Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Identify the Entities, Find the Funding, Talk Sense!
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
________________
________________
(Blog Navigation Links):
________________
________________
@ Late-Dec., 2019, STILL A RECOMMENDED READ on CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION and ADVOCACY STAKEHOLDERS (USA):
______________________________________
This Absolutely Uncommon Analysis shouldn't be!
What I do here: I expose the Systems Design, and the Designers, so Y.O.U. can Show Others, and to notify those playing certain games, "you've been flagged." Heard of "disruptive technologies?" Disruptive innovations? Despite the blog's appearance, I know what I'm doing! You're looking at long-term leverage, in the hands of the "non-experts," in the public interest, not public funded propaganda to drive business to private pockets. Hence, I'm not afraid to ask: The formula for this public/private business model isn't really that complex, but the concept itself was just so devious, insidious, parasitic, grandiose, and by now, so baked into the economic, institutional infrastructure, people either don't notice, or, in a common, cowardly, but all too human response they see, and just start denying, or looking for nicer explanations of an ugly truth -- where it's heading. For lack of nicer, but still honest terms, it's heading towards yet more slavery (and tolerating it) and genocide (and tolerating it). [[2019 comments: and the ability to drive the U.S., in particular, into even more, bigger, and more costly/dangerous wars, discrediting us (further) internationally. But I wrote this sidebar many years ago..]] As a woman, mother, a family court and domestic violence survivor [yes, he was a hitter, and more], who has already 'faced the music' in more ways than I can count, to the best of my ability, I do not do "denial." I also ask the public, what's left of it, to just not go down that Denial Road, and with it lose more of their innate humanity, perception, and ethics. There is another way out, one with a conscience: Really want system change? Make up your mind to understand government financing -- change yourself first. Find and read your local "CAFR" (government's Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports), a wonderful source of information, with flow chart, descriptions of component or blended government units it's reporting on, and reporting the balances in each fund -- ever heard of a "Balance Sheet"? Looking for this also reveals just how many governmental business entities ARE there? Find them. Read. Think about what you see. What does it mean? Governments tend to pool their investments, for example, "CALPERS" (essentially created ca. 1931) is the largest "public pension" investing platform around, or at least in the country. Getting started earlier sure helped, then adding players (subscribers) over time ALSO did. In 1985, add "CII" Council on Institutional Investors (members: in 31states and D.C.) (LA Times 1985 article on Calif. Politician (state treasurer, assembly speaker) Unruh whose idea it was for the Council so institutional funds could "flex their muscle"; and push for corporate governance reform. CII members now control $3 trillion of assets)-- my point being, government holdings are invested and when pooled like this, are major clout, but the average person never reads even a single government entity's annual financial reports to take a look. (I wasn't aware of them til 2012!) Governments not only invest their funds in business, they also by legislation, patenting, and protections, set them up to win, or lose. So, "know thy government" is a great place to start. (See blog/see links in the blog). 2019 updates: This widget's (text box) full contents, along with others', now can be viewed (better -- full-page-width) at: Many of My Sidebar Widgets Now Live Here...[Published July 9, 2019]Published short (url short-link ends "-abt") (and may eventually replace current sidebar contents, or most of them). I also published a second, similar post with other sidebar widget contents(url short-link ends '-ahh') on July 19, 2019. Thanks for your patience (and any NOT-tax-exempt donations) meanwhile.//LGH |
Doorways to Key Parts of This Blog (I split the long Dec. 2019 Widgets. Added 27 Apr. 2022).
Law 101: “Black is White Law Dictionary” and “Secret Canons of Judicial Conduct” (from “Caught.net”)
leave a comment »
People are overwhelmed with information about father’s rights, domestic violence, psychological theory and statistics. One thing to remember is that statistics are paid for and interpreted by (fill in the blank). Statistics describe a “state” of affairs — but may or may not accurately describe the cause of events, or of the state of affairs.
The state of affairs in the legal system is that — it is owned — and not by the public — they simply pay for its operations.
If the Courts are a Mighty River that has Overflown its banks — and fish are floundering and being caught in it– the narratives are not about what’s in the river, but many time’s, who’s on the shore, and what’s the bait?
