LackaCommonSense in Lackawanna County (forum’s Admin v. Admin) detracts from Exposing “Kid$ 4 Cash”
<><><><><>
Psst! The “Kids 4 Cash” thread (all 165 pages of commentary, and an unknown ratio of real people to usernames) is now somehow back up. I’d grab it while you can — who knows where it’s going next and in what version! Then again, you can figure out, the same basic information is available, probably, through other sources (if you’re not into wading through dialogue on a forum).
| TOPIC: (Kids 4 Kash, Lack. Cty) Is the FBI digging for facts or burying them? Taking a long time. |
|---|
Lackawanna County has a certain demographic (See http://lackawannafamilycourtfederal.blogspot.com, there’s a post on it) which may (or may not) make a difference in whether it’s possible to have an ongoing dialogue with people able to stick on topic. Judge for yourself….
Anyone around here old enough to remember “SPY v. SPY”?
Wikipedia:
Publication history
Prohías was a prolific cartoonist in Cuba and known for political satire. Prohías’ parodies of newly-installed Cuban dictator Fidel Castro attracted criticism, and faced with the loss of work, possible arrest and threats of execution, he fled to the United States on May 1, 1960 – 3 days before Castro took over the last of the Cubanfree press. Prohías sought work in his profession and travelled to the offices of MAD Magazine in New York Cityon July 12, 1960. After a successful showing of his work and a prototype cartoon for Spy vs. Spy, Prohías was hired.[1]
Prohías completed a total of 241 strips for MAD Magazine, the last appearing in Issue #269 (March 1987). During an interview with the Miami Herald in 1983, Prohías reflected on his career, stating “The sweetest revenge has been to turn Fidel’s accusation of me as a spy into a moneymaking venture.”[1] Ironically, Prohías was censored by MAD Magazine publisher William Gaines on at least one occasion. The strip that eventually appeared in MAD Magazine #84 (Jan. 1964) was altered as the Spies were depicted as drinking and smoking, and Gaines had a strong anti-smoking stance.[1]
Prohías eventually retired due to ill health, and died aged 77 on February 24, 1998.[1] The strips continued, with writer Duck Edwing and artist Bob Clarke creating the majority. As of MAD Magazine #356 (April 1997), Peter Kuper took over as writer and artist for the strip.
Pulitzer Prize-winning author Art Spiegelman noted that “Getting published is very important to a young cartoonist, and I somehow have Antonio Prohias to thank for helping kick off my career.”[1]
[edit]
WELL, THIS IS A GOOD VERSION OF IT. . . . No wonder it’s so easy to fleece parents in the family courts, too. Divide & Conquer. Waste time. Turn the legitimate discussion into a circus.
Nevertheless, below, one of the “Admin” has shown how an Administrator can create a username (see ‘Tarapchak.’) which demonstrates how simple it apparently is. And let this be a reminder to us all, we live in the INTERNET age, and who controls the information turnpike controls how much traffic goes which way on it, and also (through the ability to edit and/or censor) what flavor the traffic has once it’s posted, and even AFTER it’s posted as well. A very dynamic process, no matter how much one may try to “freezeframe” and analyze it.
We the People do not have the technology to keep up with all the “semantic search” information, and those of us that do have enough to make a serious dent, are often caught with our own previous personal / pathological relationships which (by definition) are a lot harder to leave than the healthy ones. Which, typically, one doesn’t need to leave anyhow, if they don’t involve choking one spiritually, psychologically, (financially), or physically.
A “Protection From Abuse” order was served on Joe shortly before Christmas 2011 (something about holidays seems to help people make major decisions about their circumstances, it seems). For the curious, there is no child being struggled over in this below — the child they are struggling over is the very large forum which has been up since around 2005. Perhaps there’s not a better form of local entertainment — who knows?
ANYHOW, this thread is more maritally-oriented with a “what about free speech?” flavor. This is approximately only ONE day of postings. Notice (in usernames) how many posts the individuals have put up. No longer being a member (by choice) I can’t click on and see who was a member for how long. Although it’s not always an indicator, very low posts may indicate a recent user — or an inactive for a long time one. Compare, for example, “Joanne Pilchesky (2,306 posts)” or “Joe Pilchesky” (11,000+ posts) or “Administrator” (395 posts). “Administrator” appears to be Joe, after having regained access to the forum through a court order in 2012…. Who Stephanie Tarapchak is posting as these days (“Investigating Family Court”), in addition to probably herself somewhere online, is maybe a moot point, due to her known relationship with Mr. P. I have also my reasons to believe (i.e., here, speculate) that she is fairly well under his psychological control, too…
See how this can seriously waste one’s time, if one continues to engage! (I”m working on it ….. 🙂 )
I’ll try to reduce the “wide-margin” factor here, but if it doesn’t work quickly, then too bad. Not worth more time…
“To the Members who believe that 2700 2940 posters were real people“
|
||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
<><><><><>
Let's Get Honest! Absolutely Uncommon Analysis of Family & Conciliation Courts' Operations, Practices, & History 
Thank you for memorializing the sad circumstances of an internet forum that could have, would have, and should have made a difference in local life.
J
April 4, 2012 at 5:08 pm
You are more than welcome. By the way, what we need to know is where the “forums” are (also called conferences) which talk about parents (while excluding parental participation) behind closed doors and agree what terminology best suits anyone that protests being inappropriately labeled.
See my post “Got Instransigence? AFCC will knock it loose.”
People (like myself) are also correctly labeled “flawed” — if the definition of “unflawed” means has no high conflict with replacing of the concept of DEFINED areas of criminal behavior as legislated by elected (not self-appointed) legislators (not “forensic psychologists” and friends) with the language of behavioral health.
remember, a forum is like a classroom, and if people are there for the wrong reasons, not too much can be accomplished til either order is restored, or those who have nothing better to do than self-entertain by creating chaos are gone.
All learning and creativity is going to have a certain amount of chaos because it’s free-flowing, and the most effective (can I say organizations, or discussions) can balance anarchy with repression. That’s what our constitution is supposed to do — only without a balance of powers, it can’t and doesn’t.
(See Patricia Evans book, I forget the name, but it talks about Power Over versus other ways of dealing with people). If you are dealing with people who cannot converse until a pecking order is established (with them at the top), then either don’t converse or make it known what is the pecking order (or leave, if possible). Because until something established that IS what the conversation is likely to be about. To the other way of living life, it’s like a foreign language.
I have more to say, but will say it on a post instead.
Let's Get Honest
April 8, 2012 at 3:54 pm
Thank You for helping with the site. Some of us had no voice.
lulacmamabear
July 9, 2012 at 4:39 pm