire system is so pervasive.  When you look at the Eleventh Amendment, when you look at judicial discretion, when you look at Castle Rock v. Gonzales, or Silva v. Garcetti (over child support), — when I look at the fact that dollars are not real money; when I look at the law of reverse efforts in seeking justice — “the house always wins” — this is simply making sense.  It’s what people do with their thinking (ideas and beliefs) which then influence action/inaction — that seem to be very, very powerful and almost invisible — because they aren’t using reason, properly.

Corporations really are “straw men” — and you, as a person in a lawsuit (name in all caps) are responding to that “INCORPORATION” and answering to it. The first part of ANY lawsuit is establishing jurisdiction — and that includes naming the parties.  Look at your casework if you have some:  Jurisdiction counts — a LOT.

It is not the devil reincarnate; but is in fact an incarnate body of legal codes that has created the Mark of the Beast through the people’s ignorance of the laws that they create. And I am here to say that it is not God that will save us from this Antichrist; but only our collective non-consent through non-participation in this system that will save us from ourselves.

If it is true that God gave men the gift and the curse of having freewill, then it must also be true that God only helps those who helps themselves

(I”M IN FAVOR OF THAT LAST!)

What is the Mark of the Beast?

-≈-

In TITLE 42 of U.S. CODE, entitled “THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE”, we can literally find the root of this evil MARK from the BEAST called SOCIAL SECURITY. Though TITLE 42 is not statutory law, but in actuality prima facie law (consent of the governed required), the implementation of that legal code is exactly what we’d expect from the beast as the Federal UNITED STATES corporation.

So let’s have a look at Section 666 of U.S.C. TITLE 42 “THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLFARE”.

Section 666 of the Social Security Act requires every state (as federal insular possessions) to obtain a persons “NUMBER” that is attached to the “NAME” of that person before such things as a license to work, drive, marry, or any other State services (privileges – not rights) are granted; of which now include Federal grants and emoluments to the states as “revenue sharing” for promotion of this enslavement via the NUMBER. In other words, a natural born citizen of the united states of America cannot work in the Federal UNITED STATES jurisdictional territory (“The Federal United States”) without being marked by the Social Security number – the number of the beast.

For those of you that don’t understand the difference between these two governments and that as citizens you are required to obey both, please read what the Supreme Court’s opinion of this fact is here:

“The people of the United States resident within any State are subject to two Governments: one State, and the other National; but there need be no conflict between the two. The powers which one possesses, the other does not. They are established for different purposes, and have separate jurisdictions. Together they make one whole, and furnish the people of the United States with a complete government, ample for the protection of all their rights (privileges) at home and abroad. True, it may sometimes happen that a person is amenable to both jurisdictions for one and the same act… It is the natural consequence of a citizenship which owes allegiance to two sovereignties, and claims protection from both. The citizen cannot complain, because he has VOLUNTARILY submitted himself to such a form of government.“ –The Supreme Court, 92 US 551: “U.S. v Cruikshank”

“And behold, I swear unto you, if ye will do this, with an oath, ye shall not be destroyed; but if ye will not do this, I swear unto you with an oath, that on the morrow month I will command that my armies shall come down against you, and they shall not stay their hand and shall spare not, but shall slay you, and shall let fall the sword upon you even until ye shall become extinct.” –Nephi 3:8

While I can choose to not consent to the mark (the social security number), the BEAST has made it virtually impossible to work, drive, spend money, or live legally without this number within the corporate world of the jurisdiction of the BEAST. And as a corporation of any kind (including that of being a person with a NUMBER), that business must comply with now established state and federal laws to continue to legally do incorporated business in the state, which is within the federal district of The Federal United States (A.K.A. The BEAST). In short, the ability to not consent to this MARK is nullified by the BEAST through the legal code that makes those without the NUMBER unable to support themselves or work without the MARK.

Section 666 of TITLE 42 clearly lays out this authority and jurisdiction. Though the majority of this CODE is referring to paternal suits of child support, it is important to understand that this power can be applied to anyone through such tools as due process and other abusive authorities. To understand the true significance of Section 666, one must understand that through the due process of the BAR Association in the court system, it is the opinion of all courts – municipal or federal (district) – that you do not own your children alone, and that your children are literally owned by the BEAST (the State).

So that there is no doubt of this being true, please review my previous article here:

Do You Own Your Children? –> http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2011/12/16/do-you-own-your-children/

Excerpt from this article:

Appellate Court of Illinois, NO. 5-97-0108:

“Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband, the wife and the state.“

Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.

Continued…

“…When two people decide to get married, they are required to first procure a license from the State. If they have children of this marriage, they are required by the State to submit their children to certain things, such as school attendance and vaccinations. Furthermore, if at some time in the future the couple decides the marriage is not working, they must petition the State for a divorce. Marriage is a three-party contract between the man, the woman, and the State“

Linneman v. Linneman, 1 Ill. App. 2d 48, 50, 116 N.E.2d 182, 183 (1953), citing Van Koten v. Van Koten, 323 Ill. 323, 326, 154 N.E. 146 (1926).

“The State represents the public interest in the institution of marriage.”

Linneman, 1 Ill. App. 2d at 50, 116 N.E.2d at 183 (1953).

Continued…

“This public interest is what allows the State to intervene in certain situations to protect the interests of members of the family.   The State is like a silent partner in the family who is not active in the everyday running of the family but becomes active and exercises its power and authority only when necessary to protect some important interest of family life.”

“The state has a wide range of power for limiting parental freedom and authority in things affecting the child’s welfare… In fact, the entire familial relationship involves the State.”

Prince, 321 U.S. at 167, 64 S.Ct. at 442, 88 L.Ed. 645.

(SOURCE: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/il-court-of-appeals/1486817.html)

“The primary control and custody of infants is with the government.”

Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62

“There is no wider area for the exercise of judicial discretion than that of providing for and protecting the best interests of children.“

Written by Let's Get Honest

November 7, 2012 at 10:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

martinplaut

Journalist specialising in the Horn of Africa and Southern Africa

Let's Get Honest! Blog: Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History

'A Different Kind of Attention Develops Sound Judgment' | 'Suppose I'm Right Here?...' (posted 3/23 & 3/5/2014). Over 680 posts, Public-Interest Investigative Blogging On These Matters Since 2009.

iakovos alhadeff

Anti-Propaganda

Red Herring Alert

There's something fishy going on!

The American Spring Network

News. by the people, for the people. The #1 source for independent investigative journalism in the Show-Me State, serving Missouri since 2011.

Family Court Injustice

Mom & Kids Need "Just Us" to Fight Family Court Injustice

The Espresso Stalinist

Wake Up to the Smell of Class Struggle ☭

Spiritual Side of Domestic Violence

Finally! The Truth About Domestic Violence and The Church

%d bloggers like this: