Who’s monitoring the Stop VAW Grant recipients? (Oregon)
Anne Caroline Drake website, with characteristic pointed questions and pulling facts together, asks about:
Erin S. Greenwald
And whether cleaning up the DV IN-house will be on the agenda, as shutting up women trying to leave DV if they are NOT on the government payroll, or federal dole.
(This is just an excerpt — her site has photos & details.)
Will Greenawald Clean Up the Mess?
Ms. Greenawald is being paid $97,008 under a federally-funded Stop Violence Against Women Act Grant:
Greenawald will be responsible for developing training materials, best-practice policies and other publications to improve the identification, investigation and prosecution of domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking.
Given the fact that a high percentage of recent dometic violence in Oregon were committed by her peers, I would have hoped her first priority would be to rid the ranks of Oregon’s criminal “justice” system of domestic violence perpetrators.
Kroger must not have done a basic Google search of Ms. Greenawald before he hired her. The first thing I found was a very disturbing YouTube video. I had read about the case featured in the video earlier today in a comment by PearlWhitcomb to a story in the Oregonian about Ms. Greenawald’s appointment:
My next post shows more on the studying fatherhood grants, just a tiny sampler I think we should know about, involving Cornell University…
Whether Fatherhood or Violence Against Women Acts,
WHO IS MONITORING THE GRANTS RECIPIENTS?
Again, “GUIDESTAR.org” is a good start. Start LOOKING at some of the 990s, and then asking, how long are we going to fund “studies” before some actually practice (like stopping it!) gets into place.
The scam, my friends, is that the US population (certain sectors of it, male and female) ARE the study. I know that wasn’t Anne Caroline Drake’s point, above, but it’s mine.
What kind of characters are attracted to these positions?
And isn’t DV about simply abusive inordinant control and out-of-control-dictatorship behavior by the abuser?
So then what is the word “CZAR” doing in there? I mean, think about the connotations.
Think also about the connotations that you can “domesticate” “violence.”
Animals are domesticated, like cats & dogs, and cattle. What is this person going to “rule” over — domestic violence itself?
At what point does language become meaningless, and how many years past that point are we, in these matters?