For example, in a river, there may be fish, and on the banks (or wading in it), there may be flyfishers, great sport.
Also, there are times the river is just too cluttered with debris, algae, it gets stagnant. not good for salmon swimming upstream, right? Well, this field is too cluttered with INFORMATION, not well processed. With rigid points of view — or a generic, vague points of view, and no operational plans.
Suppose Richard Gardner’s theory doesn’t hold water? (which it doesn’t). What should I do to avoid losing custody when being challenged by someone with a history of abuse or criminality? Buy a book? how much reading before what I read actually affects a court case — my own?
Well, #1, get the outline (shouldn’t take half a year to do so, any more):
Johnnypumphandle.com
Typically, I will refer the basic site “Johnnypumphandle.com” about three to four times a week — although I don’t know how active it is, and many links no longer active. WHY? Because it has basic analysis pretty close, and enough case histories to show some blueprint. It also addressses the role of nonprofits in the courts. Fairly good outline, don’t you think? (you family law veterans out there).
Well, that site links to “caught.net” where I’ve been before.
By the time you get through there, you should realize that Fraud, Money Laundering, and sometimes Racketeering are significant issues. That there are things called corporation front groups. That one oif the first places to look going into a court case is at your personal judge’s 700 Disclosure — and then chec it out — by figuring out the money flow in your local county’s vendor payments, grants applications, grants distributions, and so forth.
Judges doing business with someone / some business entity in the case — have to recuse themselves, or any resulting order. Call ’em on it!
Also, any nonprofit advocacy group that doesn’t tell you this — regularly — drop ’em! (and find out who’s funding THEM!
Now here is some comic relief — but like most comedy, hits a lot of truth, right on target:
OK, from CAUGHT.net
READ THIS:
and, related:
For example:
“Legal Analysis or Legal Reasoning:1. thinking usually independent of and unaffected by objective reality 2. the process of using legal terms to alter, create or deny reality 3. process used to maintain or assist the status quo, power structure and the resourceful and effective 4. a thought process commonly raised to the level of stupidity while maintaining the appearance of brilliance 5. sometimes called inverted intelligence.”
or
“Truth:1. whatever experts say for pay 2. whatever the Judiciary decides through the use of Legal Analysis.Unenlightened:1. litigants unknowledgeable regarding our position and power.”
The real fun comes from the hyperlinks.
From the same site’s founders, a few pointers – the frame of reference is “recovery” as if from a sickness.
Actually, it’s the judicial, social (etc.) systems that are “sick” (corrupt) — like environmental toxins of our basic institutions, as I see it. However, recognizing that this is NOT all one’s imagination — and that whatever life brings, you WILL find some way (including humor, gleefully putting sand in the machinery of whoever has been railroading you (and others) in the system, etc. — or whatever — to survive and live. (For one — what’s the alternative?)
I do not seriously entertain cleaning up the entire system for all history. However, wouldn’t it be great to clean up your own area, and teach others how to do the same? What a legacy! Because time is short (we get older….), another lesson I’m learning is who to dissociate with, according to what diseased or simply useless, but soul-poisoning rhetoric they carry. Just like it’s not good to befriend gangsters (well, at least I think not!) — it’s also important not to hang out with inactive complainers, and compliant complacent parroting people.
FYI, these come both in the traditional format of devotees of certain organizations AND in the leaders (professionals) of the organizations themselves. Professionalism is great — it just tends to tunnel vision, that’s my problem. It’s more like farming than hunter/gatherer way of thinking, which requires a lot of adaptability, attention to detail and a clear eye on the horizon, changing weather — AND the ability to relocate.
Anyhow, Caught.net and the pro se way founder writes:
I would call those simple survival awarenesses.
Detox, occasionally. If you can’t change something radical today, time out and have a good mock session — Black is White Law & Secret Judicial Canons.
And remember, keep all this “stuff” in perspective! Physical & Mental/emotional… Stay flexible…
(George Carlin / YouTube)
SHARE THIS POST on...
Like this:
Related
Written by Let's Get Honest|She Looks It Up
April 30, 2011 at 2:56 pm
Posted in Cast, Script, Characters, Scenery, Stage Directions
Tagged with social commentary, Tongue in Cheek Legal Definitions